Archie v. Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind Appendix
Public Court Documents
November 15, 1971 - December 6, 1971

Cite this item
-
Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. Archie v. Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind Appendix, 1971. 5043aa5d-ac9a-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/62c5064c-aeb9-47ad-8f22-e1d3c17000dc/archie-v-alabama-institute-for-deaf-and-blind-appendix. Accessed April 13, 2025.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT NO. 72 - 1107 CHRISTINE ARCHIE, by her mother and next friend, MRS. ADA ARCHIE, ET AL , Plaintiffs MAUDE V. HILL, Intervenor-Appellant, versus THE ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLIND: MR. E. H. GENTRY, The President of the Institute, Et Al. Defendants-Appellees ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION A P P E N D I X JACK GREENBERG SYLVIA DREW10 Columbus Circle Suite 2030New York, New York 10019 DEMETRIUS C. NEWTON408 North 17th Street Birmingham, Alabama 35203 Attorneys for Plaintiffs NO. 72-1107 CHRISTINE ARCHIE, by her mother and next friend, MRS. ADA ARCHIE,ET AL., Plaintiffs, MAUDE V. HILL, Intervenor-Appellant, versus THE ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLIND: MR. E.H. GENTRY, The President of the Institute, Et Al. Defendants-Appellees. CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY FIFTH CIRCUIT LOCAL RULE 13(a) The undersigned, counsel of record certifies that the following listed parties have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that Judges of this Court may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal pursuant to Local Rule 13(a). NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 Jack Greenberg Sylvia Drew 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 Demetrius C.Newton, Esq. 408 North 17th Street Birmingham, Alabama 35203 "La Drew ney for Appellant TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Docket Entries ................................. Motion to Intervene ......................... 1 Complaint in Intervention ...................... 3 Order granting Motion to Intervene ............. 11 Motion to Dismiss Complaint in Intervention .... 12 Order on Pretrial Hearing ...................... 15 Defendants' Narrative Statement of the Evidence 16 Plaintiffs’ Narrative St.atement of the Evidence 20 Transcript of Hearing of November 15, 1971 ...... 22 f Exhibits introduced at November 15, 1971 hearing: Plaintiffs' Exhibit I - Letter of 5/29/69 to Mrs.Hill from Ernest Strong, Jr. 266 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Appointment 9/8/67.............. 267 Exhibit 3 - Notice of Appoint ment 10/1/68 ................. 268 Exhibit 4 - Notice of Appointment 9/8/67 .................. 2 69 Exhibit 5 - Memorandum from Ernest Strong ................ 270 Exhibit 6 - 1967-1968 List of Teachers with Race, Salary & Date of Employment ........... 271a,b Exhibit 7 - 1967-1968 Vocational Dept. School for Deaf,Salary Schedule ...................... 272 Exhibit 8 - Letter of 8/18/69 to Maud Hill from Dr. Elliott .... 273 Page Plaintiffs' Exhibits (contd) Plaintiffs' Exhibit 9 - Newspaper Clipping 274 Exhibit 10 - Newspaper Clippings 275 a,b. Defendants' Exhibits: Defendants' Exhibit I - Letter of 8/12/69 to Mr.Elliott from Mr.Gentry... 276 Exhibit 2 - Report by Mrs. Turner & Mrs. Coe 10/18/67..... 278 Exhibit 3 - Letter of 7/31/69 to Dr.Elliott from Mr.Strong .. 279 Exhibit 4 - Letter of 7/30/69 to Dr. Elliott ............... 280 Notice of Appeal .............................. 281 OATK 1967 Aug. A ” * " 10 Aug.11 " 28 Oct.9 " 18 V 18 " 18 24 Nov. 2 Dec. 20 26 1968 Jen. 9 23 30 T I L I N G S r n O C T I 'O I N O S amoiT̂ t n r r c j n r r n i n E M O L U M I N Tnr.TunNr. Complaint filed - copy served by couneel Sunrone end complaint l.eued - del. to U.S.Marshal for eervlce Summon. and returned executed a. to all the defendant, on Aug.9. 1967, except The Department of Adult Services for the Deaf and Blind Ini Mr.George McFadden,Prealdent of said department, and filed - Sutimons and complaint returned executed as to ala n.m- In s 111 u 11 on ̂ on'Aug!*10**196'^and fUel !" M^ * dd« ' ' ^ - . ^ „ t “ f llld Anaver of the defendant, to th. complaint herein filed - copy a.rved by co.n.el Order on pretrial hearing dated Oct 5, 1967 filed and entered (Groom.) copies mailed to attorneys Notice of Motion for production of documents for inspection and copying of plaintiffs to defendants, filed - copy served by counsel - Motion of plaintiffs for the production of documents for Inspection and copying, filed - copy served by counsel - Notice t6 defendant that plaintiffs will take the deposition of Mr.E.H.Gentlry President of the Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind, on Friday, October 27, 1967,at the Federal Court Reporters Offlee,Federal Buildiig Birmingham, Alabama, at 10:00 o'clock, A.M., filed - copies served upo(i ’ E.H. Gentry and upon Hon.Robert P.Bradley,Assistant Attorney General State of Alabama,Montgomery,Ala.- Motion of defendant, E.H. Gentry to order oral deposition heretofore scheduled for October 27,1967,in Birmingham,Ala.,to be set for the same date in Talladega,Ala.,at the office of the President of the Alabama Deaf and Blind School, and further to produce certain records and documents for inspection at the office of the President of the Alabama Deaf and Blind School in Talladega,Ala.,on Oct.27,1967 at 10 a.ra.,rather than in Birmingham,Ala.,as previously scheduled, with Exhibits "A" and "B", attached, and ORDER of Hon.H.H. Grooms granting said motion,and taking of deposition of E.H.Gentry and the production of documents for Inspection be had at the office of said E.H.Gentry in Talladega,Ala.,( n Oct.,27,1967, at 10 A.M.,-filed - copy served by counsel - Deposition of E. H. Gentry taken on behalf of the plaintiff fllod Memorandum opinion of the Honorable H.H.Grooms In lieu of format findings of fact and conclusions o f law and ordering that not later than the 20 of December 1967 the defendants will submit to this Court a plan for desegregation of said Institute and the Schools composing same, their classes, instructional staff and facilities, benefits and services, the and wlthhouldlng injunctive relief pending submission and consideration o f said plan, and enjoining the defendants, servants, agents and employees respecting the filing of the plan in the time herein pro vlded filed and entered (Grooms) Plan for the deaegretatlon of the Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind located at Talladega, Alabama as required by the order tif November 3, 1967 filed - - copy served by counsel Order allowing twenty days from this date for written objection or exceptlois to the plan for desegregation oa Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind fllel and entered (Grooms) - copies mailed to attorneys - Plaintiff's objections to defendants plan for desegregation filed - copy s<rved by counsel Order, dated January 22, 1968, overruling plaintiffs' objections to defendants' plan for desegregation, filed and entered (Grooms) - copies mailed attorneysMotion of plaintiffs for a rehearing on plaintiffs' objections to defendants1 plan | filed - copy aerved by counsel - with ORDER thereon denying said motloA (Groom*)- fi: -1 F T I— L K — 12-8-C S— 23M — 3311 I Page Two D. C. 110A Rov. C iv il D n c k rt C o n iIm m tlo n EASTERN DIVISION DOCKET CA 67-440 DATE _196fl__ Feb. 5 " 5 " 21 Mar. 7 June 3 July 24 II 25 Aug. 2 Nov. 12 • 1 19 Dec. 12 II 12 II 12II 12 1969 Jan. 2•1 9•1 22 II 28 Feb 3ti 19 •t 25 Mar. 10 PltO C E E D T N fiS Ljxt* ' T'Jdifmf Notice of Appeal by plaintiffs filed - copies served by counsel Appeal bond ($250.00) filed Order, dated February 20, 1968, overruling plaintiffs' motion for reconsideratio: of the order entered on Jan. 22, 1968, overruling their objections to the plan for desegregation of the facilities of the Alabama Institute for Deaf and BllnJ; and mandatorily enjoining defendants to put into force and to carry out the pi in of desegregation filed herein on December 20, 1967, and denying the other relief sought by the plaintiffs herein, the Court retaining jurisdiction of this acti>n in order to effectuate the plan and the decree herein approving the same, file! and entered (Grooms) copies mailed attorneys Certified record on appeal mailed Clerk,O.S.Court of Appeals,New Orleans, La.- Certifled copy of Judgment of the U. S. Court of Appeals issued as and for the mandate, together with a copy of Its opinion, reversing the judgment of this Court and remanding to the said District Court for further proceedings not in consistent with the opinion of the U. S. Court of Appeals, filed Amended Plan of defendants, as a result of the opinion of the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, filed - copy served by counsel Order that any objections to the amended plan of defendants for the Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind should be filed herein within ten days from the date of this order, filed and entered (Grooms) - copies mailed attorneys Objections of plaintiffs to defendant's amended plan filed - copy served by counsel Interrogatories of plaintiffs directed to defendants filed - copy served by counsel Objection pf defendants to answering interrogatories submitted by plaintiffs flled- copy served by counsel Notion of plaintiff for order compelling defendants to answer interrogatories heretofore served on defendants by plaintiffs filed - copy served by counsel j Notice to defendants by plaintiffs of the setting of the motion to compel answers to interrogatories before Judge Grooms on December 20, at 1:30 P. M. flled-cojiy sei Motion of plaintiffs for counsel fees filed - copy served by counsel by counsel Notice to defendants by plaintiffs of the setting of the motion for-Counsel Fees before Judge Groomsloil.December 20, 1968, at 1:30 P. M. filed - copy served 1 by counsel Cost bill of plaintiff filed - copy served by counsel Costs taxed by the Clerk - bill mailed attorneys for defendants Order, dated January 21, 1969, granting plaintiffs' motion to compel answers to Interrogatories and the defendants will answer said interrogatories within fifteen days; and overruling defendants' objections to plaintiffs' interrogatories; and continuing plaintiffs' motion for counsel fees and objections to defendants' amended plan to the next regularly scheduled motion docket filed and entered ; (Grooms) - copies mailed attorneys ■ Interrogatories of the defendants propounded to plaintiffs' atoorney Demetrius Newton filed - copy served by counsel Answers of defendants to plaintiffs' Interrogatories filed - copy served by counsel Answers to interrogatories by Demetrius Newton propounded to him by defendants filed- copy served by counsel Order, dated February 24, 1969, overruling plaintiffs' objections to amended plan j in view of the statement of plaintiffs' counsel that defendants' answers to plaintiffs' interrogatories have resolved said objections, and continuing plaintiffs' motion for counsel fees to March 10, 1969, at 9:00 a.m., to permit the taking of testimony thereon, filed and entered (Grooms) - copies mailed attorn On hearing on attorney's fees before the Hon. H. H. Grooms, at Birmingham, Alabama, introduction of plaintiffs' testimony - introduction of defendants' testimony - taken under advisement - (over) it DATB 1969____ Mar. 12 Apr. 19 20 30 July 9 It 10 Aug. 7 1970 Jul. 2}it 21it 22 Aug. l\ Dec. 2 1 1971 Aug. 2 0 , Oct. 4 it 8 I'H o c k b d in g s y a £]fs' terest, s capacity ooms) - Order, on plaintiffs' motion for counsel fees and Hearing of March 10, 1969, that $4,350.00 be awarded to plaintiffs for counsel fees, said sum to be taxed as costs against the defendants, The Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind; Mr. E H. Gentry, the president of the Institute; The Board of Trustees of The Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind; Mr. Ernest Strong, Principal, Alabama State School for the Deaf; Mr. Carl Monroe, Principal, Alabama State School for the Blind; Mrs. Catherine Risen, Principal, Alabama School for the Deaf; Mr. B. Q. Scruggs, Principal, Alabama School for the Blind; The Department of Adult Services for the Deaf and Blind, and Its President, Mr. George McFadden; Keller School for the Deaf and Blind, Mrs. Mary Snell, Principal and when paid the aald sum shall be pail by the Clerk of the Court to Demetrius Newton, Esq., counsel for the plsintlffs; and further ordering that except with respect to the enforcement of the revised plan this action la terminated, filed and entered (Grooms) • copies mailed attorneys Petition of defendants for the Court to reconsider its order of March 12, 1969 assessing attorney's fees as part of the coats In this action, filed - copy served by counsel Answer of plaintiffs to defendants' petition to reconsider order assessing attornej; fees filed - copy served by counsel Order, dated April 28, 1969, overruling the defendants' petition to reconsider the Court's order of March 12, 1969, assessing attorney's fees, and the plalntl motion for additional attorney's fees in the amount of $250.00, and daily In after hearing oral argument thereon, and the Court noting that all defendant other than the state agency defendants were acting in their representative as officers or agents of said state agency defendants, filed and entered (Gr copies mailed attorneys Motion of plaintiff to require defendants to show cause, if any they have.yhy they should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with the Orders of the Court of March 12, 1969 and April 28, 1969, and ORDER of Hon. H.H. Grooms setting for hearing on July 23, 1969, at 1:30 P.M., at Birmingham, Alabama, filed - 7/23/69 Settled by agreement of parties-do not reset Writ to Serve Certified copy of Motion and Order to Show Cause Issued - del. to U.S. Marshal for service on W.W. Elliot, President, Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind, Talladega, Alabama -Writ to Service certified copy of motion and order to show cause returned, executed August 5, 1969, and filed Motion of Maude V. Hill to Intervene as plaintiff, filed - copy served by counsel Complaint in Intervention of Maude V. Hill, filed - copy served by counsel - Order granting motion of Maude V. Hill to intervene as a plaintiff, and allowlig her complaint In Intervention, subject to objections timely filed, filed and entered (Grooms) - copies mailed attorneys - /Motion of defendants to dismiss the complaint In intervention filed - copy — ’ served by counsel - 10/21/70 - overruled - 20 days to answer (Grooms) Notice of appearance of Byron D. Boyett, Special Assistant Attorney General of Alabama of Dixon, Wooten 6 Boyett, 223 W. North Street, Talladega, for defendant Alabama Institute for Death and Blind filed In CA 70-28 3rder on PRETRIAL HEARING and setting this case for non-jury trial during the November term of this division, filed and entered (Pointer) cm Narrative statement of the evidence pertaining to plalntiff-Intervenor, Maude l Hill, filed by defendants Narrative statement of the evidence pertaining to plalntiff-Intervenor, Maude ’ Hill, filed by attorneys for plalntiff-Intervenor - copy served by counsel (continued on next page) D ate O rder Ju d g m en t N< in DATS 1971 Nov. 16 16 Dec. ) i D O. noA _R «T. civil D n rk n t Ooniimmiion EASTERN DIVISION CA 6 7 -4 4 0 PRO CEED IN G S Pâ e #3 On trial before the Hon. Sam C. Pointer, Jr. without a Jury at Birmingham, Alabama, on November 15, 1971 - introduction of plaintiff's testimony - plaintiff rest - introduction of defendant's testimony - defendant rest - Findings of fact and conclusions of law dictated into record- decision in , favor of defendants entered Clerk's Court Minutes that findings of fact and conclusions of law having been dictated into the record, the Court finds that the plalntlff-intervenor does not have the degree of competency to teach in the particular area of teaching deaf children, and that the defendants have sustained theburden of proof thereof, filed and entered at Birmingham, Alabama on November 15, 1971 - cm Notice of appeal of plalntlff-lntervenor Maude V. Hill of final Judgment of the Court dated November 15, 1971, filed - certified copies mailed to Clerk, U. S. Court of Appeals, New Orleans, La. and to attorneys Bond for costa on appeal ($250.00) filed /Designation of record on appeal by plalntlff-lntervenor filed - copy served by counse 1 n72 Jan 1 ^ranscrlpt of proceedings held on November 15, 1971 (2 volumes) filed iv D*t« Or< Judgm ent IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTINE ARCHIE, by her mother and next friend, MRS. ADA ARCHIE; M\RY VALENTINE, a minor by her mother and next friend, MRS. ANNIE VALENTINE; and BENITA ADAMS, by her legal guardian, MRS. CATHERINE GROOM, Plaintiffs, VS. THE ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLIND; MR. E.H. GENTRY, The President of the Institute; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLIND; MR. ERNEST STRONG, Principal, ALABAMA STATE SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF; MR. CARL MONROE, Principal, ALABAMA STATE SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND; MRS. CATHERINE RISEN, Principal, ALABAMA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF and MR. E.Q. SCRUGGS, Principal, ALABAMA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND; THE DEPARTMENT OF ADULT SERVICES FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND and its President, MR. GEORGE McFADDEN; KELLER SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND, MRS. j| MARY SNELL, Principal, Defendants. I CIVIL ACTION NO. 67-440 I FILED in CLERK’S OFFICE NORTHERN DISTRICT o f ALABAMA JUL 2 1 1970 u I ; MOTION TO INTERVENE AS PLAINTIFF Maude V. Hill, a black citizen of the United States, and a former teacher in the defendant Institute for the Deaf and Blind moves this Court for an order permitting her intervention in this litigation under Rule 24(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The applicant's claims herein have questions of law and fact in common with those in the main action. The applicant's proposed complaint in intervention is attached hereto.) Respectfully submitted DEMETRIUS C. NEWTON 408 North 17th Street Birmingham, Ala. 35203 JACK GREENBERG CONRAD K. HARPER SYLVIA DREW 10 Columbus Circle New York, N.Y. 10019 Attorneys for Applicant for Intervention. jl - 2 - IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTINE ARCHIE, by her mother and next friend, MRS. ADA ARCHIE; MARY VALENTINE, a minor by her mother and next friend, MRS. ANNIE VALENTINE; and BENITA ADAMS, by her legal guardian, MRS. CATHERINE GROOM and MRS. MAUDE V. HILL, Plaintiff-Intervenor, THE ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLIND; MR. E.H. GENTRY, The President of the Institute; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLIND; MR. ERNEST STRONG, Principal, ALABAMA STATE SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF; MR. CARL MONROE, Prin cipal, ALABAMA STATE SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND; MRS. CATHERINE RISEN, PRINCIPAL, ALABAMA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND MR. B.Q. SCRUGGS, Principal, ALABAMA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND; THE DEPARTMENT OF ADULT SERVICES FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND and its President, MR. GEORGE McFADDEN; KELLER SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND, MRS. MARY SNELL, Principal, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 67-440 riLtu I in CLtKK S OFFICE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA JUL21 1970 WILLIAM E. DAVIS C L E R K , U. S . D IS T R IC T C O U ----UTY C L I N K V COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION I. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to the provisions of Title 28, United States Code, Section 1343(3) and (4), this being a suit in equity authorized by law, 42 U.S.C. §1983, to be commenced by any citizen of the United States or j1 other persons within the jurisdiction thereof to redress the 11j deprivation, under color of statute, ordinance, regulation, custom -3- I or usage of a State, of rights, privileges and immunitiesI secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States. The j rights, privileges and immunities sought to be secured by this action, are rights, privileges and immunities secured by the privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and by the due processi and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the j Constitution of the United States. This action is also brought pursuant to the Thirteenth Amendment of the United States Ij Constitution and 42 U.S.C. §§1981 and 1982, to secure the rights I of plaintiffs to make and enforce contracts and receive the full i and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as enjoyed by white citizens, and to enforce the rights of plaintiffs to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold and convey real and personal property on the same basis as white citizens,as hereinafter more fully appears. i This is a proceeding for a preliminary and permanent j injunction enjoining the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and || Blind, its Board Members and its Superintendent, from generally jj refusing to hire and assign teachers without regard to race or color and from specifically failing to offer a contract for the I 1969-70 school year to plaintiff-intervenor herein, solely because plaintiff-intervenor is a black teacher, who has hereto- I fore taught in the formerly black Alabama School for the Deaf at Bt. Lashley Avenue, Talladega, which school was closed for the 1969-70 school year to children above age 12. Ill. | The plaintiff-intervenor in this case is a black citizen of j the United States and of the state of Alabama residing in ! ;Ij Talladega, Alabama. She received a Bachelor of Science degree j| in vocational home economics from Alabama Agricultural and | I I -4-' Mechanical University. She has done further work in special education for three summers at the University of Alabama. She was continuously employed by the Alabama Institute for the Deaf as a Home Economics teacher for approximately 10 years prior to May, 1969. IV. The defendants are: the Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind; Mr.W.W. Elliott, the President of the Institute; the Board of Trustees of the Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind; Mr. Ernest Strong, Principal, Alabama State School for the Deaf (Negro); Mr. Carl Monroe, Principal, Alabama State School for the Blind (Negro); Mrs. Catherine Risen, Principal, Alabama School for the Deaf (whj.te) and Mr.B.Q. Scruggs, Principal Alabama School for the Blind (white); the Department of Adult Services for the Deaf and Blind and its President, Mr. George McFadden. The Helen Keller School for the Deaf and Blind and its Principal, Mrs. Mary Snell. The defendant Institute which, is in turn managed and controlled by the defendant Board of Trustees, has control of all real and personal property at each of the four school sites, the principals of which are also named as defendants. Defendant Institute controls the distribution of all funds, has general supervisory power over the affairs of the six schools comprising the Institute ire luding the power and duty of hiring personnel, establishing policies, procedures, rules and regulations concern ing their administration and operation. Each principal is responsible for implementing the policies, procedures, rules and regulations adopted by the Board of Trustees, and controls and supervises all employees at his school. The defendant Presidents, Principals and Board members are sued in their official and individual capacities. ' 5 - V. The plaintiff-intervenor herein brings this action on her own behalf and on behalf of all other teachers who are now or may in future be employed by the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind. The members of the class on whose behalf the action is brought are so numerous that joinder Of all members is impractic able. Defendants have acted and refused to act on grounds practicable to the class thus there are common questions of law and fact involved and common grievances arising out of common wrongs. Plaintiff-intervenor's claims are typical of the class and a common relief is sought for the plaintiff-intervenor and each member of the class. The named plaintiff-intervenor fairly and adequately protects the interest of the class. VI. The defendant Board of Trustee and its agents acting under color of the authority vested in them by the lasw of the State of Alabama have failed and refused to offer the plaintiff-intervenor herein a contract to teach in the Alabama institute for the Deaf and Blind for the 1969-70 and 1970-71 school years because defendants closed the upper grades of the Alabama School for the Deaf at the Fort Lashley Avenue campus under their desegregation plan and have not assigned plaintiff-intervenor to a school where white pupils are assigned because of plaintiff-intervenor1s race and color. Plaintiff-intervenor was notified by defendants on May 29, 1969, that she would not be rehired for the 1969-70 school year. VII. There are at present 6 schools in the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind all located in Talladega, Alabama: 1) Alabama School for the Deaf (South Street, formerly all white) with approximately 61 teachers serving approximately 305 black and white students in grades 1 through 12. 1 - < o - 2) Alabama State School for the Deaf (Fort Lashley Avenue, formerly all black) with approximately 24 teachers serving approximately 164 black and white students in grades 1 through 5 and 2 non-graded classes. 3) Alabama School for the Blind (South Street, formerly all I white) with approximately 25 teachers serving approximately 139 black and white students in grades 1 through 12 with one non- graded class. 4) Alabama State School for the Blind (McMillan Street, formerly all black) with approximately 15 teachers serving approximately 72 black and white students in grades 1 through 7 t with one non-graded class. 5) Helen Keller School for the Deaf and Blind (Terrel Street?, formerly all white) with approximately 16 teachers serving approximately 31 black and white students with 14 non-graded classes. 6) Technical Trade School (formerly all white) with approximately 31 teachers serving approximately 115 black and iwhite students. There are approximately 172 teachers in the institution and only 8 of them are black. I VIII. Plaintiff-intervenor alleges that on May 29, 1969, she i received a letter from the Principal of the Alabama School for the Deaf terminating her employment as of the beginning of the 1969-70 school term because of the Federal Court decree requiring j desegregation of the Institute's facilities and the defendant** plan in accordance with that decree which entailed closing of the upper grades at the Alabama State School for the deaf. Defendants stated that there was therefore no longer a need for a home -7" economics teacher at that campus. Dismissal for such reasons and under color of the laws, policy, custom, practice and usage of the Defendant Board violated plaintiff-intervenor1s rights to equal protection of the laws and due process of law under !' ithe Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States j Constitution and Sections 1981and 1982, 42 U.S.C. Plaintiff- intervenor was in addition denied due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution by virtue of the procedures used by defendants in not rehiring the plaintiff. i| IX. Plaintiff-intervenor alleges on information and belief that Home Economics is currently being taught on two other campuses I by white teachqrs vifith qualifications and experience inferior to that possessed by the plaintiff-intervenor. Plaintiff-intervenor ji also alleges on information and belief that the defendant Board j of Trustees refused to hire her for the 1969-70 school year without considering the qualifications of all teachers employed ; by the defendant institution. Plaintiff-intervenor alleges I further that a new Home Economics teacher has been hired whose qualifications are inferior to the plaintiff-intervenor1s but who is a white citizen. Finally, plaintiff-intervenor alleges on information and belief that she is better qualified than other j teachers employed by the defendant to teach in her minor areas of concentration which were Science and Social Studies. X. i! As a result of the Defendant Board's action, plaintiff- intervenor has lost her employment causing irreparable loss, injury and harm. Plaintiff-intervenor has no plain, adequate, or complete relief to redress these wrongs other than this suit for injunctive relief. iI | -a- t WHEREFORE, plaintiff-intervenor respectfully prays that: 1. The Court advance this cause on the docket and order a speedy hearing thereof and, upon such hearing, to: 2. Enter a preliminary and permanent injunction requiring the Defendant Board, its agents, employees, successors, and those lacting in concert with them to offer plaintiff-intervenor and the class she represents contracts for the 1970-71 school year in the defendant institute, in accordance with their qualifications and experience and without regard to race or color, and to I continue such contractual basis without regard to the desegregat- | ion of the institute. 3. Require Defendants to reimburse the plaintiff-intervenor for all back pay and other allowances which the plaintiff- intervenor would have received but for her dismissal by the ldefendant institute. 4. Allow the plaintiff-intervenor her costs herein and such further, and other additional relief as may appear to this Court to be equitable and just, including reasonable attorneys' fees. Respectfully submitted. DEMETRIUS C. NEWTON408 North 17th Street Birmingham, Ala. 35203 JACK GREENBERG CONRAD K. HARPER SYLVIA DREW 10 Columbus Circle New York, N.Y. 10019 Attorneys for Plaintiff- Intervenor CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have mailed, properly stamped and addressed a copy of the foregoing Motion to Intervene as Plaintiff and Complaint in Intervention to Counsel for defendants as follows: McDonald Gallion, Attorney General; Philip H. Smith, Special Assistant Attorney General; Gordon Madison, State of Alabama Administrative Building, Montgomery, Alabama 36101. This ,-X / day of July, 1970. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTINE ARCHIE, by her mother and next friend, Mrs. Ada Archie; et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION Plaint iffs NO. 67-440 vs. THE ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLIND, et al., FILED IN CLERK’S OFFICE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA JUL 221970 Defendants 0 R D E R For good cause shown, the motion cf Maude V. Hill for leave to intervene is due to be granted, subject to objections timely filed. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the motin of Maude V. Hill for leave to intervene as a plaintiff herein be and the same is hereby granted, and her complaint in intervention is allowed, subject to objections timely filed. Done and Ordered, this the 22nd day of July, 1970. United States District Judge IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTINE ARCHIE, by her ) mother and next friend, MRS. ( ADA ARCHIE; MARY VALENTINE, ) a minor by her mother and ( next friend, MRS. ANNIE ) VALENTINE; and BENITA ADAMS, ( by her legal guardian, MRS. ) CATHERINE GROOM and MRS. ( MAUDE V. HILL, ) ( Plaintiff-Intervenor ) ( V. ) (THE ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR ) DEAF AND BLIND; MR. E. H. ( GENTRY, The President of the ) institute; THE BOARD OF ( TRUSTEES OF THE ALABAMA ) INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLIND; ( MR. ERNEST STRONG, Principal, ) ALABAMA STATE SCHOOL FOR THE ( DEAF; MR. CARL MONROE, Prin- ) cipal, ALABAMA STATE SCHOOL ( FOR THE BLIND; MRS. CATHERINE ) RISEN, PRINCIPAL, ALABAMA ( SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND MR. ) B. Q. SCRUGGS, Principal, ( ALABAMA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND; ) THE DEPARTMENT OF ADULT ( SERVICES FOR THE DEAF AND ) BLIND and its President, MR. ( GEORGE McFADDEN; and KELLER ) SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND, ( MRS. MARY SNELL, Principal, ) (Defendants ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 67-440 FILED IN CLERK'S OFFICE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA AUG 1 1 1970 C L E R K . U. S . D IS T R IC T COURT M* &L £It - n•urr clerk MOTION TO DISMISS Come now the defendants in the above-styled cause by and through the Attorney General of Alabama, MacDonald Gallion, and move this Honorable court to dismiss the complaint in inter vention and as grounds therefor states: 1. The complaint fails to state a claim against the defendants. 2. The complaint fails to state facts upon which relief can be granted. 3. That the plaintiff-intervenor does not represent a sufficient class. 4. That there are no common questions of fact between the original action and the complaint in intervention. 5. That there are no common questions of law between ✓ the original action and the complaint in intervention. 6. Plaintiff-intervenor has failed to exhaust the ad ministrative remedies available to her. 7. Plaintiff-intervenor has failed to appeal her dis missal to the State Tenure Commission. Respectfully submitted. MACDONALD GALLION ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ALABAMA WALTER S. TURNER ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ALABAMA ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS / 2-1 It 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have mailed, properly stamped and addressed, a copy of the foregoing motion to dismiss, to Honorable Demetrius C. Newton, 408 North 17th Street. Birm ingham, Alabama 35023, on this the 10th day of August 1970. WALTER S. TURNER ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS COURT: U. S. District Court, N.D. Ala, East. Div. CASE: Archie v. The Alabama Institute, No. bY-^O-E (Claim of Maude V. Hill) ORDER ON PRE-TRIAL HEARING A pre-trial conference was held in this cause on August 18, 1971. 1. Counsel. Representing the plaintiff-claimant Maude Hill, Demetrius Newton; representing the defendant, Alabama Institution for Deaf and Blind, Barry McCrary of the firm Dixon, Wooten, Boyette and McCrary. 2. Issues. The only issue remaining in this case relates to the private claim of Maude Hill that she was dis charged on the basis of race as a teacher at the defendant institution and on account of racial reasons was refused re employment by that institution. The defendant institution denies the charges. The claimant was a home economics teacher at one of the four campuses of the defendant institution at the time a court order was entered requiring the four campuses to be operated on a desegregated basis. She was discharged at that time by the Board for the stated reason that the position for which she was employed no longer existed. There was a home economics position in the high school area at another cam pus, but that position was held by a white teacher. Subsequent to her termination, the white teacher left the employment of the defendant institution, and another white home economics teacher was employed rather than the claimant, Maude Hill. The board asserts that Maude Hill was incompetent as a teacher and so justifies its refusal to employ her at the time the new position opened. 3. Additionally the claimant asserts that she has qualifications to teach in science subjects and that she was not, although she made application therefor, employed to teach in such subjects even though such positions have subsequently been filled by the defendant institution from other sources. The defendant acknowledges that Maude Hill holds a certificate from the State of Alabama (Class 2, or Rank B, and has completed additional courses taught at the University of Alabama in its Graduate School). The defendant, however, asserts that the claimant is not a competent person in fact to teach in the particular area of the deaf and blind, notwithstanding such educational training, and that the claimant's completion of the graduate courses was not at a grade rate satisfactory to it. 4. This case is to be set for trial, non-jury, during the November term of this division. ORDERED that the above allowances and agreements be, and the same are hereby, binding on all parties in the above cause unless this order be hereafter modified by order of the Court. - ftDone this the <+0 day of August. 