Brief Filed to Reverse Bobby Seale's Conviction
Press Release
June 29, 1970

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Brief Filed to Reverse Bobby Seale's Conviction, 1970. 60df9f28-ba92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/72e779f6-cb4f-42e6-9a26-a2a116ac8940/brief-filed-to-reverse-bobby-seales-conviction. Accessed May 15, 2025.
Copied!
12e President Hon. Francis E. Rivers PRESS RELEASE Diciesés Counsel ck Greenb ahecai efense lund i daek eesenbete Director, Public Relations -EGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. Jesse DeVore, Jr. ambus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 ion NUMBER 212-749-8467 June 29, 1970 Attorneys for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF), have filed a brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on behalf of Black Panther Chairman Bobby Seale, who is fighting a four-year prison sentence imposed by Federal Judge Julius Hoffman in Chicago for contempt of court during the trial of the Chicago Eight. The brief contends that Seale's conviction must be reversed and the charges dismissed for the following reasons: First - he was wrongfully denied the fundamental right to present a defense to the criminal conspiracy charges either by counsel of his choice -- Charles R. Garry -- or by representing himself. Second - the court convicted him of contempt and sentenced him to an unprecedented four-year term without providing him essential due process safeguards including: -- the right to jury trial -- the right to an impartial judge -- the right to a fair hearing on the issues of guilt and penalty. Third - the brief contends that Seale's conduct, consisting as it did solely of attempts to protest the denial of his rights to be represented by counsel and to represent himself, cannot be punished as criminal contempt. Finally - the brief contends that reversal is required in the interests of justice because of misconduct by the trial court and the prosecuting attorneys. Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel of the Legal Defense Fund, has stated the Legal Defense Fund's interest in the Bobby Seale Case. "Among the important cases LDF takes are cases which may or may not make precedent or affect many people but are primarily important because they test faith in the legal system to achieve justice without prejudice. We have taken such cases when we had the manpower or funds. These often are cases where emotions have so invested the legal controversy that whether there is a fair trial determines what many people think about law. Over the years we have taken on numerous capital cases of this sort, or cases involving race riots or murder or rape. The legal issues may not seem very far-reaching and only a single individual may be involved. The causes often have not been popular." “An individual whose case has this kind of symbolic significance is Bobby Seale. Should there be any doubt about it we need look at a recent poll conducted among 1,255 blacks nationwide for Time magazine by the Harris organization found that 24 per cent of all black people say ‘the Black Panther philosophy is the same as mine.' Among teenage blacks, 43 per cent go along with the Panthers. In addition, 64 per cent of all blacks feel the Panthers have given them ‘a sense of pride' and 80 per cent feel that the shootings of the Panthers have made them feel that -more- ‘blacks have to stand together.'" It is important that an individual like Seale receive the full assurance of his constitutional rights. LDF attorneys, Mrs. Elizabeth B. DuBois, Eric Schnapper and Conrad Harper helped prepare this 178 page brief. =30= NOTE: Please bear in mind that the LDF isacompletely separate and distinct organization even though we were established by the NAACP and those initials are retained in our name. Our correct designation is NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., frequently shortened to LDF.