LDF Wins Tuition-Free New York Education for Alabama Girl

Groveland Case Victim Again Appeals to Supreme Court preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Press Releases
Creator
- LDF
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 0409add2-bb92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 5. LDF Wins Tuition-Free New York Education for Alabama Girl, 1967. 9fc4e34b-b892-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/02ae127f-e499-40a5-b1b3-7ccb85b53938/ldf-wins-tuition-free-new-york-education-for-alabama-girl. Accessed August 27, 2025.

Copied!

    ¢f 

President 

Hon. Francis E. Rivers 
PRESS RELEASE Director-Counsel 

egal efense lund Jock Greenbore 
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. ve Tene DeVere Te 
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 

Jesse DeVore, Jr. 
NIGHT NUMBER 212-749-8487 

FOR RELEASE 
FRIDAY 
DECEMBER 1, 1967 

LDF WINS TUITION-FREE 
NEW YORK EDUCATION 
FOR ALABAMA GIRL 

National Urban League Affiliate Is Sponsoring Body 

ALBANY---The New York City Supreme Court has ruled that an Alabama 
Negro teenager, now a ward of a white pen in Port Washington, Long 
Island, may attend public schools there without payment of tuition. 

The state's highest court reaffirmed a prior ruling by Commissioner of 
Education James E. Allen. 

Announcement of the court's ruling was made by officials of the NAACP 
Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) in New York City today. 

Jack Greenberg, LDF director-counsel, argued the case before Commis- 
sioner Allen last January in Albany in behalf of the Student Transfer 
Education Program (STEP), an affiliate of the National Urban League. 

Commissioner Allen ruled that the Board of Education of Union Free 
School District Number 4 failed to show "a valid or sufficient reason 
militating against reception of this pupil (Mary Elizabeth Moore) on a 
tuition-free basis." 

He added that "there is no evidence indicating that such attendance 
would cause an unreasonable additional operating cost." 

Commissioner Allen said that, even if an additional five other stu- 
dents within the same district were admitted on a tuition-free basis, 
their admissions "could in no way be deemed to cause an unreasonable 
additional operating cost." 

Mrs. Leonard Saletan, chairman of STEP, said that “other school 
districts with STEP students can now be assured that tuition-free 
acceptance of these young people can properly be maintained." She 
added that STEP now plans to expand its activities. 

Miss Moore, the youngest of five children of a Birmingham widow now 
living on social security, was placed in the Port Washington home of 
Richard and Margery Rosen. 

Mr. Rosen, an architect and city planner educated at Carnegie Tech and 
Harvard, is in charge of Community Planning for Levitt and Sons, Inc., 
the largest builder of private homes in the country. 

-30- 

The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) is a separate 
and distinct organization from the National Association for the Ad- 
vancement of Colored People serving as the legal arm of the entire 
civil rights movement and representing members of all groups as well 
as unaffiliated individuals. 



Statement by Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel 
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. 
December 4, 1967 (Re: Wallace v. Lee) 

The decision will have an enormous impact on southern school 

desegregation. 

Many of the 2,875 school districts in 11 southern states have 

resissed desegregation by inaction, feeling the probability was not 

great that a school desegregation suit would be brought against them. 

The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF), the 

primary initiator of school desegregation suits in the South. has 

been taxed to the limit to handle 300 such suits. 

& Now, school desegregation suits, on a statewide basis, can 

result in greater and more efficient desegregation. LDF lawyers are 

now engaged in statewide suits in other Southern states. 

Issued to: 

AP, UPI - Montgomery, ala; Washington (Supreme Court 
Fred Graham 
Dana Bullen 
Washington Post

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Groveland Case Victim Again Appeals to Supreme Court

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in