NAACP LDF Scores 2nd Major Affirmative Action Victory in Detroit Police Cases

Marshall v Holmes Brief of Appellants preview

33 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- cc456814-bd9a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. Marshall v Holmes Brief of Appellants, 1974. cc456814-bd9a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/759e9cf2-f6d3-4436-bf6c-00422d85d18b/marshall-v-holmes-brief-of-appellants. Accessed July 01, 2025.

Copied!

    For immediate release For further information: 
Friday, October 12, 1979 Beth Lief or 

Peter Sherwood 
(212) 586-8397 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND SCORES 2ND MAJOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION VICTORY 

IN DETROIT POLICE CASES 

New York, N.Y. - The NAACP Legal Defense Fund won a unanimous 

opinion in the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit which over- 

turned a lower court decision that had struck down the affirmative action 

policy adopted by the Cityfor the Detroit Police Department. The case - 

known as the sergeant's case —- was one of two legal challenges by the 

white-dominated Detroit police officer union to the affirmative action plan 

adopted by Detroit Mayor Coleman A. Young in 1974 to benefit blacks who had been 

discriminated against in the past by the Police Department. Prior to LDF's 

involvement the City lost the case in the trial court. Today's decision 

came just twelve days after LDF won the other Detroit police case - the 

"lieutenants" case - after a lengthy trial in the District Court for the 

Eastern District of Michigan. 

The white police officers who brought the suit had charged that the 

plan violated the federal and state fair employment acts, and the U. S. and 

Michigan Constitutions. 

Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, said 

that the cases, taken together, represent a major and significant advance in 

strengthening and defending affirmative action generally. "They will aid other 

eities and municipalities in devising and implementing affirmative action pro- 

grams that will stand the test of litigation." 

Editors: The NAACP LegaksDefense» Fund isenot part of thé National “Association 

for the Advancement of Colored People. 

~30- 

F 



RASTERN 

GENERALLY. 1ON 
ae ta 

ua HPL i

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Marshall v Holmes Brief of Appellants

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in