Jenkins v. Missouri Individual Brief of Appellee the School District of the City of Independence

Public Court Documents
January 1, 1985

Cite this item

Jenkins v. Missouri Individual Brief of Appellee the School District of the City of Independence preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Date is approximate. Jenkins v. Missouri Individual Brief of Appellee the School District of the City of Independence and Its Superintendent Dr. Robert L. Henley

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- Education
Matter
- Kalima Jenkins v. State of Missouri
Case
- Kalima Jenkins v. State of Missouri
U.S. state
- Missouri
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 1ca0a4d7-b59a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 6. Adams v. Richardson - 17 State School Districts Ordered to Enforce Civil Rights, 1975. 38cbdf0d-bb92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2c693126-ddde-4f8e-8082-8e8465233f63/adams-v-richardson-17-state-school-districts-ordered-to-enforce-civil-rights. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    259 

From: Norman Bloomfield 
NAACP Legal Defen 
10 Columbus Circle 

New York, New York 10019 

Educational Fund 

Phone: (212) 586-8397 

John Pratt 

WASHINGTON, D.C., March 14 - United States District duc 

Richardson civil ri 
today issued a further order in the landmark 

suit against HEW, requiring the agency to move more 

enforce federal civil rights laws against school dist: 

border states. 

and Educational 
The action was brought by the NAACP 

@ to drag on interminably 
Finding that HEW investigations te 

trict Court ordered the ag 
out any resolution or enforcement, the Di 

wi 

to conform to a specific investigative timetable and cut off federal 

ool desegregation requireme 
school districts refusing to comply with 

The injunction requires 

3 

school district is violating the law with: 

of racial discrimination. The agency then must atter 

through voluntary means for an additional period not to exc 

not been achieved When such compliance ha 

handed down in the spring of 1972 Co) 

and a ed by the U. S. C £ Apr in 1973, the 

cials were not enfor 

colle 

(More) 



The present suit,charged that HEW officials were moving too slowly, 

and that they had not taken e cement steps against new violations of the 

law discovered after entry of the original decree. 

The plaintiffs alleged that HEW had simply abandoned any rt to 

enforce the law against 39 school districts which were among 85 systems with 

e racial composition" listed in the 

original order requiring HEW action. 

The District Court agreed and today gave HEW 60 days to begin proceedings 

against the 39 systems. Included within this group are Baltimore, Md., 

St. Louis, Mo., and Kansas City, Mo. 

Judge Pratt additionally ordered HEW officials to begin investigations 

of 125 other school districts where, in the last two years, the agency had found 

"substantially disproportionate” schools, but took no action. 

The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund was represented by its 

cooperating attorneys Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., John Silard and Elliott C. Lichtman 

ef Washington, D. C. 

NOTE TO EDITOR: The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund is a 

completely separate organization, even though originally 

established by the NAACP in 1939. Our correct designation is 

NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., frequently 

shortened to Legal Defense Fund. The organization has a 

national staff and headquarters in New York City, and works 

with 400 cooperating attorneys throughout the country.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Jenkins v. Missouri Individual Brief of Appellee the School District of the City of Independence

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in