Clark v. Little Rock Board of Education Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Public Court Documents
January 4, 1984

Cite this item

Clark v. Little Rock Board of Education Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Topic
- Education
Notable People
- Jack Greenberg
- Ted Shaw
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- Delores Clark v. Board of Education of Little Rock School District
Case
- Delores Clark v. Board of Education of Little Rock School District
U.S. state
- Arkansas
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 8766be98-ad9a-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 6. LDF Files Federal Discrimination Suit Against Departments of Defense and Labor, 1969. 52f9aa6a-b992-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5c331688-5c49-41d8-9e3a-0fe28a241437/ldf-files-federal-discrimination-suit-against-departments-of-defense-and-labor. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 

egal ‘efense fund. = 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * 586-8397 

FOR RELEASE: April 8, 1969, 10:30 a.m. 

WASHINGTON, D.C.---The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, 

Inc. (LDF) today filed suit in federal district court here charging 

the Departments of Defense and Labor with "knowingly permitting 

and condoning racial discrimination in employment by government 

contractors." 

Qur suit names three major textile manufacturers: Dan 

River Mills, Inc.; J.P.Stevens and Company, Inc., and Burlington 

Industries. 

All told, these three companies have been awarded $75,000,000.00 

(seventy-five million dollars) during the past year---which more 

than covers the period during which their employment policies 

were in dispute. 

Named as defendants in the LDF action are George P. Shultz, 

secretary of Labor; Melvin R. Laird, secretary of Defense; David 

Packard, deputy secretary of Defense; and Ward McCreedy, acting 

director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance. 

The LDF is representing 20 Negroes from four southern states 

"and on behalf of all black employees at Dan River, Burlington 

and Stevens." 

-30- 

Phoned to: Washington press 
AP, UPI - N.Y., Alabama, S$.C., N.C. Virginia 

Contributions are deductible for U. S. income tax purposes

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Clark v. Little Rock Board of Education Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants

Topic

Notable People

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in