Calhoun v. Cook Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants
Public Court Documents
July 26, 1972

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Order for Rehearing En Banc, 1973. 8c3b3632-54e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3492d292-096b-492e-849d-9000c0cdefdf/order-for-rehearing-en-banc. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
WO From: Norman Bloomfield NAACP Legal Defense and Edcu. Fund 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 (212) 586-8397 NOTE TO EDITORS NEW YORK, N.Y¥., March 24 - Following is a statement issued by Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund in connection with today's decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Franks v. Bowman. "The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Franksvv. Bowman assures that black victims of racial discrimination will be put in their rightful place, not at the bottom of seniority ladders where they are vulnerable to last-hired, first-fired practices which have afflicted minority workers until now." The case was accepted for review by the Supreme Court a year ago today, and arguedeby Legal =DefensesFundnlawyers on November 3% The NAACP Legal Defense Fund is a completely separate organization even though originally established by the NAACP in 1939. Its correct designation is NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., frequently shortened to Legal Defense Fund.