Maryland Law on Unwed Mothers Challenged as Unconstitutional
Press Release
September 28, 1967
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 5. Maryland Law on Unwed Mothers Challenged as Unconstitutional, 1967. 5a79051b-b892-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4f2bf326-4c1c-40b6-82da-b5aa58015ca1/maryland-law-on-unwed-mothers-challenged-as-unconstitutional. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
President
Hon. Francis E. Rivers
PRESS RELEASE Diracter-Coumsel
egal efense und Jack Greenberg
Director, Public Relations
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. foe DeVore, Jr.
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 NIGHT NUMBER 212-749-8487
FOR RELEASE
THURSDAY
September 28, 1967
MARYLAND LAW ON UNWED MOTHERS
CHALLENGED AS UNCONSTITUT IONAL
LDF Suit Wants Ground Rules Changed for Judging Neglected Children
UPPER MARLBORO, MD.---A Maryland law which says a mother's illegiti-
mate pregnancy is ground ruling that her other children are neglected
was challenged in court here this week by the NAACP Legal Defense and
Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF).
The motion was filed in the Prince George's County Circuit Court in
behalf of nine children who were declared to be neglected solely
because their mothers had given birth to more than one illegitimate
child.
Under the Maryland statute, passed in 1962, a judge can conclude that
children are being raised in an "unstable moral environment" if their
unwed mother has become pregnant or has given birth to a child within
the preceding twelve months.
In challenging this statute, the LDF attorneys further asked the
court to name the mothers of the defendant children as parties to the
case. One of the mothers involved in the case is white, the remain-
ing two are Negroes.
The LDF attorneys also raised another novel issue in which they asked
the court to appoint a court lawyer for the defendant children and
their mothers.
This is the first time that a court has been requested to provide
paid counsel for a case falling outside of the criminal area. The
current case is being tried in a civil proceeding.
According to LDF attorney Leroy Clark a favorable ruling by the court
on the LDF motion would in the future have a "substantial impact on
efforts made around the country to deal with mothers receiving wel-
fare in an arbitrary and coercive fashion, by interjecting a lawyer
between them and hostile prosecutors."
The LDF attorneys handling this case are J, Franklin Bourne of Upper
Marlboro, Md. and Leroy Clark of New York City.