1971. FILED IN CLERK'S OFFICE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA /:.1)G 2 o i9/ l /5- CHRISTINE ARCHIE, by her mother and next friend, MRS. ADA ARCHIE: MARY VALENTINE, a minor by her mother and next friend, MRS. ANNIE VALENTINE: and BENITA ADAMS, by her legal guardian, MRS. CATHERINE GROOM and MRS. MAUDE V. HILL, Plaintiff-Intervenor vs. THE ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLIND; Mr. E. H. GENTRY, The President of the Institute; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLIND; MR. ERNEST STRONG, Principal, ALABAMA STATE SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF; MR. CARL MONROE, Prin c ipal, ALABAMA STATE SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND; MRS. CATHERINE RISEN, Principal, ALABAMA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF and MR. B. Q. SCRUGGS, Principal, ALABAMA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND; THE DEPARTMENT OF ADULT SERVICES FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND and its President, MR. GEORGE McFADDEN; anu KELLER SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND, MRS. MARY SNELL, Principal, )) )) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )) ))) )) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 67-440 c l e r ^ ,10L' AM| E. DAVIS cXir NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF THE EVIDENCE The Plaintiff-Intervenor was employed by the Defendant Institute as a class "B" teacher of Home Economics at its Fort Lashley Avenue School at Fort Lashley Avenue campus for several years prior to the coirmencement of the 1969-70 school year. In compliance with a federal court decree, the Defendant Institute placed a ll children over 12 years of age at another campus and, therefore, closed the Home Economics Department at the Fort Lashley Avenue campus. By letter dated May 29, 1969, the P laintiff-Interventor was notified of the closing of her department and of the termination of her employment with the Defendant Institute. The Plaintiff-Intervenor has completed 18 semester hours of aca demic work in Deaf Education at the University of Alabama. She has attained a grade of "C" in each of the courses taken. A grade of "C" will allow her ~lb' - 2 - to continue in attendance at the University of Alabama, but i t would not qualify her for consideration for admittance to the graduate school. Students who fa l l below a "B" average in their Deaf Education content and practicum courses are normally discouraged by the University of Alabama's Deaf Education Staff from teaching in the f ie ld . During the period subsequent to the aforementioned federal court decree, the Defendant Institute has interviewed numerous Negro applicants for teaching and teacher-trainee positions at the Institute. Several Negro teachers and teacher-trainees have been employed during this period of time. Since the employment of Mrs. H i l l was terminated, a white Home Economics teacner at another campus has resigned and a qualified white teacher was employed to replace her. Mr. E. H. Strong, J r . , who was the principal of the Fort Lashley Avenue campus has reported to the Defendant Institute and will te s t ify that he found Mrs. H i l l to rate low in general appearance, in i t ia t iv e , a b i l i t y to get along with people, cooperation, scholarship, use of English, knowledge of subject matter, preparation of daily work, and classroom management. He will state that he has given his opinion to the Federal Bureau of Investigation concerning whether or not Mr. H i l l is a competent teacher of the deaf. His answer was an unqualified "NO". He stated to them and he will tes t ify that he found her to be a poor speller and that that was very bad. He explained that once a deaf child learns a misspelled word, i t is almost impossible to eradicate the mistake. He states that her communicative s k i l ls with the deaf were poor. Mr. E. H. Gentry, who was president of the Defendant Institute during Mrs. H i l l ' s employment, will tes t ify that Mrs. H i l l fa iled to carry out a program in vocational education that could be considered satisfactory. He will tes t ify that on several occasions he talked with the supervisory sta ff in vocational Home Economics and requested that they help her. On the last v is i t of the area supervisor, Miss Betty Coe, she brought with her Mrs. Betty Turner, special supervisor, who informed the Defendant Institute that she could not help Mrs. H i l l . The aforementioned supervisor gave Mr. Gentry the impression that Mrs. H i l l was not qualified as a teacher of voca tional Home Economics. They state that Mrs. H i l l simply could not carry out '11' - 3 - the recommended program. In Mr. Gentry's opinion, the only area in which Mrs. H i l l did an acceptable job was in working with students in extra curricular a c t iv i t ie s . Mrs. Betty Coe and Mrs. Betty Turner of the State of Alabama, Department of Education will state that when they visited with Mrs. H i l l on October 18, 1967 from 9:15 a.m. until 4:30 p.m., they found the department to be very d irty , disorganized and dull in appearance. They will state that in their opinion, the over-all program was extremely poor and that i t is obvious that very l i t t l e teaching was being done. They found that the principal was most concerned with the poor quality of the program. Mr. Ronald Evelsizer will state that the records at the University of Alabama indicate that Mrs. H i l l was admitted as an inregular post graduate student upon her f i r s t entrance during the 1967 summer session. This implies that she either did not apply for graduate school or was not admitted as a graduate student. He will state, as hereinabove set out, that she completed 18 academic semester hours in deaf education with a straight "C" record, which will allow her to remain in attendance at the University, but will not qualify her for admittance to the graduate school. He states that this grade average indicates that she has not excelled in the teaching practicum. He will state that students who fa l l below a "B" average in content and practicum are normally discouraged from teaching in the f ie ld . He will further state that full-time students pursuing a degree in this f ie ld are not recommended for a teaching position without at least a "B" average. He will state that he could not personally recommend her as a teacher in this area of specialization. He states that his s ta ff would have d i f f i c u lty visualizing her in an academic classroom situation. The Defendant Institute has also been informed that while in atten dance at the University, Mrs. H i l l was found to have an open book during an examination. She stated that she understood that i t was an "open book" -If examination, but University sources indicate that they do not feel that there is any room for any misunderstanding in this matter. DIXON, WOOTEN, BOYETT & McCRARY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I cert ify that I have served a copy of the foregoing-Statement to Demetrius C. Newton at 408 North 17th Street, Birmingham, Alabama, by mailing a eopy to him at his address, postage prepaid, this the day of , 1971. " 7for the Defendants CHRISTINE ARCHIE, by her )mother and next friend, )Mrs. ADA ARCHIE: MARY ) VALENTINE, a minor by her ) mother and next friend, )MRS. ANNIE VALENTINE: ) and BENITA ADAMS, by her ) legal guardian, MRS. ) CATHERINE GROOM AND )MRS. MAUDE V. HILL, ) Plaintiff-Intervanor j )s. ) THE ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR j DEAF AND BLIND; Mr. E. H. ) Gentry, The President of the ) Institute; THE BOARD OF )TRUSTEES OF THE ALABAMA ) INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLIND; ) MR. ERNEST STRONG, Principal, ) ALABAMA STATE SCHOOL FOR THE ) DEAF; MR. CARL MONROE, Prin- ) cipal, ALABAMA STATE SCHOOL ) FOR THE BLIND; MRS. CATHERINE ) RISEN,Principal, ALABAMA )SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF and Mr. ) B.Q. Scruggs, Principal, ) ALABAMA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND; ) THE DEPARTMENT OF ADULT )SERVICES FOR THE DEAF AND ) BLIND and its President, Mr. ) George McFadden* and Keller ) SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND, ) MRS. MARY SNELL, Principal, ) )Defendants ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 67-440 14 i v y.w'vi * <■' 7 NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF THE EVIDENCE The Plaintiff-Intervenor was wmployed by the Defendant I Institute as a class "B" teacher of Home Economics at its Fort j Lashley Avenue School of the 1969-70 school year. In compliance with a federal court decree, the Defendant Institute placed all children over 12 years of age at another campus and, therefore closed the Home Economics Department at the Fort Lashley Avenue campus. By letter dated May 29, 1969, the Plaintiff-Intervenor was notified of the closing of her department and of the termina tion of her employment with the Defendant Institute. The Plaintiff-Intervenor was employed at the Defendant Institute for a perion of ten years and has a Bachelor of Scienc4 degree in General Home Education, and a minor in Literature, -zo - II i' Social Studies, History and English. She has done advanced work in Special Education-5 hours; Language for the Deaf -6 hours; Reading for the Deaf -3 hours; Physiology of Deafness-3 hours; Speech for the Deaf -3 hours; Elementary Curriculum for the Deaf - |j 3 hours;and Nursery School Education-3 hours. that she was qualified to teach in her major field and several to testify as to her competence. Their names are now available but will be furnished court and counsel as soon as they are available. |j object to any such information as found in the last prargraph, page 3, of the Defendants narrative statement of October 1, 1971 I;11 Plaintiff-Intervenor hopefully will engage in some dis- |i covery prior to trial time. Plaintiff-Intervenor will expect the evidence to show Ij areas in her minor fields, and that there where job openings ■ i available. Plaintiff-Intervenor expects to call 2 or 3 co-workers The Defendant will call either as her own witness or ij an adverse witness, Mr. E.H. Gentry and Mr. E.H. Strong. Plainitff-Intervenor would move to strike and would il DEMETRIUS C. NEWTON 408 North 17th Street Birmingham, Alabama 35203 JACK GREENBERG SYLVIA DREW 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019!) a o.oiy of the foregoing : i'.vl States mall, postageo' i o tu Id!) niHii, jj o ^ z r is 1 / Demetrius C. liewton, Attorney 408 Jlorth 17th Street Birmingham, Alabama 35£03 -2/1" J 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Ftdrrai BuiUmg B*r^H$gbam Makmma IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT Or ALABAMA, S OUT BERN DIVISION MAUDE HILL, ET AL, ) )PLAINTIFFS, ) )V. )ClVIL ACTION NO. 67-440 )THE ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR ) DEAF AND BLIND, FT AL, ) FILED !N CI H K 'S O FFIC E y NORTi,lR:i JlalRisll ‘Jt Al.V-\MA( )DEFENDANTS. ) 4 i W ' i U,4M £ !• " S „ CLERK « S COURT /C A p T I O w*. •' J Oeputv ClerK THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE came on to be heard before the Honorable Sam C. Pointer, Jr., Federal . ■Judge, Federal Court House Building, Birmingham, Ala bama, on the 15th day of November, 1971, following. iwhich the following occurred: A P P E A R A N C E S Mr. Demetrius C. Newton, Attorney at Law, 408 North 17th Street, Birmingham, Alabama, appear ing for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Byron Boyett and Mr. Barry McCrary, Attorneys at Law, Talladega, Alabama, appearing for the Defendants. 2 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham. Alabama I N D E X WITNESS: DE CE RDE RCE Maude Hill 6 23 40 226 E. H. Gentry 42 60 72 Grover George 81 86 Mary Lou Cottrell George 90 96 99 Sara Blue 101 Betty Turner 107 114 123 125 127 Betty Coe 130 135 138 139 Mrs. J. B. Rogers 142 153 Dr. W. W. Elliott 162 185 199 201 202 203 Dr. Ronald Evilsirer 204 212 219 220 221 - Z 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama . P R O C E E D I N G S NOVEMBER 15, 1971 MORNING SESSION THE COURT: We have set for trial this morning the matter of the claim of Maude Hill against the Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind including the several members of the board or principals Involved for that Institution. Is the plaintiff ready? MR. NEWTON: The plaintiff la ready, and we respectfully request the rule. THE COURT: Is the defendant ready? MR. BOYETT: Yes, Your Honor. THE COURT: If you will swear the wit nesses in, Mr. Darby. (WHEREUPON, the witnesses were sworn in.) THE CLERK: All the witnesses will be re quired to remain outside the courtroom. If you will follow Mr. Barnett, he will shew you where to be. 9:15 A. M. ] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama THF COURT: Before you leave, let ■« ex plain to each of you what that la about. We have a rule that has been followed for aany aany years, that on the request of either party, the witnesses other than those that are directly par ties to the litigation are requested to reaaln outside and cose in the courtroom only when It is time to give the testimony. The purpose of that rule is to just give additional assurance that when the witness testifies, he or she will be testifying really what he or she knows, and not unduly influenced by hearing what somebody else recalls about the case. That is the reason for the rule, and it is appropriate for either side to ask for it. IMR. BOYETT: Please, Your Honor, we would l like to ask that Dr. Elliott be excused from the rule. He is president of the institute. THF COURT: That will be fine. MR. BOYETT: Mr. Gentry is a party too. Mr. Gentry, you can reaaln in. MR. NEWTON: I would think not, Your Honor. Mr. Gentry at that time-- at the time of the -2,5- ] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama Institution of this lawsuit was the president. We have the president here now. HR. BOYETT: He is a named party. THE COURT: Well, I believe Mr. Gentry would be excused or discharged as a party. MR. NEWT ON: He is no longer with the de fendsnt. THE COURT: He would be discharged as a party, I believe. So he would not cone under as the exception to the rule and would be subject to being discharged, I would think, as a party to this litigation. MR. NEWTON: Yes, sir. MR. BOYETT: All right, sir. I assume the same would be true of all -- let's see, Mr. Strong is no longer there, and Mrs. Kathryn Riser retired, and Mr. Scruggs is retired. So that would be true. THE COURT: Right. Unless you want to have substitutions. MR. BOYETT: No, sir. THE COURT: But otherwise they would be due to be dismissed, I would think, as parties 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama f.------------------------------------------ -------------------- _ ____ | O to the litigation. MR. NFWTON: Yea, sir. THF COURT: You sight hold your first wit ness, Mr. Newton. MR. NFWTON: We would like to coll the plaintiff, Mrs. Maude Hill. (Rule Invoked.) I MAUDE HILL. being previously duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION j Q (BY MR. NEWT ON:) Will you state your nase, 1 please, na'aa? A Maude Hill. Q Mrs. Hill, where do you live? A I live at 1712 West Bell Street, Talladega, Alabama. Q Mrs. Hill, were you ever employed by the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind? A I was. Q Will you tell us, Mrs. Hill, what training, if any, that you have beyond high school? - 2 7 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Bermingbem, Alabam a | 7 A I have a BS degree in heme economics. Q Now when you tell me, Mrs. Hill, what de grees you have, will you tell me from what Insti tution? A Yes. I have a BS degree in home economics from Alabama A & M University. And I Q All right. Do you have, Mrs. Hill, any training beyond the Bachelor of Science degree in home economics? A I do. Q And will you tell us what training you have, Mrs. Hill, in that area? A I have two summer trainings equal to 20 hours of advanced study from Tuskegee Institute and an 18 hour credit from the University of Ala bama . Q All right. What is your minor field, Mrs. Hill? A Social studies and English. Q Do you have a teacher's certificate? A I have. Q Can you tell us what class and rank teacher certificate you have? s - n - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Bmldmg| Btrmtngbam, Alabama A I have a class B. !Q All right. And when la tha last tlaia your teacher's certificate was renewed? A The last tine it was renewed, 1970 -- ex cuse me, hold it. I'm sorry. 1960. I'm net sure. But I do know It expires In '74. Q It expires in 1974? A Yes. Q And I believe that class B teacher's certi ficate Is given for a period for a certain number of years? A Yes. Q Is it eight years or something? A Eight years. Q And you say your current teacher's certifl cate will expire in 1974? A Yes . Q Now when you were employed at the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind, where did you work? A I worked on the Fort Lashley Campus In Talladega. MR„ NEWTON: Mark this. -29 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal BmiUmg Rtrvrungbem Alabama | (Plaintiff'* Fxhibit 1 narked.) Q Mrs. Hill, I would like to shew you a docu ment marked Plaintiff'* Exhibit No. 1 for Identifi cation, and ask you ifjou recognise that document? A (Pause.) Q Do you recognize it? A Yes, I do. Q Now was this document received by you from the principal of the Alabama Institute for the Deaf i and Blind? | A It is. Q And was this a letter terminating your em ployment with the Institute? A Yes, it was. MR. NEWTON: If it please the Court, I would like to offer Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 1 for identifi cation into evidence, as Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 1. THE COURT: All right. Is there any objec- t ion? MR. BOYETT: No, sir. THF COURT: All right, it is received. Q How long, Mrs. Hill, were you employed at the Institute? -30- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, A labama A Ten years. Q And the Fort Lashley Campus that you re fer to, was that at the time of yeur employment, were all of the students black or were all the the stu dents white or were they mixed? A For nine years all were black, but the last year we had a few, maybe about a doien white. Q All right. New during the last year, where you had about a dozen white students, were yeu also the teacher in home economics for the black and white students? A Yes, I was. MR. NEWTON: All right, mark these, please. (Plaintiff's Exhibits Ne. 2 through 5 marked.) Q Mrs. Hill, I would like to show you what has been marked for identification as Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 2, and ask you te look at it, please, ma'am. Q A Q (Pause. ) Are you familiar with that? Yes, 1 am. Will you tell us what that is, please -31- Mr s. I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting C om pany 409 Federal Butldmg Birmingham, Alabama Hill? A This is a contract that was sent to me by ray principal and asked ta sign. These con- tracts were given out each year and asked ta sign. And ray salary was not -- Q Just answer ay question. You are farailiar with it? A Yes. Q And you are farailiar with the mount af i us what the date of as shown on that doeu- I will show yau Plaintiff's tell us what the araount that ? wii; show you Plaintiff's to look at Plaintiff's what the date of that exhibit is? the salary, aren't you? A Yes, I an. Q And will you tell Plaintiff's Exhibit 2 is, ment ? A October 1, 1967. Q All right. Now I Exhibit No. A -- and also o f the salary scale is on A $ A ,797. Q All right. New I Exhibit No. A and ask you Exhibit No. A and tell us '32- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Birmingham, Alabama 12 A October 1, 1967. Q Now are you telling ua that those two ex hibits are dated on the gait day? A Yes, they are. Q All right. Now will you tell us what the salary scale is on that one, please, ma'am? A $5,297. Q All right. Now I will show you Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 3, Mrs. Hill, and aicyou the date of that ? A October 1 , 1968. Q And will you tell us what the salary scale is on that, please, ma'am? A $5,504. Q Now just answer my question as it relates to this. I wilj. show you what has been marked for identification as Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 5. Did that come to you in the due course of business as an instructor at Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind? A Yes, it did. Q And will you tell us who sent it to yon? - 3 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama i: A The principal, Erneat Strong. Q All right. And did it have to do with either of these exhibits previously shown to you? A Yes, it did. Q All right. And which one of the exhibits did it have to do with? A Had to do with Exhibit No. 2, cast with ■ Exhibit No. 2. Q Was that as a result of your being dissatis fied with the salary? A It was. MR. BOYETT: Now -- all right. Q Well, does Plaintiff*s Exhibit No. 4 dated the same dite show a change in salary? | A Yes, itdoes. MR. NEWTON: Your Rsser, I would like to introduce into evidence Plaintiff's Exhibits No. 2, 3, 4 and 5. THE COURT: Any objection? I MR. BOYETT: No objection. THE COURT: Is there any relevancy to 2, 3 and 4? Wouldn't 5 be really the only relevant one other than showing the enploynent back then? ■3 <r I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 m ».:>* >• #' ■■ * •' ederal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama MR. NEWT ON: 5, Your Honor, is s request to sign one of the other exhibits. THE COURT: Wouldn't Exhibit -- MR. BOYETT: No. 3 is the '67-68 ss1ery. THF COURT : 3 is the — the lest yeer, isn't it? | MR. NEWTON: Yes, sir. THE COURT: I receive then, although there being no objections, but it does appear only Plain tiff's Exhibit 3 has a particular relevance, so far as the salary is concerned. MR. NEWTON: Your Honor, ve think that they # j have some relevancy toward her eventual termination. Now, Mrs. Hill, after you received the let ter that we have previously identified as Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 1, did you have any conversation with your principal after receiving that letter? A No, I didn't. Q Did you have any conversation with the - president of the institute after receiving that letter ? A Yes, I did. Q All right. Now when you say president of -35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal B uilding Birm ingham , Alabam a th« institute, who did you have that conversation with ? A Dr. Elliott. Q All right. la that the gentleman sitting here now? A Yes, it is. Q All right. Now whan you had the conversa tion with Dr. Elliott, what, if anything, was said between you and Dr. Elliott re your re-employment? A Yes, it was. Q Did he say anything to you at all -- tell us what he said. A I told him - - I carried him the letter and showed him, and he said, yes, he knew about it. And he said he didn't have anything to do with that, because that is Fort Lashley's campus, and Mr. Strong was in charge of that. And I told him he ‘was president of the institution, and I was about to go away to school next week, I was to go to school, and I wanted to be sure before I left school]. And he told me, well, at that time he didn't know what could be done. But for me to go on to school and not worry and come back in August, and he would -36- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birrrungbam, Alabama have found something for me to do. Q All right. Norn did yon In fact go on to school that summer? A Yes, I did. Q Where did you go? A University of Alabama. Q All right. And was that the summer of 1969? A it was. j Q Norn when you returned from school, did you have any conversation with Mr. Elliott? *A Yes, I did. Q And will you tell us what that conversation was ? I A Well, he said that this home economics had i been discontinued, and they had more than enough home economics teachers on the South Street Campus, and that he didn't have anything 1 could do unless they had an opening for a house parent, and had an opening for someone to help with the children, fin ing the children's hair. And I told him I didn't want either of those. Q All right. Now, Mrs. Hill, during the course of -- I believe you said fifteen years you were -37' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Birmingham, Alabama emp1oyed? A Ten. Q During the course of ten years that you were employed at the Institute, did yon ever receive a letter from any official of the institute telling you that you were incompetent to teach home eco nomic s ? A No, I did not. Q Did you ever receive have a conference with either of the president of the institute or the principal of your campus informing you that you were incompetent to teach in the area of home economics ? A No, I didn't. Q Do you know who the other home economics I teachers were on the campus, on any and all campuses of the institute? A 1 knew two of them. Q All right. Will you tell us who they were, please, ma'am? A One was Miss Katie Dempsey. At first she iwas working on the Fort Lashley Campus, and then she was transferred to the Fort Entrance Caapus. - 3 f t - I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Aloha i Q Now, Mrs. Katie Deapsey, is she e black tea cher or white teacher? A She is white. q And what was she teaching on the Fort En trance Caapus? A Clothing. q Do you know what training Mrs. Deapsey had? A Well, she -- educational wise she finished high school. Q Now when Mrs. Deapsey was transferred, then she left your caapus and went where? A To the South Street Caapns. Q When she went to the South Street Caapns, what did she do over there? A Well, she taught in the area of hoae eco nomics, but I'a not sure. Q All right. Now was she teaching over there in the school year 1969-70? A Yes, she was. q She was teaching that after you had been discharged? A Yes. Q All right. Now naae me another -- I believe *39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Bmildmg Birmingham, Alabama v»'e» jte. you said you knew two. Did you know another hoae economics teacher? A Yes, Mrs. Scruggs. I; ' .1-11: | Q Now, Mrs. Scruggs, did she teach home eco noaiics over on the main caapus ? A Yes, she taught on South Street Caapus. Q Do you know how long she worked at the in- sti tute ? A No. But she was there when I came. Q So she was there a number of years? A Yes. Q And do you know what training she had, if any? A W^ll, I know she had a BS degree. And she had done soae advance study, but I don’t know how much. Q All right. Is Mrs. Scruggs still with the institute? A No. She retired. Q Do you know what year she retired? ! A I think she retired in *70. I’a not sure. Q Would that have been one year after you had been dismissed by the institute? - i t - o - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama A Yes. MR. NEWTON: Mark this. (Plaintiff's Exhibit 6 marked.) Q Mrs. Hill, I would like to show you Plain tiff's Exhibit No. 6, marked Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 6 for identification. I would like to ask you if you see your name on here? A Yes, I do. 0 And if you see the salary by your name? A Yes. Q And you see the date of employment? A Yes. Q Now I would like to ask you if you see a star by your name? A Yes. Q And if you see a star at the very bottom of that page? A Yes . Q And I would like to ask you if this infor mation is accurate as it relates to you? A Yes. MR. NEWTON: Your Honor, I would like to offer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 5 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama Plaintiff a Exhibit No. 6 for identification into evidence as Plaintiff's Fxhibit No. 6. MR. BOYETT: May it please Your Honor, we object, because the document contains a great deal of other things, and this is the first tine I have seen it. And I don't know what he has offered it for. It is repetitious of testiaony already of fered, her eaploynent and anount of her salary, and how it relates to the fther matters shown on there. In other words, I don't see any relevancy of it. MR. NEWTON: Your Honor, it shows many things. MR. BOYETT: I know it, but we have no proof of it. MR. NEWTON: It shows the salary of various teachers, it shows additional training. And it was j taken, and I will be willing to testify at this time, it is the official document of the institute, taken in response to deposition furnished by Mr. Gentry who was here, who may or may not remember 1giving it to me, but I can say under oath that I j.got it as an official document of the institute, - ^ 2 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building B*rmmg6am. Alabama because I think it is germane. If it please tha Court, l would be happy to swear to it at this tlae, THE COURT: I will sustain the objection ®t this tine. But if counsel cannot work out the differences at a recess, then naybe it will be ap propriate for you to take the stand. MR. NEWTON: All right. Since your dismissal by the Alabama Insti tute by letter dated May 29, 1969, have you had any other employment, Mrs. Hill, since that tine? A Not regular. For one year I did supply work. Q You did supply work for one year? A Yes. Q And where was that? A In the county, Talladega County. Q In the Talladega County school system? A Yes. Q And what did you teach, doing supply work in the Talladega County school system? A Social studies for the most part, and P.E . - ^ 3 - I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bm ldm g Birm ingham , Alabam a 2 Q And I believe social studies was your ■inor field of concentration, is that right? j A Yes. Q And can you tell us approximate ly how i much money you earned during the one year that you supplied? A About -- let me see. 700 and something dollars. Q 700 and something dollars? A Yes. j Q Less than $800? A Yes. Q And from the time of your dismissal, Mrs. Hill, until this present time, has any official of the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind or any board member ever conveyed to you that you were dismissed because of your being Incompetent to teach your field? A No, it hasn't. I MR. HEWTON: Your witness, sir. CROSS EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. BOYETT:) Mrs. Hill, you were - H - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal BmUmg Bemungbam Alabama teaching there at your lnatltute -- well, at the time you started teaching, you saw a lot of progress! made at the institute during the time you were therep did you not; I mean, that by Insofar as people teachp ing without degreees, general upgrading or there was a constant program of trying to upgrade the curri culum of the school? A Well, during my employment there? Q Yes, ma'am. I'm asking if you didn't ob serve that, if you weren't conscious of that? A Yes. iQ And you saw it? A q Yes. Q And of course although you were on the Fort Lashley Campus, you were -- and you had a principal there on the campus, Mr. Strong, but you also were conscious of what was going on, on the other campuses? A No. Q You did not ? A No. Q You had no connection with the other cam puses? - k 5 - I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 fe d e ra l Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 25 A No. Q You had no -- you didn't have any occasion to visit any of the home economics departments of the other campuses? A No. Q Neither for the defendant achool nor for the blind school? A No, never. Q And in other words, you confined all your activities to the Fort Lashley Campus? A Yes. Q Now did you receive visits from supervisory personnel from other -- in other words, did Mr. Gentry, while he was president, did he ever come to visit? A Not as an official visit. Sometime when he had guests. Q Well, did he come by from tiaM to time? A Yes. Q Did he talk to you from time to time? A Just passing the time of day until I called a conference with him. Just, you know, how do you do and that kind of thing. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 fe d e ra l Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Btrmingham, Alabama ■ Q And Bpv what people did you consider to be your immediate supervisor? A Mr. Strong, the principal. And at the tine Mrs. Rogers was the supervising teacher. Q That is Mrs. Jack Rogers? A Yes. Q She was the supervisor of teachers? A When I was eaiployed, yea. Q Now she would cone every day and sonatinas most of the tine she would visit at least twice a day, would she not? A No. Q She didn't? A No. Q How often would she cone? A She would cone occasionally naybe once a day -- not every day, but she would cone often. She wouldn't cone every day. Q What did she do; what did she talk to you about, and what did she do when she cane? A Well, she would comnent on ny work. Some times suggestions, what she thought rfiould be done. Q And did you ever talk to her about problens ~ k 7 ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama _ 27 that you had in the department? I A I didn't have any. Q You didn't have any probleaa? A Mot any probleaa that needed talking with •- 1 aean about. Q Is the saae true with Mr. Strong? A Well, what is true about Mr. Strong? Q That you had no probleaa and that you didn't discuss any probleaa with Mr. Strong? A Yes. 1 discussed probleaa with Mr. Strong. Q What would be the nature of these probleaa; Just routine natters that would coae up In the usual! curriculua of the school? A Yes. Q Other than that there is nothing that in presses you particularly? A Well, one thing, made a little reaark about was when I was hired, 1 was asked to be the Girl Scout leader, to assist the Girl Scout Leader. And I did. And then before the year was over, it was turned over to me entirely. And I was nominated to go to this national convention. And I asked per mission to go. It was to last a week, about a week. - k * - ] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmldmg Brrrmngbam Alabama : —-------------- 1 And he said that I could go. And this lady that ■tended clothes would keep ay class while 1 was gone, and about a week Q Who was this lady? A Mra. Arnold. And about a week before tiae to go, he told ae to rewind hia at that tiae. And I did remind hia. And he said that if I went, I would have to get soaeone to teach in ay place. And I would have to pay that person to teach. And maybe Mrs. Arnold would work in ay place. But I would have to pay her the tiae that she taught. Although she was eaployed by the state and got a aonthly salary. Q In other words, that is the problea that you remeaber? A It wasn't a problea. I just say -- Q But it was the incident that you reaeaber? A Yes. Q But this didn't directly affect your curri culum of your day to day work in your clasarooa, did it? A No. Q Now -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Burning bam, Alabama j A I had a alnor problaa like discipline or something like that, but very few of those we would discuss. Q Now you taught deaf students? A Yes. Q And how did you communicate with them? A By finger spelling and sign language and readlng. Q Does this In itself present soae unique I and special problems? A At first I thought so. And I didn't want to accept the job. But after Mr. Strong told me, why you will catch on, you won't have any trouble, and I asked if there was special classes given to the new teachers, and he said no. You will catch on. And some of the older girls will help you, and since you're to work with the older girls, you will catch on. And then I was allowed thirty minutes a day for the girls to teach me some of the i signs that were used in the classroom. Q And you tell us that the time that you were employed, and the time you started teaching, that you knew nothing of communicating, you had no specif 1 -50- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Bmldmg Birmingham, Alabama I 30 deaf education? A No special. Q So any special deaf education that you re ceived, it was received while you were with the institute? A That*s right. Q There was no program available like the one that you went to the University at the time you started down there, was there? A No. But later there was a summer session set up, I think it waa at Clark College, and said some of the teachers could go to this program. And I wanted to go. And he said no, you can't go because this is not available -- it was teaching of Negro deaf children, that waa the name of the course. And he said no, that I couldn't go because it was not available to vocational teachers and P.I.j teachers. But 1 found that that was not true, be cause the program was available to P.E. teachers. Q Now just a brief reference -- how many sum mers did you say you attended? A Attended what? Q The University? S I - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Btrnungbam, Alabama ^ A Three. Q Three sunners? A Yes. I Q And is it true that eil three summers that you aade an average -- that you made a grade of C on all courses that you took? A No, that is not true. Q Itisnottrue? A No. I did make an average of C, but I didn't make a C on all courses. Q Oh, you made an average of C? A Yes. Q In other words, some grades were below C? A No, above C. Each suascr we had two classes. And the first summer I received a C in both classes.' The next summer I received a B and C, and the next j summer a B and C. Q Now isn't it true, or did you know that a C was -- would not -- it would qualify you for con tinuing this special education, but it would not qualify you for admission to the graduate school? A Yes. Q And that you could not be entered into 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 32 graduate work, that it was considered substandard? I A Well, you could enter, but it wouldn't -- you couldn't enter graduate work if Q If you could be admitted? A Yes. Q You could enter graduate? A I mean, the C wouldn't keep you -- the C that I had from the summer wouldn't keep me fromI entering that work. Q In other words, the C in graduate school and C in this type of work is considered substan dard work? A Yes. C in graduate work is substandard work, but I was not -- Q This was graduate work for you? A I was not going to get graduate credit. I was going to get Information and methods of teach- ing the deaf. That is why I was there. Q And in other words, you were not interested in pursuing a post-graduate course, but you merely were seeking information that might be of some bene fit to you in your teaching? A In my classroom work. I had never had a - 5 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmldmg Btrmingbam, Alabama 33 course in deaf graduate education, and this was an opportunity, and I did go. Q Now you mentioned Mrs. Dempsey as being | one of the teachers. Now was not Mrs. Dempsey, didn't she confine her duties to sewing? A She was the clothing teacher at Fort Lashleyi Campus. Q Commercial sewing actually? A Not at Fort Lashley. As I said, I didn't know her to do this on the South Street Campus. Q You didn't know on the South Street Campus she confined her activities to commercial sewing? A I did not. q There is a difference between teaching sew ing home economics students, that is, making clothes and all, and commercial sewing, is there not? A Yes. It is different. Q Commercial sewing is quite a part of the program at the institute down there, is it not; rehabilitation work, in other words, people that engage in that, it is part of that work? A Yes . Q You taught primarily foods, did you not? