Court Voids Extended Terms for County Commissioners
Press Release
April 26, 1966

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 3. Court Voids Extended Terms for County Commissioners, 1966. b25d3df0-b692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/79b56fe7-3f08-4d6d-b517-20be2c18f981/court-voids-extended-terms-for-county-commissioners. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
10 Columbus Circle New York, N.Y. 10019 JUdson 6-8397 NAACP Lega? Defense and Educational Fund PRESS RELEASE President Hon. Francis E. Rivers Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tuesday, April 26, 1966 COURT VOIDS EXTENDED TERMS FOR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Fund Wins Victory in Bullock County, Alabama MONTGOMERY -- A three-judce federal court last week struck down a provision of an Alabama law that would have postponed elections of Bullock County Commissioners for two years. The commissioners are the county's principal governing body. The court, acting on a suit brought by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, was divided 2-1 in its opinion. District Suds 4 Frank M. Johnson, Jr., who concurred in the decision, said the hitory of voting discrimination in Bullock County and the states Alabama "has been systematic, intentional, invidious and in clear violation of the Fifteenth Amendment. The terms of two of the four county commissioners expire next January. The law, enacted two weeks after passage of the federal Voting Rights Act, would have extended their terms two. years, thus postponing elections for those posts until 1968. The court ordered a primary election to be held May 31, with a general election in November. The other two commissioners, whose terms expire in January, 1969, would also have had their terms extended two years. Elections for those posts would have been changed from 1968 to 1970. Legal Defense Fund attorneys contended that the purpose of the law was to prevent newly registered Negroes from voting or running for county commissioner. Although the law was passed nearly a year age. its pro- visions did not become generally known until last February when Ben McGhee, one of seven Negro plaintiffs in the suit, “attempted to file as a candidate for county commissioner. Hegwas told there would be no election this year. (more) Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Publie Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 aoe Court Voids Extended Terms For County Commissioners The county has nearly twice as many voting age Negroes as white, but only since passage of the Voting Rights Act have Negro registered voters outnumbered whites. Circuit Judge Richard T. Rives wrote the court's opinion. He held that extension of the terms of incumbenetor fici als violated a provision of the Voting Rights Law that forbids changes in the voting qualifications and procedures that were in effect November 1, 1964. 4 Judge Johnson disagreed with Judge Rives that there was no racial discrimination involved in the extension of the com- missioners] terms. The history of discrimination against Negro voters led him to "the firm conclusion" that the extension of terms "was racially motivated," Judge Johnson said. District Judge H. Hobart Grooms dissented. Legal Defense Fund attorneys involved in the case were Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg, Fred Wallace and Michael J. Henry of New York and Fred Gray of Montgomery. ~/306=