Background on Phillips v. the Martin Marietta Corp. and Griggs v. the Duke Power's Dan River Steam Station
Press Release
December 3, 1970
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Background on Phillips v. the Martin Marietta Corp. and Griggs v. the Duke Power's Dan River Steam Station, 1970. cf4e954c-ba92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/510e6652-e7f1-4826-a944-3ea0e7da6c89/background-on-phillips-v-the-martin-marietta-corp-and-griggs-v-the-duke-powers-dan-river-steam-station. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
ressRelease p iat an a
December 3, 1970
BACKGROUND
Phillips v. the Martin Marietta Corp.
Griggs v. the Duke Power's Dan River Steam Station
Attorneys for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund,
Inc. (LDF) are preparing for the first Supreme Court tests of
the 1964 Civil Rights Act's Title VII provision, which forbids
job discrimination on grounds of race, color, religion, national
origin or sex. The two Title VII cases, which involve sex dis-
crimination charges against the Martin Marietta Corporation in
Jacksonville, Florida and racial discrimination charges against
the Duke Power's Dan River Steam Station in North Carolina, will
be heard by the high court in early December.
If these LDF suits succeed, they will give new hope to two
of the most exploited groups in the labor force -- blacks and
women -- and will probably lead the way to success in hundreds
of similar cases against members of the American business community
whose arbitrary standards of hiring, firing, and promoting
employees have led to job discrimination.
Mrs. Ida Phillips' sex discrimination case against the Martin
Marietta Corporation began in 1966 when she answered that company's
“help wanted" ad for assembly line workers, knowing she could
fulfill the only stated requirement -- a high school diploma.
Mrs. Phillips, a white woman who had six children, was turned down
for the job because she had preschool youngsters. Distressed by
her predicament, Mrs. Phillips went to the Equal Employment
Opportunities Commission, got the right to sue, and has been in
the courts ever since, while waiting tables.
In the high court, LDF attorneys will argue that although the
company's policy prohibits hiring even women whose preschool off-
springs have a grandmother at home to take care of them or a day
care center to go to, the company has no rule against employing
widowers left with the same responsibility to care for young
children.
LDF lawyers will further charge that although Title VII allows
for "bona fide occupational qualifications" to dictate a preference
for one sex over the other for certain jobs, Martin Marietta did
not claim any such reason for excluding Mrs. Phillips from its
assembly lines, nor did the company assert that women with pre-
school children were any less capable, efficient, trustworthy, or
otherwise less valuable employees than men with such children.
If Ida Phillips wins her case, she may well become a significant
figure in women's liberation, although she probably never had any
such thoughts.
NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. | 10 Columbus Circle | New York, N.Y. 10019 | (212) 586-8397
= President
Phillips v. Martin Marietta
Griggs v. Duke Power's Dan River Steam Station -2-
A few statistics reveal the implications of her challenge.
While 29% of the mothers of preschool children work, the majority
of these are nonwhites who work out of need, rather than choice.
Ida Phillips is making a fight for the equal rights of all women,
but it is minority women who have the most to gain from her claim.
In the second test case, Willie S. Griggs, a black man:who
works as a power company laborer, is charging racial discrimination
against his employer, the Duke Power's Dan River Steam Station. His
complaint attacks testing and formal educational requirements at
Duke where their effect is to disqualify a disproportionate number
of blacks from jobs or promotions, and where these requirements
have no demonstrable relationship to the skills needed to perform
the job.
LDF lawyers hope to show that these testing and educational
requirements kept Griggs pinned at the lowest level in his
company, where, after seven years of employment and earning top
pay in his company's traditionally black Labor Department, he was
still making less than the minimum any white employee took home.
Duke, which generates and sells electricity, is a company that
Maintained separate drinking, toilet, and locker facilities labelled
“white" and "colored" until a few years ago.
Not until a year after passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
did the first black man escape from the Labor Department to a
position one peg above in the Coal Handling Department. That
man had 13 years' seniority and a high school education. Almost
immediately afterward, the company laid down additional requirements
for transferring a step up from the black Labor Department: either
you had to have a high school diploma, management said, or achieve
a specific score on one of two (highly abstract) intelligence
tests -- the "Wonderlic" or the "Bennett."
A lower court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth
Circuit have already ruled that the policy placed an unfair
burden on Duke's long-tenured black employees, since tenured white
workers had been permitted for years to transfer throughout the
plant without passing tests or having a high school diploma.
Now, LDF lawyers hope the Supreme Court will find that the
kinds of tests and educational requirements Duke adopted violate
Title VII because they (1) exclude blacks disproportionately and
(2) have nothing to do with the ability to do the job in question.
Underlying this challenge to the discriminatory policies of
Duke, are the conditions under which most blacks get their education
in the South, which make it less likely for black people than for
whites to be able to satisfy such testing and schooling requirements.
Statistics point to the fact that only a third as many black
men as whites graduate from high school in North Carolina. Segregated,
inferior education serves to remove a great deal of the inclination
to learn. Add to that the evidence that formal education often does
little to improve a black man's chances in the South, and the common
need to bring some money into a poor household at an early age, and
the high rate of early dropoutism there becomes easy to understand.
That was even more true in Griggs' school days than now.
=30=