Memorandum on School Desegregation Cases

Harrison v. NAACP Brief for Appellees preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Notable People
- Thurgood Marshall
- Jack Greenberg
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- Harrison v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
Case
- Harrison v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
U.S. state
- Virginia
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- ae426689-b59a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 3. Memorandum on School Desegregation Cases, 1966. cb5d3df0-b692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ad92baa9-ef26-4875-ad82-fe50aaa04f9a/memorandum-on-school-desegregation-cases. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

10 Columbus Circle

New York, N.Y. 10019
JUdson 6-8397

NAACP

Legal Defense and Educational Fund
PRESS RELEASE
President

ion. Francis E. Rivers

DirecosiCounest ‘
Jack Greenberg

MEMORANDUM

May 23, 1966

TO: Working Press

FROM: NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

SUBJECT: School Desegregation Cases

NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund lawyers this week

will ask U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals for sweeping school

desegregation decisions that could have widespread effect across

the South.

Legal Defense Fund attorneys will appear before the Fifth

U.S, Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans Tuesday and Wednesday,

May 24 and 25 to argue cases involving schools in Fairfield,

Bessemer and Jefferson County, Ala.; Baton Rouge and Caddo and

Bossier Parishes, La., and Clarksdale, Miss.

Another appeal, involving Oklahoma City, Okla., public

‘schools, will be argued Wednesday, May 25, before the Tenth

Circuit in Wichita, Kans.

School desegregation suits in all eight cases were initiated

and fought by the Legel Defense Fund.

Fund attorneys are seeking court orders that will require

affirmative action by local school boards to "completely

disestablish segregated patterns and eradicate segregated Negro

and white schools."

Desegregation of faculty and staff is sought as “a pre-

requisite for effective school desegregation,"

The Legal Defense Fund contends that "free choice provisions

of school desegregation plans approved by lower courts fall far

short of standards laid down in previous Fifth Circuit decisions

and guidelines established by the U.S. Office of Education.

Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 Sr ©

In Wichita, Fund Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg will argue

against an appeal taken by the Oklahoma City School Board. After

a Legal Defense Fund suit, the federal district court last August

ordered the school board to take affirmative action towards both

pupil and faculty desegregation. The U,S, Department of Justice

has intervened in five of the seven Fifth Circuit cases.

Appearing for the Legal Defense Fund in the Fifth Circuit

cases will be: Fairfield, Ala,--Demetrius Newton of Birmingham;

Bessemer, Ala.--Oscar W. Adams Jr. of Biminghan; Jefferson County,

Ala.--Norman C. Amaker of New York; Baton Rouge, _La.--James M,

oom III of New York; Caddo Parish, La.--Charles H. Jones, Jr.

of New pork; Bossier Parish, La.--James M, Nabrit III of New York,

and C pekedale. Miss.--Henry Aronson of Jackson.

Enclosed is a copy of an August, 1965 press release on the

Oklahgna City case for your information.

iy ‘

The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. is neither

synonomous with ror a part of the NAACP. Established in 1939,

the Legal Defense Fund represents members of all civil rights

organizations as well as unaffiliated individuals.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Harrison v. NAACP Brief for Appellees

Notable People

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in