Dr. John L. S. Holloman's Statement
Press Release
December 16, 1965

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 3. Dr. John L. S. Holloman's Statement, 1965. 1c546989-b692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/6088121f-7efe-4c7f-b7e4-4a6118be00c8/dr-john-l-s-hollomans-statement. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
Statement by Dr. John L. S. Holloman, Jr., M. D. President, Medical Committee for Human Rights and President Eleet, National Medical Association Thursday, December 16, 1965 10 AM, Executive Room, Hay-Adams House, Washington, D. C. ‘The Negro American, in comparison with his white fellow citizen, has more diseases and disabilities; one-third more days ere. when he is unable to function at full physical capacity; is sick enough fe oerequice bed rest on twice as many days; loses one and one- third times more days from work due to disease and disability; has a higher mortality rate, including a 90 per cent differential in infant MeeEal ity and seven years shorter life expectancy. To summarize: of every 1,000 white Americans in their late forties, five will die in the coming year. If they are Negro, ten 3 crisis in health is accentuated in the deep Southi The 1946 Hill-Burton Act entrenched a rigid pattern of segregation in the eleven states of the Old Confederacy.* This rigid wall persists despite the clear intent of Title VI of, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The fact is that, throughout the South, most of the 2,000 hospitals and other health facilities discriminate against Negroes. There are hospitals which admit no Negro patients, many more which bar Negro physicians from treating hospitalized patients, and numerous nursing schools which admit no Negroes, to training.» es * Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi North and South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia hy r e t -2- = of Statement by Dr. Bt of Aes E ie a oF + ‘John L, S. Holloman, Jr., M, Dy Segregation of Negro patients is widespread, frequently in an old facility after a new building has been erected. Sometimes, when there is an overflow of white patients, Negro beds are moved into the halls. It is within this sobering framework that we, as physicians and healers, met with Mr, John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, yesterday afternoon. Qur specific concern focused on three key areas: 1, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act requires that HEW cut off Federal assistance to any institution found guilty of discrimination. Hundreds of complaints have been filed. The complaints of the three organizations represented here today have run the gamut from segregated, separate and/or unequal rooms, cafeterias, treatment facilities, maternity wards and on to discourteous treatment of Negro patients. We stressed our belief that HEW has ineffectual machinery for enforcement of Title VI with regard to hospital and medical facilities; that HEW has inadequate investigatory personnel; and, inadequate procedures for processing complaints. We took sad Rights Act... and facilities across abuse, it appears kee refused received payments notice that 17 months after passage of the Civil after scores of complaints against medical the entire South...and glaring abuse after glaring that only four hospitals in Mississippi, which ‘to sign compliance forms with the Department have not © because of Title VI. Bi es es z =3- Statement by Dr. John L. S, Holloman, Jruy M. D. These delays have persisted despite the obvious health disadvantages faced by Negro citizens. 2. We expressed our aie pornanice over reports that HEW plans to bypass Title VI with respect to payment of individual doctors under Part B of the Health Insurance Law. Under this program, the Southern white physician who treats a Negro patient, who is a recipient of Medicare funds, was last month offered the consoling advice of the American Medical Association--through its House of Delegates, that he does not have to desegregate his private treatment facilities--since Medicare money is going to the individual patient. Presently, under the Medicare Bill, there is no mention of the fact that hospitals in receipt of Medicare funds covering the hospitalization of patients must provide service on a non- discriminatory basis. We told Mr. Gardner that it will not be possible to implement the full scope of the health insurance and welfare medical assistance provisions, unless a bold and deliberate effort is made to bring all disadvantaged people, and particularly southern Negroes, into the mainstream of American medicine and health care. Therefore, we stressed that it is particularly important that the Federal funds to be spent under the Medicare Act should be spent in a non-discriminatory way; and, in no case should they be used to support segregated facilities. As Statement by Dr. John L. S. Holloman, Jr., M, D. In particular, we pointed out again that a far more vigorous effort, than has appeared so far, will be necessary to desegregate hospitals and institutions that are receiving Federal money and we are not to be content with scant compliance depts! Members and workers of the National Medical Association and the Medical Committee for Human Rights in the South indicate that this is a dangerously wide-spread pattern. 3. Thirdly, we made specific inquiry as to the disposition of more than 300 complaints of hospital discrimination, filed with HEW by the Legal Defense Fund, MCHR, the NAACP, NMA and other individuals.