Background on Phillips v. the Martin Marietta Corp. and Griggs v. the Duke Power's Dan River Steam Station
Press Release
December 3, 1970

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Background on Phillips v. the Martin Marietta Corp. and Griggs v. the Duke Power's Dan River Steam Station, 1970. cf4e954c-ba92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/510e6652-e7f1-4826-a944-3ea0e7da6c89/background-on-phillips-v-the-martin-marietta-corp-and-griggs-v-the-duke-powers-dan-river-steam-station. Accessed October 09, 2025.
Copied!
ressRelease p iat an a December 3, 1970 BACKGROUND Phillips v. the Martin Marietta Corp. Griggs v. the Duke Power's Dan River Steam Station Attorneys for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) are preparing for the first Supreme Court tests of the 1964 Civil Rights Act's Title VII provision, which forbids job discrimination on grounds of race, color, religion, national origin or sex. The two Title VII cases, which involve sex dis- crimination charges against the Martin Marietta Corporation in Jacksonville, Florida and racial discrimination charges against the Duke Power's Dan River Steam Station in North Carolina, will be heard by the high court in early December. If these LDF suits succeed, they will give new hope to two of the most exploited groups in the labor force -- blacks and women -- and will probably lead the way to success in hundreds of similar cases against members of the American business community whose arbitrary standards of hiring, firing, and promoting employees have led to job discrimination. Mrs. Ida Phillips' sex discrimination case against the Martin Marietta Corporation began in 1966 when she answered that company's “help wanted" ad for assembly line workers, knowing she could fulfill the only stated requirement -- a high school diploma. Mrs. Phillips, a white woman who had six children, was turned down for the job because she had preschool youngsters. Distressed by her predicament, Mrs. Phillips went to the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission, got the right to sue, and has been in the courts ever since, while waiting tables. In the high court, LDF attorneys will argue that although the company's policy prohibits hiring even women whose preschool off- springs have a grandmother at home to take care of them or a day care center to go to, the company has no rule against employing widowers left with the same responsibility to care for young children. LDF lawyers will further charge that although Title VII allows for "bona fide occupational qualifications" to dictate a preference for one sex over the other for certain jobs, Martin Marietta did not claim any such reason for excluding Mrs. Phillips from its assembly lines, nor did the company assert that women with pre- school children were any less capable, efficient, trustworthy, or otherwise less valuable employees than men with such children. If Ida Phillips wins her case, she may well become a significant figure in women's liberation, although she probably never had any such thoughts. NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. | 10 Columbus Circle | New York, N.Y. 10019 | (212) 586-8397 = President Phillips v. Martin Marietta Griggs v. Duke Power's Dan River Steam Station -2- A few statistics reveal the implications of her challenge. While 29% of the mothers of preschool children work, the majority of these are nonwhites who work out of need, rather than choice. Ida Phillips is making a fight for the equal rights of all women, but it is minority women who have the most to gain from her claim. In the second test case, Willie S. Griggs, a black man:who works as a power company laborer, is charging racial discrimination against his employer, the Duke Power's Dan River Steam Station. His complaint attacks testing and formal educational requirements at Duke where their effect is to disqualify a disproportionate number of blacks from jobs or promotions, and where these requirements have no demonstrable relationship to the skills needed to perform the job. LDF lawyers hope to show that these testing and educational requirements kept Griggs pinned at the lowest level in his company, where, after seven years of employment and earning top pay in his company's traditionally black Labor Department, he was still making less than the minimum any white employee took home. Duke, which generates and sells electricity, is a company that Maintained separate drinking, toilet, and locker facilities labelled “white" and "colored" until a few years ago. Not until a year after passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act did the first black man escape from the Labor Department to a position one peg above in the Coal Handling Department. That man had 13 years' seniority and a high school education. Almost immediately afterward, the company laid down additional requirements for transferring a step up from the black Labor Department: either you had to have a high school diploma, management said, or achieve a specific score on one of two (highly abstract) intelligence tests -- the "Wonderlic" or the "Bennett." A lower court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit have already ruled that the policy placed an unfair burden on Duke's long-tenured black employees, since tenured white workers had been permitted for years to transfer throughout the plant without passing tests or having a high school diploma. Now, LDF lawyers hope the Supreme Court will find that the kinds of tests and educational requirements Duke adopted violate Title VII because they (1) exclude blacks disproportionately and (2) have nothing to do with the ability to do the job in question. Underlying this challenge to the discriminatory policies of Duke, are the conditions under which most blacks get their education in the South, which make it less likely for black people than for whites to be able to satisfy such testing and schooling requirements. Statistics point to the fact that only a third as many black men as whites graduate from high school in North Carolina. Segregated, inferior education serves to remove a great deal of the inclination to learn. Add to that the evidence that formal education often does little to improve a black man's chances in the South, and the common need to bring some money into a poor household at an early age, and the high rate of early dropoutism there becomes easy to understand. That was even more true in Griggs' school days than now. =30=