Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Prof. Richard Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton

Correspondence
February 20, 1987

Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Prof. Richard Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton preview

Cite this item

  • Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Prof. Richard Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton, 1987. 3f6384d1-ea92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4b98a8ac-bdcf-4d3f-8792-c49a2c097344/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-prof-richard-engstrom-re-whitfield-v-clinton. Accessed April 28, 2025.

    Copied!

    Lese,EDrenseH. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND' INC.
g9 Hudson Street, New york, N.y. 10019 o (212121$.1900

February 20, 1987

Professor Richard Engstrom
Department of Po1itical Science
University of New Orleans
New Or1eans, Louisiana 70148

RE: San Whitfield, et aI. v. BiII Clinton. et aI-
Dear Dick: 

r

I thought you would be interested in the judge,s schedule for our
Arkansas Run-Off Primary Case. We are working with the Census
Bureau to see if hre can get block data for phirrips county. we
have the block data for the two major cities, but need it for therest of the counties. I will call you on the 27th of February to
discuss our racial block voting analysis.
Sincerely,

-,1\ ,,
'-t-Ltt-<-- '*'.'^(( t 1't:1

Lani Gui4d,er

G/r
Enclosure #f
(Dictated, but not read)

Contributions are dcdutible lor U.S. incomz tnt purposcs

The NA/IGp Legal Dslense & Educationat Fund, lnc. (LDR is not part ol tho l{ational Association tor the MvancetDenl ol Colored hople (i{,qACP) affiough

LiiFfistodiEd-btth; iiAcpino itriiesGibmmitmennoeqJatriohs. LDFhas had lor over25years aseparate Board, program,statt,otlicoand budget'

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top