Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler Brief for the United States

Public Court Documents
February 18, 1976

Cite this item

Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler Brief for the United States preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- Education
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 93e8fc99-c09a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 3. Former White Mate Resents New Negro Husband; Demands Children's Custody, 1966. 805553d2-b692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2a9b5294-b523-46ed-990d-4cade9c29f92/former-white-mate-resents-new-negro-husband-demands-childrens-custody. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    10 Columbus Circle 
New York, N.Y. 10019 
JUdson 68397 

NAACP 

Legal Defense and Educational Fund: 
PRESS RELEASE 
President 

Hon. Francis Rivers Roney a 

BD jack Crcenborg March 7, 1966° 

FORMER WHITE MATE RESENTS NEW NEGRO 3 
HUSBAND; DEMANDS CHILDREN'S CUSTODY 4 

Federal Court Grants Hearing March 25th 

LOUISVILLE, Ky,.---A March 25th hearing to determine the future of 

five white children, their mother and her new Negro husband, was 

secured in Federal District Court here this week by attorneys of 

the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. 

Mrs. Francis Eilers Anderson wants her children returned to 

her new home, All five youngsters are presently being cared for 

in homes provided by the court pending outcome of the hearing. 

Mrs. Anderson divorced George Eilers in June of 1963 on 

grounds that he was "unfit to act as father and husband." She 

gained custody of the children. 

She subsequently married Marshall Anderson, a Negro, in 

Illinois in January of 1964 and moved to a predominantly Negro 

neighborhood in Louisville. 

The following month, Mr. Eilers petitioned the local curcuit 

court for custody of the children on the sole ground that the new 

husband was a Negro. 

Kentucky law declares marriage between a white and a Negro 

illegal and void. 

Circuit Judge Lyndon B, Schmid ordered the children removed 

from their mother and issued an order saying "rearing these 

children in a racially mixed atmosphere will per se indoctrinate 

them with a psychology of inferiority." 

Legal Defense Fund attorney, James A, Crumlin, questioned a 

letter sent in January of 1965 by Judge Schmid, which stated: 

"Since the divorce, the mother has married of her rece and 
the court feels the best interests of the children require that 
they be reared in a home other than the one maintained by the 
mother and her new husband.” 

Joining Attorney Crumlin in the case are Legal Defense Fund 
Attorneys Jack Greenberg and Leroy Clark of New York City. 

=30=. 

Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Inf ion—Night Number 212 ide 9-8487 eB

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler Brief for the United States

Impact area

Topic

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in