Webb v. County Board of Education of Dyer County, Tennessee Reply Brief for Petitioner
Public Court Documents
October 3, 1983

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Orders for Hinds County School Board, 1972. 00673504-d267-f011-bec2-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/64377cea-30e8-49bf-9055-868fb23110fc/orders-for-hinds-county-school-board. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
| ACexAVOER o Homes, 1 . a 2 a JY : United States Court of Appeals NEW ADDRESS | B FIFTH CIRCUIT : 600 camp STREET EDWARD W. WADSWORTH OFFICE OF THE CLERK ROOM 408-400 ROYAL ST. CLERK a NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130 September 28, 1972 Mr. Robert C. Thomas, Clerk U. 8. District Court P. O. Box 769 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 RE: Nos. 28030 & 28042 - U.S.A. vs. Hinds County, Dear My. Thomas: Enclosed is a certified copy of an order entered by the court in the Hinds County School case. Very truly yours, EDWARD W, WADSWORTH, Clerk 2d Q 7 By 0 QA of F 4 Y./ Giclee Deputy Clerk /cg enclosure cc and enclosure to: Mr, Robert C. Cannada Hon, Dan M, Russell Mr, Jack Greenberg Mr, David L. Norman Mr. Melvyn Leventhal OEP (17; EDWARD W. WADS WORT IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS CLERK L FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT NOS. 28030 & 28042 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Vv, BHINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, ET Al., Defendants Appeal from the United States District Court Southern District of Mississippi (September 28, 1972) Before BELL, THORNBERRY, and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: ~- The modification to the student assignment plan for the Hinds County School System which was approved by Honorable Dan M. Russell, Jr., United States District Judge in an order dated September 19, 1972 (order appended hereto), is hereby adopted and made the order of this court. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28 day of September, 1972. Yor Barry 1% sn ~ (;S > ¥ “ 0.4 ££ United States| Circuit Judge 1 48% {/ | £: / 1 f LI fff | / NYA Vi XE AA / Man? wk United States Circuit Judge Sent | / | United States Circuit Judge ' 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) PLAINTIFF ) ta) ’ = ) Vv. ) HINDS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, ) ET AL, ) ) DEFENDANTS ) ORDER Came on this day for hearing the request of the Hinds County Board of Education that the desegregation plan for the CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 4075 (J) Pr SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI BY FILED SEPL21370 ROBERT C. THOMAS, CLr Hinds County School System, ordered into effect by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on November 7, 1569, in Civil Action Number 28042, be modified; and It appearing unto fhe Court, and the Court finding that proper notice has been given to attorneys for the plaintiff and attorneys for the intervenor, and that no objection to the proposed modification has been filed with the Court; and It further appearing unto the Court, and the Court finding that rather than approve the proposed modification in toto that the Court should approve specific changes in designated attendance cen It further appearing unto the Court, and the Court finding, based upon representations of the attorneys for the Hinds County Board of Education, that only changes in the grades to be assigned to certain desi are contemplated at this time; gnated attendance centers IT IS, THEREFORE, ordered and adjudged, subject to » approval of this order by the Fifth Circul t Court of Appeals, that the plan of desegregation hereinabove referenced for the Hinds County School District be, and the same is hereby modified to the following extent, and to the following extent only: The Hinds County Board of Education shall have the authority. to change the grades served by the Edwards Consolidated School from grades 1 and 2 to grades 1, 2 and 3; and to change the grades served by the Edwards Junior High School from grades 3 through 9 to grades 4 through 9. It is specifically ordered that this modification "does not authorize any, change in the lines of any of the zones heretofore set forth in the above referenced desegregation plan, nor does it authorize the transfer of any pupils from one of said zones to another zone. Except as herein specific- ally modified, said desegregation plan remains in full force and effect. #4 ) ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the hii day of i liz Aen 1972. | ' 4 Jz i 27 t, 7 oF er a J Tr A Le geet District Judge rr on Approved as to form: ALTE promi Hol Jee fr Attorney 4 Unipgd States of America |)