Correspondence from Kirk to Still
Correspondence
September 15, 1986
3 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Correspondence from Kirk to Still, 1986. b887fe97-b7d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/66fa4f50-c634-4e52-aa40-bf6e352ef801/correspondence-from-kirk-to-still. Accessed November 06, 2025.
Copied!
LAW OFFICES
WO Fok A
CURRY & KIRK
P.O. DRAWER A-B
Corroltlon, tloluma ITH
J. H. CURRY (1801-1984) AREA CODE 205
W. O. KIRK, JR. September 15, 1986 TELEPHONE 367-8125
—,
Mc. Edward Still Copy
Attorney at Law
714 South 29th Street
Birmingham, AL 35233
Re: Dillard vs. Crenshaw County (Pickens County)
Dear Ed:
I received your letter of September 11, 1986, with regard to
the above case.
The stipulation entered into between Pickens County and the
Plaintiffs call for elections in November of this year under an
approved remedial election plan and to this date there is no
approved remedial election plan.
The plan that Pickens County submitted to the Court and to
the Justice Department calls for single-member district
commissioners from Districts Two and Four to be elected in 1986
and no elections for commissioners in Distrists One and Three
until 1988 and there is certainly no reason to suggest that
commissioners be elected by any means for Districts One and Three
until the year 1988. Since the four commission district plan
filed by Pickens County has no changes in Districts Two and Four
and since they have had single-member district elections in the
Primary, it would seem to me that no additional election would be
necessary except the General Election in November which could be
held under single-member district voting for Districts Two and
Four.
With regard to your list of questions, Pickens County would
respond as follows:
(1) There is no problem with identifying voters under the
four member plan as that has already been done.
(2) The public has been well informed by radio and
newspaper accounts, as well as a public hearing concerning this
case and the position of the parties.
(3) It would be a virtual impossibility to reidentify
voters under the five member plan submitted by the Plaintiffs by
November 4, 1986. The five member plan cuts across all precinct
district lines in Pickens County and the plan itself only
identified population and nct voting precincts and not registered
voters.
(4) Certainly, no candidate qualification deadlines have
been set as that would be impossible under the condition of not
knowing which plan will be implemented.
The position of Pickens County is that no elections will be
necessary 1in November of 1986 except for the elections of
commissioners in Districts Two and Four to be voted on only by
the registered voters of the respective Districts Two and Four in
the General Election.
There would be no elections in Districts One and Three until
1988.
All of this is in accordance with the plan submitted to the
Justice Department and the Court.
Sincerely yours,
WOKjr:bw
cc: Hon. Myron H. Thompson
U. S. District Judge
P.O. BOX 235
Montgomery, AL 36101
Mr. James U. Blacksher
Blacksher, Menefee & Stein, P. A.
P. O. Box 1051
Mobile, AL 36633
Mr. Larry Menefee
Blacksher, Menefee & Stein, P. A.
Fifth Floor, Title Building
300 21st Street North
Birmingham, AL 35203
Mr. Terry G. Davis
Seay & Davis
P.O. Box 6215
Montgomery, AL 36106
Mr. Julius L. Chambers
Ms. Deborah Fins
NAACP Legal Defense Fund
99 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10013