Ex Parte Gene Mitchell Gray Motion for Leave to File and Petition for Writ of Mandamus; Brief in Support of Motion and Petition for Mandamus
Public Court Documents
January 1, 1951

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Supplemental Answers of Plaintiff F.C. Wilson to Defendants' Interrogatories, 1976. 126404ae-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/795027d0-1952-4cd6-8130-0dddbf83e65e/supplemental-answers-of-plaintiff-fc-wilson-to-defendants-interrogatories. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION WILEY L. BOLDEN, REV. R. L. HOPE, CHARLES JOHNSON, JANET O. LeFLORE, JOHN IL. LeFLORE, CHARLES MAXWELL, OSSIE B. PURIFOY, RAYMOND SCOTT, SHERMAN SMITH, OLLIE LEE TAYLOR, RODNEY O. TURNER, REV. ED WILLIAMS, SYLVESTER WILLIAMS and MRS. F. C. WILSON, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION VS. NO. 75-297-H CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA; GARY A. GREENOUGH, ROBERT B. DOYLE, JR., and LAMBERT C. MIMS, individually and in their official capacities as Mobile City Commissioners, $F N H ok % ok Sk ok oF ok ¥ ok % oF X k ok * * Defendants. SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWERS OF PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANTS! INTERROGATORIES Undersigned plaintiff submits his supplemental answers to defendants' interrogatories propounded to each plaintiff on or about August 25, 1975, as follows: 2. See Appendix A. 3. See Appendix A. 4. See Appendix A. 31. Plaintiffs do not claim that the City of Mobile's form of government has Jiserininated against any of the groups of persons referred to in interrogatories 6-30, except for the black citizens of Mobile. 32. When the City of Noblle's form of government was instituted in 1910, it was the design and intention of those persons who constructed and participated in the Mobile government to dilute the votes. of black citizens and deny them equal access to the political processes. Thus, the first discriminatory action was the institution of the City's present form of government; the names of the particular per- sons having the described discriminatory intent are unknown to plaintiffs. Since the institution of the City's present form of government, the failure to alter or amend this form of government consitutes a continuing discriminatory omission. The names of all those persons who have supported this form of government, with its discriminatory effect, are unknown to the plaintiffs, and, indeed, it would be impossible to know and list the names of all such persons. A recent act evidencing the subject intentional discrimination was the opposition exhibited by Messrs. Doyle and Mims to the refer- endums that would have altered the City of Mobile's form of government. Additionally, all three of the present City Commissioners are parties to the continuing discriminatory omission, described above, of failing to alter or amend the City's form of government. 41. (c)=(y) Plaintiff has no opinion. 43. Yes. Since blacks are generally poorer than whites, the filing fee required of candidates is a Hot fin percentage of disposable income of potential black candi- dates than of potential white candidates. 45. See Appendix A. 50. The only factor mentioned above in No. 49 which should be retained in a constitutional system is elec- tion by a majority vote. As to other factors, see my ori- ginal answer to this question. 51B. (a) The Commission form of government implies a multi-member panel with (Executive and Legislative) powers. If such a panel were to have individually-assigned powers which were not jointly-held under the applicable law, then any plan of Commission government would still be an at-large system and thus unconstitutional given the prevailing political and racial situation in Mobile. , ~~ 64. See Appendix A. 65.(f) See Appendix A. 120. See Appendix A. 128. See Appendix A. 134. See Appendix A. 135. See Appendix A. 7 ord » tt / ZL 7 ; aif fA a 7 26.14 J iy al 1 Ar ~ 1 i ot lly iy / T i “B11 R CRSH I iE i l ST GREGORY B/ STEIN CRAWFORD & BLACK ASHER 1407 DAVIS AVENUE MOBILE, ALABAMA 36603 EDWARD STILL, ESQUIRE SUITE 601 - TITLE BUILDING 2030 THIRD AVENUE, NORTH BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35203 Attorneys for Plaintiffs STATE OF ALABAMA ) $4288 COUNTY OF MOBILE ) Personally appeared before me, the undersigned authority ‘ : “A 7] /7 / £. Zz, in and for said County and State, Jf)l, 7+ C+ UF 1 /sils 8 Fy - re. = known to me, who upon being first duly sworn by me, on oath deposes and says that aA is informed and believes, and on such information and belief states, that the foregoing answers to interrogatories propounded by the defendants are true. Before me on this the 409 day of (isis. s oat tv id 19 /4 (A Fv Cr RY / 7] ASN fy LAAN E h IC MOBILE sas. AT.ADAMA F 4 E NOTARY PU { CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE T do hereby certify that on this the 20% day of January, 1976, I served a copy of the foregoing Supplemental Answers to Interrogatories upon all counsel of record as listed below by depositing same in United States Mail, postage prepaid, or by HAND DELIVERY. Charles Arendall, Esquire David Bagwell, Esquire Post Office Box 123 Mobile, Alabama 36601 S. R. Sheppard, Esquire Legal Department City of Mobile Mobile, Alabama 36601 { i J 2 Ca 34 J. U. BEACKSHER GREGORY B./STEIN CRAWFORD & BLACKSHER 1407 DAVIS AVENUE MOBILE, ALABAMA 35603 EDWARD STILL, ESQUIRE SUITE 601 - TITLE BUILDIN 2030 THIRD AVENUE, NORTH BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35203 JACK GREENBERG, ESQUIRE JAMES NABRITT, ESQUIRE CHARLES WILLIAMS, III., ESQUIRE SUITE 2030 10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE NEW YORK, N. Y. 10019 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Ze Yes. 3. No. 4. Self: Husband: APPENDIX A Willie Wilson, Age 74, 1507 Hogan Street. (a) (b) (c) (4) (e) (a) Answered in original answers. Grand Bay Living with parents. Locust Street Living with aunt. Congress Street Living with relatives. Rylands Lane Renting. Lexington Avenue Renting. Hogan Street Own. Answered 1n original answers. Ward #10, Voting Place at Davis Avenue, up-to 1975, MW-33-99-3, Mt. Olive Baptist Church, last two elections. No. My best recollection is that it was sometime in the 1930's. 45. 04. 65. 67. 68. 69, 70. 71. 72. 73 74. 75, 765. (b) (c) {d)~{s) No. My best recollection is as follows: Congress Street Renting Gaston Street Renting 1505 Hogan Street Own No. (i)-(iii) N/A. N/A. I have chosen not to do so. 77. 78. 100. 102. X03. 104. 105. 106. X07. Yes. 108. N/A. 109, Yes. 110. N/A. 111, Yes, 112. N/A. 1137 Yes. 114. N/A. 120. Answered in original answers. 128. Xo. 122. Xo. 331... Hope 5 years John LeFlore 25 years Maxwell 20 years Purify 20 years Scott 20 years 134. No. 135, Yes. Mr. John LeFlore: Life Office. 7 or 8 months ago: Atlanta