LDF Files Brief in Mobile, Ala. School Desegregation Case
Press Release
September 16, 1970
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. LDF Files Brief in Mobile, Ala. School Desegregation Case, 1970. 65eca23a-ba92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/578ab97e-3927-4d09-96e3-1287836b3768/ldf-files-brief-in-mobile-ala-school-desegregation-case. Accessed November 06, 2025.
Copied!
13]
4 cs
ile ae Hon. Francis E. Rivers
PRESS RELEA Uvector Counsel
, efense | lund c a ae jak a
s f V/ rector, Public Kelation NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC y ‘Charles J. Hayes
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 + JUdson 6.8397 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
LDF FILES BRIEF IN MOBILE CASE
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Attorneys for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund have filed a
brief in the U.S. Supreme Court today asking that the Court make a final de-
termination as to how to achieve full school desegregation throughout the
South.
The case involved is Davis v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile
County (Ala.). The case, which has drawn national attention, will be argued |
on October 12 and 13 when the Court begins its 1970-71 term. |
The Legal Defense Fund, in the Davis brief is asking the Court to
declare the following general principle that: Every Black child is to be |
free from assignment to a "Black" school -- an identifiable racial minority
school -- at every grade of his/her education.
The brief argues that the only excuse from this requirement is cases
of "absolute unworkability" of desegregation plans, as for example where
blacks are a very high percent of the total school population and perhaps in
other extreme circumstances of geographical and demographic flukes.
The LDF argues that its proposed principle requiring the elimination
of all identifiable "black" schools in dual systems is simple enough to
bring an end to protracted litigation, will promote uniformity of desegre-
gation efforts and nevertheless allows some flexibility for local problems
and extreme cases. The brief underlines the importance of the cases saying:
"The decision of the Court in these cases may decide
whether the promise of Brown (the 1954 desegregation
decision) will be kept for thousands upon thousands
of black children. That promise is broken by the
current approach of the Fifth Circuit which leaves
segregation intact in the main institutions of dual
system -- the all black schools."
The LDF obtained Supreme Court review of this case complaining that
the desegregation plan now in effect in Mobile leaves about half of the
black elementary school children in Metropolitan Mobile in schools which |
are all black. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ordered the
plan into effect on the recommendation of the U.S. Department of Justice |
which has participated in the case since 1968. The suit was begun on be-
half of Negro pupils and parents in 1963 by the N.A.A.C.P. Legal Defense
& Educational Fund, Inc. Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel of the Fund, will
argue this case before the Court.
=30=
NOTE: Please bear in mind that the LDF is a completely separate and distinct
organization even though we were established by the NAACP and those initials
are retained in our name. Our correct designation is NAACP Legal Defense and
Educational Fund, Inc., frecuently shortened to LDF.