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 V ¥ i /. v\V Federal C ourt R eporting Com pany 409 Federal Bmldmg Btrmtagbam Alabama 1 6_______________________ . .. 1 A l was hired to teach foods. But after Mrs. j Dempsey left, I taught food and clothing. Q That was the last year? I A The last year. j Q Yes. When did Mrs. Dempsey leave the South -- the Fort Lashley Campus? | A She left, oh, that was about four or five | years before. . 10 And then you taught both foods and clothing? A Yes . j Q Did you receive any supervisory visits from 1 anyone from the Department of Home Economics with the state ? ; A 1 received one. Q And do you recall when that was? A Talking about the year? 1 Q Yes, ma'am. 1 11 A No. 1 Q Was that in -- on or about October 18, 1967?| A Maybe. Q And at that time could you tell us who it was that came? A Mrs. Turner. 1 -55- I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Bemungbem Alabama 35 Q That Is Mrs. Batty Turner froa Tuskegee? A Yes. And Mrs. Coe. Q And Mrs. Coe fro* -- A Froa the state, I think. Q She is the state supervisor? A Yes. Q And Mrs. Turner was also a state supervisor?! A Yes. Q How long did they stay with you on that day?! A Well, Mrs. Coe stayed only a short tiae, but Mrs. Turner stayed practically a day. iQ All right. A Better part of a day. Q All right. And did they talk to you about your program? A Mrs. Turner did. IQ And had you known Mrs. Turner before this? i A Yes, I knew her. Q You had worked with her in Future Hoaeaakers^ did you not ? A No. Q You had not? A No. -56- I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birrmngbam, Alabama Q You did have a group of girls in Future Homemaker programs, did you not? A Only by name • Q Only by name 9 A Yes. We never did participate in any of the activities. It was there when I c ame, and each year they continued, but only by n a m e . We d i dn ' t do anything, didn't par ticipate in any of the func - tions or acti. vities of the school. Q And when Mrs. Turner was there, did she encourage you to work toward establishing a chap ter ? A I don’t recall. Oh, yes. I think so. Q You think she did? A Yes, I think so. Q Now you have introduced -- has been intro duced here two different -- well, I will skip aver that. I think this is for prior years. At the time that you were terminated, is it not true that all of the girls that would have been involved in home economies, that they would move to the South Street Campus? A Now I couldn't say yes or no. -57' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal B uilding Birm ingham . A labam a Q Well, they did not have hone economies at the Fort Lashley Caapus? A That I can say they did not. 0 They discontinued it? I A They discontinued hoae ec at the Fort Lash ley Caapus. Q And they aoved it, and Mrs.Seruggs -- now you said you knew Mrs. Scrugga for aany years? A Yes. Q Mrs. Scruggs was a very capable, very cos- petent teacher, was she not? A I didn't know her as a classrooa teacher. Q You never observed her work, and you had no opinion? | A Never been in her classrooa, and never ob served her work. I just knew her as an individual. Q You say Dr. Elliott talked to you about and offered you eaployaent, you said in hair fix- | ing. Actually they were Interested in cosaetology, did they not? I A They didn't teach it. Q I know, but didn't you say they were in terested in setting up and teaching it? -5*- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting C om pany .•‘.-■L/k :f * >y. | 409 Federal Bmildmg Birmingham, Alabama A Yes. Q And n a k e d you If you would b e Interested In that? A Y e n . And I told thea I didn't have any training whatsoever in cosmetology. Q Mrs. Hill, in talking about your work, you have applied for your -- for withdrawal of your teacher retireaent and signed, I believe, a state* went to the fact that you do not Intend to teach again in public schools or state educational in stitutions of the State of Alabama? A I had to do that in order to get the re tireaent aoney that I needed very badly. Q Well, I'm just saying, though, that you did do that? | A Yes . Q And that -- and that was in, I believe, July iof '71? A Yes. Q All right. As I understand it, you have positively testified that at no time did anyone ever criticize your program or ever criticised the fact it was dirty, and it was disorganized, and that - 59- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmldmg Birmingham, Alabama 3S you were not you didn't hive the proper curricu lum, and that you were not teaching proper foods, matters that are Just basic things that go to home economics; is that your testimony to the Judge that no one has ever talked to you about those matters 'and never criticised you for them? A I don't think you naked -- I mean, I didn't j say that. Q I will ask you now, then. A I will say that the date that Mrs. Turner came to visit. Q Yes. A And Mrs. Coe, well, Mrs.Turner criticised. She said that it was not organised, and it could be cleaner. But she could understand, because I ididn't have anything to work with. I didn't have any filing cabinets, and the children used -- I used I the cabinets in the kitchen to put their clothing project work in, because I didn't have any other place to put them. And you know, clothing shouldn't! be kept in the kitchen. But I didrft have any other place to keep them. So that is why we used the cabinets to store the children's projects when they -60- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Btrrmngham, Alabama were working on their projects. She said it was not organized, and it was -- coaid be cleaner, and Mr8. Turner is the only oae. Q She is the only one? A Yes. MR. BOYETT: All right. Your witness. REDIRECT EXAMINAT ION Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) I have one or two aiore questions. As part of that, you talked to black parents froa time to tiae though who caae to visit their students there at the school where you taught, is that right? | A Yes. Q That was part of what the lawsuit was all about, wasn't it; they didn't have adequate facili ties over on the black caapus to store up anything; even in the doraitories they didn't have lockers as opposed to the whites, did they? A They didn't. Q And let ae ask you this, Mrs. Hill, did you wait over a year after filing this lawsuit ~ b l " ] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Budding Brrnunghom, Alabama before you filed for your teacher retirement? A I waited two years . Q Was it upon my advice to tell you to fin- ! ally go ahead, because I couldn't tell you when this case was coming up? A Yes. Q Now isn't it a fact that you cannot with- draw teacher's retirement from the state unless ) you say that you don't expect to teach in the State of Alabama again? A That's right. Q Otherwise, if you expected to he reemployed, they would have to hold your teacher's retirement, that is one of the rules, is it not? A Yes. Q Did you have a very good janitorial service there in and around the school where you taught? A No. Q Was it a fact that your children did not i have places to put their clothing even in the dormi tories and lockers to put their things even when they were in class? A Yes . -62.' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Utrnungham Alabama Q Things they would not use? A Yes. |Q This was the general condition of the Fort I Lashley Campus, is that right? A Yes. MR. NEWTON: That's all. THE COURT: All right, you can step down. MR. HEWTON: I call Mr. E. H. Gentry. E. H. GENTRY. being previously duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) Please state your aaae, please, sir. A E . H. Gentry . i Q Mr. Gentry, you're formerly the president of Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind, is that right? A That's right. Q Do you recall, Mr. Gentry, in answer to a subpoena to get certain documents, and my spending the better part of an entire day with you in your office up there some three or four years back? - 6 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmldmg Brrnungbem, Alabama ^ ̂ A Get a subpoena? Q Yes, sir. You recall my taking your depo sition in your office along with another young nan I when this case was first instituted? MR. BOYETT: Judge, I assume he is talking about this case, he is talking about the case which this is an intervention, and we are just trying the inter vent ion. Q This is the same case. Do you recall the case of Christine Archie vs. yourself and Alabama Institute of Deaf and Blind? A Yes, I recall that. Q And do you recall my coming to your office with another young man and Mr. Tom Meador, the !Court Reporter? A Yes, I do. Q And we took your deposition for the better | part of a day up there? A That's right. Q And we asked you at that time in response to that subpoena for the deposition to bring recordj of teachers and salaries and so forth?1 ! A Right. " 64- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Brrmtngham, Alabama "T .... Q And you had that prepared for us? A Right. 1Q And 1 would like to show you this document, I and ask you if this isn't one of the documents that ! you prepared for us? ! A I'm sure it is. I have every reason to be- i lieve this is correct. Because I did prepare such -- have prepared such salary schedules, what it actually amounted to. f MR. NEWTON: Now, Your Honor, I would like to renew and ask that the Court will accept Plain- tiff ® Exhibit No. 6 for identification into evidence as Plaintiff's Exhibit 6. THE COURT: Any objection? MR. BOYETT: 1 don't know what the date on it is, Your Honor. I don't know what date this was taken on. THF COURT: Is there any indication? MR. NEWTON: Yes, sir. The very top of it has 1967-68. THE COURT: I will receive it. Q Now, Mr. Gentry, you know Maude Hill, did you? 1 I -65- 44 i i \ i I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Bermingbam, Alabama I A Yea . Q And she was in your employ athere at Alabam. Institute at Fort Lashley Campus, is that right? A Right. Q She was employed during your tenure there ? A Yes. Q When did you retire? A No. I believe she was there when I went over there as -- I mas head of the adult deaf and blind department, and Maude was already employed when I was made president. Q All right, sir. You came from the adult deaf and blind department, is that correct? A Yes, the adult blind and deaf. 1 ' ' ' iQ When you were made president, she was al- ready employed there, and do you have any judgment, | Mr. Gentry, how long she was employed there while you were president? A All the time since 1 went in. Q When did you retire ? A July 1, 1968. Q So then when did you go there as president Mr. Gentry ? ~ ( o G ~ I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham. Alabama 46 A I think It was in '62. 1 was there six or seven years. I can't recall whether It was six or seven, but six or seven years. I Q During your entire tenure there, Maude Hill was employed there? A Yes. Q And what was her Job? j A Well, I can't recall at any particular tine when she was moved into the hoaie economics teaching role. But I found her employed as a teacher or supervisor. Now I wish I could have gotten that record clear. But if I understood it, she had done some supervisory work too. What I mean by supervisory, looking after the care of the children. Q So at some time though during your tenure there as president of the institute, she did teach |in the area of home economics, you're sure of that? A kight. I'm sure of that. Q Did you occasionally visit her class? A Yes . i Q Have any conversations with her? A Yes, 1 did. 1 Q Did you ever see any of the work that her '67- ] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building BtrmtHgbam, Alabama 47 students did there? A I saw -- made a special point to show m some of the things the students did. q Would you sny it was good work? A Well, I'm not an expert in sewing, and dresses and the work there, 1 don't know whether it was good or not. I think there was some good work done in the program. Q All right, sir. A But that was in -- you're talking about the clothing area or the sewing area or the cook- I ing? q Well, we will start with the clothing area. You said that -- I believe that was what you were talking about at that time, waan't it? A Yes. IIQ All right. Now did you also have a ten- Idency -- have an opportunity to see the class in operation in the cooking area? A Yes. I was in there when the classes were. Q Did you have an qpportunity to observe and form an opinion about how the students were doing in that area? -68- I 1 2. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ■ • , ■« - * Federal C ourt R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama I| A Sure. Q How were they doing? A I would say it wasn't up to standard at 48 .n. Q All right. Was the equipment up to stan- dard in the Fort Lashley Campos? A It wasn't everything we desired, and we discussed that, and we knew it wasn't. Q Would you think the lack of equipaMnt be- Iing up to standard would have some bearing on how the product turned out? A Well, it way have soae. But we had the aaae ! equipment as far as cooking was concerned that you find in any home ec department over the state. The iI gas company and Alabama Power Company furnished -- | changed out equipment about every three years. I They had standard stoves and refrigerators and so I forth. Q Are you teLllng me the equipment was the same on both campuses? A I'm telling you that as far as what we had in the cooking for -- for teaching cooking and stoves -- see, the gas company furnishes some, and the - 6 9 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Bmldtng B*rm*ngbam, Alabama 49 Alabama Power Company furnishes some, and the re frigerators were the same. If i understood from those companies they made no difference. Q And when you say you thought the cooking was not quite up to standard, what did you find wrong with the cooking, Mr. Gentry? A Well, that is a rather long story, the vocational home economies department -- you aee, they are supposed to follow a lesson plan for a class or -- I don't think too -- we don't call that in vocational curriculum. But they follow, steP fcy *teP» •» the students make progress. And I have referred to that department down there many times while I was there to the state supervisory staff in vocational home economics. I said they are doing more tooty-fruity than they are following any plan. I saw very little evidence of following any organized teaching plan. Q When you said that this was in relation to your home economics department? A Right. Q Both of them or one of them? A The one on Fort Lashley Avenue. - 7 0 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama ------- 1 . 50 Q All right. And you found that they were not following the plan as put out? , IA That's right. Q Now, let me ask you this, this plan that you refer to, was this a plan that was generally put out for teachers of home economics? A Over the state. Q Whether they be deaf or blind schools? A That * s right. Q Bat you do have some special problems with deaf children as opposed to other children taking the same course, is that right? A That is true. Q All right. Now did yea talk te Mrs. Hill on one of these visits about following a plan? A Well, I wouldn't want to under oath say just exactly ay approach to her, because I -- every j i visit I made, as any superintendent or head of a school system would da, was through the principal's office. And in addition to that, from time to time 1 did talk with the vocational department from the state office at Montgomery about my concern for this particular as against the one that was up on the ' l l ' ] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Brrmtngbam, Alabama 51 other c aapus. Q All right. Now, Mr. Gentry, you recall ithat at the time -- now you said this guideline that you refer to is put out by the state depart- ■ent for students who are in the deaf school and I students who are in the blind school, is over ithe board across the state, is that right? A Yes . I Q Now do you recall that in the years pre ceding your retirement, 1964, '65, '66, '67, the . black children at the Alabama -- I believe yau | identified the schools, you comld always tell which was the black one because you had the word state in there, it was called -- the black school was called the Alabstma State School for the Deaf? A Right. Q And the blind school -- the black blind school was called the Alabama State School fori I the Blind? IA That's right. |Q All right, sir. Now do you recall, Mr. j Gentry, that the Alabama State School for the Deaf was not a graded program in 19 - at the coMtenep- -72-- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R eporting Com pany 409 Federal Butldmg Btrvungham, Alabama ■ent of this lawsuit, Archie vs. Alabama Institute, that that was a non-graded prograa In tha Alabama State School for the Deaf? A That's right. Q And in the Alabama Institute for the Deaf, meaning the white school, it was a graded program, is that right? A Well, no. They are not -- if I understand it, of course, you can get that answer from the president now, as 1 understand it they are not haven't met all the standards for accreditation ! as of this good hour in any school. Q No, sir. That was net my question. In the year 1966-67, and a few years before that and per haps a year after that, you had grades -- you ware graded over atthe Alabama Scheol for the Blind, Alabama Institute for the Blind, what I choose to call the white campus, at that time they had gradest| students would be in the fourth grade, fifth grade and so forth, and the entire Alabasui State School for the Blind was non-graded, is that right? iA No. I couldn't rightly say, because you're I -- you have jumped off of the school for the deaf ” 7 3 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Btrmingbam, Alabama * >V 53 on to the school for the blind. Q Let's just take, Mr. Gentry, the two at the tiae, the two deaf schools. A Nov 1 thought you scant deaf when you were mentioning blind awhile ago. Q Yes, sir. Let's take the two deaf schools, j Is it not a fact that the Alabama State School for the Deaf, the black school, in 1966-67 was a nen- graded school; I don't mean accreditation, but just non-graded? A Now in order to rightly answer your ques tion, I would have to say that there was a diffe rence in philosophy of the principals of the school for the deaf and the prinicipal of the school for the state deaf. There was a difference in philoso phy of those two principals. And ay chief concern all my years there was to get that philosophy to gether. Now as far as the classification of students by Mrs. Strong and the classification of the students by Mrs. Riser, they did not agree. Q Mr. Gentry, you recall both the testimony in your deposition in this case, this is one of the issues that we talked about at that time, is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmldmg Birnungbam, Alabama that r ight ? A That's right. Q Do you recall you had certain graduation and certain things where a child would be promoted, I believe you called it intermediate, you had about three or four different classifications in one school that were not present, and l'm talking only about the deaf schools at that time, isn't that right ? i A At times there we had, in the school for the deaf, lower intermediates, upper intermediates, and the regular advanced program. Mr. Strong did not follow that connotation in his school entirely. Q So there was no uniform policy of teaching black deaf? A Between the two school? Q White deafs and black deafs? i A Right. Q As a matter of fact, those four grade levels! you talk about in the deaf school, there were in fact only two in the black school, and they had nothing to do with the area of improvement, is that right? '75- ( ■'*»/ krf'.'t 4<HJ > W>.t W*11, no* 1 ■ not t°i*I «o answer that question yes for the simple reason s«Msa of the best teachers we had were in the state school for t h e deaf. And we had some good t e a c h e r s -- II mean -- let se call it the Fort Lashley Avenue and Main Campus. But I found that they were all taught regardless of the connotations put on the grade situation by the principals. They were all taught on the level at which they could best understand and be the best served. I don't care whether it was three or four grades, you call it that, or whether you call it lower intermediate or elementary grades. They did not call them -- they did not use the same connotation. But I will assure you thst some of the best teaching we had there was in the state school, that is, the school on Fort Lashley Avenue. Q But now, Mr. Gentry, along areas of accom plishment at the Alabama State School for the De*^> y°u ^ad students -- because you did not have them divided in these various grades, you had stu dents in those grades who were achieving, and sam who were not, and some who were slow; you did not e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Budding Birmingham, Alabama 56 have the kind of division that you had at the -- for the aain caapus, is what I'a talking about? A My answer would have to be no. You're trying to force me to say soaething that they were not getting the saae type of instruction at one school they were in another, or they were not classified according to Q Well, it is a fact they weren't getting the saae instructions, or the saae courses, as far as that is concerned at that tiae, isn't that right ? IA It depended on the individual teacher. Q Well, there were aany courses that were offered at Alabaaa Institute for the Deaf that were not offered at the State School for the Deaf at that tiae, at the time of coaaenceaent of Archie vs. The Institute, isn't that true? A Unless unless it was, as I reaeaber in that deposition, unless it was in the vocational area. I Q That is true. Yes, sir. A But as far as acadeaic, you're trying to lead me to say -- - 1 7 - I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmldtng Btrnungham. Alabama 57 fV N ©, s i r . A -- that when I go from one school, all right, if I vent in a class of Mrs. For bus down at Fort I Lashley Avenue, and went up to the class of teacher X in the other school, 1 sight find no comparison. | Mrs. Forbus may be doing a whale of a lot hotter ithan this teacher. By the same token I may find the teacher in this school doing a poor job, aad one up here doing a good job. Now I'm not going to ianswer, Your Honor, unless he forces it on me, that the type of training that they were getting in one I |school in every area was superior to the other, because I cannot say about those teachers who are dedicated and doing -- and who did a good job there. THE COURT: Mr. Gentry, just a minute. I don't believe you really need to worry about where he may be leading you. If you will Just answer his questions, and assume that I can draw a distinction between inferences and what ought to be Inferred instead of trying to protect yomrself against in ferences that you think might be drawn about it. Just answer his questions. A Well, thank you, Your Honor. - n s - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama Q Mr. Gentry, did you think that Mrs. Hill was a dedicated teacher during the tisie she was there under your tenure? A Well, I think she was Interested in -- Q Do you think she was dedicated to her Job? A In certain areas she showed intense in terest in what they were doing. Q All right. You think shewns dedicated to her job. You have any probleas with her about not coning to work or not showing up on tlae or any of those things? A Not any particular one any aore than the others. Q All right, sir. Did you ever send her a letter or cause to be sent to her a letter or anything about her? A Not as I recall. Q About inefficiency or anything? A Not that I recall. That doesn't aean that I wasn't concerned in talking with the principal. Q You did that with aany teachers, didn't you, all over the institute? -7 9 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R eporting Com pany 409 Federal Bmldmg Bemungbam Alabama ' -*A< -'VV- ■ ■ | — ..- .— 4 ■ 5 9 - A Sure. But I don't remember ever -- I don' t remember sending a teacher any letter. 1 I wouldn't do that over a principal. Q That is why 1 asked you if you caused to be sent. I Did you ever instruct any principal to send her a letter about her condition? I A No. i Q All right. Did you ever call her to your office to complain about her competency or lack of it ? A No. Q Did you ever instruct her principal to call her to his office about her incompetency? A That was left entirely up to him after I had told him what my Q All right, sir. And during your tenure as president of the institute, you never dismissed Mrs. Hill or sought to dismiss her, did you? A No. MR. NEWTON: Your witness, sir. THF COURT: Let's take about a ten minute recess. ' S O - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham. Alabama (WHEREUPON, proceedings were in recess from j 10:30 A. M. until 10:45 A. M. , following which the following occurred:) THE COURT: Cross examination. CROSS EXAMINATION Q (BY HR. BOYETT:) Hr. Centry, I believe you testified that at the time you came to the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind, that you came in connection -- you were with the vocational rehabili tation program? A Not entirely. It is the vocational education. Vocation was a service in vocational education de partment . Q And home economics as such is vocational education? A It is one of the services inthe total vo- i cational program. q All right. Now, Hr. Centry, what is your background in vocational education? A Well, first of all, I was principal of a state school under the State Board of Education, - 2 h 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham. Aloha 61 that was a vocational regional school, agricultural and trade school. And from there in 1930 I went to i the State Department of Education as supervisor of the rehabilitation service, which is a part -- was at that time for the divided division part of the whole vocational program. Later I was made asso ciate director of the total program of vocational education which includes home making, agriculture, T & I, and rehabilitation at that time. And I stayed in the state department for 23 years, and was in Talladega 15 years as director of vocational education there, and the adult department before the board made me president of the institute. Is that the background you wanted? q Yes, sir. Is it in this connection that you say that an organized plan is the essence of a vocational educational program? A In all areas, not similar, not the same type plan. q I understand. A But in the field of what we call vocational home ec, vocational homemaking program, there has b e e n evolved over a period of years of which I was 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 hederai Court R eporting Compnm\ 409 F*Ur*i BmUmg Btrnungbum, Alabama involved with that standardisation program for all departments in the state. Q Now is this program the plan that you testi fied that your observation of Mrs. Hill did not fol low? A No, she didn't follow that. I'm definitely sure of that. Even though I had very little contact in her classroom, but in my years of experience of going into hundreds of home ec departments over the state, 1 didn't have to be an expert in that to re alize that our department there was deeply concerned to me, it was not up to anybody's standard. Q And when you went in the department, in other words, you had worked in these fields, and you were familiar with the equipment and so forth, and you observed -- you could observe for yourself the equipment that wss available for the program, and you were conscious of the equipment that was available in her department? A Yes, I was. Q There might have been other things that might have been desirable? A Oh, definitely, yes. 'S3' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham. Alabama Q That is true, I suppose, through all de- partnents of the Institute? A Yes. Q And did --Is cleanliness an iaportant part? A Very auch so. Q And especially In regard to food? A That's right. Q Did it cone to your attention at any time about the type of food she taught as to whether or not she was following a basic food prograa or whe- ther -- what did you call it, tooty-fruity? A Yes , tooty- fruity. Q What is that, cooking what you want to? A That is cooking little cookies and things that was created there, and I talked to the princi pal many tines. There was a created feeling that they were rendering the best service in the hoae ec departaent when they were cooking things that would be needed for their own parties and things of that kind. I saw evidence of that. And so told the principal. I didn't discuss it with the teacher because 1 would have been out of place to have done it. And I told him he ou to correct 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Bmldmg Birmingham, Alabama 64 some of that, and get her on the bean of teaching vocational hone economics, because that area another thing that I did with all the teachers, I I think we wade a good -- 1 think we made some progress in this area, even in the homemaklng department down there, of getting things cleaned up. It was messy,I mean, it just wasn't --the cleanliness wasn't what it should be. And when the state supervisor came in, they would report i that same thing. 1 think their reports will bear that out that they found it. Q All right, sir. Now you had additional problem with your students there by virtue of the fact that they were handicapped? A That is true. Q And did this make it more difficult to secure personnel, teachers and other personnel, supervisors and so forth, to work with them? A Well, in the field of homemaking educa~ tlon, let's put it, well, it is true in the other areas, academic programs of the school, but in this area particularly I just didn't know of any- where to look for someone who would take that job. - 85- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama I, iIt was not up to any standard, the department wasn't.! And we had difficulty -- we have had difficulty in jall ny experience over there in finding qualified teachers who had beth the background of work with the deaf and general background, educational back- •ground. Q And is this problea aore acute in areas like vocational education hoae economic teachers? A It definitely is. Q Mow the teacher when -- now I believe the actual implementation of the federal order that -- I believe they moved all students beyond grade eight to the South Street Campus, did they not? A Well, there again when this case Q Was that after you left? A No. That was before. That was while I I was still there. And when this deposition was being taken, and when they had a hearing on our plan, the plan called for the plan of integrating the schoel which we were deeply involved with all during 1967 and early part of *68, and mainly in '67, which Hr. Bagley represented the insti tute from the attorney general's office at the time 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R eporting Com pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 66 that case was before m s . I think that is the Christine Archie case that he was referring to this morning which I -- that had to do with the integration of the school. New in that, Your Honor, we had a plan that we thought over a period of three years, and that was moving all of what we could call ordinarily in the public I schools junior-senior high school pupils, abolish ing both in the schools for the blind and abolish ing junior-senior grades entirely. That was to Igo into effect July 1, 1968. The remainder of that plan called for moving grade by grade over a period of three years. And at that time we would have a total Q That was the plan though that was approved by Judge Grooms that later the Fifth Circuit though ordered you to go ahead and integrate imme diately. Now I'm talking about the order of the court that ordered the implementation. A Let's get the record straight here. That was the plan that our board had approved, and that is the plan that I turned over to -- even though they had questioned it before Dr. Elliott came - V \ - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 67 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal BmUmg B*rnungbam, Alabama in as president. I told hla that this was the plan. Q Oh, I see. That was turned over to Dr. Elliott? A Right. Q That vas the plan when you turned the institute over? A But by the tiae he got there, they had done this. They didn't want to wait three years to get a total integration. And they had what is the right word I'a trying to say, they had appealed that plan. Q And the Fifth Circuit had erdered -- but that was under Dr. Elliott? A That's right. That part of it was under Dr. Elliott. Q But now so actually the answer to ay question, then, the iapleaentation of the plan of Integration was carried out under Dr. Elliott's administration ? A That's right. Q And after your retireaent? A That's right. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Brrrmngbam, Alabama 68 Q Nov, Mr. Gentry, you were familiar with Mrs. Scruggs? A That's right. Q And of course although you retired, you kept in close contact and still do with the per sonnel and what goes on in the institute while living in town, I mean, you hear about it from time to time? A Well, if you mean by that, I meddle. Q No, I mean, now you -- would you say there was any comparison from aa administrator's standpoint, is there any --in your judgment i* there any comparison between Mrs. Mill's quali fications and Mrs. Scruggs' qualifications? A Oh, yes. Mow at this point, let me naybe i made a statement in here, that I don't want to retract, but I want to clarify. I did in fact, when the board emftoyed Dr. Elliott, well in advance of July 1st, it was take effect on July 1st, and as a matter of fact asked me to serve one more month in August. And in fact, I did tell Dr. Elliott that you're going to have a problem with this program of integration. You're i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Birmingham, Alabama | _ *?