Court Voids Extended Terms for County Commissioners
Press Release
April 26, 1966
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 3. Court Voids Extended Terms for County Commissioners, 1966. b25d3df0-b692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/79b56fe7-3f08-4d6d-b517-20be2c18f981/court-voids-extended-terms-for-county-commissioners. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
10 Columbus Circle
New York, N.Y. 10019
JUdson 6-8397
NAACP
Lega? Defense and Educational Fund
PRESS RELEASE
President
Hon. Francis E. Rivers
Director-Counsel
Jack Greenberg FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, April 26, 1966
COURT VOIDS EXTENDED TERMS
FOR COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Fund Wins Victory in Bullock County, Alabama
MONTGOMERY -- A three-judce federal court last week struck down a
provision of an Alabama law that would have postponed elections of
Bullock County Commissioners for two years. The commissioners are
the county's principal governing body.
The court, acting on a suit brought by the NAACP Legal
Defense and Educational Fund, was divided 2-1 in its opinion.
District Suds 4 Frank M. Johnson, Jr., who concurred in the
decision, said the hitory of voting discrimination in Bullock
County and the states Alabama "has been systematic, intentional,
invidious and in clear violation of the Fifteenth Amendment.
The terms of two of the four county commissioners expire
next January. The law, enacted two weeks after passage of the
federal Voting Rights Act, would have extended their terms two.
years, thus postponing elections for those posts until 1968.
The court ordered a primary election to be held May 31,
with a general election in November.
The other two commissioners, whose terms expire in
January, 1969, would also have had their terms extended two years.
Elections for those posts would have been changed from 1968 to 1970.
Legal Defense Fund attorneys contended that the purpose
of the law was to prevent newly registered Negroes from voting or
running for county commissioner.
Although the law was passed nearly a year age. its pro-
visions did not become generally known until last February when
Ben McGhee, one of seven Negro plaintiffs in the suit, “attempted
to file as a candidate for county commissioner. Hegwas told
there would be no election this year.
(more)
Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Publie Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487
aoe
Court Voids Extended Terms
For County Commissioners
The county has nearly twice as many voting age Negroes
as white, but only since passage of the Voting Rights Act have
Negro registered voters outnumbered whites.
Circuit Judge Richard T. Rives wrote the court's opinion.
He held that extension of the terms of incumbenetor fici als violated
a provision of the Voting Rights Law that forbids changes in the
voting qualifications and procedures that were in effect November
1, 1964. 4
Judge Johnson disagreed with Judge Rives that there was
no racial discrimination involved in the extension of the com-
missioners] terms. The history of discrimination against Negro
voters led him to "the firm conclusion" that the extension of
terms "was racially motivated," Judge Johnson said.
District Judge H. Hobart Grooms dissented.
Legal Defense Fund attorneys involved in the case were
Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg, Fred Wallace and Michael J.
Henry of New York and Fred Gray of Montgomery.
~/306=