LDF Asks Supreme Court to Put Teeth in Its '54 School Ruling; Christian v. Board of Education of Strong School District, Arkansas (Telegram)
Press Release
February 15, 1968 - February 16, 1968

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. Legal Defense Fund Takes New Orleans School Case to Court of Appeals, 1962. e61b4c30-bd92-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ee9ad17f-ea4d-4e83-869a-7854b3ff4c86/legal-defense-fund-takes-new-orleans-school-case-to-court-of-appeals. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
PRESS RELEASE NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND TOCOLUMBUS CIRCLE + NEWYORK19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397 DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS JACK GREENBERG CONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY President Director-Counsel Associate Counsel S25 LEGAL DEFENSE FUND TAKES NEW ORLEANS SCHOOL CAS& TO COURT OF APPEALS June 1, 1962 NEW YORK -- The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is scheduled to hear June 29 an NAACP Legal Defense Fund appeal which asks for faster integration in the bitterly contested New Orleans, La. school case. A Fund motion to advance the case on the docket and dispense with printed briefs was granted by the Appeals Court today. An order to desegregate the first six grades of New Orleans' public schools by September, 1962 was made by former District Judge Skelly Wright on April 9, 1962. Judge Wright's order was modified by his successor, Judge Frank B. Ellis, on May 23, when he ruled that the School Board need desegregate only the first grade by September, and one grade each succeeding year. Judge Wright resigned on April 16 to become a member of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The Fund's motion to the Court of Appeals asked that the School Board be required to take all necessary steps to comply with the April 9th order. The motion also asked that the Appeals Court issue an injunction which will keep the 12 Negro children now in integrated first and second grades in desegregated schools when they advance to the second and third grades in September. In his decision of April 9th, Judge Wright observed that Negroes are required to take special tests to qualify for transfers, racially designated school zones are still being used in New Orleans, and that only 12 Negro children of 13,000 have been desegregated under his 1960 order. He also noted that 5,549 Negro school children, but no white children, are on platoon (double session), and among other inequities, Negro classes are conducted in classrooms converted from oe stages, custodians’ quarters, libraries and teachers’ lounge rooms, while similar classroom conditions do not exist in white schools. Judge Wright also invalidated on April 9 the Louisiana Pupil Placement Law until the Board has abolished "Negro" and "white" schools and racially drawn school zones. Judge Ellis, in his modifying decision of May 23, expressed agreement with most of Judge Wright's findings. He continued the invalidation of the Pupil Placement Law as now applied in New Orleans, and noted that the Board had not voluntarily complied with Judge Wright's previous desegregation orders. He based hig withdrawal of Judge Wright's order to desegregate the first six grades, however, on administrative problems that the Board would encounter if it were to comply by September. Legal Defense Fund attorneys argued in yesterday's motion that "the Orleans Parish School Board has presented no evidence of admin- istrative problems even tending to justify continued segregation in grades 2 through 6...except generalized statements." A. P. Tureaud, Ernest Morial and A. M. Trudeau of New Orleans; Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit, III and Constance Baker Motley of New York City represent the Negro children. ---0---