Mississippi's Anti-Negro Voting Laws and Anti-NAACP Laws Challenged

Press Release
March 17, 1958

Mississippi's Anti-Negro Voting Laws and Anti-NAACP Laws Challenged preview

Cite this item

  • Press Releases, Loose Pages. Mississippi's Anti-Negro Voting Laws and Anti-NAACP Laws Challenged, 1958. 01852469-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/52c38cb5-04f1-47e6-a0e5-0df44592a399/mississippis-anti-negro-voting-laws-and-anti-naacp-laws-challenged. Accessed June 13, 2025.

    Copied!

    PRESS RELEASE® e 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 
TO COLUMBUS CIRCLE + NEW YORK 19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397 
DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS oS THURGOOD MARSHALL President Director-Counsel 

MISSISSIPPI'S ANTI-NEGRO VOTING LAWS 
AND ANTI-NAACP LAWS CHALLENGED 

March 17, 1958 

JACKSON, MISS,--Mississippi'ts first civil rights suit to reach the 

courts since the 195 Supreme Court decision in the School Segrega- 

tion Cases was filed here in the United Statea District Court on 

Friday, March 1). ‘The action challenges amendments to the state 

constitution and laws which, in effect, deny Negroes the right to 

vote, It was filed by NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund attor- 

neys in behalf of “ev. H, 8. Darby and other Negro citizens of 

Jefferson Davis County. 

The action also challenges Mississippi's new anti-NAACP laws 

which prohibit the giving and receiving of financial aid and furnish- 

ing of legal services without charge in law suits, Violations of 

these statutes constitute a crime punishable by a prison term of one 

year. 

Rev. Darby on two occasions tried to register in Jefferson Davis 

County in order to vote in Mississippi elections. On each occasion 

the registrar of voters required him to take a written examination, 

This examination included a requirenent that the prospective voter 

give a "reasonable interpretation" of a provision of the Mississippt 

Constitution and demonstrate a "reasonable understanding" of the 

duties and obligations of citizenship. 

This requirement was instituted following a 1955 amendment to the 

Mississippi Constitution and voting statutes which are designed to 

restrict Negro voting in the state. 

Prior to these amendments the Mississippi Constitution and 

statutes required a prospective voter to be able to read or write any 

provision of the Mississippi Constitution or give a reasonable inter- 

_pretation of it when read to him. The "reasonable understanding of 

the duties and obligations of citizenship" clause was not previously 

in the state constitution. 



-2= 

On each occasion on which Rev. Darby sought to register, he was 

denied the right on the ground that he had failed the examination, 

Mississippi was one of the first deep-south states to enact legis- 

lation aimed at cutting off NAACP Legal Defense Fund aid to southern 

Negroes in civil rights litigation. These laws, enacted in February, 

1956, make it a crime to receive or give legal services without charge 

in a law suit or to accept financial assistance for the purpose of com- 

mencing or prosecuting further any law suit, 

Rev. Darby and his lawyers seek a federal court injunction enjoin- 

ing Mississippi's Attorney General Joe T. Patterson from enforcing 

these laws and enjoining the registrar of voters of Jefferson Davis 

County from enforcing the amendments to the Mississippi Constitution 

and statutes which are designed to restrict Negro voting. 

Rev. Darby's Mississippi lawyer, R. Jess Brown of Vicksburg, has 

sought the financial and legal aid of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. 

The Defense Fund is giving financial aid and furnishing legal counsel 

to Rev. Darby. 

NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund attorneys in the case 

are Thurgood Marshall and Constance Baker Motley of New York. 

E30 he

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top