_ going to have when you combine high schools, you're going to have to select between one teacher and another. And I want to tell you, and I want to go on record now, and later I gave Dr. Elliott a . letter to this effect, that the teacher by our standards, they're wine and the principal's, we had been very auch concerned about the hoae ec department in Fort Lashley School, and that 1 would highly recommend to him, it was his prerogative and the board's, but I told him at that time that I had discussed Maude Hill's case with the executive committee on several occasions as far back as 1964 and *65, and they said well, who are you going to get to replace her. I said well, I have no recom mendation to make at this time. Let's just hope that we can help her build a department up to stan dard. Q But my question, though, really about Mrs. Scruggs' qualifications, had Mrs. Scruggs been teach* ing in the field a long time; did you find her not only experienced, but very competent and very able teacher ? A Yes. -qo- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 70 Q Probably one of tha aorc abla aeabtri of the faculty at the institute? A That's right. Q And I believe her husband, Nr. Scruggs, was principal of the school for the deaf until the school for the blind? A Re had a background in public education before he eastt there. He was an outstanding teacher in vocational agriculture. You have got to understand why I nay be a little hard in answering these questions. I wean, hard on individual answering these questions. But you have to understand that in all the vocational departiaents that I went in for a period of years up and down the state, and my position in Mont gomery, and when the agreement was reached for me to go to Talladega, it was with the full sup port of the state department that we would upgrade these vocational departments. We would get some jnew buildings, which we did, and we would upgrade them. Now down at the school on Fort Lashley Avenue, when I went there in '54, the Fort Lashley Avenue Buildings, and as I pointed out in my -qi- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Birmingham, Alabama deposition which will beer me out In that, that they had for a period of years there, they had a far better school plan than they had on the other campus. Now when we got this three million dollar building prograa, then the plan up at the other campus surpassed this one, and as I pointed out, this doesn't have anything to do with the Maude Hill case, but as I pointed out, time and again in my deposition, Graves Hall was a disgrace and a fire trap, and they had wore modern buildings at the state school, because they had been enjoy ing that for ten years before the other school got any relief. And I would have to say here that the home making department in the new build ing program at the school for the deaf was far superior to the home ec department in the school for the state deaf. But I couldn't have said that if I was on this witness stand in 1964, be cause it was not. They were just teaching in a makeshift situation at that time. MR. BOYETT: Mark this. (Defendant's Exhibit 1 marked.) Q Mr. Gentry, you referred to conversations -qz" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Bimungbam, Alabama 72 that you had with Dr. Elliott when he took over as president, and then later that you wrote him a letter. I show you a letter dated April 12, 1969, and ask you if that is the letter that you direc ted to Dr. Elliott, specifically in regard to Mrs. Maude Hill? A This is the letter. This is a copy of the letter. Q Look and see if that isn't the original letter; see if that isn't your signature? A Yea. This is the original letter, be - cause it is my signature here. MR. BOYETT: All right, sir. May it please the Court, we offer this as Exhibit 1 for the de fendant . THE COURT: It is received. MR. BOYETT: I believe that is all. REDIRECT EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. NEWTOH:) Mr. Gentry, I have maybe two more questions, sir. Isn't it a fact that the home ec courses -«?3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Bmldmg Bermtngbam, Alabama taught at the Alabama State School for the Deaf, meaning the black school, that at that time wasn't that called general home economics? A It had to be, because it was not approved for home ec. Q And for the Alabama School for the Deaf, had a course called vocational home economics? A Correct, because it was standard. Q These standards that you say that these |courses were up to, this means they were following |the program that was put out by the state depart ment that you talked about, the general program? A Yes. Q As a matter of fact, those teachers who taught courses in vocational trades, whatever the trade might have been, even the salary scale was different, isn't that true? A Now you will have to be more specific. Q All right. Let's just talk about the two teachers. Let's talk about Mrs. Maude Hill teaching and assuming -- I'm jmst assuming now, assuming the same kind of training and same kind of experienc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal B udding B irm ingham, Alabam a 74 Mrs. Maude Hill taught general hone *eo- nomlci at Alabama State School, and Mrs. Scruggs taught vocational home economies at the State School for the Deaf, meaming the white school. All other things being equal, wouldn't the salary ordinarily be different for the teacher that taught vocational home economics and the teacher who taught general home economics? A Well, since you brought that in the pic ture, I'm going to have to make a statement here to clarify one thing. When I went with the in stitute as president, as I recall it, I found Maude Hill's salary $2508 or 16 dollars, something like that. It was very low on the totem pole. That was the cenditlon 1 found. I found that the j i other home ec teachers were on -- came near being . on a state salary schedule. So 1 took that to my board. And when a meeting of the entire board of trustees was held, the state superintendent of education being present, I made a recommendation to that board. I said I'm concermed about these people who have degrees and qualifications on paper being so low, and what would be your -- what would -95- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R eporting C om p**} 409 Federal Bmiidmg Brmungbam, Alabama 75 be your suggestions to ae In correcting this situa- tlon. You reaeaber at that tiae the institute was in debt $104,000 when I went there. And we had just gotten a little bit of increase. And over a period of three years froa that time, Dr. Meadows, who was then the state superintendent of education, told our board that I recoaaend that we authorise | Mr. Gentry to wake adjustaents in these salaries as rapidly as the funds are nade available. But he could not in one swoop, we couldn't expect hia to put all these teachers on the saae salary sche dule. It was so lew. But over a period of years, these three years, let's try to get thea up to a living -- a standard. Mow one other stateaent and I will bei through. Now pursuant to that, the records will show there that that salary, and I told Maude Hill this two or three tiaes when she caae to ay office and aaybe talked to ae at the school, it seeaed to ae her concern, and I had explained it to her, I told her the state superintendent of education recoaaended to our board of trustees, -qfc' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Pederai Court Reporting Company 409 Federal B udding Btrmmgbam AL+ams I t •ad that I was carrying out that. And, whereas, over a period of three years we got enough money, everybody was underpaid, both white teachers and black teachers. We found soae of the white tea- |chers, Dr. Elliott, just in as bad a shape as Muade Hill was in. Q Yes, sir. A But now one last stateawnt. I told Maude this, and you raised this salary schedule. We told her we were going to do everything we could. 1 had instructions to do that. So over a period of three years her salary was increased about 74 per cent, where the other teachers Inthe school was around 41 per cent. And your records -- the records of the president of the Institute will j ' bear that out, and 1 think 1 told you that at the time of the deposition over there. Q I'm not talking about the raise at all. A We weren't either. Q But when you pay a vocational teacher, a vocational home economics teacher as opposed to the general home economics teacher, isn't your salary scale of such that the vocational teacher -91' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Budding Birmingham, Alabama makes more money, be that teacher black or white? A Well, that is true. Q That was my question. And Mrs. Hill was teaching general home economics A But that wasn't Q Did Maude Hill designate the course general home economics or did the institute designate the course ? A I explained it as explicit as I could, Judge, to the attorney, as to the predicament 1 found myself in with Maude Hill when I went there, and the predicament it was in when I left. She was making better -- around 55, 57 hundred dollars when I left there. She was making around 2500 when I went there. Q Yes, sir. 1 understand that. But you had courses in home economics at two different schools, one for the black and one for the white with different names. One was called vocational and one was called general home economics. Who gave those courses the designation? MR. BOYETT: This is repetitious, and he -78- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 fe d e ra l C ourt R eporttng Com pany 409 Federal Building _____ Bnymngbam, Alabama has continued to go back to this Christine Arehie case. In other words, I say -- I don’t think I there is any integrational question involved here or any question about the institute. THE COURT: Well, I think it nay have so"* bearing relative to competency or experience in teaching the kind of course that was going to remain available or open. To the extent you raise an objection, I overrule it. Q Now, Mr. Gentry, who gave the courses those designations; the institute? A I would say yes. i ^ riRht, sir. Now this guideline or this book, whatever for the teaching of home eco nomics that you have talked about, that was not being followed at the Fort Lashley Campus? A Let s call it the state plan. ^ All right, sir. Now did that state plan have to do with general home economics or did that state plan have to do with vocational home economics ? A Many schools -- when I was la Montgomery, many schools used this plan in their general home -99' I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Brrmtngbam. Alabama economies program. Q But what was tha plan designed for, general or vocational? A Well, it could be used either/or. But general heme economics teachers, we had many of them that couldn't qualify for vocational to use t hat. Q Referring to that saae deposition in this case, and, Mr. Gentry, I would like to show you a document -- let me have this marked. I (Plaintiff's Exhibit 7 marked.)' Q I would like to show you a document that has been marked Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 7 for identification. Do you recall preparing that as for your vocational department for us at the time of that deposition? A That's right, yes. Q Is that a copy of that that you furnished us at that time? A These were our vocational teachers. Q Yes, sir. All right. Now, Mr. Gentry, when you iden tified a teacher as having rank 1, what are you -/OO' J 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama Calking about? A Wall, I haven't kept up closely with this. You mean certificate rank? Q Yes. When I say rank of certificate, and this is when you were there in '67-68, what did you mean by rank 1 at that time? A Well, I think they were master's degree people. Rank 2 were BS degree as I recall. 80 Q And rank 3? A Well now you're getting me down to where it is a little more technical. Somebody in the state department would have to answer that, some body with the state department. But I think rank 3 is two years of college or better. I'm not sure. Q They are generally people who do not have a college degree? A Right. Q And rank 5? A Well, that is actually a person just in -- they can be issued only an emergency certificate. MR. NEWTON: Your Honor, I would like to offer Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 7 for identification into evidm ce as Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 7. - 1 0 1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 81 THE COURT: Does it show a data as of which MR. NEWTOH: Yes, sir, 1967-68 school year, j THE COURT: All right. Any objection? MR. BOYETT: We think it is iswaterial, Your Honor. THE COURT: All right. I will receive it into evidence. MR. NEWTOH: That's all 1 have. THE COURT: Any additional questions? MR . BOYETT: No. THE COURT: All right. You can step down. Thank you. Can this witness be excused? MR. NEWTOH: Yes, sir. I have no further que st ions . (WITNESS EXCUSED.) MR. NEWTON: I call Mr. George. GROVER GEORGE. being previously duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) Will you state your name, please? - I 0 3 - - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmildmg Birmingham, Alabama A Grover George. Q Where do you live, Mr. George? A 97 Knoxville, Talladega, Alabama. Q Were you ever employed for the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind? A 1 was. Q And when were you first employed there? A September, 1960. Q And how long did you work there? A Seven years, until May of 1967. Q May of 1967? A Yes. Q And while you were employed there, what were your duties? A I was a teacher in the woodwork shop. Q All right. What training do you have, Mr. George? A I have a BS degree in secondary education, and a major in foreign language and a minor in art at the Alabama Teachers College. Q Daring the seven years you were employed at the institute, where were you employed, what particular school or campus? -/0 3 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Birmingham, Alabama A At Alabaaa Institute for the Deaf and Blind . Q A Q What caapus did you work? Deaf and blind, on the deaf All right. When you say the deaf eaapus, did you work at Alabaaa State School for the Deaf, meaning the black Institute? A That 1 s right. And did you work there your entire seven years ? A That’s right. Q Did you have occasion to know Mrs. Maude Hill during that time? 83 A I did. Q Did you have occasion to visit in her c1assroos or see her at her classrooa? A Occasional, yes. Q Did you ever have occasion to see her stu- dents there? A Yes, I did. Q Now as a teacher with sose years of ex perience, in your judgment was Maude Hill conducting an orderly class? -/Of- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama A The part I saw ah ________________ ___M I sat* it she was. Q I believe you said that you have a minor in industrial education? A Industrial art. Q So you're familiar, to some extent, with trade courses, are you not? A That 1s right. Q Did you have a chance to observe her home economies classroom? A Yes, I did. Q Did her learning process seem to be going on ? A Well, it certainly did. I mean -- Q Now, Mr. George, were you terminated by the institute ? A Yes, I was. Q And when was that? A The spring of '67. Q All right. Was it by letter or otherwise? A By letter. Q From whom? A I believe it was E. H. Gentry. - I P 5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama Q Who was at that tlae president of the in - s titute ? A That's right. Q And did your letter state any reason for your teralnatlon? A No. As I can vaguely reittnber, it spoke of that you would be no longer eaployed by the Institute, and that -- that is all 1 can reseaber. That you will be no longer eaployed by the insti tute. In other words, that was the aost iaportant part to ae. | Q It didn't give any reason or anything else for your teralnatlon? A No, it didn't. i Q It didn't have anything in there about your work in connection with that? A No, not about ay work. Q So you had worked there previously seven years ? A That's right. Q And had you had any special training in woodwork that you were teaching? A Special training? - 1 0 b - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 —--- - ■■■ - if**' ° '<• 1 . • ,/* . ' y:- . . . t.. Federal Court Reporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama Q Yea. A Other than Alabasia State College. Q 1 scan, in your minor, I gueas it was, in Industrial arts, Is that woodwork a part of it? A Yes, elementary carpentry and cabinet making Q So you mere trained in your work? A That's right. Q And had a degree? A Yea, sir. Q And that Is all the information you r* - celved upon your dismissal? A That Is all. MR. NEWTON: That is all I have. THE COURT: Any cross examination? MR. McCRARY: Yes. CROSS EXAMINATION Q 1 (BY MR. McCRARY:) Hem old are you, Mr. Georg* ? A 45. Q And by whsa are you employed atv? A The Talladega Dealer Home Publishing Com- pan? In Talladaga. - t o i ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rttn g C om pany 409 Federal Bmldmg Btrmingbam, Alabama I 87 Q What do you do for then, Mr. George? i A I work the press operator, labor press ope rator. Q Aad when you were employed by the Alabama State School for the Deaf, Mr. George, In terais of your departattnt as) the hone ec department, where -- how far apart were you? A It was In classrooms you might say, and In other words, the woodwork shop Is on the end of the building, on one end of the building, and the home ec departattnt was -- well, you might say it | was on the other end. And in the center, from the center to the other end, you might say, because they had an entrance in the center of the building extending to another entrance on the other end of the building. Q Now what were the occaslmns, Mr. George, I for you obaerving the classroom activities in the home economics department? A Well, pccasionally she would send for the boys to come around and do different things, build things. Our biggest thing -- a lot of tla* we would come around and remove things from the building. - / 0 g - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama Q In other words, your students would go down j and assist Mrs. Hill in doing something? A In moving. !Q Some work around the home ec department? A That's right. Q Did you on oecasion take your meals in the home ec department there? A Yes. At one time we had such as parties -- not parties, but I don't know how you would term it. But 1 have occasionally eaten in there. Q And on other occasions did the instructors ithere at the institute, at that campus, did you I ask you whether or not you used the home ec de partment there and the products of the home ec de partment as a place and a means of socialising one with the other; in other words, would you meet down there and drink coffee and eat cookies that students had prepared on occasions? A Yes, on occasions. Q And isn't it true, Mr. Ceorge, by and large, as far as your opportunities to observe it and so forth, these are the occasions when you were in the department itself, when you were down there, and you - ipq- J 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Bermtugbem, Alabama 89 were eating the cookies and taking your a«ali down there, and that aort of thing? A Well now on tone occasions when I didn't have a class, I have known of some cases where I didn't have ay class that I observed her teach ing her class. Q All right, sir. A On soac occasions I have been around to her rooa when I didn't have a class, and when I wasn't in ay classroom or didn't have a class in my room, then I have been around and observed her. Because during the last years I worked there, we had supervising teachers there, and we had meet ings there. Q All right. Mr. George, on these occa sions what was she doing? A Well, she was teaching the girls how to set tables and place the things on tables, how to cook and how to mix, how to name the different utensils in the kitchen and that sort. Q All right. And this is the extent of the instructions insofar as your opportunity to ob serve Mrs. Hill in the classroom? - n o - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting C om pany 409 Federal Budding Birmingham, Alabama 90 A Yea, I would aay so. ■ MR. McCRARY: That is all. MR. NEWTON: That's all I hava. Thank you, Mr. Georg*. jTHE COURT: Can the witness be excused? MR. NEWTON: I would like to request that. THE COURT: All right. (WITNESS EXCUSED.) I i MR. NEWTON: I would like to call Mrs. Mary L. George. MARY LOU COTTRELL GEORGE. being previously duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) State your name, please, | ma'am. A Mary Lou Cotrell George. Q Where do you live, Mrs. George? A 97 Knoxville, Talladega, Alabama. Q Mrs. George, were you ever employed by the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind? A Yes, I was. '///" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 91-j----- !Q And hem long were you so employed there? A From August 31st -- August 30th, 1 believe, of 1960, until May of 1967. Q So you were there approximately seven academic years? A Yes. Q And whatwas your job at the institute, Mrs. George ? A House parent. Q All right. Now by house parent, was that someone who lived in one of the cottages, who looked afterthe girls welfare and et cetera? A Yes. Q And was the home economics department in the cottage in which you lived as house parent? ! A NO. q Where was it in relation toidiere you lived ? A It was in back. But I had to take the little girls -- as a house aother, I had to take the little girls around to the same building where the home economics building was to get their hair washed and pressed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 92 Q How often would you go in the area where [ the home economics was? A Daily. Q Did you ever go into the home economics class? A I had to, because that was also sewing, and the little girls' clothes had to be repaired in the same building and in this same room. Q Would you stay there for some time when you would go, or would you just go in and come out ? A I would stay there most of my free time getting the little girls' clothes repaired nost t imes. Q. All right. And do you know Mrs. Rill? A Yes. Q And did you see her on these occasions as a teacher there? A Yes. I saw her daily. Q What training do you have, if any, Mrs. George ? A Three and a half years in business at Alabama State Teachers College in Montgomery. - I I 3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama Q And are you nov employed? A Yes. As a substitute teacher for the Talla dega City System, part time at Talladega Daily Home, also housekeeper at Shocco Springs Baptist Aasembly, which is a summer camp. Q When you’re currently teaching in the County of Talladega, do you teach any special courses? A No. I'm mostly in the high school. Q And you teach all of the courses generally offered in the high school when jou work as a sub stitute teacher? A Yes. I Q Now during the time that you were employed there and Mrs. Hill was teaching home economics, I believe you stated you had many opportunities to observe her? A Yes, to see her. Q And do you sew yourself? A Yes, I do. Q And do you cook? A Being a mother of seven I have to. Q Did you have occasion to observe the dents in learning situations in Mrs. Maude Hill's -I Ilf 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reportmg Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama-------- --------------------------------------------- j- 94. j class ? A Yes, I did. i Q And being house Bother, were some of these students later returned to you where you kept then overnight and so forth? A Yes. Q Were you able to fora any judgment as to whether these students were actively learning in this class? A Yes. Q Were they actively learning in this class? A Yes, they were. They would tell me about -- those that were able to coasranlcate would tell ae about their experiences. I was a house parent i in between for small girls say one year, and then the next year would alternate to the large girls. So 1 had a chance to be a house parent to all of them. And 1 observed her working with all groups, the ssiall ones and the large ones. Q What was the condition most of the tlae you visited these -- Mrs. Hill's classes there Iof cleanliness of the hoae economics? A Well, in ay opinion 1 thought it was very HI 5 " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Bim ungbam , Alabama 95 clean. All right. Now let ae ask you, Mrs. Ceorge, if you have a lot of janitorial help and otherwise to help throughout the Lashley Street Caapus over there at the tiae you were employed? A There was a janitor there, but he was in the main building aost of the tiae. Q Vere there any aalds or anyone to clean up around there? A No aalds. Q Were there any there to clean up in the home econoalcs departaent? A There were no aaids on the caapus other than in the kitchen. Q And when you say kitchen, you're talking about A Q A Q there ? A Q Dining area. Where they took their aeals? The aaln dining area. And of course were there any white students Not at that particular tiae. Were there any thereduring the entire tiae -nk> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ■ W .S|*- ’T- Pederal Court Reporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama you were there? A No. Q All right. And when did you leave the institute ? A May of *67. Q And you resigned your position there? A Yes. I resigned to go back to college, but 1 didn't go back. MR. NEWTON: I believe that is all. Answer his questions. CROSS EXAMINATION Q (*Y MR. BOYETT:) There have been several references to janitorial service. That is part of the hone economics is to clean up the kitchen, isn't it? A Well, I wouldn't -- 1 don't know. Q You don't know whether cleaning up after cooking is required of cooking? A Well, in this case, in a lot of cases it would be a natter of cleaning up before, because the kitchen was used for most everything, I mean, not only by Mrs. Hill, but by other nenbers of the 96 ' H I ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 32 faculty. Q What would they use It for? A Well, as I said, a sewing room. Q All right. And what else? |A Sometime a classroom. Q You mean other members of the faculty did their sewing in there? A Yes . Q Did you go over there and sew? A No. Q You didn't. But other members of the fa culty did? A Well, I was a member of the staff, not the faculty. Q And you said insofar as you could communi cate, were you able to talk with sign language? A Yes. In my opinion eery effectively. How ever, some of the children were not able to communis cate, because in some cases you had fourteen and I fifteen year olds there with their first experience in school, which didn't know how to read nor write or do anything. Q And that was a very Important part of the -H8' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Bmldmg Bermtngham, Alabama program of the school curriculum for the deaf, to teach them -- to properly teach them the proper manner to read and write? A Yes. Q Even more so because of their handicap? A Are you saying for the home economics tea- icher ? Q I'm saying for any deaf child? A No -- I don't understand you fully now. Q Well, I will ask you this, isn't it true that if a deaf child learns to spell a word incor rectly, that it is more difficult to teach them the correct way, because you have first got to unteach them, and then you have got to teach them, doesn't that present-- or haven't you had any particular training in the area of deaf educa tion? Aren't you familiar with that? A Yes, I'm familiar with that. Q Well, is that correct? A Yes. But in some of these cases, what I'm !trying to say is some of these children hadn't ' been trained at all. ! Q Yes. - I 19' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Birmingham, Alabama A Not even In the basic fundamentals say of reading and writing. And for instance say if a y«ar old cotses there, then at that parti cular time the child was placed in vocation before it learned to read and write. Q And so that hadn't become a part of the curriculum? A That had to become a part of Mrs. Hill's duty to first teach the child how to read and write before she could teach it anything about sewing. MR. BOYETT: I believe that is all. i REDIRECT examination Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) Let me ask you one other question, Mrs. George. Was there a lot of equipment in the home economics department? A Very little. Q Were there places in that building and even in your building where you were house mother for childrm to store their things, lockers, et i !cetera ? - i x o - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 • Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 101I A The lockers -- in the hose economics build ing, no lockers. However, in the doraitory there were lockers, but they were insufficient. Soae of the doors woalda‘t open. And there was small looked like cabinet type things. Q Now how aany students -- do you have a judg-t imerit how aany students Mrs. Hill taught in hoae economics class? A I believe one class had from 17 to 20, I Ibelieve. Q All right. Now he asked you a question a minute ago about cleaning up as being part of > \cooking. I have in wind scrubbing the floors as a part of cooking? A Well, that is what I had in mind also. Q Those students have to bring things with them froa other classes into the hoae ec rooa? A They would have to bring their belongings, yes, their books and papers. I Q You have a janitorial service to scrub the floors, et cetera, in that room, or did the students have to do that themselves? A The students had to do that themselves. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 101 As 1 said, 1 understood there were two janitors throughout the entire building. MR. NEWTON: That's all I have. THE COURT: Anything else? MR. BOYETT: I don't believe so. THE COURT: All right, you can step down. MR. NEWTON: I would request this witness be excused. THE COURT: That is fine. You nay be ex cused. (WITNESS EXCUSED.) MR. NEWTON: Mrs. Sara Blue. SARA BLUE, being previously duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. NEWTON:)) Would you state your name, please, na'an? A Sara Blue. Q Where do you live? A 1605 First Court, West. Q Is that in the City of Birmingham? - IIV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R eporting Com pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama A Birmingham. ■ Q Mrs. Blue, were you ever employed by Che Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind? A Yes, I was. Q And when were you employed there? A 1 was employed from April 1, *58, until some time in September of *67. Q From April 1, 1958, until September of 1967? A ^ight. Q What were your duties, Mrs. Blue? A Physical education instructor. Q And where within the institute for the deaf and blind were you employed? A At the gym. Q And when you say at the gym, what school? A On the Fort Lashley Avenue Campus. Q And when you say Fort Lashley Avenue, are you referring to a school that was at that time a black school? A Right. Q And you were the physical education teacher? A Right. Q And do you have a degree? 102 - i z y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Federal Court Reporting C om pany 409 Federal Buildmg Birmingham, Alabama 101........ I -.I A Ho. <4 Did you have one at the time you ware em ployed ? j A I had what you call a substitute, I guess. Q All right. Did you have a teacher's certi ficate ? A Right. Q Is that a temporary teacher's certificate? | i A It was temporary. Q How much training do you have, Mrs. Blue? A I have three and a half years at Alabama State College in Montgomery, and one summer at the University of Alabama at Tuscaloosa. Q Andvhere did you live, Mrs. Blue, when you worked at the institute? A Bryant Hall. j Q Was that on the Fort Laahley Campus? A That was on the Fort Lashley Campus. j Q Do you know Mrs. Maude Hill? iA Yes, I do. Q Did you know her during the years you were employed there? A Yes, I did. ___________________________________ - n i t - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama Q And can you cell us whet she did at the in stitute? A She was the home economics instructor. Q All right. Did you ever have occasion to visit her classroom? A Yes, I did. I Q And did the children live inthe place where ; iyou - - | A No children -- I lived there, but the chil dren didn't live there. Q You lived in a place designed for the fa culty people? A Right. Q Now did you have occasion to visit the classroom ever taught by Mrs. Hill? A Yes. Q Did you have an opportunity to see a learn ing situation going on? A 1 did. Q Were the children actually learning? A They were. Q la your opinion? A They were. -/2b 104 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 fe d e ra l Court Reporting Company 409 Federal building Birmingham, Alabama 105 Q Did yon have an opportunity on any occasion to look at the generd condition of the home tconoalc root? A I did. Q And on how many occasions? A Well, I lived there. So I was In and out all day. Q All right. A When 1 would go to my class and cone back, I have my room in her quarters. So I had to come in and out quite a few tlmea a day. Q Your room was where? A In Bryant Hall where the home ec department was located. Q Was it on the same floor? A Same floor. It was a one-story building. Q All right. Now did you have an opportunity to note the cleanliness in and about the home eco nomics room? A Yes. Q Was the home ec room kept clean, in your opinion ? A Yes, it was. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Bm ldtng B irm ingham, Alabama Q Was there order kept in A Definitely so. 1| Q And would you -- did you have an opportunity! to observe the students learning and being taught cooking, for instance? A Yes. Q Did you see any progress on the part of any students in cooking? A Quite a number of times I did. Q All right. Did they sees to be learning to do it ? A Yes , they did • Q Was Mrs . Hill able to communicate? A She was. You had to be able to co\ otherwise you couldn't teach them. Q All right. In your opinion would you say Mrs. Hill -- being a teacher yourself and observing her, and you were teaching the saae kinds of stu> dents she was teaching? A The very saae students. Q The very saae students. In your opinion as the teacher and someone there who lived in the building and who obaerved -I XT- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Brmungbam, Alabama e v e r y day Right. •- in your opinion was she doing a credible in teaching these students? Yes, she was. MR. NEWTON: Your witness. MR. BOYETT: Ho questions. MR. NEWTON: I would like to request this witness be excused. THE COURT: That will be fine. Thank you. I (WITNESS EXCUSED.) II MR. NEWTON: Plaintiff rests. THE COURT: All right. First witness for the defendant. IIEVIDENCE ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT MR. McCRART: Mrs. Betty Turner. BETTY TURNER. being previously duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. McCRARY:) Would you state your her A Q job - \ % % - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Budding Birm ingham, Alabama name, please, ma'am? I A Betty Turner. Q Mrs. Turner, by whom are you employed? A State Department of Education. Q And how long have you been eo employed? A I'm beginning my 33rd year. i * Would you relate Just very briefly for the Court, please, what your duties are as such supervisor 1 A My duties are to work with the high school j Iteachers of home economics throughout the State of Alabama, and assisting them to strengthen their programs, and also work with the Future Homemakers of America, the youth organisation in assisting them. Q I believe you stated these have been your duties for some thirty odd years? A Yes. Q Mrs. Turner, do you know Mrs. Maude Hill? A I know Mrs. Hill, yes. Q All right. Would you relate for the Court when you first came in contact with Mrs. Hill, and what the occasion was? 108 fe d e ra l C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama I A I case In contact with Hrs. Hill on tha occasion when the New Homemakers of America Youth i Organ!ration for Negro Girls sponsored a project at the school for the deaf and blind. We furnished draperies and pillows, bedspreads, and Mrs. Hill, I 1 net her then. Q And was she an instructor of hone economics at the institute at that tis«? A She was. Q And did you on that occasion have an oppor tunity to observe her classroom? A Not really. I went to her claas because she cooperated with us. I did have occaaion to go in her classroom. Q In other words, she was a lady who was in charge of the New Homemakers of America of the in stitute at that time? I A Yes, she had a chapter. Q Now when you went to her classroom, did you -- in other words, it was your job to visit these various classrooms and make observations, I take it; when you go to any classroom you observe those thing which you normally look for? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama A At that tine that wasn't ay purpose in the first tiae I visited there, that wasn't ay purpose. Q All right. Now I will ask you whether or not in your official capacity as state supervisor, you have ever visited the classroom of Mrs. Hill? A Yes. IQ Did you make that visitation alone or with someone else? A Mrs. Coe, the district supervisor, and I were invited. Q And on this occasion did you In your capa* city as supervisor aake observations concerning jtheclassrooa? A Yes, we did. ! MR. McCRARY: Mark this. i (Defendant's Exhibit 2 marked.) Q 1 believe you stated Mrs. Coe was with you? A Miss Betty Coe. Q She was with you? A Yes, she was with me. We went together. Q And would you tell the Court what you saw. what were your observations? -13/- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 111 A As far as I can reocabcr vc observed chat the classroom was disorderly. There was no evi dence of real teaching that we weuld like to have j seen on the basis that it was going on. And we Iwere not sure that the atmosphere was for Learning, and as we talked with the teacher, we brought out these points with her, and we gave suggestions. Q Do you recommend to the various teachers that you call upon that they follow a planned program of teaching home economics in the class room? iI A We have. We make suggestions to them based on what we think. Each teacher's needs are diffe rent. So we work with them in terms of what we think she needs, in terms of suggestions. My re port shows that. I Q Now you mentioned a report. 