Maryland Law on Unwed Mothers Challenged as Unconstitutional
Press Release
September 28, 1967

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 5. Maryland Law on Unwed Mothers Challenged as Unconstitutional, 1967. 5a79051b-b892-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4f2bf326-4c1c-40b6-82da-b5aa58015ca1/maryland-law-on-unwed-mothers-challenged-as-unconstitutional. Accessed October 09, 2025.
Copied!
President Hon. Francis E. Rivers PRESS RELEASE Diracter-Coumsel egal efense und Jack Greenberg Director, Public Relations NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. foe DeVore, Jr. 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 NIGHT NUMBER 212-749-8487 FOR RELEASE THURSDAY September 28, 1967 MARYLAND LAW ON UNWED MOTHERS CHALLENGED AS UNCONSTITUT IONAL LDF Suit Wants Ground Rules Changed for Judging Neglected Children UPPER MARLBORO, MD.---A Maryland law which says a mother's illegiti- mate pregnancy is ground ruling that her other children are neglected was challenged in court here this week by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF). The motion was filed in the Prince George's County Circuit Court in behalf of nine children who were declared to be neglected solely because their mothers had given birth to more than one illegitimate child. Under the Maryland statute, passed in 1962, a judge can conclude that children are being raised in an "unstable moral environment" if their unwed mother has become pregnant or has given birth to a child within the preceding twelve months. In challenging this statute, the LDF attorneys further asked the court to name the mothers of the defendant children as parties to the case. One of the mothers involved in the case is white, the remain- ing two are Negroes. The LDF attorneys also raised another novel issue in which they asked the court to appoint a court lawyer for the defendant children and their mothers. This is the first time that a court has been requested to provide paid counsel for a case falling outside of the criminal area. The current case is being tried in a civil proceeding. According to LDF attorney Leroy Clark a favorable ruling by the court on the LDF motion would in the future have a "substantial impact on efforts made around the country to deal with mothers receiving wel- fare in an arbitrary and coercive fashion, by interjecting a lawyer between them and hostile prosecutors." The LDF attorneys handling this case are J, Franklin Bourne of Upper Marlboro, Md. and Leroy Clark of New York City.