Two North Carolina Trucking Firms Charged with Bias in LDF Law Suits
Press Release
September 3, 1966

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 4. Two North Carolina Trucking Firms Charged with Bias in LDF Law Suits, 1966. 15391421-b792-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5dcf14b5-2609-41be-9ca9-52fb8b8838b7/two-north-carolina-trucking-firms-charged-with-bias-in-ldf-law-suits. Accessed July 09, 2025.
Copied!
/ q) \ 10 Columbus Circle Key New York, N.Y. 10019 aac JUdson 6-8397 Legal Defense and Educational Fund PRESS RELEASE President Hon. Francis E. Rivers Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg FOR RELEASE SATURDAY September 3, 1966 TWO NORTH CAROLINA TRUCKING FIRMS. CHARGED WITH BIAS IN LDF LAW SUITS CHARLOTTE-----The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. this week filed suits charging employment discrimination against two North Carolina trucking firms. The suits were filed against the Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. and the Central Motor Lines, Inc. Both the defendant com- panies are trucking firms operating from Charlotte, N. C. and are engaged in inter-state commerce. The Legal Defense Fund attorneys, in their U.S. District Court complaints, allege that the defendant companies in both the cases refused to consider the plaintiff's application for employment. The Negro plaintiffs in the two separate cases are Charles W. Walker, and Marcus Black, respectively. Mr. Walker, in his complaint, stated that the Pilot Freight Carriers Inc. refused to accept his application for employ- ment as a long-haul truck driver, because of "equipment shortage". However, subsequent to Mr. Walker's application, according to the complaint, the company hired five white workers for the same posi- tion. In the case of Mr. Black, the Fund attorneys charge the Central Motor Lines with discriminatory practices against the plaintiff and other members of his race. Segregated toilet facil ities, dressing room facilities, and general refusal to consider advancements for Negroes in job positions, were some of the main charges listed in the complaint. A similar complaint was filed earlier with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which found reasonable cause to believe the alleged violations had eccurred. The Commission tried to seek a conciliation between the principal parties, but was unsuccessful. The Legal Defense Fund attorneys then filed the two civil actions for relief. Legal Defense Fund attorneys involved in the case are Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg, Leroy Clark, and Robert Belton of New York, Conrad Pearson of Durham, N. C., and Julius Chambers of Charlotte, N. C. -30- Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 RIverside 9-8487 te)