Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Prof. Richard Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton

Correspondence
February 20, 1987

Cite this item

Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Prof. Richard Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Legal Department General
Creator
- Lani Guinier and others
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 3f6384d1-ea92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. List of Motions Set for Hearing, 1977. a2a658c0-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a01c266a-7d4a-4ac4-bec4-13126d6d1a72/list-of-motions-set-for-hearing. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR ae bo JAN 

THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

  

  

WILEY L. BOLDEN, ET AL 

v. Civil Action No, 75-297-P 

LEITA G, BROWN, ET AL 

iio : il 
Vv. Civil Action No, 75-298-P 

JOHN LIL, MOCRE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS 
OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PROBATE JUDGE OF 

F/M TIT TT AT TRTET ™TY A 
MOBILE COUNTY, ET AL 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following MOTIONS have been set for HEARING 

Judge Virgil Pittman, Room 207 U.S. Court House and Custom House 

Building, St. Joseph and St. Louis Streets, Mobile, Alabama, at 2:00 P.M, 

n MONDAY, MAY 23, 1977: 

1. In Civil 75-297P -- Motion filed on December 9, 1976, by the 
Plaintiffs for award of Costs and Attorneys! fees, 

2. In Civil 75-297-P -- Motion filed on December 17, 1976, by the 
Defendants to defer award of Costs and Attorneys! fees. 

3. In Civil 75-297-P -- Motion filed on December 23, 1976, by the 
Plaintiffs in Response to Defendants! Motion to Defer Award of Attorneys! 
Fees. : 

4, In Civil 75-298-P -- Motion filed on December 17, 1976, by the 
Plaintiffs for Award of Costs and Attorneys! Fees. 

5. In Civil 75-298-P -- Motion filed on January 6, 1977, by Robert R. 
Williams, et al (School Board Members) to Strike Taxation of Costs and 
Plaintiffs! Attorneys! Fees; Motion to Deny Plaintiffs! Motion for Costs 
and Plaintiffs! Attorneys' Fees, or in the Alternative, Motion for Hearing 
on the Merits. 

6. In Civil 75-298-P -- Objections filed on March 37, 1977, by the 
endants, Mobile County, et al, to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Award of Costs 

££ 
A 

and Attorneys! “Fees with Respect to County Commission Issues. 

Date: May 11, 1977. : 

          
WILLIAM J. OF CONNOR, 

A 

  

Clerkf 
md 

Copy to: 

Messrs. Jim U, Blacksher and Iarry Menefee, 1407Davis Av., Mobile, Ala. 36603 
Mr. Edward Still, Suite 601, Title Building, 2030 Third Av., North, 

Birmingham, Ala, 35203 
Messrs. C. B. Arendall Jr., Travis M, Bedsole Jr., and William C, Tidwell III, 

P. 0. Box 123, Mobile, Ala. 36601 
S. R., Sheppard, City of Mobile's Legal Department, P.0,Box 1827, 

e, Ala. 36601 
jack Greenberg, James M, Nabrit III, & Chas. E. Williams, Suite 2030, 

Mr, James C. Wood, 1010 Van Antwerp Bldg., Mobile, Ala, 36602 
Mr. Ralph Kennamer, P, O, Box 624, Mobile, Ala, 36601 

s. Robert C, Campbell III, Daniel A. Pike, Frank G. Taylor, The Plaza 
West Bldg., 800 Downtowner Blvd,, Mobile, Ala, 36609 

Page 1 of 2 Pages 

 



 
 

 
 

— — 

ne 

  

3 > PY 
Snot dln od a 

OO 

 
 

\ #1 
-J

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Prof. Richard Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in