Opposition to Plaintiffs-Appellants' Motion for an Injunction Pending Appeal or, In the Alternative, For Issuance of the Mandate and Memorandum in Support Thereof; Affidavit of Kendall L. Vick; Memorandum in Support of Opposition to Plaintiffs-Appellants' Motion for an Injunction Pending Appeal or, In the Alternative, For Issuance of the Mandate

Public Court Documents
May 16, 1988 - May 23, 1988

Cite this item
Opposition to Plaintiffs-Appellants' Motion for an Injunction Pending Appeal or, In the Alternative, For Issuance of the Mandate and Memorandum in Support Thereof; Affidavit of Kendall L. Vick; Memorandum in Support of Opposition to Plaintiffs-Appellants' Motion for an Injunction Pending Appeal or, In the Alternative, For Issuance of the Mandate preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Williams. Draft of Gingles v. Edmisten and Pugh v. Hunt Stipulation 2, 1982. 90de10dd-da92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/76000dab-e5e3-4e9e-8cdb-1d647bd2c172/draft-of-gingles-v-edmisten-and-pugh-v-hunt-stipulation-2. Accessed April 06, 2025.

    Copied!

     

 

W "“
.l" '

(5) The General Assembly did in fact adopt three new
apportionment plans with the ratification of H.B. l, S.B. l, and

S.B. 2 (Attachments D-F); s—

 

rev

(6) rIn addition to enacting its reapportionment plans
for the State Senate, State House of Representatives and United
States Congress, the General Assembly enacted H.B. 3, providing
alternative dates for North Carolina's filing period and primaries,
as more specifically indicated in Attachment G. I

(7) Pursuant to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of
1965, 42 U.S.C. 19730, North Carolina's three new apportionment
plans must now be submitted to the United States Attorney General
for pre—clearance;

(8) The parties hereto stipulate that they can complete
discovery in the actions pending before this Court by the 30th day
following the United States Attorney General's decision on the
issue of whether to pre-clear each and every apportionment plan
last enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly;

(9) With respect to interrogatories and requests to
produce submitted to any party during the discovery period, response
to said interrogatories shall be due by the 15th day following
service of the interrogatories or requests to produce.

This the _____ day of February, 1982.

RUFUS L. EDMISTEN
‘ ATTORNEY GENERAL

 

James Wallace, Jr.
Deputy Attorney General

for Legal Affairs
Attorney General's Office
N. C. Department of Justice
Post Office Box 629
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Telephone: (919) 733-3377
Attorney for Defendants

 

 

 

J. Levonne Chambers
Leslie Winner fi”
Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, Wallas,
Adkins & Fuller, P.A.

951 South Independence Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Telephone: (704) 375—8461
Attorney for gingles Plaintiffs

 

x

 

Arthur J. Donaldson ,
Burke, Donaldson, Holshouser & Kererly
309 North Main Street

Salisbury, North Carolina 28144
Telephone: (704) 637-1500

Attorney for Pugh Plaintiffs

.ae-po.

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top