Rachel v. Georgia Reply Brief for Appellants

Public Court Documents
September 30, 1964

Cite this item

Rachel v. Georgia Reply Brief for Appellants preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Date is approximate.

Topic
- Criminal Justice
Notable Person
- Jack Greenberg
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 0cfde2bd-c19a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 5. Greenberg Statement on Newark Medical School, 1967. b4e00264-b892-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/168cdd01-4356-4169-bdea-7de46d3e73eb/greenberg-statement-on-newark-medical-school. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    Statement by Jack Greenberg 

Re: New Jersey College of Medicine and Dentistry 

Friday, December 29, 1967 

On advice of attorneys of the NAACP Legal Defense and 

Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) representatives of the Newark 

Area Planning Association and the Committee Against Negro 

and Puerto Rican Removal will not participate in today's 

meeting with trustees of the New Jersey College of Medicine 

and Dentistry, which has been called by the Committee of 

Concern, 53 Washington Street, Newark at 12 noon. 

Our clients received notice of the meeting only yes- 

terday and staff lawyers, who had previous committments, 

are unable to attend. 

We and our clients are awaiting a response to our 

complaint filed December 20th with Robert Weaver, secretary 

of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 

The LDF, in that complaint, outlined its opposition 

to two applications of the Newark Housing Authority which 

seek federal urban renewal assistance in acquiring over 

150 acres for the Medical College. 

Sent to: 

Newark News via AP wire 

Leo Sandora - Newark Star Ledger via telephone 

Walter Wagganor - New York Times, Newark, via telephone 

Paul Tharpe - UPI Newark via telephone

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Rachel v. Georgia Reply Brief for Appellants

Topic

Notable Person

Organization

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in