1 show you a document consisting of three pages, which has been marked for identification as Defendant's Exhibit No. 2, and ask you whether or not, Mrs. Turner, that is a copy of the report which was made under the di rection of you and Miss Coe subsequent to your visit to Mrs. Hill's classroom? -/?a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 112 A We aade this report. Q It was aade jointly by you and Mias Coe? A Yes. Based on our observations and these are suggestions that we aade. MR. McCRARY: May It please the Court, we offer Into evidence Defendant's Exhibit No. 2 as previously aarked for identification. THE COURT: Any objections? *». NEWTON: No. THE COURT: It is received without objec tion . iQ Now as part of your duties when you call on a teacher and discuss their prograa with them, do you Bake observations relative to the teacherfe attitude, and how she receives you, and the purpose ! of your visit and so forth? jA Well, we have to. IQ And what was your impression concerning Mrs. Hill's attitude toward your visit and Miss Coe's visit? A As far as I can reaeaber, Mrs. Hill was receptive to the suggestions we gave. Q That you aade? I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Budding Birmingham, Alabama 113 A Yes. Q Following your report? A Yes. Q Now did you wake an observation relative to tie way Mrs. Hill related in the classroom to the students? A Well, I think 1 stated previously, but it was difficult to observe -- therewas an ataiosphere of no warsth and cooaonicadon so far as I could see . THE COURT: 1 didn't understand that. You say there was or there was not? A There was not. Q And of course specialised in the area of home ec, you would deem this to be an Important feature? A Yes. Q Now, Mrs. Turner, with regard to education in this specialized field of deaf education, did you make observations relative to whether or not Mrs. Hill had an appreciation for the special needs that thlt> particular type of student has, and if so, what was that impression? - / 39- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1|| A I '■ afraid I can't answer that. That is in j -- 1 don't think I could answer that fairly. Q In sunwary, Mrs. Turner, you went there for the purpose of observing and evaluating and the report which you and Miss Coe prepared is the sunar| of what you found? A The purpose of our visit was to give assis tance and to help if we could, that was the purpose of our visit, to help Mrs. Hill as it is with all teachers. Q And your findings are sunnarizad in your repor t ? A Yes. \ MR. McCRARY: Your witness. i CROSS EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) Mrs. Turner, have you worked in this particular job for these 33 years? A That is all I have done. Q So all of your teaching experience and your supervisory -- rather experiences have been with the State Department of Education as a super visor ? ' 1 3 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Birmingham. Alabama A Throughout the state of Alabaaa. Q Yes, a a ' a m . Nov during these 33 years, has your super vision throughout the State of Alabaaa for the most part been limited to black schools? A No. Well, they sere -- at one tiae they vere all black, yes. Q They vould be aost of your 33 years, isn't that right ? A Yes. Q All right. And vhen you went on this occa sion that you refer to with Miss Coe, i# that the only classrooa you visited? A At that school? Q Yes, aa'aa? A it is. Q Did you go to any other school in the in stitute on that occasion? A I did not. Q Did you go to Mrs. Scruggs' class at the white school for the deaf? A I did not. Q And I believe you said you were Invited to 115 - / 3 ^ I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Brrmtagbam, Alabama 116 cose. Who extended that Invitation? A Miss Coe can answer that question, because it wasn't extended to we personally. Miss Coe is the district supervisor, and it was extended to her, personally. Q So Miss Coe received the invitation? A Miss Coe. Q Miss Coe received the invitation to cowe? A Yes. Q So that information about being invited, only she knows the answer to that as to who invited you ? A 1 would rather you ask her. Q Ma'am? A 1 would like for you to ask ter. Q Well, you don't know, this is my only ques tion? A I understand Mr. Gentry invited her to !cone . Q You don't know? A I answered the question, the invitation was not extended to me personally. Q All right. Then did you come at the suggesf - / V ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Bmldtng Birmingham, Alabama tion of Miss Coe? A No. I didn't cone at the suggestion of Miss Coe. We work as a teas. When we visit with the district supervisors, we go with thea where they ask us to go with thea. Q So at Mrs. Coe's suggestion? A It is Miss Coe. Q So at her suggestion you went with her to that school? A She told ae we were invited. Q Now did you sign or in any aanner this fin- i ished product here? A We don't sign thea. We aake thea out to gether. We are not required to sign thea. Q What do you do with thea after you aake thea out ? ! A We send a copy to the state supervisor, a copy goes to the principal of the school, and a copy goes to the teacher. There is a copy that goes to the teacher. Q All right. And in visiting this school, did you -- what was the condition of the equlpaent and so forth, did you check? 117 - 13 8 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama A It was very limited. Q ■uaX A It was very limited. Q All right. Do you recall, Mrs. Turner, how ■any students were under her supervision while you visited there? A No. Q And I notice, Mrs. Turner, froa your re port where it says, consideration given the follow ing: Do you setn by that, aa'aa, that these are things that you take into consideration in Baking your overall evaluation? A These are suggestions that we give the teacher that she will consider class Instructions, and we give suggestions. IQ These are suggestions that you think the teacher needs in order to improve her? A That 's right. Q Her instructions ? A Yes. Q And I notice on here you have instructional materials is one thing you talked about? A Yes. 13 4 - 1 1 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama , , _----------------------------------------------------- 119 Q You talked about public relatlona alao on I here. And what does FHA wean? A Future Hoaeaakers of America. Q That is sort of a group? A Youth organization which is a part of the ho«e economies program in Alabama. Q I notice you have here, departmental manage- Iment checked also? A Yes. Q And you have on here, filing? A Yes. Q Did you find adequate filing cabinets and so forth in order to put these materials in this particular home economics department? A If I -- I do not believe we found adequate filing. In fact, the equipment was not adequate, period. Thatis why we made suggestions to her based on those things. Q And I believe you found that, is it true, Mrs. Turner, that you found Future Homemakers of America more in name than in deed, is that right, would you say that that is an accurate fair state ment ? - t l + 0 " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ■ry'*-, (£>• - ,1 .• :■ ' . V" ' ■•••■ : | F ederal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birrmngbam, Alabama j A I don't understand your question. iQ I believe at one tioe on direct exaaination you said that your first visit there was in connec tion with the New Homemakers of America? A That 1m when we had two separate organisa tions . Q Then on the other hand, when you case back, one of the things you checked here was your Future Homemakers of AaMrlca? I A That was not a chapter organized. Q And the Future Homemakers of America at the time of this report was in October, 1967, you no longer had the two separate groups? A No. We had one group. Q And the institute did not have a chapter of Future Homemakers of America? A Mrs. Hill didn't have a chapter. I don't know what the institute had. Q When you say Mrs. Hill, let me ask you this, for my own information and hopefully for the Court, a teacher in your years of experience does not on her own just establish a chapter, does she ? - 1 y - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Brrrmngbom, Alabama 121 A If she wants to. Q She does not need permission from the prin cipal? A You cut me off. On her own initiative, if she wants to have a chapter, sha will organise it with the permission of the officials. She will have to do that. Q All right. So at this time after the all black New Homemakers of America was no longer in existence, when you came there on this visit in Oc tober, 1967, they did not have a chapter of Fnture Homemakers of America? A No. Q All right. And I believe one of the other things you recommended was a state adopted textbook for that class, is that right? A Yes. That she would try to get. Q Now do you, Mrs. Turner, have any special training in communicating with the deaf? A No, I don't. Q And I believe that is the only two occasions you ever visited Mrs. Hill's classroom, was one, on the occasion with the New Homemakers of America, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Butldtng Btrmingbem, Alabama when you were there, not to evaluate her at that time, is that right? i A The only tine I went to evaluate her was on this one occasion. Q You have not visited the clasirooa at any other occasion other than that, than the two occa sions that you refer to? A Well, 1 went there siore than two tines with the project. I went there many tines, but it was not for the purpose of evaluation. Q When you say you went there nany tines -- | A Following up plans with the project. Q Was this during the tine when Mrs.Maude Hill was a teacher there? A Yes. Q But you went there on an evaluation tour with Miss Coe? A Yes. I Q Only on one occasion? ! A Yes. Q And that is the only occasion that you have put into writing, in the evaluation that you found in the classroon? - / if 3 *" 122 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting C om pany 409 Federal Budding Birmingham, Alabama A To my knowle d*«. MR. NEWTON: Thank you, na'aa. That's all. REDIRECT EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. McCRARY:) You recall, Mrs. Tamar, what your observations were concerning the personal appearance of Mrs. Hill when ps visited on these occasions, particularly the occasion when you wade your official visit? A I think that is cm the report, isn't it? Isn't that on the report? Don't you find that on the report? Q I was referring to ay notes -- oar notes fron our conference with you when I asked the ques- t ion. Do you recall what your inpression was as to her personal appearance? (Pause.) MR. NEWTON: She is his witness, and I would respectfully object to leading the witness. THE COURT: Overruled. I don't believe that is leading. MR.NEWTON: We except. 123 / n ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ^ federal Court Reporting Company 409 Fader si Bmldmg Birmingham, ALshams A Do I have to answer that? THE COURT: Yes, please. Go ahead. You're under a duty to answer the question. You don't *have to be interested or anxious to testify, but when you are asked, you have to answer. A Well, honestly I do recall that there was one thing that 1 talked to Mrs. Hill about personal^ Ily was her appearance. Q And do you consider personal appearance of a home ec teacher in the classrooa a very im portant factor in her prograsi? A Yes. | Q And I will ask you whether or not it was your impression that she lacked in appreciation iof a high classroom standard? A Well, from her appearance of her classroom, there was no evidence from the appearance of her classroom that evidenced it. Q That she did or did not ? A She did not. Q She did not ? A It was not exhibited on our visit. And 1 think the report backs that up. 124 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 • v *; Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Budding Birmingham, Alabama FILED IN CLERK’S OFFICE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA JA « 1 ^ [9/2 W I L L I A M E P A V I S MAUDE HILL, ET AL, ) )PLAINTIFFS, ) ) v* ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 67-440 )ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF ) AND BLIND, ET AL, ) )DEFENDANTS. ) VOLUNE TWO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birm ingham , Alabam a MR. McCRARY: Yes, na'n. I believe that Is all. MR. NEWTON: I have ose more question, Mrs. T urner. RECROSS EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) You have done this for a number of years. Have you ever on one given oeca- sion found just what you're saying was not exhibited in a teacher's classrooai, the high standard of ex- cellence we will choose to call it this aiorning, and later went back one month later, two months la- I ter after talking to the teacher, and offering your suggestions, and you found nothing to criticize? A That is one of the joys I get out of ay job, yes . Q Is that you frequently find A I don't say frequently, but I have found it. Q Part of your job is to help the teacher correct these things? A I wouldn't have it, if it wasn't. Q And the state department considers this a need throughout the State of Alabama? -/^7- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama A Yes. X U MR. NEWTON: That's «11 I have. THE COURT: I need to ask you a couple of q ue s t i on 8 . Is there a difference between a general ho»e economics class and a vocational home economics class in terms of what is required? A Well, the big difference -- yes, sir, there is a difference. The big difference is one is a reimbursed program, the vocational program is reim bursed. The teacher's salary is reimbursed. That is a sum provided for it, and certain standards that are set up, and supervised. A general program may or may not be. There of* some schools that furnish -- pay the teachers the same salary that a vocational teacher will get, but the big difference is one is reimbursed. THF COURT: Would the course typically be roughly the same? A Yes. quate would THE COURT: teaching in a that indicate If someone was performing ade- general home economics course, that same person could adequately 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Federal Court Reporting C om pany 409 Federal Bmldmg Bermtngbam Alabama teach vocational hoaie economics? A Yes, basically. THE COURT: Okay. MR. NEWT OH: If Your Honor please. THE COURT: Go ahead. RECROSS EXAMINATION Q (BY MR* NEWTON:) Does that also asaa though that there might be a very vast difference in the equipment between the teacher of a general home economics and the teacher A Not necessarily so. Q I believe you talked about reimbursed. And I believe you used some other statements in relation to His Honor's questions. A One is a reimbursed program, the vocational program is reimbursed, and a general program is not reimbursed, from the state department. But they do some of the same standards, some requirements, and pay the same salary. Q But you mentioned some other things about vocational in anwer to His Honor's question. Don't they in the vocational program somelma - H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Bemungbam, Alabama get equipment, let's say, that the general vocation might not get? i A Each system has to famish -- Q Do they have a staff to maintain the equip- ment and maintain the buildings and so forth? A Net by the state. That is done by the sys tems . Q Done by the system? A Yes. s Q And you did not get to see on this occasion the vocational home economics department? A No, sir. i Q Was this Mrs. Hill's class a general heme economics class? A Yes, sir. Q New when you say reimbursed, tell me all of what that means, Mrs. Turner? A Well, reimbursed, you refer to that, that is the salaries are reimbursed by the state, have s salary schedule, teaches vocational home economic^, and it is according to the years of experience and training. Q And of course all of the equipment and - 1 5 0 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Berrmngbem, Alabama 129 Iiwherever it coaes froa is furnished by the systea? A Yes. That is how they qualify to get a vocational prograa, certain standards required. Q Do you have to have aore equlpaent say to have a vocational hoae econoaies departaent than a general hoae econoaies departawnt? A I can't answer that. I don't know whether you have to have aore or not. You have to have enough to have a standard prograa, but whether aore jor less I can't answer that. Q Let ae ask you this, if you know. Are the standards the sane for establishing a general hoae econoaies prograa as it is for a vocational hoae econoaies prograa? A That would depend because if you want a prograa of hoae econoaies, it depends uponthe lean- j tion, depends on what the systea wants to put in jit, and depends wholly on what the systeas wants. We don't decide. The state does not decide. When you apply for a prograa, then it is left entirely with the systea as to what the requlreaents are, and that is out of ay reala. Q But in order for a systea to be certified - / 5 / ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmldmg Birmingham, Alabama------------ ________________________________---- --------- as having a vocational home economics department where they are reimbursed by the state, the state j approves that, is that right? A They do. MR. NEWTON: That's all I have. MR. McCRARY: No questions. May she be ex cused ? THE COURT: Step down. You'reexcused. (WITNESS EXCUSED.) THE COURT: We either can have another wit ness, if you have someone that will be short, or we ! can take a recess at this time. Do sou have a wit- I ness ? MR. BOYETT: Miss Coe will probably be brief. THE COURT: All right, let’s try. MR. BOYETT: All right, sir. BETTY COE. being previously duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. BOYETT:) State your name, please, -/5Z- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Fedord B udding Birm ingham , Alabam a a a ' u . A Betty Coe. Q And, Mis* Coe, by whoa are you employed? A The State Department of Education, Voca tional Division. Q And how long have you been in this employ ment ? A 1 have completed ten year*. I am working now within the eleventh year. Q And I believe you're designated a* the dis- j trict supervisor? A Yes, I am. Q And Talladega is in your district? A Yes. Q And you are familiar with the vocational program for the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind? I A Yes, I am. Q It is on somewhat the same level as the high schools except for the special problems they have in dealing with the handicapped? A Yes. Q Now to shorten this some, I believe that -/53 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmldtng Birmingham, Alabama you cats* Co Talladega -- I *«an, you came to Talla dega with Mr*. Betty Turner on October 18, 1967, for the purpose of Inspecting the vocational hone economics department on the Fort Lashley Avenue? A Yes. I Q At the school for the deaf? A Yes. I Q And did you participate with Mrs. Turner in making that inspection and in filing this report as a result of your visit? A Yes, I did. Q Now had you visited this department on prior occasions ? A I had not made a supervisory visit. Q Had you had occasion to be in the department; when you had made these observations? A Yes. I had walked through the department. Q Being in hoaw economics, if you walk in my home or walk in another home economics depart ment, you make certain observations, do you not? IA Yes, you do. Q In regard to cleanliness, orderliness and organization and so forth, all those matters that 132 i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 fed era l Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Bmldmg Birmingham, Alabama------------------ ------ ----------- I 133 relate to the science of hoae econoales? A Yes. Q And would you tell the Court in your own words -- well, let me withdraw thnt. What was the occasion for your coning to Talladega ? A Mr. Gentry, who was then the president of the institute, had a great deal of concern about this particular program, and It was his request that Mrs. Turner and 1 make a visit there. Q And did you, from time to time, discuss the home economics problems of the Alabama Insti tute with Mr. Gentry or with the president? A Yes. Q And I suppose you have with Dr. Elliott since he took Mr. Gentry's place? A Yes. Q So he requested that you and Mrs. Turner come and make this supervisory visit? A Right. Q As a result of which you filed the report that is defendant's Exhibit No. 2? A Yes. - / 55 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 134 Q All right. Now would you toll the Court I know that you filed a report and that is what you found. But would you tell the Court in your own words as to just what -- the impression that iyou got when you went there as to how she related to the students and as to the sufficiency of the !job that she was doing as a home economics tea cher? A Well, it was my impression that the depart ment was not well kept. There did not seem to be an indication that the home economics program was being carried out in the ways that would likely have met the needs of the students there. It did not seem that there was a plan for the instruction al program in home economics that was adequate to meet the needs of the students that were enrolled. We did,,of course, have an opportunity to sit down and talk with Mrs. Hill. And it was not clear to me that there were adequate plans made for a home economics program to meet the needs of those people j that were enrolled. |Q Now the purpose of your supervisory visit is to determine what the situation is and to try - 1 5 6 ' 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 fe d e ra l Court Reporting C om pany 409 Federal Bttildmg H*rm,ngham, Alabama to be helpful if you can? A Right. Q And that is what you did on thi. occasion? A Right. II Q And the result of your visit was made known to the administration? 1 A Right. MR. BOYETT: Your witness. i CROSS examination Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) Mi., Coe, during your ten years in this area, you do thi, quite often, I believe, don't you, visit various home economics departments and offer suggestions? ! A Yes, 1 do. Q And this is something that you find that you have to do quite often in wherever you are j offered various suggestions? Yes. This is part of my responsibility. Q Counsel a moment ago prefaced the question to you with this language, you were invited to visit the vocational home economics department. Do you know that thi. was . vocational home economic* - / s i - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Bmldmt> Brrrmngbam Alabama ; 13$ class ? A This program was not a vocational home economics program the technical sense of the word. Q Have you had any special training in teaching the deaf, Miss Coe? A I have not. Q And in this report and in reports yoa from time to time make, you make suggestions not only as to teaching methods, but you make suggestions as to equipment needed, books needed and methods of instruction, et cetera, all of which you did in this report? A Yes. Q In other words, when you made this report, there were suggestions for the teacher herself, and there were suggestions which obviously must be done by someone other than the teacher, is that 'correct ? A Yes. Q And, Miss Coe, when you mentioned finally about a plan, now are you referring to the guide lines as put out by the State of Alabama for teachers of home economics when you refer to an - 158 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Btmungbam. Alabama j 137 inadequate plan? A That is the resource which is available te any teacher who teaches hose economics, no matter where she teaches. And this is our -- I was re ferring to this, this is a resource that they have. We don't expect that they take it and go right down by page by page by any means. Q Now was this the only supervisory visit you made to Mrs. Hill's class? A Yes. Q Let me ask you this, Miss Coe. in the plan that you refer to which is sort of a resource thing, i gather, do you have varying degrees of things that should be done from day to day for say a student in grade ten, as opposed to a stu dent in grade eleven, as opposed to a student in grade twelve? A It is built on a sequential plan. Q Did you find, in going to the class, an all black class at Fort Lashley, they had students there for the first time and some had been there for a year, all in the same class? I I A I don't recall at this particular time - / 59 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 fed era l Court R eporting C om part) 409 Federal Building Birmingham Alabama--------------------- 4 138 this being discussed. Q Do you recall for instance, Miss Coe, that this -- that this particular class at Fort Lashley i Street Campus was really a non-graded class, but there were a conglomeration of all grades of ex- perience in Mrs. Hill's class? A I assume that this is true. Q Did you visit on this same day vocational home economies class on the other campus? A 1 don't believe that I did at that particular, t ime . MR. NEWTON: That's all I have. Thank you. REDIRECT EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. BOYETT:) Miss Coe, you are familiar with the other home economics classses at the insti-i tute, are you not? A Yes, I am. Q And you have had occasions to visit them? A Yes, I have. Q And you knew Mrs. Scruggs prior to her re tirement? A Yes, I did. - I ( o 0 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Btrwungbam, Alabama 139 Q Do you have an opinion as to Mrs. Scruggs ms a teacher, did she carry on an effective progrsa?i A From ay observation, it seemed to ae that she did carry on a prograa that did aeet the needs of those who were enrolled. I Q And as a aatter of fact, she had aany years' ! experience, and she was quite qualified, was she not? A This was my observation. Q And what about the teachers after her retire ment, do you know -- have you had occasion to observe the teachers that are there now? A Yes, I am. Q Mr s. Washum and Mrs. House, I believe? A Yes, I am. Q And are you familiar with their program? A Yes, I am. Q Do you consider them competent and qualified? A I do. I1 MR. B0YET7: I believe that's all. MR. NEWTON: 1 have maybe one or two more questions, Miss Coe. RECROSS EXAMINATION (8? MR. NEWTON:) Was the equipment adequate - / ( c l - I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Butldmg Btrnungham, Alabama 140 •t the Fort Lashley Campus on tha occasion of this supervisory visit? A I believe that you wouldnote in the report that we did make some suggestions for improvement Iin equipment. Q Would you say that equipment at the Alabama j Institute for the Deaf, the other campus, is ade quately equipped? A They do have needs for equipment there also. Q Comparing the two as of October 18th, at the time of your visit, was one far superior to the other l A Well, there were definitely differences in the equipment in each of the schools. I don\ know -- when you say superior, I don't know exactly. IQ Which would be better, in your opinion? A I think the basic equipment was essentially the same, for the two. There were some other kinds of things in the department on the other campus that would have been rated as superior. But the basic equipment was essentially the same. MR. NEWTON: That is all I have. Thank you. THF COURT: Anything else? ~ / (c Z - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Btttkltftg Birmingham, Alabama MR. BOYETT : No, air. I believe that la all. THE COURT: 1 want to ask you maybe a quea tion or two. Did you ever go back, not neceaaarily as a supervisory visit, but go back in the following two years and observe what was going on in Mrs. Hill’s class during the next two years that she remained as a teacher? A No, sir, 1 did not. THE COURT: Did you ever have reports come to you or from anyone else on behalf of the school relative to what parts of your suggestions were put into effect or what parts were not? A I did not. THE COURT: All right. MR. NEWTON: That's all. THE COURT: All right, you're excused. Thank you. (WITNESS EXCUSED.) THE COURT: Let's take our lunch recess at this time; be back at 1:30. 141 - l b 3 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Btrnungbam. Alabama ^ ̂ (WHEREUPON, proceedings were in recess frots 12:20 P. M. until 1:40 P. M. , following which the following occurred:) II NOVEMBER 15, 1971 1:40 P. m . AFTERNOON SESSION THE COURT: Next witness. MR. BOYETT: Mrs. Rogers, Judge, end if you will come around and take the stand, Mrs. Rogers. Your Honor, let me explain that she has a hearing difficulty, but 1 think she has a hear ing aid, and I think she will be able to do all right, and also Dr. Elliott stepped downstairs to see someone, and he will be back in a minute. MRS. J. B. ROGERS. being previously duly sworn, testified as follows: | DIRECT EXAMINATION j | Q (BY MR. BOYETT:) State your name, please, ma'am. A I'm Mrs. J. B. Rogers. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham. Alabama ^ > Mrs. Rogers, I believe you're retired at the present time? A Yes, sir. i Q And prior to your retirement, where did you wor k ? A I was a supervising teacher, whet was at that time called Alabama State School for the Deaf. Q And this was on the Fort Lashley Campus? A Sir ? Q This was on the Fort Lashley Campus of Alabama Institute? A That is what it is called now. Q How long were you the supervising teacher? A Seven years. s Q And prior to that time what did you do? A I was a classroom teacher in the same school for five years. Q Now who was your immediate supervisor? A My principal, Mr. Strong. Q And was Mrs. Maude Hill a teacher under your supervision? A Yes, sir . And she was the home economics teacher there 1*1 -/fo5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Brmungham, A labama A That's right. Q Mrs. Rogers, would you pleas* tell Judge Pointer what your duties were as a supervising tea cher? A Well, I was in charge of the curriculum entirely and training new teaehers, teachers of the deaf had to have special training, and I was in charge of all teaching methods, textbooks, curriculum, and with the classroom procedures. Q And in connection with that, were lesson plans a part of your responsibility, and did you have a requirement that teachers had lesson plans? A All the teachers handed in lesson plans to the following week to me. Q When you received the lesson plans, what i did you do with them? A l went through with them and corrected them or made suggestions. Sometimes 1 went and talked with the teacher, then I turned them over to the principal, and he went through them, and then they were returned to the teachers. Q With notations and suggestions? A That's right. -/66- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 145 4 Q And also did you confar with the teachers froa time to time in regard to aLl of the areas you have talked about? A Yea. Q Curriculum, procedure, organization? A Yes. Q Lesson plans and all this? A Yes. Q How often did you have occasion to visit a teacher and especially Mrs. Hill's classroom? A Well, I didn't visit her classroom, but maybe sometimes for several days. But I went around, I walked around both buildings. She was in a different building from my office, but I was over there nearly every day. Q Now could you tell Judge Pointer -- could you give him some evaluation of Mrs. Hill as a teacher, the manner in which she performed her assigned duties, and the teaching program that she carried on under your supervision, or I say that you observed as her supervising teacher? A Well, I couldn't say she was a very good teacher. Her work was not well planned, and she - ! ( d 7' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting C om pany 409 FaArai Bmiidmg Btmrnngbam, A labama ------------------------------— ----------------------1 didn't folio* any suggestion I made about that. They hardly ever cooked anything except candy and desserts, and 1 wanted then to have a sore basic program of hose econoaica. But I was not successful in getting that carried out. I think her -- I think her personal appearance was very much against her. She often case to school not quite clean and with her hair looking rather wild. When she wrote recipes on her board, she wrote her lessons, she was the worst spelling per son I have seen. One day I saw her senu on the board, and she had pudding on the board, and she had it spelled p-u-d-d-e-n, and that is just an example that 1 happened to remember. Q Is spelling especially important in tea ching the deaf? | A Yes, it is. Q Would you explain to Judge Pointer why that is so? A Well, it is obvious the deaf children have to get everything through their eyes. And if it is spelled one way by one -- one time, and another way another time, it is very confusing -/68' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Brrrmngbam, Alabama to then. Q In other words, you don't have the benefit of sounds, but that you use -- A They have to use their eyes only. All they learn eoses through their eyes. Q To a large extent their communlcation is a sign language? A Yes, sir. Q And they use a lot of characters and every* thing that makes it easier to become confused than with the spoken word, is that correct? A Yes. Along with their sign language. There are not signs for everything, so there is a good deal of spelling done, and spelling is especially important to them. And they learn through what they read and what the teachers write on the blackboard. Q And in that connection, do you stress handwriting ? A Mrs. Hill's handwriting waa very poor. Q And I say, though, is that an area that you receive special emphasis in, in teaching the deaf? -/69- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama A Yes. Q On the lesson plans, did yon sake any spe- elal effort to correct then In any partlcnlar man ner, to call her attention to Mistakes that she ■ was making or specifically did yoa ever correct them in red ink and hand them back to her in that manner to try to emphasize? A I always did. Q Did you discuss this with her? A I did to some extent. Q Was Mrs. Hill cooperative? A To sosm extent. Hot thoroughly. Q Was she by nature Inclined to be defen- sive ? A Yes, 1 feel so. i MR. NElfTOM: We object to what she was by nature Inclined to be unless this witness is some kind of an expert. THE COURT: I sustain. I understand the objection. Q Well, actually, Mrs. Rogers, what 1 would like for you to explain to the Judge is that what Mrs. Hill's response would be when you would try - n o - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama to correct her or when you would try to dlicvia with her areas of limitation, do you understand ny question? A Yes, sir. She aiostly just ignored sc. Q All right. Now did you call these nat ters to the attention of Mr. Strong? A Yes. Q And discuss it? A Yes, sir. Q And hawe occasion to discuss it with Mr. Gentry? A Mo. Q You did not? A No. Q You discussed it with Mr. Strong? A That's right. Well, there was one year when Mr. Strong was away that I discussed things with Mr. Gentry. Q That was in 1964 when Mr. Strong was in California? A That's right. Q And at that tine did you also discuss natters with Mr. Patton who was assistant to the - M - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Buildmg Birmingham, Alabama president ? A Yes, sir. There were three men who assis ted me that year that Mr. Strong was away. Q Who were the three men? A Mr. Gentry, Mr. Patton, Mr. McFadden. They took a week about. Q Mr«, Gentry was president of the institute, Mr. Patton was assistant to the president, and Mr. -- what was Mr. McFadden? A I'm not sure what his title was. Q I believe he is at the present time over the trade school, is he not? A Ye 8 . Q Or over all of the rehabilitation work over what they call the adult department? ! A That's right. Well, that is what he was then. Q Mrs. Rogers, what did you observe insofar as Mrs. Hill's -- the way that she related her self to the students, and the way she related her self to other members of the faculty? A Well, I didn't particularly observe in that area. For one year we had to break up a little thin ---------------------------------- «------------------------------ - - 1 7 2 . ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama that was going on. MR. NEWT Oh: I object to anything that la not responsive to hL> questions. MR. BOYETT: Well, was this in the area within I'a speaking of? A Yes, sir. Q Would you tell the Judge what this is, pleas|e, if it is pernisslble? THE COURT: Go ahead. And then I will have to rule after it coses in as to the possible rele vancy. I can't tell at this point. MR. NEWT ON: Yes, sir. It's just that the question -- I have tried not to interrupt, but the answers have not been responsive all day. And that -- the question was, did she have an opportunity I to observe the plaintiff here in her relationship, in cososunieating with the students and other sesbers of the faculty, and the witness started talking about sonethlng she had to break up one year, and I just don't think that is a responsive answer. THE COURT: It nay not be. But go ahead and rephrase your question, and then naybe 1 can rule on it. - 1 1 3 151 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Bmldmg Bremangbam, Alabama 152 MR. BOYETT: All right. Mrs. Rogers, state what, If anything, you observed that affected the relationship or the manner in which Mrs. Hill related to the students or manner in which she related to other faculty there on Fort Lashley Campus. A I don't think her relationship with the majority of the faculty was good. Q This was -- in other words, this is what you tell the Court, this is your opinion? A That is my opinion. Q In connection with your dealings with her? A Yes. Q And observations that you made? A Yes. MR. BOYETT: I believe that is all. Well, just one other question. Did you consider that Mrs. Hill conducted an acceptable standard of work? A No, I don't think it was acceptable. We have had much better work in that department and school. MR. BOYETT: All right. - n i t - - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabamat--- — -------------------------- :--------------------------- _ _ --------- THE COURT: If you will answer his questions. CROSS EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) Mrs. Rogers, I believe when you first case to the institute, you came from another state altogether, is that right? A That's right. Q And what state was that? A Oklahoma. Q And had you taught in the State of Oklahoma? A Yes, a good many years. Q And did you retire from that job out there? 