Correspondence from Winner to Leonard; Motion to Certify Class Rule 23, F.R. Civ. P.; State Board of Elections Registration Statistics Part II; Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Certify Class; Affidavits

Correspondence
December 15, 1981 - March 16, 1982

Cite this item
Correspondence from Winner to Leonard; Motion to Certify Class Rule 23, F.R. Civ. P.; State Board of Elections Registration Statistics Part II; Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Certify Class; Affidavits preview

Correspondence from Winner to Leonard; Motion to Certify Class Rule 23, F.R. Civ. P.; State Board of Elections Registration Statistics Part II; Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Certify Class; Affidavits of Ralph Gingles; of Fred Belfield; of Sippio Burton; of Joseph Moody

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Order RE: Plaintiff's motion to consider additional evidence, 1983. 2fedaba7-d492-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b0d27b94-0a56-43b1-a2b2-2ded4c52f66b/order-re-plaintiffs-motion-to-consider-additional-evidence. Accessed April 06, 2025.

    Copied!

    rN THE uNrrED srATEs DrsrRrcr couRr I ri T E lf
rOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ; ''J iUI .*/

RALEIGH DIVISION ,-,iil' . lj lgg3

ss

RALPH GINGLES, €t dI., )

)
Plaintiffs )

)

J.. IitU;J l_ilrJN,4Rii,,.:t.i;?l(
U.,S. Dt-S'i t?lCT CCu?f

E. L)iSl-. i,lo.OAil.

) NO. 81-803-Crv-5
)

ORDER
)

Defendants )

;,'.
Presently before the court is the plaintiffs' motion to con-

.,' sider additional evidence filed November 22, 1983 to which plain-
,-, tiffs have attached proposed new exhibits 90, 9I and 92. Plaintiffs

,,.,,." also ask leave to file additional exhibits relating to post-trial

' County. In a response to this motion defendants have stated that
they have no objection to the courtrs consideration of plaintiffsl

*l*6,$n proposed exhibits 90, 91 and 92 but do strenuously resist the

introduction of further evidence by the plaintiffs relating to

other post-trial elections. Defendants have attached to their
response defendantsr proposed exhibits 65, 66 and 67 .

Upon consideration of plaintiffs' motion and defendantsr
: response the court has concluded to allow the filing of plaintiffs'

exhibits 90, 91 and 92 and defendantsr exhibits 65, 66 and 67.
'.,,.,. The court will consider these exhibits to the extent that they

' are found to be relevant and otherwise admissible in evidence.

, - The motion of plaintiffs for leave to file additional exhibits

VS.

RUFUS EDMISTEN, €t dI.,



relating to

Mecklenburg

:*:;':

post-trial elections

County is denied.

'.o-"o

held in jurisdictions other than

December 5, 1983.

sditlS

a,'"

F. T. DUPREE,
UNITED STATES

Paoe )

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top