Lemon v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 139 Brief Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees

Public Court Documents
January 25, 2000

Lemon v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 139 Brief Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees preview

This is a joint brief between the Legal Defense Fund and the Chicago Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Karen Meyer, John Duncan Odell Williams, Virgil Eiland, Pat Haynes, Craig Anderson, the Estate of John Beamon, Shirley Nyman, and Franklin Edmonds, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals acting as Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Memo from Cox to Chachkin with Draft Stipulations, 1999. 80c2fb39-dc0e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e588b58f-f9a7-4ae9-b236-3efcf5ae2cab/memo-from-cox-to-chachkin-with-draft-stipulations. Accessed August 19, 2025.

    Copied!

    ¥ 
JUI-06-83 TUE 10:39 NAACP LDF FAX NO, a P. 01/03 

Regional Office 

1444 | Street, NW, 10th Floor NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE Washington, DC 20005 (202) 682-1300 Fax: (202) 682-1312 AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 

FAX TRANSMISSION 

NORMAN CHRACHKIN 
LDF-NY 

212-219-2052 

Topp A. Cox 
ASSISTANT COUNSEL 
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 
1444 I STRLET, NW, 10TH FLOOR 
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 

(202) 682-1300 

DATE: JULY 6, 1999 

NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): 3 

IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL 3 PAGES, PLEASE CALL (202) 682-1300 TO NOTIFY US. 

MESSAGE: Norman: These are my draft Section 2 stitpulations Cromartie. 1 tried to do my best to balance brevity with enough detail. Please let me know what you think. Thanks. 

Todd 

The information contained in this facsimile message 1s legally privileged and confidential informarion intended only for the use of the individnal or entity named above. If the reader of this message 1s not the intended recipient. you are herchy notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this telecopy is strictly prohibited. If you have received this telecopy in crror, please immediately notify us by telephone and return the onginal message to us at the above address via the United States Postal Service. 

National Office Regional Office Contributions are The NAACP Legal Defense & Educational F und, Inc. (LDF) is not part Suite 1600 Suite 208 deduetibls for U.S. ul the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 99 Hudson Strooct 315 West Ninth Strect inoome tax purposes. (NAACP) although LDF was founded by the NAACP and shares its New York, NY 10013 Los Angelos, CA 90013 corrmnilment to equal rights. LDF has had for over 30 YCArs a scparate (212) 219-1900 (213) 624-2403 Board, Program. staff, and budget. Fax: (212) 226-7592 Fax: (213) 624-0075 

2826821312 PAGE .QQG1  



    

JUL,-06-99 TUE 10:39 NAACP LDF FAX NO. “® P. 02/03 

STIPULATIONS 

The parties agree that they will not contest in this case that. 

1. In North Carolina and in the areas comprising Congressional Districts 1 and 12 of the 1997 Sessions Laws, Chapter [| in the 1997 Redistricting Plan, African-American voters are politically cohesive. 

2. In North Carolina in the areas comprising Congressional Districts 1 and 12 of the 1997 Sessions Laws, Chapter 11, the white majority votes sufficiently as a bloc to enable it, in the absence of special circumstances, usually to defeat the African-American voter’s preferred 
candidate. 

3. North Carolina and the areas comprising Congressional Districts 1 and 12 of the 1997 Sessions Laws, Chapter 11 the have a long history of official discrimination against its minority citizens which has affected the right of minority citizens of North Carolina to register, vote, and otherwise participate in the electoral process. 

4, For nine decades, from 1901 until 1992, no African-American candidate had been elected to Congress in North Carolina. 

5. In North Carolina, African-American voters were disenfranchised as a result of 
deliberate state laws that both denied African-American voters access Lo the ballot box and diluted their votes. 

6. The State of North Carolina utilized measures such as poll taxes, literacy tests, anti-single shot voting laws, and at-large and multi-member election districts to exclude African- Americans from the political process. 

2 In its 1970 and 1980 reapportionment plans, the North Carolina General Assembly intentionally fragmented the African-American vote in the northeastern portion of the state to make sure African-American voters could not gamer enough support to elect their preferred candidate to Congress. 

8. In North Carolina, racial appeals in campaigns have been used, as late as the 1990's, by white candidates to discourage white voters from voting for African-American 
candidates. 

9. The minority citizens of the State of North Carolina and the areas comprising Congressional Districts 1 and 12 of the 1997 Sessions Laws, Chapter 11 continue to bear the effects of historical racial discrimination in such areas as education, employment, and health, which hinders their ability to participate effectively and equally with white citizens in the political process. 

10. African-American voters as a whole are Jess well-educated, lower-paid, more likely 

JUL 6 "89:14:42 

  

2826821312 PAGE.



    

JUL-06-83 TUE 10:40 NAACP LDF FAX NO. a 3 P. 03/03 

to be in poverty, and have less access to telephones, cars, and money than do their white counterparts, which adverscly affects their ability to participate effectively in the political Process. 

11. Under the totality of circumstances. the State of North Carolina and the Jurisdictions comprising Congressional Districts 1 and 12 of the 1997 Sessions Laws, Chapter 11 has denicd minority voters an equal opportunity to participate in the political process and elect candidates of their choice to office. 

12. The State of North Carolina has a compelling interest in complying with the Voting Rights Act and assuring that racially polarized voting patterns and the lingering effects of the State’s past discrimination do not exclude the State’s African- American citizens from equal access to the political process. 

2826821312 PAGE .BA83 JUL “B '83 11:42

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top