Brief Filed to Reverse Bobby Seale's Conviction
Press Release
June 29, 1970
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Brief Filed to Reverse Bobby Seale's Conviction, 1970. 60df9f28-ba92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/72e779f6-cb4f-42e6-9a26-a2a116ac8940/brief-filed-to-reverse-bobby-seales-conviction. Accessed December 05, 2025.
Copied!
12e
President
Hon. Francis E. Rivers
PRESS RELEASE Diciesés Counsel
ck Greenb
ahecai efense lund i daek eesenbete
Director, Public Relations
-EGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. Jesse DeVore, Jr.
ambus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 ion NUMBER 212-749-8467
June 29, 1970
Attorneys for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF),
have filed a brief in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh
Circuit on behalf of Black Panther Chairman Bobby Seale, who is fighting
a four-year prison sentence imposed by Federal Judge Julius Hoffman in
Chicago for contempt of court during the trial of the Chicago Eight.
The brief contends that Seale's conviction must be reversed and the
charges dismissed for the following reasons:
First - he was wrongfully denied the fundamental right to present
a defense to the criminal conspiracy charges either by counsel of
his choice -- Charles R. Garry -- or by representing himself.
Second - the court convicted him of contempt and sentenced him to an
unprecedented four-year term without providing him essential due
process safeguards including:
-- the right to jury trial
-- the right to an impartial judge
-- the right to a fair hearing on the issues of guilt
and penalty.
Third - the brief contends that Seale's conduct, consisting as it
did solely of attempts to protest the denial of his rights to be
represented by counsel and to represent himself, cannot be punished
as criminal contempt.
Finally - the brief contends that reversal is required in the
interests of justice because of misconduct by the trial court and
the prosecuting attorneys.
Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel of the Legal Defense Fund, has stated
the Legal Defense Fund's interest in the Bobby Seale Case. "Among the
important cases LDF takes are cases which may or may not make precedent
or affect many people but are primarily important because they test
faith in the legal system to achieve justice without prejudice. We have
taken such cases when we had the manpower or funds. These often are
cases where emotions have so invested the legal controversy that whether
there is a fair trial determines what many people think about law. Over
the years we have taken on numerous capital cases of this sort, or cases
involving race riots or murder or rape. The legal issues may not seem
very far-reaching and only a single individual may be involved. The
causes often have not been popular."
“An individual whose case has this kind of symbolic significance is
Bobby Seale. Should there be any doubt about it we need look at a recent
poll conducted among 1,255 blacks nationwide for Time magazine by the
Harris organization found that 24 per cent of all black people say ‘the
Black Panther philosophy is the same as mine.' Among teenage blacks,
43 per cent go along with the Panthers. In addition, 64 per cent of
all blacks feel the Panthers have given them ‘a sense of pride' and 80
per cent feel that the shootings of the Panthers have made them feel that
-more-
‘blacks have to stand together.'"
It is important that an individual like Seale receive the full
assurance of his constitutional rights.
LDF attorneys, Mrs. Elizabeth B. DuBois, Eric Schnapper and Conrad
Harper helped prepare this 178 page brief.
=30=
NOTE: Please bear in mind that the LDF isacompletely separate and distinct
organization even though we were established by the NAACP and those initials
are retained in our name. Our correct designation is NAACP Legal Defense
and Educational Fund, Inc., frequently shortened to LDF.