Correspondence from Pugh to Ganucheau (Clerk)
Public Court Documents
April 11, 1988

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Correspondence from Guinier to Stevas, 1985. 02caf321-d692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ef7b4378-6528-4d25-8be6-b387ebccb613/correspondence-from-guinier-to-stevas. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
May 9, 1985 the Honorable Alexander L. Stevas CIerk Supreme Court of the United States wainington, D. c.20543 Re: 83-1968 - Rufus L- Edmisten, et al' v' Ralph Ginqles, et aI- Dear Mr. Stevas: I am counsel of record for appellees in the above ".piio.r"d case in which probable jurisdiction was noled, April 29, 1985. Pursuant to our conversa- tion of itray 3 , 1985, I write to alert you to a potential |roblem I have regarding the briefing 'schedule dlscribed in the Memorandum to Counsel in Ci=." Granted Review on April 29, 1985. The brief for appellents is now due June 13, 1985. Accordingly, the brief for appellees will be due in mid-JulY, 1985. As I stated during our conversation, I am also lead counse] for one oi three co-defendants in a crimi'naI j;t case that is set for trial June 17, I98s I9!i!Sq 6tat,es v. sp?lcgf -Bgqug,-Jr., et al', cr' No' 8500014 and Cr. No. he trial is sched- uled to last four weeks, during the same period in which I would be preparing the brief for appellees. I thought it prudent to bring this apEarent conflict to youi attent,ion early on. Counsel for appellants havi stated they do not object to my seeking an ex- tension of time within which to file my brief' Thank you for your consideration and assistance. Respectful111 Yourtl Oil,&,^*A* Carol Lani Guinier cl,G/ r cc: Jerris Leonard, Esq. James Wa11ace, Esq- \iXJ:TY NiNE FlUDSON STREE]- NE\l/'iCFK. )r Y 1C013