Daniel v. Paul Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae

Public Court Documents
February 1, 1969

Cite this item

Daniel v. Paul Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Date is approximate.

Impact area
- Economic Justice
Topic
- Economic Justice
Matter
- Mrs. Doris Daniel and Mrs. Rosalyn Kyles v. Euell Paul, Jr., individually and as Owner, Operator or Manager of Lake Nixon Club
Case
- Mrs. Doris Daniel and Mrs. Rosalyn Kyles v. Euell Paul, Jr., individually and as Owner, Operator or Manager of Lake Nixon Club
U.S. state
- Arkansas
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 682df2eb-ae9a-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Derrick Bell (Dean, University of Oregon School of Law), 1985. 86b34fbd-e892-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9bd91eba-dc81-4ece-8bdb-f25ba42ba9c0/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-derrick-bell-dean-university-of-oregon-school-of-law. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    Lesa,U&renseH.

October 30, 1985

Dean Derrick BelI
University of Oregon
School of Law
Eugene, Oregon 97403-L221

Dear Derrick:

As always, it was good to talk with you. I am
delighted you will try to join us at LDFrs
offices on Friday, November 22 at 11:00 a.m.,
for JuLiusr dry run in Gingles. I enclose the
briefs for the parties as well as the Solicitor's
and Senator Dolers briefs as amici.

I look fonnrard to seeing you on the bench.

sincprjly,
/ ,,/

Xgz.,,^--
Lani Guinier

LG/ r
Enclosures *2

Contrihutions arc dctluctiblt tor L).5. income lar plrrposes

The NAACP TEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIoNAL FUND is not part of the National Association for the Advancement ol Colored People although il
was lounded by it and shares ils commitment to equal rights. LDF has had lor over 25 years a separate Board, program, stall, ollice and budget.

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.

99 Hudson Street, New york, N.y. 10013o(212) 219-1900

,'*,

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Daniel v. Paul Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in