Argument on the first litigation to reach the United States Supreme Court embracing…
Press Release
October 6, 1960
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. Argument on the first litigation to reach the United States Supreme Court embracing…, 1960. 152a3193-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/72dfc5b1-9d4e-4006-b65e-f304cf544b88/argument-on-the-first-litigation-to-reach-the-united-states-supreme-court-embracing. Accessed November 03, 2025.
Copied!
‘PRESS RELEASE® rd
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND
10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE + NEW YORK 19,N.Y. «© JUdson 6-8397
DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS > THURGOOD MARSHALL
President Director-Counsel
NEt YORK, Oct. 6.-- Argument on the first litigation to reach
the United States Supreme Court embracing the basic issues in the
cases involving students arrested in sit-in protest demonstrations, is
scheduled to be heard Tuesday, October ll,
The case involves a Howard University law student who was arrested
and convicted for refusing to leave an interstate bus terminal
restaurant when he was ordered out by the management.
The case was filed with the U. S. Supreme Court on September 15,
1959, in behalf of Bruce Boynton. He was arrested in December, 1958,
at the Trailways Bus Terminal in Richmond, Va. while en route from
Washington, D. C. to his home in Selma, Ala.
Boynton was convicted in the Richmond Police Court and fined
$10.00, The conviction was twice appealed but upheld by the city and
state courts.
Thurgood Marshall, Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and
Educational Fund said that while the Boynton case is not one which
involves the world famous outbreak of student sit-in demonstrations,
the decision could very well resolve the legality of most sit-in
activities.
"The issue in the Boynton case is whether an interstate passenger
can be convicted for refusing to leave a restaurant which is obliged
to serve interstate travelers," Marshall explained.
Boynton has been supported by the United States Solicitor General
in a brief filed as a friend of the court.
Mr, Marshall pointed out that the issue in most of the sit-in
cases now pending before the various courts is whether the police can
enforce segregation in privately owned restaurants, lunch counters and
other places open to tie general public.
"More than 1,600 ctudents, white as well as Negro, have been
arrested in 12 southern states," Marshall declared, “The majority of
the cases are in the lower courts while e few have reached appeals in
other courts."
i & @
Mr. Marshall disclosed that the amount of the fines leveled
against the students far exceeds $50,000; bond money, he said, is well
over $100,000.
NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys responsible for taking the
Boynton case to the Supreme Court are Mr. Marshall, Constance Baker
Motley and Jack Greenberg, all of New York City. Local counsel in the
case are Martin A. Martin and Clarence Newsome, both of Richmond, Va.
=UaDs=
10/6/60