LDF Files Brief in Mobile, Ala. School Desegregation Case
Press Release
September 16, 1970

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. LDF Files Brief in Mobile, Ala. School Desegregation Case, 1970. 65eca23a-ba92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/578ab97e-3927-4d09-96e3-1287836b3768/ldf-files-brief-in-mobile-ala-school-desegregation-case. Accessed May 14, 2025.
Copied!
13] 4 cs ile ae Hon. Francis E. Rivers PRESS RELEA Uvector Counsel , efense | lund c a ae jak a s f V/ rector, Public Kelation NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC y ‘Charles J. Hayes 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 + JUdson 6.8397 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE LDF FILES BRIEF IN MOBILE CASE WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Attorneys for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund have filed a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court today asking that the Court make a final de- termination as to how to achieve full school desegregation throughout the South. The case involved is Davis v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County (Ala.). The case, which has drawn national attention, will be argued | on October 12 and 13 when the Court begins its 1970-71 term. | The Legal Defense Fund, in the Davis brief is asking the Court to declare the following general principle that: Every Black child is to be | free from assignment to a "Black" school -- an identifiable racial minority school -- at every grade of his/her education. The brief argues that the only excuse from this requirement is cases of "absolute unworkability" of desegregation plans, as for example where blacks are a very high percent of the total school population and perhaps in other extreme circumstances of geographical and demographic flukes. The LDF argues that its proposed principle requiring the elimination of all identifiable "black" schools in dual systems is simple enough to bring an end to protracted litigation, will promote uniformity of desegre- gation efforts and nevertheless allows some flexibility for local problems and extreme cases. The brief underlines the importance of the cases saying: "The decision of the Court in these cases may decide whether the promise of Brown (the 1954 desegregation decision) will be kept for thousands upon thousands of black children. That promise is broken by the current approach of the Fifth Circuit which leaves segregation intact in the main institutions of dual system -- the all black schools." The LDF obtained Supreme Court review of this case complaining that the desegregation plan now in effect in Mobile leaves about half of the black elementary school children in Metropolitan Mobile in schools which | are all black. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ordered the plan into effect on the recommendation of the U.S. Department of Justice | which has participated in the case since 1968. The suit was begun on be- half of Negro pupils and parents in 1963 by the N.A.A.C.P. Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel of the Fund, will argue this case before the Court. =30= NOTE: Please bear in mind that the LDF is a completely separate and distinct organization even though we were established by the NAACP and those initials are retained in our name. Our correct designation is NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., frecuently shortened to LDF.