Wife of Miss. NAACP Head Seeks High Court Review of Dismissal as Teacher
Press Release
April 4, 1966
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 3. Wife of Miss. NAACP Head Seeks High Court Review of Dismissal as Teacher, 1966. f3714ae4-b692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7013aa50-2fff-4fe5-979c-05f577bda940/wife-of-miss-naacp-head-seeks-high-court-review-of-dismissal-as-teacher. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
10 Columbus Circle
New York, N.Y, 10019
JUdson 6-8397
NAACP
Legal Defense and Educational Fund
PRESS RELEASE
"ion. Francis E. Rivers
Difsctor-Counsel FOR RELEASE
Jack Greenberg Monday,
April 4, 1966
WIFE OF MISS. NAACP HEAD
SEEKS HIGH COURT REVIEW
OF DISMISSAL AS TEACHER
Legal Defense Fund Represents Mrs. Aaron Henry
WASHINGTON---The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund today
asked the Supreme Court to review the case of a Mississippi school-
teacher, fired after she and her husband had been active in the
civil rights movement.
Mrs. Noelle M. Henry, wife of Dr. Aaron Henry, Mississippi
State president of the National Association for the Advancement of
Colored People, had taught in the Coahoma County, Miss. school
system for 11 years.
She sued the school board in 1962 after it failed to renew
her teaching contract.
In its petition to the Supreme Court, the Legal Defense Fund,
which is a separate organization from the NAACP, alleges that the
school board's action in denying Mrs, Henry employment was
arbitrary and violated her constitutional rights.
The suit, which alleged that Mrs. Henry was not rehired be-
cause of her and her husband's civil rights activities, was dismissa
in Federal District Court, The Circuit Court of Appeals
subsequently upheld the dismissal.
In the trial of Mrs. Henry's suit, Coahoma County school
officials testified that her contract was not renewed because her
husband was a defendant in a libel suit and was also facing
morals charges.
The courts denied attorneys’ attempts to prove that the
charges against Dr. Henry were part of a pattern of harassment for
civil rights activity.
Also denied was an attempt to challenge Mrs. Henry's dismiesat
on grounds that charges against her husband should not effect =
her qualifications as a teacher.
Representing Mrs. Henry are Fund Director-Counsel Jack
Greenberg, James M, Nabrit III and Derrick A. Bell Jr. of New York,
and R, Jess Brown of Jackson, Mississippi.
=30-
Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 Ss