Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Prof. Richard Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton
Correspondence
February 20, 1987

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Prof. Richard Engstrom Re Whitfield v. Clinton, 1987. 3f6384d1-ea92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4b98a8ac-bdcf-4d3f-8792-c49a2c097344/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-prof-richard-engstrom-re-whitfield-v-clinton. Accessed April 28, 2025.
Copied!
Lese,EDrenseH. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND' INC. g9 Hudson Street, New york, N.y. 10019 o (212121$.1900 February 20, 1987 Professor Richard Engstrom Department of Po1itical Science University of New Orleans New Or1eans, Louisiana 70148 RE: San Whitfield, et aI. v. BiII Clinton. et aI- Dear Dick: r I thought you would be interested in the judge,s schedule for our Arkansas Run-Off Primary Case. We are working with the Census Bureau to see if hre can get block data for phirrips county. we have the block data for the two major cities, but need it for therest of the counties. I will call you on the 27th of February to discuss our racial block voting analysis. Sincerely, -,1\ ,, '-t-Ltt-<-- '*'.'^(( t 1't:1 Lani Gui4d,er G/r Enclosure #f (Dictated, but not read) Contributions are dcdutible lor U.S. incomz tnt purposcs The NA/IGp Legal Dslense & Educationat Fund, lnc. (LDR is not part ol tho l{ational Association tor the MvancetDenl ol Colored hople (i{,qACP) affiough LiiFfistodiEd-btth; iiAcpino itriiesGibmmitmennoeqJatriohs. LDFhas had lor over25years aseparate Board, program,statt,otlicoand budget'