1 A That's right. Q All right. And when you first came to the Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind, you came as a classroom teaeher, is that right? A That 's right. Q Had you at that time had any special train- ing to qualify you to teach the deaf? A I had.. The first year I was there, 1 taught in the school for the blind, and in the : spring I took a course, about an eight weeks course, Q All right. Did you yourself have problems - 1 1 5 - 153 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Bernungbam, Alabama communicating with the deaf children at your school ?j A Well, I had to learn. Q I mean, do you still have problems comment- eating with deaf people? A No. I'm quite proficient no*. Q Were you in the year 1966-67 proficient in communicating with deaf children? A I retired in '65. Q All right. So when you retired, Mrs. Hill ; was still employed by the institute, is that right? A That's right. Q Now you were not in the hiring and firing end of the Fort Lashley Campus? A I had no authority in that respect. Q Do you have any special training in heme economics, Mrs. Rogers? A No. Nothing beyond a high school course. Q You gave an example of pudding being mis spelled on the board at one time. Did you talk to the teacher about that at that time? A No, I didn't. I wouldn't have said any thing before her class. -/74r 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building B*rm*ngbem, Alabama Q Did you ever talk to her about that word, pudding ? A I don't know whether I did or not. I corrected her spelling on her lesson plans all the time. Q Now back to this word pudding that you saw on the bulletin board. As an example of her atrocious spelling, did you talk to her about that word and on that occasion to Mrs. Hill? A No. Q Do you know whether Mrs. Hill wrote it? A Of course she is the only who wrote the I recipe on there. Nobody else would. Q Do you know, to your knowledge, whether she wrote it or someone else? A I'm quite convinced she wrote it. It was in her handwriting. Q And you recognized this as being the handwriting of Mrs. Hill? A Yes. Q And this is what you based your judgment that she misspelled the word? A Well, I'm sure she did. 155 - / 77" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 fe d e ra l Court R eporting C om pany 409 Fedarnl Building Birmingham, Alabama Q All right. Now «h*n you say thatjou cor* rcctad har laaaon plana for misspelled words, was this often or soaetimei or when? A Always. Q Always? A Yes. Q Thera was always a Misspelling on each and every lesson plan? A No. I didn't mean that. 1 wean -- I misunderstood your question. Q You always corrected it when you found it? A That is what I naan. Q And you always corrected it if you found I it on another teacher's lesson plan? A That's right. Q Generally if any teacher at the school for which you have supervisory authority, sent a misspelled word, you, in the normal course of business, would correct it so it would be called to the teacher's attention, is that correct? A That's right. Q And you have to do that on some other teachers ns wall as Mrs. Mill's lesson plans, is - 1 7 8 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama that right? A That's right. Q At one time while you war* a suparvising teacher Mrs. Hill had the responsibility for teach ing home economics, and also teaching the same area Mrs. Dempsey had taught, is that true? A Mrs. Dempsey taught the sewing. Q And then while you ware still there, did Mrs. Dempsey leave and go to the other campws? A She went to the sewing room. It was next door to her room. She sometimes went In there, and did her personal sewing. Q Were you still at the institute when Mrs. Dempsey was transferred over to the main campus? A Ho -- oh, yes, Mrs. Dempsey. Yes. Q Can you ever recall a single garment, not talking about knitting or crocheting, being done by those students while Mrs. Dempsey was there? A Oh, I can recal1 dosens of them. Q Garments, I mean full garawnts ? A They made full dresses for aw. Q All right . You recall garawnts being made under Mrs. Hill's supervision when Mrs. Dempsey was 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building ______ ___ B*rm*ngb*m, Alabama no longer at the Fort Lashlay street Cap..? A No, I don't. Q You don't rccal1 that? A No, I don't. Q Are you saying that she didn't or you don't recall? A I just don't recall. It has been six years since I taught, and I have forgotten things. Q How when Mr a. Daap»y was there, the sewing part of It was not taoght by Maude Bill, is that right? A That's right. Q When Mrs. Dempsey left, Mrs. Hill taught the seving and the other, is that correct? A That's right. Q Non let me ask you something, because you were the supervising teacher. You can beat answer this for us. Did Mrs. Hill have in her home economies class students who had just gotten there for the first time as well as students who had been there for some time, first year students, all mixed -ISO- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama together in the hoae econoales class? A Sonetiaes that was tree. Q All right. Nov yon reported, I believe you said, to Nr. Strong when he was there, except forthe year he was out, these little areas that you pointed out that yon found about Mrs. Mill, her not having an adequate lesson plan or spelling, | you pointed those things out to Mr. Strong, did you not ? A Tea. But he read the lesson plans too. Q And when you found soaething in your In - speetlon and tour of visiting classreoas, you would point that out to hla? A Usually. Q And the year that Hr. Strong was not there, I believe you state you talked to Mr. Gentry, Mr. Patton and a Mr. MeFadden? A That's right. Q None of these people had physical offices on the Lashley Street Caapus, did they? A Well, when they were over there, they just used the principal's office. Q All right. And you pointed these things -/8 /- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Bemtmgham, Alabama out to these people, whoever you found? A Yes, sir. Q Did you ever put in writing either to the superintendent -- either to the principal, Mr. Strong, or to Mr. Gentry, or to Mr. Patton, or to Mr. McFadden the fact that you thought this lady was incompetent to teach that class? A No, I don't remember ever putting it in writing. Q Did you ever request as a supervisor-teacher during your tenure there that Mrs. Mill be replaced by someone who was more competent? A No, I never did. j Q Did you ever, during the year Mr. Strong was away, suggest to Mr. Gentry, the president of the institute, that he should replace Mrs. Mill with someone more competent? A That he should -- Q Replace Mrs. Hill? A I don't recall that I ever did. Q Did yon ever make that suggestion to Mr. Patton? A I don't ever recall I did. - / 8 Z - I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama Q Did you o v e r m o k e Chat suggestion Co Nr. McFadden ? A Not that I recall. Q And at the tlae you resigned from the in stitute In 1965, Maude Hill was still eaployed there as a teacher, Is that right? A Yes, sir. MR. NEWTON: That's all 1 have. Thank you, aa1 am. MR. BOYETT: That's all. THE COURT: Okay. You can step down. Thank you. MR. BOYETT: May she be excused, Your Honor? MR. NEWTON: 1 have no objections. Your |Honor. THE COURT: All right. Fine. (WITNESS EXCUSED.) MR. BOYETT: Let ae check on a aan that is supposed to coae from out of town. (Pause.) MR. BOYETT: Judge, he hasn't gotten here yet. I will go with Dr. Elliott. -/S3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama DR. W. W. ELLIOTT. being previously duly svorn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. BOYETT:) You are Dr. W. W. Elliott, the president of Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind? A Yes, sir, that is correct. Q And how long have you been president of that institution, Doctor? A Since August 16, 1968. Q And I believe that it has already been brought out in previous testimony that at the time that you came to the institute, that it was in the process of implementing the integration order? A Yes. Q And you implemented that program yourself? A Yes. Q Now would you explain to Judge Pointer just what the situation was in regard to Mrs. Hill and -- well, let me first, before I do that, what is your background that qualifies you for your job, Dr. Elliott? -/8V-- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabam a A Well, of course, I have degrees in school administration and my forty years of experience. I have had administrative responsibility over whde school systems for the last twenty years. Q And what degrees do you have? A I have a bachelor's degree, master's degree. I have graduate work at Columbia University, Texas Christian University. Q And with this background experience, you were selected as president of the institute? |A This is correct, yes. Q All right. Now if you will answer the questions about what the situation was in regard to the home economics department on the Fort Lash- ley Campus? A Well, when I arrived in Talladega, of course, 1 had many conferences with Mr. Gentry, whom I suc ceeded, regarding the organisation and structure of the program there. We were under Court order I by the Fifth Circuit Court at that time, assigned to the Fort Lashley Campus, but had not notified the parents of about twelve mentally retarded deaf white students. The same thing was true in the 163 - I $ 5 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Bmldmg Birmingham, Alabama 166 blind given department. And assuming that this had been approval by the district judge, and It was my responsibility to notify the parents after I arrived there on the 16th of Avgust. So these children were transferred to the Fort Lashley Campus, these youngsters sere. And ve left the campus intact so far as the rest of the students were concerned there. We continued the home ec department that year. Mrs. Hill, of course, was the home ec teacher. Now about January we received a series of questions from the district judge. Have you done this? Have you done that? Have you done the other? And of course my -- then I got to seeking and looking for the court order that ap plied. I had not read the court order, assuming that everything was in shape. And then when 1 found the court order finally was in the attorney general's office in Montgomery, and after I made a careful study of this, it was my judgment that we had not done what the federal courts were re quiring at that time since the case had been ap pealed to the Fifth Circuit, and was under the decree of the Fifth Circuit Court which said all - l i b - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham. Alabama departments at the institute must be integrated by September 1 of that year, '68. And this mas the first time that the full intent of this court order came to my attention after I got a copy of it and read it. And I, therefore, answered the questions as best 1 could, and returned them to the district judge, and told him that the fol lowing September that we would completely and fully integrate and comply with the Court order of the Fifth Circuit, which we attempted to do. Now we had great difficulty among our people in deciding how this should be done, whether or not to hold both campuses Intact from grades prep school through the twelfth grade, or whether to try to put the high school on one campus and the elementary on another. And so we came to the de cision, and so reported to the courts, that we were going to divide our children by ages and not by race, having all children ages six through eight on the South Street Campus, and all children ages nine, ten, eleven and twelve on the Fort Lash- ley Campus. And all children thirteen years and up on the South Street Campus. And the reason we - / 87- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 • Ifr ■■ m Federal C ourt R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 166 had to do this was because of our facilities to fit children to the facilities we had. Now this left us with only children who were nine, ten, eleven and twelve on the Fort Lashley Campus, and all of them at the elementary level on the South Street Campus. If you under stand the education of a deaf child, there are -- they are three or four, sometimes five years behind a hearing child. So in order to do this, we also had to change the dormitories, and con vert academic buildings into dormitories. And then this necessitated our carrying all the high school children who were formerly in home economics to the other campus where we had a very small home ec department. So we abolished the home ec department on the Fort Lashley Cos- pus the following year. That was in September of 1969. And no longer had a home ec department and converted it into dormitory for children. Q And this is what precipitated the ter mination of Mrs. Hill in May of 1969, I believe-- what was her termination date? A VOICE: The letter was referred to, May - 188- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Bermingbam, Alabama Iof '69. I Q Yes, this is what -- A I would say that not only was it a factor involved -- Q All right, sir. Now you had -- at that time you had been there from August of '68? A Yes, sir. Q Until Hay of '69, at the time that she was terminated ? A Yes, sir. Q All right. During that time, did you have occasions to familiarise yourself with Mrs. Hill i and the level of her achievement of her work or I whatever you want -- however you would like to put it? j A Well, to the very best of our ability to do so, yes, in conferences with the principal of the school, and conferences with Mr. Gentry, the former president of the school, and in conference with the state supervisors. Q Now she was just one member of the faculty of the entire institute? A Yes, this is correct. -/89- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Birmingham. Alabama Q And you only have a Halted aaount of tlae that you could spend with any one? A Yes. Q And, Dr. Elliott, other than the -- now what did you have in the way of hoae econoales; what I'a getting at Is just exactly what your situation was on the hoae economics, and I'a pointing toward the Baking of the decision that you made in regard to the hoae economics depart - sen t ? A Well, on the South Street Campus, which was formerly the caapus of the all white deaf school, and the advanced departaeat, we had one hoae ec teacher, and this was Mrs. Scruggs. Q All right, sir. Could you tell -- A She was what they classified her today in the teras we have used here today, she was a vocational hoae economics teacher in that this unit was reimbursed by the State of Alabaaa for that teacher unit, and supposed to meet their standards. Now in addition, and this was the only reiaburseable unit we had in the entire com plex. - 1 9 0 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Berrmngbam, Alabama Q You had home economics in the blind school? A Yes, sir. We had home economics in the blind school. And this was not a reimbursed pro gram by the state, and in the terms that we have used here today, could be considered as general home economics, although 1 cannot separate the two, under the philosophy that we operate in Talla dega. Q Now when you implemented your program, what philosophy did you adopt Insofar as yonr home economics is concerned, or did you make any changes in your philosophy? A Yes, sir. We made considerable change in that we did not feel that the children on the South Street Campus were getting enough training and education in foods. So we extended Mrs. Scruggs not only -- she was doing clothing most of the tine, and we extended that to include foods on that campus. And as we worked with the area vocational school, which is part of our technical school there, some of our children were redirected in thearea of vocational home economics, into the area trade school which is -191- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birrmngbem, Alabama on the Sylacauga highway. Q Are you saying that your pupil load was reduced ? A Yes, sir, our pupil load was reduced. Q After A On the South Street Campos, although we had gone Into.foods, yes. And we had two, as 1 recall, two less students the year after Inte gration to that that we had had on South Street Canpus the year before we fully Integrated. Q And what pupil load did Mrs. Scrugga have; din you make any study In that regard as to the pupil load that she was carrying, and the pupil load that Mrs. Hill was carrying, and the amount of teaching tine and so forth as related to the two johs; did you make any deternination in that area ? A Well, prior to that particular year, Mrs. Scruggs had a larger number of girls who were taking home economics. But on the year that we integrated, as we changed,,she had two fewer children than Mrs. Hill had the last year that she was with us. - i q x - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmldmg Birmingham, Alabama 171 Q Nov what about the tine that Mrs. Hill did she have vhat you would consider a full teach ing load, or did you specifically, Dr. Elliott, did you find that she had an excessive amount of free t iae ? A Well, compared to vhat the other home ec teachers had, yes. Q And specifically vhat did you find in that regard 1 , j A 1 think, as 1 recall, that her vorkload was about four hours and fifteen minutes a day. Q And this would give her how much free time? A Well, in a six hour day, an hour and forty- five minutes off. Q And that compared with the average teacher, ! vhat, forty-five minutes free time? Yes, sir, the planning period, yes. Of course they have a lunch period. . • Q All right. Nov so all the students that were in the home ec program were then moved to the South Street Campus? A Yes, sir. Every one of them. Q And they were all assigned to Mrs. Scruggs? - / 93 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama A All of them who took home ec. Now there were others who were put in other vocational train- Ing, and this is different in that it is training --pre-vocational training for a job. We talked about clothing today. Mrs. Denpsey does not teach really -- is not considered a vocational hone eco- noaics teacher. She is a trades teacher, teaching coanercial sewing where they nake draperies, and they train to go on the job in a sewing industry. Q 1 believe you have the sewing industry there in connection with the institute, your blind I made goods? A Yes, eaploy aany of our people there, yes, j sir. j Q Now away from that area there, when you get into the area of qualifications of the teachers,, and this is -- you had to weigh the qualifications of the different personnel? A Yes, sir. Q Not only did it apply to the hoae eeonoaics department, but also applied throughout the insti tute? A Yes, sir. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Btrrmngbam, Alabama j Q What did you find in the hove economics area ? A 1 found that the other two teachers whom Iwe had teaching home ec at the school for the blind and Mrs. Scruggs, who was teaching at South Street School for the Deaf, had very fine qualifl- Ications for the jobs that they were doing, and in- deed had been on the job for many many years there. Q All right, sir. Now what did you find insofar as Mrs. Hill's qualifications? A Well, of course based on past conferences that 1 had had with the forsrer president of the institute, and the principal of the school, and those to whom 1 talked regarding her qualifications^ ■her qualifications were inferior to those of the other two teachers that were employed at that time. Q Did you have any -- did you have any per sonal knowledge of any specific areas in which this was true or for the most part was your -- did you act upon information which was furnished to you by others? A I acted upon the information that was furn ished to me by the principal of the school, the 173 -*95- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama state supervisory personnel, and the present fmrmer president of the Institute. HR. BOYETT: Mark this, please. (Defendant's Exhibit 3 marked.) Q Dr. Elliott, earlier today the plaintiff introduced a letter in regard to her termination from Mr. Strong MR. NEWT ON: May I see it. MR. BOYETT: Oh, excuse me, Mr. Newton. (Pause .) Q 1 show you a letter here dated July 31, 1969, addressed to you from Mr. Ernest C. Strong and ask you if you received that letter from Mr. Strong as principal of the school in regard to Mrs. Hill? A Yes, I did. Q And did this letter -- was the contents of it in line with information that had been com municated to you by Mr. Strong? A Yes. q And this is what you have reference to, this is the information that you acted upon? A Yes. 174 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama----- ------------------------------------------------ 1 Q In presenting the matter. Actually the board of trustees A That's right. In presenting the matter to the board, I acted upon this letter, yes. Q Let's clear that up, the matter of termi nation of a teacher. Actually who terminates the teacher, Dr. Elliott? A Well, really I could not -- personally could not consider this letter as being authorized by the executive committee. But it was the policy that I had been followed there by the institute for a long period of time through consultation with the presi dent ofthe institute. But I was cognizant of this letter that Mr. Strong had written to Mrs. Hill. i!MR. BOYETT: And may it please the Court, we offer in evidence Defendants Exhibit No. 3. ITHE COURT: Any objection? MR. NEWTON: No, sir. THE COURT: All right, it will be received. Q Now -- MR. NEWTON: Let me say this, Your Honor, I don't object to the Instrument as a document that 175 - / 97 ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 si ' * W V v- federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Bermingbam, Alabama . was received by Mr. Elliott in the due course of business. I did object to it as being a document vouching for the truth there of, that I have no opportunity to cross examine the person who wrote it. THE COURT: All right. There are no ob jections taken to this being inforsustion? MR. NEWTON: No, sir. THE COURT: Before this witness, but whe ther the information is accurate, you're not stipu- lati ng? MR. NEWTON: That's right. | MR. BOYETT: That is what we are litigating. Now, Dr. Elliott, at the time of Mrs. Hill's termination, and at the time that you were attempting to implement in a change at the institute, did you talk to Mrs. Hill about working in some other area other than home economics? A After Mrs. Hill received this letter from Mr. Strong, as I recall, she called me over the telephone and told me that she would like to see me. And she came up to my office, and told me that she had received a scholarship, as I recall, to the 176 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama University of Alcbtst to do m s t r work there in education. And she asked sc for aj advice ®n whether or not she should go, and I suggested that since she had received the scholarship, that she should go on to school, and which she did. And I at that tlaie, as has already been brought out, told her to come back to see we, and we wotld see if there was anything that she eouid do in our program in Talladega. Q Now did you make any definite commitment -- I believe she testified on direct examination that you told her that you -- to go on to school, and that you would find something for her? A 1 told her we would look into the situa tion and see if there is something that we could find that she could do in the school. Q All right, sir. And now this was — this program of her attending school, this was already set up before you-- in other words -- A Well, I will say I had nothing to do with setting it up. It wasn't set up -- I think it was set up that spring, some way, somehow, but I had nothing to do with it being set up. -199- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 fe d e ra l C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama Q Well, I believe she had attended two pre vious lusasri In '67 and *68? A That la correct. Q But that actually under the progress, the only point I'si bringing out, when ahe discussed with you, it was not a question A No. She just told we -- Q In other words, you did not tell her to i go to school as an inducesttnt? A No, sir. Q For her to continue her employment with the institute ? A No, sir. I Q Or in that regard, but A Not at all. 0 Well, state to the Court whether or not you told her that it was an opportunity for fur ther educational benefits? A She had already been accepted down there by the University. So I understood that she had been accepted to go to suaser school again during the summer there, and certainly I didn't want to keep her fross going to school. So I suggested -ZOO' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Buiidmg Bm^m mebam .1ialm mt* 179 to her that she go on. Q And It was In that context? A Yes, sir. Q Of encouraging as you would anyone to fur ther their education? A Correct. Q When she returned, did you discuss with her any other area of employment with the institute? A Well, when she returned frosi having com- i pleted the work at the University, she case into my office and talked with me. And I talked with her about past experience as a teacher in the home ec department, and mentioned some of the complaints that had been made about her to her, and some of the things that I had observed in my limited time to go into the department myself, and told bar that I did not know of anything particularly that we would -- MR. B0YETT : Excuse me. Judge, this is my other witness. You can wait outside. Excuse me, Judge. Co ahead, sir. A And that I didn't know of anything parti cularly that we had there for her. So then she - Z O \ ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama vent to the chairmen of the executive committee of the board of trustees aid requested a hearing. And he immediately called me over the telephone. And I'm not sure, but I think I told Mrs. Hill that if she wanted to appear before the executive committee of the board of trustees, that she would have that right to do that. Q And did you subsequently arrange for her to appear at a meeting? A Yes. Q Of the executive committee? A When the executive committee chairman called me, said certainly, yes, we would be delighted to have a hearing for her. And we set a date for the time she would appear before the executive committee. Q And did she appear? A She did. Q And did the board discuss the matter in detail with her at that time? A Yes. Q And then what -- A Well, let me say, in the discussion in de tail, let me say that Mrs. Hill came before the - Z O Z ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama board and made her statement to the board, a rather lengthy statement to the board. And when Mrs. Hill had left, the board, executive committee by unanimou vote, voted to cancel her contract with the lnsti- s t ute. 181 All right, sir. And then did you subsequent ly notify her? A Yes, I did. Q All right, sir. Dr. Elliott -- may It pleas the Court, 1 will go ahead and have this amurked, when he returns. This will be defendant's Exhibit No. 4. e (Defendant's Exhibit 4 marked.) MR. BOYETT: You saw this before lunch? MR. NEWTON: Well, I will make my objec tions at the time you ask the questions. MR. BOYETT: All right. Dr. Elliott, you know Dr. Ronald Evilsiser at the A Q A Q University ? Yes, sir. At the speech department? Yes, sir. Do you understand that he was the coordinat or - 203- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama . _ _---------------- i 182 of the program? A Yes, sir. Q That Mrs. Hill attended there at the Uni versity ? A Yes , sir. Q And did you receive a letter bearing the date of July 30, 1969, from Dr. Evilsiaer? A Yps, sir. Q And is that the letter that you received from him? A Yea, sir. Q And does that letter specifically apply to Mrs. Hill and the work that she did at the University ? A Yes, it does. I MR. BOYETT: If it please the Court, we offeir it in evidence. MR. NEWTON: May it please the Court, we would like to respectfully object to this letter being offered in evidence, and we base our objec tions on one specific ground, that things contained in this letter are obviously hearsay on the part of the writer who wrote it; all through the letter, ' 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama particularly the latter part of the latter, he talks about what somebody told him, and for that reason the letter is objectionable. The witness is here to testify himself. THE COURT: I'm going to overrule the objection and allow it to be received. But only for the purpose of showing what information was available before the board, or this witness, and not as to the truth of the matters contained therein. Certainly if you wish to go into this, if Dr. Evilsizer testifies, you would be in a po sition MR. NEWTON: We renew our objection be cause we think it is prejudicial to the record, and except to the court's ruling. THE COURT: All right. Let me get this clear, when was this meeting of the executive committee of the board? A I'm not sure of the date. I'm sure that-- MR. McCRARY: August 15th. THE COURT: It was after the letter from Dr. Evilsizer and after the letter from Mr. Strong to you? - 2,05" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birrmngbam, Alabama A Oh, yes. Q- Now, Dr. Elliott, I will ask you to state whether or not at the time the board reviewed Mrs. Hill's statement, that they listened to Mrs. Hill and considered her statement, if at that time you also brought to the attention of the board the I comments of Mr. Strong, the report from the State Department of Education? A Yes, sir. Q The report -- letter from Mr. Gentry, the former president, and also this letter that has just been introduced into evidence? A I did. | Q All this information-* I A Was presented to the executive coMilttee. Q That was after they had had an opportunity to hear Mrs. Hill? A Yes, sir. Q All right, sir. And that was on August 15, 1969? A Yes, sir. MR. BOYETT: All right, sir. Your witness. -2 Ob- 184 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Budding Birmingham, Alabama CROSS EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) Now, Dr. Elliott, as president of the institute, you have in your care, custody and control the records of all the faculty ; members at the institute, is that right? A Yes, with the exception of the adult departs men t. Q Which means that the records of Mrs. Maude Hill and all the other teachers at Fort Lashley Campus were part of the records that you would !normally have in the ord inary conduct of your busi- I| ness ? 1 A Yes . Q Now, sir ,, let me ask you a question. Prior to your taking over, and I 1believe you took over on or about August 16, 1968? A Correc t. Q Was there any single item written by anyone in the official record file of Mrs. Hill that day, August 16, 1968? A I 'm not sure. I don't know everything that is in the file. I couldn't answer that question. - 2,07 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 186 Q Have you ever seen anything in the file that would -- in the file, not what somebody told you on the street, in her file that would suggest to you about her competency as a teacher over the ten years she had been there? A 1 cannot answer this question specifically, and give you -- I recall items. Whether or not they are in the file, 1 couldn't say, because I do not have the file, all the file with me. 1 know of things that were there prior to my goi ng there. But whether it is on a note paper or what it is, 1 couldn't answer. Q Mrs. Hill taught there for one year when the schools were ordered desegregated, right? One school year? A Yes. She taught the year before. We completed the plan as given to us by the Fifth Circuit. Q A year after she left, isn't that correct? A After who left? Q Mrs. Hill. A No. We -- no. We implemented the Fifth Circuit Court decree prior to her leaving there - 2 0 8 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham. Alabama 187 during the summer. And we terminated her contract ' during that summer. | Q You said you implemented the decree prior to her leaving? A Well, she had not -- we were in the process in the first year that the decree was Implemented was 1969. She did not teach in '69 and *70. Q That ' s right. A Okay. Q But Mrs. Hill — you had begun to Implement the decree whidi would account for the twelve odd white students she had over there for her last year? A Yes, this is correct. Q So then at no time after the order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Cir- Icult to have the schools totally desegregated, was Mrs. Hill employed there? A After the decree? Q After you implemented the decree which was late when you got there being implemented? A After the complete implementation of the ! decree, Mrs. Hill was not employed. Q All right. And aside from the twelve - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama students on the Fort Lashley Campus, Chose were the only white students on the Fort Lashley Cam pus at all in 1968, is that right? A That is correct. Q All right. Now all these things that you said you pointed out to the executive committee, were these pointed out in Mrs. Hill's presence at that meeting, on or about the 15th of Augast? A At least some of them were. Now how many of them there were, I don't know. Q Now this letter just Introduced into evi dence by Mr. Evilsizer, dated July 30, 1969, this letter was sent to you as president some two or three months after Mrs. Hill had already been terminated, is that right? A Well, it all depends on what you call ter - nination. Q Well, she received a letter back in May from Mr. Strong, and you said that was -- that had been the practice before yougpt there, saying she was terminated? A To an extent. vhether you could call that termination, I don't know. -z/c- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Bmidmg Bernungham, Alabama Q Let me just ask this question, please, sir. Between Hay 29, 1969, the date of the letter to Mr. Frnest Strong to Mrs. Maude Hill, terminating her, and it is quite clear, it says we regret to Inform you that you don't have a teaching position any more; now from that day, May 29, 1969, until the date of Defendant's Exhibit No. 4, July 30, 1969, she didn't work for the institute, did she, between those dates? A No, no teacher worked. Q And she hadn't worked since? I A No teacher worked because the school was not in session. j Q Did she get any other notice of termination other than this one, and denying her request after she had met with the board? A Yes. She got a letter from me after the board meeting. Q Right. And that was -- that letter was not the official termination? A Yes, it was. Q That was denying of her rehearing, wasn't it? ' Z U ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama A No. It was termination. _ 190 MR. NEWTON: Will you please siark this for the plaintiff, please, sir? (Plaintiff's Exhibit 8 marked.) Q Doctor, I show you a letter, allegedly written by you, marked Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 8 for identification dated August 18, 1969, and ask you if that is the letter you just referred to; is that the letter you just referred to? A I wrote this letter, yes. Q Have you written her any other letter re garding her termination? A Not that 1 know of. I Q Now isn't it a fact this letter only refers to her meeting with the executive committee on August 15, and the fact that you don't have a po sit ion for her ? A It says we do not have a position for her, that is correct. Q All right. And it does not cancel or modi- ! fy at all upon her previous letter she received? A From Mr. Strong, no. MR. NEWTON: I would like to offer Plaintiff's - 2 / Z - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama Exhibit No. 8 into evidence as Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 8. MR. BOYETT: No objection. THE COURT: ' All right. Q And in that letter, Dr. Elliott, or in Mr. Strong's letter to her that you were familiar with, neither of those letters expressed any incompetence on the part of Mrs. Hill as the reason for her dis charge ? A That is correct . Q All right. As a natter of fact, thoae let ters blame the Integration process on the fact that she no longer had a job available? A My letter. My letter does not blame the integration on it. I'm not sure what Mr. Streng-- Q You don't call it by name, sir? A No. Q Will you please read into the record the first complete sentence in paragraph 2 of Plain* tiff's Exhibit No.8? A Read what ? Q The first sentence beginning in. A In the reorganization of the school, the - 2 1 3 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Bmrungbam, Alabama committee feels that it does not have a position to offer you for the term beginning in Septembm; '69, which included the total reorganisation of the school, not because of integration. Q Why were the schools being reorganized? A Because we had the area vocational school which had just come into existence, and we were reorganizing the entire vocational department. Q Now have you changed, Dr. Flliott, in any manner the method of identifying certain areas in the school since the time you took over the school in 1968? A I am not sure of what youVre referring to. Q Well, specifically let me show you Plain tiff s Exhibit No. 7 that is already in evidence, showing the vocational department. Do you still have the vocational departsrcnt as such that you carry on your records there now? A No. The vocational department now is under the principal of the school just as any other pub lic school in the State of Alabama. At that time it was a separate department with a separate head. Now it has a supervisor now who is responsible to i i I ' ! 