A United States Court of Appeals was requested to order the Dallas School Board to stop its stalling…
Press Release
January 14, 1960
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. A United States Court of Appeals was requested to order the Dallas School Board to stop its stalling…, 1960. bd25e1b1-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/679fe7ab-fcd4-40f2-9cc6-bbc7ea65eb55/a-united-states-court-of-appeals-was-requested-to-order-the-dallas-school-board-to-stop-its-stalling. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
-PRESS RELEASE ®@ @
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND
10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE + NEW YORK 19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397
DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS oe THURGOOD MARSHALL
President Director-Counsel
January 14, 1960
Dallas, Texas.--A United States Court of Appeals was requested
to order the Dallas School Board to stop its stalling and submit a
plan for the desegregation of its public schools in time for Negro
children to be enrolled in integrated classes at the beginning of the
September 1960 term.
The request was made in a brief filed with the Fifth Circvit
Court of Appeals in New Orleans on Monday by attorneys for the NAACP
Legal Defense and Educational Fund in behalf of Negro public school
children of the City. It is the fourth time the Dallas School Case
has been brought up to the appellate court in 4% years.
The district court on April 16, 1958, entered a “final judgment"
which restrained and enjoined the school board from requiring and per-
mitting segregation of the races in any school under its supervision.
The school authorities on July 27, 1959, contended that while
they have done their best to comply with the state and federal laws,
it is physically impracticable to desegregate immediately due to a
state law which provides for the withdrawal of state funds from any
school district which desegregates without voter approval in a local
referendum.
However, at a hearing held July 30, 1959, attorneys for the Negro
children, despite the court ruling restraining the school authorities
from permitting segregation, modified their demand for immediate
desegregation and asked that the school board merely submit "a plan
for desegregation within a reasonable time which would provide for
desegregation beginning September 1960."
The school board, instead of complying, has used every stalling
method and finally offered to initiate the referendum which calls
for local voters' approval.
On August 4 the district court agreed with the school board's
contentions that its actions constituted good faith in implementing
all constitutional principles, that more time should elapse before a
aoe
definite date for desegregation be set, and that the local referendum
calling for voters' approval should be invoked.
In the brief filed in behalf of the Negro children, Legal Defense
attorneys argue that the district court erred in its decision and
asked the Court of Appeals to reverse the decision and to instruct
the district court to order the Dallas school authorities to submit
a plan for desegregation which would provide for desegregation begin-
ning September, 1960.
Attorneys for the Negro children are Thurgood Marshall of New
York, W. J. Durham and C. B. Bunkley, Jr. of Dallas, Texas. Assistinc
in the preparation of the brief is Elwood H. Chisolm of New York.
=280es