192 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Budding Bremen gham, A labama the principal of the school. At that tlae the supervisor was responsible to the president, and it was a different division. Q All right, sir. And this is when at that time during the 1967-68 year Mrs. Dempsey, that we have talked about, was carrying on the vocational department ? A That was prior to my time. Q All right. But those records were avail able to you when you took over? A Yes, they were. Q Now let me ask you this, Or. Elliott, be ginning September, 1969, how many teachers of home economics did you have? A Two. Q You had Mrs. Scruggs, I believe? A Yes. Q And you had another teacher. What was her name ? A Mrs. Palmer. Q Now will you tell me about the training and background of Mrs. Palmer? A She has a degree in home economics, many 193 - 2> /5~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 fc d & a l C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama years of experience in the field. And l don't know i I don't recall the training that she has in addi- t±>n to that. Q All right, sir. A She does not have a master's degree, as I recal1 it. Q All right, sir. How long had she been with the institute? A For years. I'm not sure. I would aay 20 or 25 years. Q All right. Now after your first year there, on or about May or June of 1970, Mrs. Scruggs re tired, did she not? I A Yes. Q Now did you hire a replacement for Mrs. Scruggs? A I did. Q And will you tell me who that person is? A Mrs. House. Q And where was Mrs . House previously em ployed ? A As I recall in the Talladega County school system. -Z/b" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 121 Q And what was her job at that tine? A She was the hone ec teacher. Q All right. And what is her training? A She has a degree in hone econonics plus special courses in deaf education. Q All right. How nany hone ec teachers did you have that year after Mrs. Scruggs retired? A We had three. Q All right. And who else did you have? A Mrs. Washun. Q And was Mrs. Washun in the system prior to that time? A No. She was not. She was new. IQ And where did you hire Mrs. Washun from? * She was a graduate from one of the univer sities. I'm not sure which. Q And* was her training in the area of hone economics ? A Yes. Plus special -- we kept Mrs. Washun. We had Mrs. Washun there in 1968 and 69 as a teacher in training, also in deaf education, taking special university courses in deaf education. Q All right, sir. And so you had then this - 2 1 1 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal B uilding B im ungbam , Alabam a Mrs . Washum and who was the third person? A Mrs. Palmer. Q Mrs. Palmer? A Yes . Q So of the three home economics teachers, you had in the 1970 school year, beginning Sep tember of 1970, two of them were brand new to the home economics department, one was brand new to the school system altogether,to your school system? A Having spent a year there in training. Q I said, but one was brand new altogether? A No. Both of them had spent a year In training. q Both had spent a year in training? A In deaf education. Q Neither of them had previously at your school taught in the home economics department? A No, they had not. Q Can you tell us in September of 1970 how many new teachers you hired all together? A No, sir, I cannot. Q Can you tell us if you hired any other than these people you're talking about? 196 - 2 / 8- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama A Q Yes, I did. How many teachers did you hire in social studies ? A I'» -- as I recall none in social studies. Q All right. In English? A None in English that next year. Q Well, what areas did these new people you hir ed wor k in ? A Most of them were in the primary and ele mentary fields. Now we eaployed several teachers to go into the training prograa who were not as signed classroom work, but were assigned to the training prograa to take college courses there on the campus. And we paid them salaries to be there and to be Involved with supervising teachers and with children in a training prograa to sub sequently take jobs in the classroom. Q How many non-degree teachers do you now have ? A I have no idea how ■any. Q You have aany? A Yes, we have. Q And soae of the new ones you hired in the Jiz - 2 /9 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Bmldmg Birmingham, Alabama 1970 school year are non-degree people, are they not ? A If we employed one without a degree, I do not recall at this time. Now under special condi tions where a teacher has been involved with deaf children visually impaired, but only as a last measure in every case do we employ anyone who has less than a degree at this tla». This is the policy now. Now I'm not talking about what the policy was back. Q Now you have several on the faculty that carry on A Several on the faculty now who don't have degrees, that do not have degrees, and we are re placing them as fast as we can. Q Are you replacing them by discharge? A Some. Q Because they don't have degrees? I A Yes. Q Do you have a Mrs. Jackson currently em ployed at the Fort Lashley Campus? A Mrs. Jackson? Q Jackson, yes, sir. 198 - Z 2 0 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building B m m ngbam , Alabam a A I believe so, yes, sir. Q Does she have a degree? A I'm not sure. Q Do you know what she is teaching? A She is in the priaary department there. Q At your meeting before the coaalttee which prompted your letter of August 18, 1969, did Mrs. Hill say to the coaalttee in your presence that she was available to teach in other areas for which she had training and had a teacher's certi ficate ? A Yes, she did. MR. NEWTON: 1 believe that's all. Thank you, sir. MR. BOYETT: That's all. THE COURT: All right. MR. BOYETT: Dr. Evilsirer -- Judge, let me call hia back just a aoaent. THE COURT: Hold hia out there. REDIRECT EXAMINATIOH Q (BY MR. BOYETT:) Dr. Elliott, we talked about your offering, about your discussions with - Z Z l - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Build,ng Birm ingham , Alabama Mrs. Hill and all. I'a not sure that we brought it out, but when she returned, if you offered her employment in another area, if we did, what area was it in?t A Well, I think this was discusaad this aornlng, but I asked Mrs. Hill if she would be interested in serving as a house parent, or we |refer to them as supervisors, they are super visors over the children, and I alse asked her if she would be interested in personal grooming or cosmetology. And she informed me she would not be interested in either. Q And did you establish such a program? A No, sir. We had had one there through the years, and we were at that time planning to continue it, but it has since closed. Q And she was offered this, and she de- c 1 ined ? A 1 would not say that I offered it to her. I would say that I asked her if she were interested, and I had no right to make an offer when she said she wasn't. Q I see. And since that time have you had 200 ~ l z z - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama any further discussions with Mrs. Hill of any na ture about any employment with the institute? A Well, she has called -- as I recall, she has called me over the telephone and asked me if I had any job for her, and I told her no. MR. BOYETT : All right, sir. That is all. RECROSS EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) Dr. Elliott, when you refer to personal grooming and cosmetology, was that -- A It is one and the same. Q is that a course to be taught there? A Yes . Q Did Mrs. Hill have any training in the area of cosmetology? A Other than she would be trained in voca tional home economics to do personal grooming. That is part of the home economics program in many instances. Q But there is also a very special course in cosmetology that takes all of one's time? A That is a trade. - 2 2 . 3 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Bmldmg Birrmngbem, Alabama-------------------------------------------------- [ 201 i Q And did she inform you at that time that she had no training in cosmetology? i A All she said to me mas she wasn't interested in the job. Q She told you she wasn't Interested in be coming a house parent also? A Yes, or supervisor. We call them super visors. MR. NEWTON: Okay. REDIRECT EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. BOYETT:) One other thing mentioned. You have built a new trade school? A Yes. Q Adjoining the Fort Lashley Campus, have you not ? A Correct. Q And thin trade school was completed and went to operation in 1969? A Yes. Well, in fact it went into operation in 1968, about July, '68. But the area of vocation al high school part of it, the area vocational schoo part of it had not been completed at that time. 1 - 2,2^' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal BuiUmg Birmingham, Alabama And it was built after -- about the time that I was -- that I went there, and on through that year. Q And in this trade schoal where you have much better facilities for all kinds of aptitude tests and testing programs and everything else as far as A That's correct. Q As far as finding what someone is suitable for ? A And it has, therefore, cut down on the part that -- the vocational education on the other two campuses where it was previously held, yes. Q And you have an opportunity now through the trade schools to offer opportunities to the handicapped that you did not have before? A That is correct, yes. ■ iMR. BOYETT: All right. MR. NEWTON: One final question, Doctor. RECROSS EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. NFWTON:) Some of the students there that Mrs. Hill previously taught in general home economics at the black school were later 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Brrrmngbam, Alabama filtered into other trade trees end other courses, is that correct? A Y«s, I believe that would be a correct statement. MR. NEWTON: That's all. MR. BOYETT: All right. That's all. THE COURT: Let's go ahead and take about a ten minute recess. (WHEREUPON, proceedings were in recess from 2:53 P. M. until 3:07 P. M., following which the following occurred:) MR. BOYETT: We will have Dr. Evllslser. DR. RONALD EVILSIZER. being first duly sworn, testified as follows: DIRECT EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. BOYETT:) You are Dr. Ron Evilsizer ?| A Yes. Q And are you employed, Dr. Evilsizer? A By the University of Alabama at Tuscaloosa. Q And what department? A In the department of speech and special - Z Z(o~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Btrmirtgbam, Alabama education. Q And how long have you been at the Ifniversityl A Since 1 9 6 3 . Q And what is your title? A Well, I'm assistant professor, also coordi- nator of programs for the deaf. Q All right. Now this program for the deaf, would you explain to Judge Pointer just what that program is? A There are several programs actually. I imagine what you're after is the training programs. Q Yes, sir. A Or teacher training. Q Yes, sir. A We have a regular academic program which is primarily a master's degree level program to train classroom teachers. Then in addition to that we have for the past five had special summer programs, also for the purpose of preparing teachers for class room teaching for the deaf children. Q Now what particular areas do you deal in, in these programs? A I'm not sure what you mean by areas. - Z 2 7" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 20$ Q Well, what subjects? A Subjects? Q Yes, sir. A Our program is geared largely to preschool and elementary school children education, unless a person comes in the program already having secondary background. Still the content of our program is stiU the same until they get to the level of super vised teaching, and that is a different subject matter. Q In connection with that, then your program is designed so that it will be beneficial to tea chers that are employed at the Alabama Institute for the Deaf? A That 1 s right. Q And in such a program did you become acquainr ted with a Mrs. Maude Hill? A Yes, I did. j Q And she was a student? A Yes. Q At the University? A During the summer programs, yes. Q And you were the coordinator of the program? - 2 Z 8 " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama A Right. Q And ire you familiar with the record of Mrs. Hill while she was a student there at the University? A Her academic record? Q Yes , sir. A Not specifically. I only have -- I did not have Mrs. Hill in class myself. And so I really do not have a record of her performance. Q Well, have you had occasions to review Mrs. Hill's record that is kept in the regular course of business by the University? A At the end of each summer I have. Q And do you know what the level of per formance of Mrs. Hill wav? A It'*, I recall, right around a C, letter grade C. That doesn't mean all C's, but I think on the average that would be pretty close. Q This is not graduate work? A In Mrs. Hill's case it is not. Q And she would not be considered as a graduate student, and the level of her work would 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Brrmtngbam, Alabama not qualify her for -- A As I recall when she was first admitted, she did not meet the requirements for admission to graduate. So she was given the option cf en rolling as an irregular post-graduate, that is sort of in between. It is for people who have completed their bachelor work, but who have not met the admission requirements for graduate work. Unless this was changed some time after her ini- tial application, that would have been her status at the time she was enrolled. Q Dr. Evilsirer, you encounter special prob lems in teaching the deaf, do you not? A Yes, you certainly do. Q And would you elaborate some of those prob lems for the court? A Well, we look at the two major areas. Virst^ is in terms of academic learning, that is to take place for deaf children, just as you would for hearing children. This is compounded by the cossaaif- cation problem that deaf children have. In fact, they have initially no language, and don't acquire it with natural means. So there needs to be an - 2 3 0 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding BirmingbaM, Alabama 209 understanding as to how this language is acquired, and how the teacher can help the child to develop this language. And this is really probably wore technical and wore difficult than the teaching in academic areas; at least that has been my experience. Q And is that part of your program to try to assist teachers in that particular area? A Yes, it is. This is true. Q And do you think that there is any signifi cance in the fact that there is any relation be tween the level of academic attainment of Mrs. Hill and the continuing in the program of teaching the deaf A Q A Q A Q A that Q are In the program at the University? No --well, yes. Or in the profession? In the profession? In the profession? Yes . 1 would have to rely here on the records 1 do have and so forth. But you have reviewed those records as they kept in the regular course of business? - 2 3 I ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama ^ That'* right. And I would have to respond somewhere between what we would expect I guess of an under-graduate student and graduate student. For a graduate student who is in our regular pro gram, a person who's functioning at the C grade level would not be recommended for classroom teach ing. The under-graduate program, and I'm going on as best I remember now from the college of edu cation, I believe a 1.1 grade point average is required for someone in the teacher education pro gram of 1.0 being a C. So this would be slightly better than a C. So again it would be an impres sion on the basis of her performance. And my im pression would be I would have to be very reluc tant to recommend her for an academic teaching position. Q And did you so cemmunicate your views to the Alabama Institute? A I think I gave them that impression. Q And that was your opinion? A Yes. Q In other words, that she is -- falls below the minimum level of attainment for a person to 210 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company ■ «> ,‘i" . 409 Federal Building Birmingham. Alabama 211 continue in the classrooa situation of teaching i deaf children? THE COURT: Just a minute. MR. NEWTON: I nov interpose an objection. I don't think this witness has said any such thing. It is a conclusion, Your Honor. THE COURT: Sustained. I think it is leading the witness. Sustained. Q Well, on the basis of her demonstrated performance at the University, tell the Court whether or not you would consider that she could satisfactorily perform in the classroom? I MR. NEWTON: I again interpose an objection. The witness has stated, one, he did not teach her. , So anything he knows about her preformance other than knowing she was in the program were from re cords he saw kept in another office, though he was the coordinator of this program, and when you use the word demonstrated performance by someone who did not teach a person, 1 don't see how he can answer that question. THE COURT: I'm not sure that he can an swer it either, but I'm going to overrule the - 2 3 3 " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 fe d e ra l C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama objection, and see if he la in a position to answer it based on the record. MR. NEWTON: We except. A State the question again. Q To avoid repeating the objection, wuuld you read it back? (Question read.) A The most I can say is that in terms of what my recommendation would be, and that would have to be based on her reported performance, both aca demically and in terms of Q You would not recommend her? i A I could not on that basis, because I don't have the kinds of information on which I would base a recommendation. Q All right. And you conveyed this informa- tion to Dr. Elliott? A Yes. Q That was in July of 1969? A Right. MR. BOYETT: All right, sir. Your witness. CROSS EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) Now which is correct, 212 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama .— -------j. Doctor, that you don't have the kinds of informa- . . itlan that you can make a valued judgment or that you conveyed something that you relied on informa- ! tion from others to Dr. Elliott? A I could make a valued judgment, but it is I on the basis of experience that the teachers in the program have had and on the basis of the grades earned. Q Yes, sir. But you're talking about mhat you saw on record, and what someone else told you about the person that you did not teach, is that right ? A Yes . Q And based on the fact that you rely on that .person -- those teachers' judgment? A Yes . MR .NEWTON: I again renew my objection to that exhibit, and I beLieve it was Defendant's Ex hibit No. 8, and ask that it be withdrawn. THE COURT: I will overrule it. MR. NEWTON: We except. THE COURT: I have indicated, however, that 1 wasn't going, and did not receive it but for a 213 -235- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 214 limited purpose. Q Now, Doctor, all during your direct exami nation, you talked about academics. Would your answer be the same, Doctor, as to the level of performances or whatever you're talking about for a teacher that was teaching wood work, whose primary responsibility would be say woodwor k? A On the basis of what that teacher should be able to demonstrate, knowledge about the subject woodwork, it would be. Q All right, sir. Now the same thing about home economics? A Yes. Q Doctor, if you're talking about a summer program such as this, there are many things that enter into whether a student is a graduate student in like some institutions passing graduate records examinations. jA Yes, that is part of our admission. Q And a student who enters your special pro gram for teaching the deaf may not be Interested in getting a master's degree and taking graduate -236- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmldmg Birmingham, Alabama record exams, that is true? A Yes, that is also true. Q Now would you call in something so specialist Iand something so different as what you taught there, I a student Wio takes four courses and has two B's ■and two C's, is that a total failure in your -- would Iyou consider your program having failed, or the tea-j j cher having failed in the learning process? A I wouldn't consider that total failure. Q All right. And would you jaat take those !four grades alone and say this teacher is not cap* able of teaching? I A No, not those four grades alone. Q All right, sir. And do you have any ex perience with Mrs. Hill, any personal experience with Mrs. Hill as a student at the University that you could evaluate other than the grades that you saw and the information that other teachers gave you? A No. Q So in any judgment you made at all, are taken from some grades you saw on the record and some conversations with teachers who are not present 237 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmldmg Birmtngbam, Alabama here on this stand at this timef is that right? A That's right. Q And I believe you say it is your training program there was geared to elementary school edu- cat ion ? A Primarily, yes. Q Now in the process of being a coordinator, when a teacher came to take your summer program, whether they mare taking it on a graduate level or whether they were taking a survey course during the summer for strength, did you check into the background of that teacher to determine what that teacher taught, wherever she came from? A We have a transcript of her courses, so that would show an indication of what her previous training had been. Q And previous experience? A Right. ' Q That would not, however, show classroom situations like whether she had all children at the same academic level, whether she had a mixed ball of wax, students in varying ages and so forth as for instance with a deaf school? -Z38- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Bremengbam, Alabama A No, It would not show that. Q Would you say as a coordinator, the sucesaa or failure of a teacher, many of these things would be important to how successful a teacher could be in a classroom with a lot of people? A Yes, they seem to be. Q Wouldn't you say, Doctor, if a teacher had seventeen students, some of them could barely read, some were in there day 1 or as of October 18th, month 1, some of them in there year 2, some of them have other emotional problems, wouldn't you say many of these things would determine how effec tive a teacher of home economics could be, no mat ter how good she was ? | A That certainly would be part of it, yea. i Q And, Doctor, wouldn't the amount of equip- j ment and the kinds of equipment also affect, have something to do with the effectiveness of a tea cher in a classroom such as this? A Yes, it would. Q Have you ever visited Mrs. Hill in the teaching of her class at Alabama Institute for the Deaf and Blind? - 2 3 ? " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama A Not that I recall. I may have stepped into her room at a time. I don't reaaafcar specifically visiting her classroom. Q You haven't made any notes or formed amy opinion or written anything as it relates to her teaching in her classroom situation, have you? A No, I have not. Q And, Doctor, this letter that has been referred to and has been admitted into evidence as Defendant's Exhibit No. 4, do you recall what occasioned you to write this letter? A Yes. Dr. Elliott had indicated to me that Mrs. Mill was no longer on the staff and would like my views. Q So this letter was written after Mrs. Hill was no longer a member there and written on July 30, 1969? A Well, during the summer. I don't know if she was on the staff or not. I don't know when her appointment was completed. Q But you wrote it on the 30th of July? A I wrote in on the 30th of July, right. Q Had you ever had an occasion though, she - l t o - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | 2 L 9 I had been there two previous tuners, to write Hr. Flliott or anyone else in connection with the in- stitute, a letter concerning the perforasnee of Mrs. Hill? A No, I don't. Q Now is it also on this letter that you refer to a Mrs. Ruth Walker, who taught Mrs. Hill? A Yes. Q And you pointed out here some things Mrs. Walker told you, is that right? A Yes, sir. Q Can you, Doctor, of your own knowledge say to me or to His Honor that Mrs. Maude Hill was not an effective home economics teacher at the Alabama State School for the Deaf? A Not of my own knowledge. MR. NEWTON: I believe that's all, sir. REDIRECT EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. BOYETT:) Doctor, I believe you did say that you state to the Court that based upon what information you do have, and as the coordinator of the program, then you familiarize yourself with -2 4 4 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama levels of performance , do you not? A Yes, I do. Q And based on the information that you do have, that you could not recommend her? A Right. MR. BOYETT: A11 right, sir. That's all. MR. NEWTON: One question. RECROSS EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) If presented with infor mation other than the information that is available to you, is there a possibility that you could change your mind about that? I MR. BOYETT : Judge, we object to that. MR. NEWTON: I'm calling for an educator who has given -- THE COURT: Overrule, if he can. Q Is it possible you would change your mind if presented other information? A Yes. I tried to utilise all the informa tion I have. MR. NEWTON: That is all I have. THE COURT: Doctor, as I understand it, - 2 I f Z - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Bernungham, Alabama part of your testiaony her* is that based on what you know, you wouldn't be in a position to recoa- mend her? A That's right. THE COURT: Are you also saying that you are in a position to recoaaend against har hiring? A This is as best, would be a recoaaendation, ; yes, on the basis of information I had, if I was in a position of hiring her, 1 would not do so. RECROSS EXAMINATION' Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) Doctor, this proapts another question or two froa ae. ! When you say this, are you talking about ! a person who never worked in the area, if the information you now have was now given to you, and this person caae to you for a job, is that what you're talking about? A No. You scan what I was basing hiring Q His Honor asked you could you also fora a judgment against her, that is, against hiring her, and your answer said, based on the inforaa- tion you had, if I aa correct, that you could not. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmldmg Birmingham, Alabama Now, are yo u Calking about hiring soaieone who comes to you cold and you get some information from a teacher and see some grades? A Usually that is about the extent of the information you have in hiring situations. Q But let's suppose -- let's add one other step, that someone had done a credible job for ten years teaching home economics, and had these grade levels, and we are not talking about teach ing on graduate level where you require a B ave rage. Would that be enough to make you vote against hiring that person? A If 1 had a recommendation? Q If you had someone who had taught in a school for a period of ten years, communicating with deaf children, teaching a course in home economics, and the information given you was that she had done a fair to credible job, and had B's and C's teaching in elementary type level, would you not A Someone who had firsthand knowledge of her teaching experience would recommend her to me, then I would consider that very possible. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama Q I believe when you told us, when you testi fied on direct, thst s 1.5 is s B record, or a C record, w«s generally sufficient to teach on an elementary type level? A Yes, for the undergraduate program. Q Mrs. Hill was not enrolled in your school ever as a graduate student, was she? A No, she was not. Q And she would have and earned a degree in the area of home economics, did she not? ^ » *• I recall that is correct. Q Now all things being equal without anybody telling you anything else, would that alone be enough for you to say that you would not recommend this person for teaching? A I was not referring to home economics as such. I was referring to -- because I’m not quali- pi fied to recommend or not recommend in that field, but as far as her understanding and working with deaf children, that would be the basis for it. Q Her understanding and working with deaf children, but we are talking here, Doctor, about a teacher of home economics, who teaches children - Z i f b - 223 I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmildmg Birmingham, Alabama who happen to be deaf, and you're saying that her competency in the area of home economics has no thing to do with your evaluation, is that what you are saying? A That is essentially what I'm saying. Q So you're essentially grounding your in formation on hearsay from two teachers and seeing how many grades did you see all together, Doctor? A Well, I believe she attended three summers and two courses each summer would be six grades. Q Some of them were B's, were they not? A I believe at least one. I don't remember i exactly. Q Two of them? , iA I just don t know. Q All right. And so this alone is how jdu base your judgment on not employing a teacher? A Not that alone. Again if I had a recom mendation from someone who is familiar with her work, that would be a basis. Q And you didn't have that? A No. Q When you made this judgment? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birrmngbam, Alabama 225 A No. Q You only had work done at your school and conversations with teachers there? A I did have recomnendations that accompanied her original application. That was the only thing as far as from people who were familiar with her wor k. Q >tod were those recommendations good or bad? A I haven't looked at them for awhile. 1 believe there should have been three. They don't stand out as being good or terribly bad either one. Q Well, in other words, when persons get recommendations to enter a program, they usually get favorable ones, don't they? A Unfortunately that is often the case. Q And would ymu say more frequently than not the case? A More frequently, yes. MR. NEWTON: All right. That's all I have. THE COURT: Anything else from this wit ness? MR. BOYETT: No, sir. jTHE COURT: All right, you can stap down and - Z t f l - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 « 4 > * Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama be excused. MR. BOYETT: Thank you, Doctor. (WITNESS EXCUSED.) MR. BOYETT: We rest, may it please the Court. THE COURT: All right. MR.NEWTON: I would like to recall Mrs. Hill for about two or three brief questions on rebuttal. THE COURT: All right. MR. NEWTON: And I would like to ask these be marked. (Plaintiff's Exhibits 9 and 10 marked. ) REBUTTAL TESTIMONY ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF MAUDE HILL. being previously duly sworn, testified further as follows: REDIRECT EXAMINATION Q (BY MR. NEWTON:) Mrs. Hill, I would like to show you a photograph and an article marked 226 -2^g- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmldmg Birmingham, Alabama Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 9 for identification, and (ask you if you recognize that? A Yes, I do. Q And I would like to ask you what does this represent ? A That picture represents the clothing pro ject that those girls carried on. ■ IQ Were these your students? A They were my students in home economics. Q In home economics? A Yes. Q And was this an award won by those young people that you taught there? A Yes. Q And the clothing they wear, were those made under your supervision and care? A They were made under my supervision and care. And when they started Q Just answer my question, please, ma'am. i Now I would like to show you Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 10. A Yes . Q Also showing a group of young people, third 227 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama place winners In the county 41 dress revue? A That's right. Q I would like to ask you if these were your students? A They were my students. Q And I would like to ask you if this award was made for your students for work they had done in the home economics department? A It was. Q And this was inthe area of dressmaking I bel ieve ? A Yes. Q All right. And I believe in Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 9 your name is listed as teacher there? A Yes. MR. NEWTON: All right. Your Honor, I would like to offer into evidence Plaintiff's Ex hibit No. 9 and Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 10. THE COURT: All right. MR. NEWTON: And that is all we have. THE COURT: It is received. You can step down. Does counsel feel a need to argue the case -2So- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham. Alabama orally? MR. BOYETT: No, air. MR. NEWTON: We will submit it, Your Honor. THE COURT: The Court is prepared at this time to enter its findings of facts and conclusions of law in this case. These being dictated to the Court Reporter, and in the event of an appeal, the Court would re serve the right to correct that to the extent of minor typographical errors and matters of that sort. These findings and conclusions are based on the evidence that has been heard in open court, the several documents that have been exhibited, and allowed into evidence, some of which were allowed only for limited purposes. These findings and conclusions are also based on the provision of the pre-trial order which was entered after the original filing of this complaint, and intervention. This case is an adjunct to much an earlier case that was brought against the Alabama Institute, and which had culminated in the establishment of a plan for desegregation of the facilities and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama 2 30 faculty and staff and educational opportunities at the Alabama Institute. This took place essen tially back in 1968, with a decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and sub sequently followed by a decision of this district court, Judge Grooms rendering this decision. As a part of that plan for desegregation, there was put into effect a restructuring of the facilities afforded at Talladega for education of deaf and blind, and particularly what had been known as the Alabama State School for the Deaf, in |which the educated black youngsters were reconsti tuted as a facility for educating all children, white and black, in the deaf program for grades nine, ten and twelve year olds with whatever grades might I be appropriate for them, and the children, both white and black of other age groups were placed at what formerfy was called simply, I believe, Alabama School for the Deaf, which in this hearing has become known as the Main Campus or the South Street Campus. As a part of that restructuring, some classes, at least those in home economics, which had been offered and afforded at both facilities, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama were only to be afforded at one of thoae facilities. And the institution found itself in the position of having a general hone economics course offered at the state school or what we call the Fort Lashley Avenue School, and a vocational hone economics class at the Main Campus, whereby thereafter all home economics course materials would be provided at in effect the high school level or above twelve years of age students, it became necessary for the institute to make some decisions relative to who should be retained as among those that had been teaching in home economics area at the two facili ties . The particular court decrees which per tained to this lawsuit did not spell out exactly what -- in what manner the decision would be made about who would be retained and who would not. However, in the Fifth Circuit opinion, that reference was made to certain other decisions that the Fifth Circuit had rendered including a deci sion involving the Jefferson County Board of Edu cation, and the mandate was placed by the Fifth Circuit, that every effort should be made by the -263' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama institute to put into effect in its teacher assign ment matters, the same kinds of rulings or require- ments that had been placed for regular public educa tional facilities in the Jefferson County case. In the Jefferson County case, the Fifth Circuit had outlined certain things that should be done in order to implement plans of desegregation, including the basing of any demotions or dismissals on a non- racial reason, and of providing that any teachers displaced as a part of the process of converting cr changing to a desegregation plan should have some j priority for re-employment if qualified. The stan dard there is not and was not stated as being mare or less qualified than some other applicant, but whether or not the displaced teacher was qualified. Although not placed specifically in those terms in the orders relating to the Alabama Institute, the reference in the Fifth Circuit opinion to the other cases incorprated at least by reference this same general theme as to what should be done on any displaced teachers in the institute. The Court concludes that the burden of proof under the circumstances rests on the board -251*.- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama of education to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the action which it took in terminating the plaintiff here, Mrs. Hill, on firsthand or in failing to re-employ her on the second hand was for non-racial reasons. And insofar as the failure to re-employ, that she was not merely less qualified than other applicants, but in fact was not qualified for the jobs which were offered. So there are two different standards Iinsofar as the question of which teacher should be retained at the time of original contracts. I see it that the test would be choosing the bet ter qualified for non-racial reasons. So far as any re-employment is concerned, 1 see the test as a requirement to rehire someone who was displaced and in contraction, unless that person was not qualified at all. Those are the two tests 1 am going to attempt to apply in this case, and upon the facts and testimony presented. I should say that 1 find it a difficult case to decide under these standards. The plain tiff has a BS degree with specialization in the teaching of home economics, and has had some ten -Z55- J 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Building Brrmmgbem. Alabama years' experience in teaching hove economics with at least three summers of work in studying the teaching of deaf children, handicapped by inability to hear properly. On the record of academic back ground for being a teacher generally certainly this plaintiff would have such qualifications. And generally the fact that someone has been teaching for ten years and wasn't discharged during that ten year period, as a matter of fact wasn't discharged within the first two or three years, would certainly) Ibe an indication that she was considered adequate for the particular type of teaching. There comes a question that has been raised by at least one witness -- raised by two witnesses as to the effect of the grade scoring that the plaintiff had while attending the University of Alabama in terms of taking special courses in the teaching of deaf children. And under the evidence for the three summers of work she received four C's and two B's or a 1.33 average. This testimony has a mixed effect. First, it indicates both a willingness to learn more about teaching deaf children, and the acquisition of additional knowled - 256- 234 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama about hov that can best be done. But on the other hand, the grades attained are, under the testimony, subject to question instead of shoving real compe tence, perhaps shoving the contrary. The Court is avare, though the evidence didn't really demonstrate this, that a C grade is normally considered to indicate fair rather than failing and rather than poor. The testimony of Dr. Evilsizer, vho is a coordinator at the Dniversi of Alabama, Involved in the training of teachers for deaf children, indicates that there is some general correlation betveen ability to teach deaf children adequately and attaining grades in the neighborhood of a B average in special courses that are taught for these teachers. 1 think in and of Itself the mere obtaining of less than a B average in special deaf education courses vould not be adequate to shov that someone vas or vas not qualified to teach the deaf. But it is a factor that the Court feels needs to be considered. In conjunction vith the evidence relative to her performance over the last approximate 10 years, by those vho had opportunity to actually 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Baiidmg Birmingham, Alabama observe the teaching and the results of her teach ing, there is soise conflict in the evidence as to exactly how effective Mrs. Hill was in teaching. 1 suppose anyone involved in teaching recognises her difficulties in attaining the kind of results that you would like to get froai your students. And I can't help but believe that this suit be particularly difficult in the teaching of deaf children in the field of deaf education, and the frustration that people have in that field. Several witnesses appeared to attest to the general Manage ment of the class by Mrs. Hill, her ability to i conduct the training and classroom work, and that I according to their viewpoint, some learning was going on under Mrs. Hill's help and supervision. Then there are personnel from the State Department of Education who found approximately two years before her termination that there were distinct deficiencies in what was taking place in Mrs. Hill's classes, particularly in questioning whe ther there was a good atmosphere for learning, whether there was adequate preparation in terms of planning, the training to be given, and as to -268' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal C ourt R eporting C om pany 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama whether or not there was a good inspiration being given to the students to learn through Mrs. Hill's own appearance, personal appearance or Banner of communicating with the students. These tend to be very subjective ways of looking at what is going on, but certainly there are many things that can only be subjective and not objective. It does appear from the testimony and par ticularly from the testimony of Mrs. Rogers, who for some four years was a supervisor of Mrs. Bill, in terms of teaching and instruction work at the ! school, that Mrs. Hill has had difficulties in I terms of getting perhaps across to the student as much as they were capable of, and as to her perhaps failure to plan adequately, and being too limited in what she was teaching the students there. There is testimony that Mrs. Hill's handwriting and spelling are poor. This may seem a trivial thing, and perhaps would be in many areas, but the Court is impressed that in terms of teaching deaf chil dren, that a high priority has to be placed on this skill of good spelling and good handwriting. Unfortunately it's usually pretty difficult to -- -2 5 9 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Federal C ourt R ep o rtin g C om pany 409 Federal Budding Birmingham, Alabama 238 for a teacher to correct spelling and handwriting late in life, and after her own educational basic educational processes are gone, to come back and make changes along that line. Yet, in terms of an administrator looking for improvement and upgrading of a school for deaf children, cer tainly there is reas on why this Court would go along with in placing emphasis on good spelling and good handwriting on the part of teachers. Mrs. Hill received a letter back in May or early June of 1969 from the principal indicating that she was -- that her employment was being Iterminated, and there would not be a position for her at the school the following term. Subsequently a hearing was held before the executive committee of the institute, on or about August 15, 1969, in which Mrs. Hill was given an opportunity to express herself about her abilities and capabilities and desire to stay at the school. There was also presented to the executive committee, though perhaps not in Mrs. Hill's pre sence, some information which had been obtained by the saperintendent from Dr. Evilsirer, the -Z6o- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Puderal Court Reporting Company 409 Fedard Bmidmg Birmingham, Alabama coordinator at the Italversity of Alabama, from a former superintendent of the institute, and infor mation from the personnel with the State Department of Education, indicating as previously indicated some deficiencies in Mrs. Hill's ability. The Court does not believe that the re quirements of the constitutional due process of law requires that these letters necessarily be given to her in advance of the hearing, but that could be considered, that they could be considered by the board along with her statements, and along with any other stateownts that she may desire to i submit on her own behalf. The Court, after weighing all the evidence, finds itself in -- with the conclusions, that in the particular area of teaching deaf children home economics or other courses with which generally Mrs. Hill would be generally competent, that she does not have the degree of competency which would place the board under a duty to rehire her or to continue her employment. I recognize that in reach ing this conclusion that there is some inconsistency in the fact that the board retained her for ten - 2 < o l - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Budding Brrmingbam, Alabama years as a teacher, and apparently was willing to do so as long as she was only teaching blacks. But when it case to teaching whites, apparent iy the standard went up, at least that woald be a surmise the Court would make as to what the board is doing which certainly the Court, if this be the case, the Court can't feel very happy about that kind of double standard. At the same time, based on this evidence and still admitting there is some conflict and agony on the part of the Court trying to reach what the conclusion is, I do believe l'm persuaded that in the area of teach ing deaf children, that Mrs. Hill lacks the kind of competency that the board has a right to re quire. This is not to say that she would not be competent to teach home economics to persons not suffering under this particular handicap. The evidence presented by both sides indicated that she was operating under rather some difficult conditions in teaching a non-graded course. And the Court sees that this would present a mighty heavy responsibility, but rather than excusing because of the difficulty, the Court sees this - V o l - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Frdrrd Bmidmg Birmingham, Alsbam* rather as a reason for permitting a board to re quire perhaps higher standards for anyone who is going to be placed in that kind of position and condition. The Court really does not reach the ques tion of the competency of the other four teachers whose competency has generally been brought into focus, that is, Mrs. Scruggs, who was the voca tional home economics teacher, plus the three other teachers who I believe were hired as home economics teachers in the following year or period after Mrs. Hill's termination. Other than the Court concludes that again based on academic training and record, they apparently were quali fied just as on the basis of Initial academic training and record Mrs. Hill was qualified. It is only the ruling I'm making is based in a large part upon the kind of evaluation that has been made from those who saw her operating over the last seven or eight years as a teacher actually working with deaf children. The Court recognizing that sometimes the incidence of desegregation process seem to fall -263- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Fndaral Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama heavily on those who don't really ask for it, but it nevertheless cones, and this is both white and black, sees this as another kind of illustration of that very point that the process is extremely painful, and sonatinas hits nany different people in the process. I conclude that the board has sustained its burden of proof regarding both its termina tion of service, and its failure to re-enploy, and will enter judgment accordingly. (WHEREUPON, proceedings were adjourned at 4:00 P. M., November 15, 1971.) - 2 H - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Bmldmg Btrm ingkem , AUPrnm* C E R T I F I C A T E STATE OF ALABAMA) JEFFERSON COUNTY) 1, Thomas E. Dempsey, Official Court Repor ter of the United States District Court, Birmingham, Alabama, do hereby certify that I reported in steno- typy the foregoing proceedings at the time and plact stated inthe caption hereof; that I later reduced my stenotypy notes to typewriting under my super- >ision, and the foregoing pages contain a full, true and correct transcript of the proceedings as herein set out. I further certify that I am neither of coun sel nor of kin to any parties to said cause, nor in any manner interested in the result thereof. ^ OFFICIAL COURT RffORTE - 2 (cb- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Federal Court Reporting Company 409 Federal Building Birmingham, Alabama C E R i I F I C A T E STATE OF ALABAMA) JEFFERSON COUNTY) I, Thomas E. Dempsey, Official Court Repor ter of the United States District Court, Birmingham, Alabama, do hereby certify that I reported in steno- typy the foregoing proceedings at the time and place stated inthe caption hereof; that I later reduced my stenotypy notes to typewriting under my super- i vision, and the foregoing pages contain a full, true and correct transcript of the proceedings as herein set out. I further certify that I am neither of count sel nor of kin to any parties to said cause, nor in any manner interested in the result thereof. .5 V OFFICIAL COURT RFFORTE Alabama Inatitut* for 9raf and Blind follafega. Alabama 3516B May 29, 1969 72-1107 Mrs. Maude Hill 1712 T'est Mattie Street Talladega, Alabama 3t>l60 Dear Mrs. Hill: ve regret to inform you that the teacher position of Home Economics at the Alabama School for the Deaf, Ft. Iashley Avaiue Campus, vd.ll be terminated with the beginning of the 1969-70 school term. This action is being taken because of the Federal Court decree and the plan of the Institute to place children at this school who will not be over 12 years of age. Therefore, our Home Economics Department will be closed. I give you this information so you will have the opportunity of making the necessary arrangements for employment next fall. ’’e appreciate your interest and past endeavors in teaching the deaf and hope that you future success. ED/ib cc: pr. M. 7 . Elliott will accept our best wishes for your Sincerely yours, Imest Strong,'7Jr., Prin Alabama School for the Ft. Lashley Avenue Cam; - H o l e ' i ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLI N O T I C E OF A P P O I N T M E N T * 2 . VI rs • Maude Hi 11 You have been assigned to the position of T e a c h e r --------- ------------ -------------------—— in the S c h o o l f o r t he D ea f dqiartment of the Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind at the salary of $__4 , 7 9 7 . 0 0 _____________________ ____________________ _____ ______more or less to be paid i n _______12______________________monthly pay ment beginning _____ O c to b e r 19___67 and e n d in g _______ S e p te m b e r 3D.,-. 19. fid plus ......... _ ----- — ----------------- — -------------- - Signet September 8, 1967 'President PLEASE SIGN DUPLICATE COPY AND RETURN TO OFFICE Accepted as above Name . . __________ _____ ______ ___ Date .. . . PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT # > - Z<*7- ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLIND \< >/1< i 0 1 \ r r ( 'i \ i \u \ r Vl r s . Maude J.i 11 Yon h a w hi t'ii asM̂ iii (I tin iit>-s1111<■ i ni Instructor in tlir School for Blind - F . La.-nley depunment ->t tin Mah.imu Institute tor Deaf and Blind at tlir salary of S 11lo he paid in and end in« September 30 5,504.00 monthh pa\ incuts he^inniiui l'l69 plus more or less October 1, 1968 President Signed Date October 1, 1968 PI KASK kl.KP OHI(.l\\\ \ M ) Hill B \ M ( A F I ) (Oplfs T O TUI O F F K . F Accepted ,is above t . c-Name & „ ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BUND N O T I C E OF A P P O I N T M E N T no? M Maude Hill You have been assigned to the position of --------Te a c h e r --------- ------------------------------------- in the _ S t a t e S c h o o l f o r t h e D e a f __ dtpartment of the Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind it the salary of $------------- ----------- -----------5 ^ 2 9 7 ^ 0 0 ---------------------------------------------- more or less 12to be paid i n ------ and e n d in g ______September 30^ . monthly payment beginning 19 66 plus ----- — ----- Signed October 1l__ 19. 67 Date S ep tem b er 8 , 1967 1’LEASE SIGN DUPLICATE COPY AND RETUKN TO OFFICE Accepted as above plain: i t ? 1 > s-i fName M E M O R A N D U M To FROM --------------- tRNEST STRONG, Principal - v i o - r RACE 1967-68 ANNUAL SALARY i DATE OF EMPLOYMENT •ALABAMA STa'I j. SOiLOi, H.'i. TIM; DiT.t- Principal - Strcnc, Err.c: RANK II White * !H RANK III Colburn, Evelyn White Gilchrist,' Katherine White Gilchrist, Wright White Negro 3,674 5.136.00 5.031.00 5*, 136.00 4.178.00 4.250.00 1944 1943 1942 31967 2967 C\ vb -ra q xhi- w John Negro 5,173.00 1965 V3 ,* Clara Negro 1 5,400.00 1 1967 k p'. Maude Negro : 5,297.00 f 1959 I David White 5,400.00 1967 * M.i Id rod Negro 5,3.18.00 1966 ■ *lrr n , Anna Negro - 5,400.00 1966 . , Harlteen Negro 6,037.00 1956 * Baker, Colon White CO ro b o 2963 * Blue-, Sara Negro 4,256.00 I960 (Resigned - Sept. 1967) * Bush, Peggy White 3,719.00 1963 Clark, Naomi White 3,916.50 1961 * Cole, Frances White .3,250.00 2967 *Torbus, 011 i 0- Pea:rl White 3,753,00 1961 * 'Lanier, /.out ’White 3,436.00 1964 Steed, !•' Hi' • White ’> Vie i M j 1953-1958, 1962 *Spai nhou.i , Dori a White 4,'M7.77 ‘ 1362 * The cl: or non. i.oi White 3,0(0 .50 I960 ^Denotes teacher has had additional education courses beyond rank of certificate. *•2,7 /of______ T RACE ANNUAL SALARY ALABAMA SCAT;: ••VnOOL I'OR Hi!- DEAF - Continuod Nix, Matdlie Negro 1,06-1. To /^AAPart Time Vacancy - Part Time Art Instructor 900.00 Bryant, Jane White 3,000.00 Secretary Strong, Ernest 300.00 Travel Vacancy - Thor;apist Time 3,000.00 .1.10, V!M>. U S Cosmetology Inst 9 mo. 10 mo. I i - _______ :................ .............................:___ ______ :________ _ : VuCATIlNAL ULPI. - SCHOOL FUR THE n K A l? ThACEut R A M u/ CnhTlFIC.,,TL tiAU KAnn i hughston, Fred Jhide ttAflK II ocrugK.s, Mrs. i^rgaret " RA.\A III Clara, Clarence " benipaey , :lrs. Katie 11 button, Houston " ford, Mr a. w. " Kara jiiS, >ira. i. : ene " t Alton, els. j.Et> .el " Ramey, Clayton " Whatley, *. o. " Foaby, onester " *Norred, .. j-mmy " aMHUAL oALAr X SUBJLCT TAUGHT DATE OF EMPLCYMEHT *748 fl.X Asst. Voc. birector 1960 6o'5C. O Hone Ac. 1939-1940; 1943- 4978. 00 bakery 1945 5 U 5 . X oooBiercial Hewing 1947 6OCO.0O Printing 1967 4178.dO Arts a Crafts 1966 5428. OC Cosmetology 1943 547j.00 Typing a Business hractioe 1943 4995-00 ohoe Repairing 1947 5971.00 Bartering 1936 • 00 Auto Mechanics 1963 540U.V-O industrial Arts 1967 * ber.otes teacher ,\ae had additional education courses beyond rank of certificate (EaUahrga. Alabama 35160 August 18, 1 % 9 o v? & y - y <̂<3 Mrs. Maude V. Hill 1712 W. Battle Street Talladega, Alabama 35160 Dear Mrs. Hill: The Executive Committee requested me to express their appreciation to you for coming before the Committee on Friday, August 15* They gave very careful consideration to your statements to them and the problems of employment at the Institute for the 1969-70 school term. In the reorganization of the schools, the Committee feels that it does not have a position to offer you for the term begin ning in September 1969- As was indicated to you at the meeting, certain departments which have previously been operated at the Institute have been closed and we did not have a position that was acceptable for several of the people who had previously held positions at the Institute. W. W. Elliott, President WWE/lc - INTIFF’.s 4-H DRESS REVIEW WINNERS — Tim* flHrto attend the Alabama State School tor the Deal and are members at the girls' 4-H club. They recently won la the 4-H girl* (tress review which was heM at the school under the direction of 4-H leader Mrs. Maude Hill. They are left to right Elisey .angford, first place; Joyce Hicks, second placet and ( third place. W' ■& P County Ex- agent, Rina’* She and have a 4-H many activihe* held by the Talla dega County E xtension S er v ice program . What kept the 15 girls fro® Tana to Page 15, Column 1 • “ TH — PLAINTIFF'S I t e x h i b i t A / O lu g u st 12, 1969 VO 1107 SOI Maole Drive Talladega, Alabama Da. hi. U. E l l io t t , PatA-ule.nl Alabama I n s t i tu te fca V taa S Blind P. 0. box 268 Talladega, Alabama 35160 Dear Da. E l l io t t : R ecen tly you requested me Co g ive you mu estim a te of U/u. Maude H ill as a kerne economicA teach er. Frankly, Ahe fa ile d to caaau out a proqram in vo ca tio n a l education th a t could be conAideaed s a t i s f a c to r y . On Aeveaal cccaAionA I ta lk ed uuth the su p erv iso ry s ta f f in vo ca tion a l home economics in vo ca tio n a l education and requ ested th a t then help hea. On th e laA t v iA i t the SupeaviAoa o ̂ thiA aaea baought w ith hta Mrs. B e tty Turner, S pecia l SupeaviAoa. Miss Coe, Aaea Supervisor, met w ith me and Mr, Strong and Mrs. Tuanea. Mrs. Tuanea to ld ua a t th a t time th a t Ahe could not help Uoa. H ill, we inAlAted however th a t Ahe weak uiith hea th a t day to Aee if Ahe could not g e t hea to fo llo w a nlan oa o u tlin ed fo r a home economicA departm ent. Mrs. Tuanea d id v iA i t uiith hea but A tated in the outAet th a t Ahe was not ab le to t e l l Mrs. H ill anything oa to g e t hea to caaay out any program becauAe Ma a . H ill appeaaed to <e e l th a t Ahe was alaeady doing a good job and Apent hea tim e juA tidying tier program. In thiA connection, 1 fe e l th a t even though theae Ia no aeccad of AupeaviAoay visits xn Mrs. H i l l ' s fo ldea a t the I n s t i tu te , you could g e t a re p o r t of viAitA made from, VU44 Coe. I am sure th ey mould t e l l you oa I am th a t i t I a oua fe e lin g th a t Mas. H ilt Mia not q u a lif ie d oa a teachea of vo ca tio n a l home economics. Even though the department in which she twaked d id not have the veau b e s t equipment, the p h ysica l f a c i l i t i e s as a s ta te paogaam was such th a t i t could be appaoved by the S ta te Vepaatment as meeting minimum standards; b u t Mas. Hill sim ply could n et caaay out the program as recommended. In my opim on I f ee l th a t she d id an accep tab le job in working w ith stu den ts in th e ir a c t i v i t y programs. She seemed to be -more in te r e s te d in ex tra cu rricu la a c t i v i t i e s o^ the g i r l s and boys in' the school than in her teaching job. Her probiem was d iscu ssed by me w ith Mr. Strong on se v e ra l occasions and, as A tated above, we d id seek help from the su p erv iso ry staff, In the S ta te Department of Education but i t appeared th a t th ey weae unable to do aw th in g to g e t hex to accep t a program th a t would meet a standard in home economics. - 2 7 1, 2 I-t would appear, ^fum Mm , H i l l ' a c o lle g e aecoAdi th a t &he n ig h t be mo\e MUtable. to be coyuu.deA.ed In an oaea In AocUal i tu d le i l& th e I a a t a l l q u a lif ie d ^cn a teaching job . I tAuAt th U I a th e in h u m ation de&iAed. SlnceAelu, ’ be m to I K t y i I . DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Montgomery 4 “**• i 4 * REPORT OF SUPERVISORY Y01Tt *•' • School Ml ah—s School for R t f VOCATIONAL DIVISION 7 r f r o m Dnto of V is it Oct. 18, 1967 To AaAjpje. S u p e rv iso r * • B it ty On C l a i m s V i s i t e d a n d O t h e r P a r t i c i p a t i o n Conference w ith teacher C o n s i d e r a t i o n G i v e n t o t h e F o l l o w i n g (x ) C la ss Instru ction (x ) FRA .....M R tr ) H om e E x p er ien ces ( ) H om e V is its ( ) Adult Work ( z ) D epartm ental Im provem en ts ( ) E valuation (x ) In stru ction al M ateria ls (x ) P u b lic R ela tion s ( ) R ecord s and R eports (x ) P r o fe s s io n a l Growth (x ) D epartm ental M anagem ent ( ) Other (z ) F ilin g P l a n s A g r e e d U p o n : ( x ) Sum m ary Made During V is it ( ) Sum m ary Made F ollow ing V is it C lass In stru ction - Study and use the S ta te Course o f Study as a guide in p lo w in g m i t e o f in s tr u c tio n , keeping in mind the, needs , in t e r e s t s «*d a b i l i t i e s o f p o p lls . m . Work toward e sta b lish in g an IRR Chapter. . Study m a ter ia ls and inform ation sent from D is tr ic t IWL O ffice , M ontevallo. (Rlssr Coe w i l l send) . In terpret to pu p ils the r e la t io n sh ip o f FHA to the Home Economics Program. ( I t i s u- in te g r a l part) Supervised Experiences . Study forms and make a plan for including th is as an in teg r a l part o f the program. . Study the Pupil Data Foma and make a plan for securing the inform ation from the p u p ils . . Use the inform ation secured from Pupil Data forms in planning for u n its o f ln s tr u o tio u . Departmental Improvements . Clean ou tsid e and in s id e o f a l l ca b in ets . . Clean storage cabinet and arrange for to te tray (p la s t ic d ish pans) storage. . Arrange equipment in each u n it kitchen according to as organised p lan . . Plan w ith the P rin cip al for the repair o f leak in g p ip es in the u n it k itch en s mad fo r rep a irin g or rep lacing the dishwasher. . Use the Inventory-Evaluation form in determ ining seed s In th e department. . (Ring as s guide, the Iqelpaamt and Furnishings M d i , provide seeded small as funds are a v a ila b le . (See s ttso h sd ) - X " ] g ~ n • 2 • D e p a r t m e n t The department m i vsxy d ir ty , d isorgan ised and d u ll in i e a v a ila b le fo r department a l use except for 4 ranges a baiag taught In one n t m a t p r e ee s t . An ad d ition a l roa as a c lo th in g laboratory. Very I a r e fr ig era to r , la provided that l i t t l e a * . mxl A ll t t l t t w i l l h i deve^effeu Teacher 00 th* _ ^ fe n - lv * at th# A n n i n a o f the v i s i t , bet b efore the oooolui or 1° h* “° 8t r#c*Pt i v « to su ggestion s. She eeeaed apprehensive" in regard to the r e u o m for our v i s i t , but once she r e a lise d that me mere t W - T ! plane for strengthening the prograa she N e e d p leased " t W * t0 * * * P r o g r a m o v e ra ll prograa i s e x tra se ly poor. I t i s obvious that very l i t t l e teaching 4 . done. No in s tr u c tio n a l m ater ia ls are a v a ila b le . The book S t Z m In ocemended from the S ta ts Adopted Textbook l i s t . S w e a t io i^ ~ S r e o ' ’■ « ta t t a . not I m . « d . mere mads for studying and u * a g the Course o f Study. Various- asp ects o f the prograa were in terpreted- te -th e *-Tnrhtr — f <7uallty P f • M aterials for use in e sta b lish in g ** m Chapter m ill he i i l l hL Z ^ * r * 0th *r “ t *r la I * a v a ila b le in r e la t io n to various asp ects o f the m ill bs sen t such as a l l report /o jp p , Equipment 9ui<fe w d F ilin g Quids. . fcJ T 1 C o n f e r e n c e Wi t h P r i n c i p a l a n d / o r S up s r i u t s n d s n t . T h e most concerned mith the poor to ta lity o f the p rcg ro i. Bs f e e l s th a t m a m what i e weeded fo r abe mede in the f a c i l i t i e s , program. He asked th at me P r i n o l p a l i s M 1Hk * The teacher and the School Presldamt to have * isu n d ersta m d in g e . -2.79' Teacher Krn. Maude Hill School Alabama School for Deaf_____ County T.- _> Date of Visit October 18. 1967___________ Supervisors Betty Coe and Bettye 3. : ^ PLANS AGREED UPON (continued) Departmental Improvement■ (continued) . As funds are available, provide searing machines. Recommendations are made for _4 Touch and Sear Model 609, JL 626 Slant Needle Chain Stitch and the replacement of 1 machine head for a 609 head. Instructional Materials . As funds are available, add instructional materials in relation to concepts in the Course of Study. . Provide copies of Steps In Heme Living to be used as a Textbook. (State Adopted Textbook List) . Make teaching materials following suggestions mode such as flash cards, newapapei and magazine .pictures and inexpensive books. . Develop bulletin boards in relation to class instruction using the talent of pupils in class. Filing , When funds are available, provide a filing cabinet. . Study filing guide for suggestions for setting up a system of filing. (Miss Coe will send a copy of Guide) Departmental Management - Develop a plan for keeping the department clean, organized and attractive in appearance. (Develop a chart or some device for rotating the re» sponsibilities of the pupils.) -2 i o Alabama Inatitutr for flraf anb Sltnb OCallairga. Alabama 351 BO July 31, 1969 C /*? C v ■ y y a liilUDAi-’T* S' EXHIBIT # Dr. W. W. Elliott, President Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind Box 268 Talladega, Alabama 35160 Dear Dr. Elliott: On May 29, 1969, I sent you a copy of the letter I had written to Mrs. Maude Hill, Home Economics Teacher. This letter noti fied her that she would not be employed as a Home Economics Teacher for the 1969-70 school tern because this department was being abolished at the Fort Lashley School. This is to further advise that I have found Mrs. Hill to rate low in the following areas: general appearance, initiative, ability to get along with people, cooperation, scholarship, use of English, knowledge of subject matter, preparation of daily work, and classroom management. Sincerely yours, ECSjr/lc -279' U NI VE RSI TY OF A L A B A M A C O L L E G E O F A R T S A N D S C I E N C E S U N I V E R S I T Y A L A B A M A 3 5 4 8 6 me 5 D E P A R T M E N T O F S P E E C H P . O . B O X N O . 1965 J u l y 30 , 1969 D r . W. W. E l l i o t t , P r e s . Alabama I n s t i t u t e f o r De af and B l i n d T a l l a d e g a , Alabama 35160 D e a r Dr . E l l i o t t : T h i s l e t t e r i s t o f o l l o w - u p o u r t e l e p h o n e c o n v e r s a t i o n o f l a s t F r i d a y i n r e g a r d t o Mrs . H i l l ' s s t a t u s h e r e a t t h e U n i v e r s i t y . She was a d m i t t e d as an I r r e g u l a r P o s t G r a d u a t e upon h e r f i r s t e n t r a n c e d u r i n g t h e 1967 Summer S e s s i o n . T h i s i m p l i e s t h a t s h e e i t h e r 1) d i d n o t a p p l y f o r G r a d u a t e S c h o o l , o r 2) was n o t a d m i t t e d a s a g r a d u a t e s t u d e n t . I am i n f o r m e d t h a t s h e e n r o l l e d t h r o u g h t h e C o l l e g e o f E d u c a t i o n , b u t h a v e n o t b e e n a b l e t o d e t e r m i n e w h i c h d e p a r t m e n t . Mrs . H i l l h a s a p p l i e d f o r , and b e e n a w a r d e d , t r a i n e e s h i p s i n e a c h o f o u r S p e c i a l S tu d y I n s t i t u t e f o r T e a c h e r s o f t h e D e a f . T h es e w e r e d u r i n g t h e summer t e r m s o f 1967, 1968, and 1969. C r i t e r i a f o r a w a r d i n g t h e s e t r a i n e e - s h i p s a r e 1 . ) e x p e r i e n c e i n t e a c h i n g t h e d e a f , 2 . ) u n d e r c o n t r a c t t o do so f o r t h e e n s u i n g a c a d e m i c y e a r , 3 . ) a c a d e m i c s u c c e s s , 4 . ) r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s . Our r e c o r d s show t h a t Mrs . H i l l h a s s u c c e s s f u l l y c o m p l e t e d 18 s e m e s t e r h o u r s o f a c a d e m i c work i n e d u c a t i o n o f t h e d e a f . I n f a c t , s h e h a s a t t a i n e d a s t r a i g h t C r e c o r d . T h i s w o u ld i n d i c a t e t h a t s h e h a s n o t shown s t r e n g t h a c a d e m i c a l l y n o r i n t h e t e a c h i n g p r a c t i c u m w h i c h h a s b e e n a p a r t o f t h e s e I n s t i t u t e s . A g r a d e a v e r a g e o f C w i l l a l l o w h e r t o c o n t i n u e i n a t t e n d a n c e a t t h e U n i v e r s i t y . How e v e r , on t h e b a s i s o f t h i s w o r k , s h e w ou ld n o t b e c o n s i d e r e d f o r a d m i s s i o n t o t h e G r a d u a t e S c h o o l . In a d d i t i o n , s t u d e n t s who f a l l b e l o w a B a v e r a g e i n t h e i r d e a f e d u c a t i o n c o n t e n t and p r a c t i c u m c o u r s e s a r e n o r m a l l v d i s c o u r a g e d by o u r s t a f f f rom t e a c h i n g i n t h e f i e l d . No f u l l t i m e s t u d e n t p u r s u i n g a d e g r e e i n t h i s f i e l d i s recommended f o r a t e a c h i n g p o s i t i o n w i t h o u t a t l e a s t a B a v e r a g e . F o r s o l o n g a s t e a c h e r s l i k e Mrs . H i l l a r e u n d e r c o n t r a c t t o t e a c h t h e d e a f , we w i l l s t r i v e t o p r o v i d e w h a t e v e r t r a i n i n g we can f o r them . Ho we ver , I p e r s o n a l l y w o u ld n o t recommend a t e a c h e r whose d e m o n s t r a t e d p e r f o r m a n c e i s no b e t t e r t h a n C i n h e r a r e a o f s p e c i a l i z a t i o n . M rs . Ru th W a lk e r h a s h a d M rs . H i l l i n c l a s s d u r i n g e a c h o f t h e summer s e s s i o n s . She r e p o r t s some s t r e n g t h w i t h i n t h e a r e a o f home e c o n o m i c s , b u t a g e n e r a l w e a k n e s s i n o t h e r a r e a s . We w o u ld h a v e d i f f i c u l t y v i s u a l i z i n g M rs . H i l l i n an a c a d e m i c c l a s s r o o m s i t u a t i o n . I t r u s t t h a t t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n w i l l be o f some h e l p t o y o u . I am s o r r y t h a t t h e - Z % o - 2 - U n i v e r i s t y r e c o r d s o f f i c e w i l l n o t f o r w a r d a t r a n s c r i p t a t my r e q u e s Ho we ver , i f yo u w i s h t o a s k me any o t h e r s p e c i f i c q u e s t i o n s , I s h a l l p l e a s e d t o r e s p o n d a s a c c u r a t e l y and h o n e s t l y a s I am a b l e . S i n c e r e l y , R o n a l d E v e l s i z e r , Ed.D. C o o r d i n a t o r , P r o g r a m s f o r T e a c h e r o f t h e Deaf SPEECH AND HEARING CENTER c c : Mrs . W a lk e r R E : s j 1 CHRISTINE ARCHIE, by her mother and ne::t friend, MRS. ADA ARCHIE:MARY VALEi'iTIlJE, a minor, by her mother and no::t friend, MRS. ANNIE VALENTINE: and BEHITA ADAMS, by her legal guardian, MRS. CATHERINE GROOM and MRS. MAUDE V. KILL, Plaintiff-Intcrvenor V3. TIIE ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR TI1E DEAF AND BLIND; Mr. E. II. Gentry, The President of the Institute; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TIIE ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND; Mr. Ernest Stronr, Principal, ALABAMA STATE SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF; Mr. Carl Monroe, Principal, ALABAMA STATE SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND; Mrs. Catherine Risen, Prin cipal, ALABAMA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF and Mr. B.Q. Scruggs, Principal, Alabama School for the Blind; The Department of ADULT SERVICES' FOR THE DEAF AND BLIND and its President, Mr. George McFadden and KELLER SCHOOL for tho DEAF AND BLIND, Mrs. Mary Snell, Principal. Defendants. ))))))))))))))))))))))•))))))))))))))))) CIVIL ACTION NO. 67-440 FILED IN CLERK’S OFFICE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA DEC 6 19/1 WILLIAM E. DAVIS CLERK, U S. DISTRICT COURT T t •//. UTT CLERK NOTICE OF APPEAL Notice is hereby given that the plair.tiff-intervenor, Maude V. Hill, hereby appeal to tho United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from an order of the United States District Court, November 15, 1971, entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama denying plaintiff- intervenor the relief she sought, and filed on November 15, 1971. DEMETRIUS C. KENTON 408 North 17th Street Birmingham, Alabama 35203 JACK GREENBERG SYLVIA DRE17 10 Columbus Circle New York, Nov/ Yorh 10019 Attorneys for Plsrintiff-Intervenor '28/' ii C)T-VfTFJ: C-.TB OF SERVICE This is to certify that on this (o day of — -Cs~y ^1971, I mailed a copy of the foregoing Notice of Appeal to Barry McCrary, Esq., 223 V.'oat North Street, Talladega, Alabama, attorney for defendants, via United States Mail, postage pro—naid. DEMETRIUS C. NE^rTON