Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Disclose Expert Witnesses Pursuant to Practice Book Section 220 (D)
Public Court Documents
November 28, 1990
7 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Disclose Expert Witnesses Pursuant to Practice Book Section 220 (D), 1990. f0857975-a946-f011-8779-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/79ddcd17-2ba5-4161-ae49-8aea41958ea9/joint-motion-for-extension-of-time-to-disclose-expert-witnesses-pursuant-to-practice-book-section-220-d. Accessed November 02, 2025.
Copied!
Cv89-0360977S
MILO SHEFF, et al. SUPERIOR COURT
Plaintiffs
Vv. : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN
WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al. AT HARTFORD
A
L
LJ
L L
J
Defendants NOVEMBER 28, 1990
JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO DISCLOSE
EXPERT WITNESSES PURSUANT TO PRACTICE BOOK SECTION 220(D)
The parties respectfully request an extension of time to
disclose the experts expected to testify at trial pursuant to
Practice Book Section 220(D) as follows:
a. On January 15, 1990, all parties shall simultaneously
disclose the initial list of persons whom each party expects to
call as an expert witness at trial (including any employees cor
consultants of defendants or plaintiffs), shall state the subject
matter on which the expert is expected to testify, and shall
state the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert
is expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each
opinion.
b. Every sixty days thereafter, all parties shall exchange
a list of any additional expert witnesses identified in the prior
sixty-day period.
NO ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED/NO TESTIMONY REQUIRED
c. Plaintiffs shall make final disclosure of such expert
witnosses 120 days prior to the final trial date, and defendants
shall make final disclosure of such expert witnesses sixty days
thereafter.
In. support of this joint motion, the parties state the
following:
fi On July 13, 1990, the defendants submited
snteioiathoics to the defendants which requested a list of
expert witnesses which the plaintiffs intend to offer.
iF On September 24, 1990, the plaintiffs submitted
interrogatories to the defendants which requested a list of
expert witnesses which the defendants intend to offer.
3. On September 6, 1990, plaintiffs submitted a Joint
Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's First
Set of Interrogatories, which included a stipulation that
disclosure of experts be delayed until October 31, 1990.
4. on October 9, 1990, defendants also submitted a Motion
for Extension to Disclose Experts Pursuant to Practice Book
Section 220(D).
5. On October 31, 1990, this Court granted a Joint Motion
for Extension of Time to Respond to Interrogatories Regarding
Disclosure of Expert Witnesses, pending formulation of the
present motion.
6. Because of the extremely complex and comprehensive
nature of this case, at the present time, neither party has
completed the process of identifying expert witnesses for trial,
nor have the identified experts completed all of their research
and analysis.
7. The present case. presents a broad challenge to the
defendants’ practices in regard to the system of public education
in the WaTL Lond region. Because of the wide range of possible
issues upon which the plaintiffs might want to offer expert
testimony, the defendants will not know the entire scope of
expert testimony they might need to seek until plaintiffs have
identified their experts and the subject matter on which these
experts will testify.
B. The present motion would permit plaintiffs’ experts to
substantially complete their research prior to being subjected to
depositions by defendants. The present motion would also permit
defendants to wait until such research is completed to conduct
depositions, thus alleviating the need for duplicating
depositions of the same witness.
g. The parties, by this motion, do not waive any rights
they may have to object to depositions or other discovery of
experts, or to move for payment for such depositions or other
discovery pursuant to Practice Book Section 220.
WHEREFORE, the parties request an extension of time as set
out above to disclose their experts pursuant to Practice Book
Section 220(D).
FOR THE PLAINTIFFS
Philip D. Tegeler
Martha Stone
Connecticut Civil Liberties
Union Foundation
32 Grand Street
Hartford, CT 06106
Wesley W. Horton
Moller, Horton, & Fineberg
90 Gillett Street
Hartford, CT 06105
Julius L. Chambers
Marianne Lado
Ron Ellis
NAACP Legal Defense &
Educational Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10013
Helen Hershkoff
John A. Powell
Adam Cohen
American Civil Liberties
Union Foundation
132 West 43rd Street
New York, NY 10036
Respectfully Submitted,
Wilfred Rodriguez
Hispanic Advocacy Project
Neighborhood Legal Services
1229 Albany Avenue
Hartford, CT 06112
John Brittain
University of Connecticut
School of Law
65 Elizabeth Street
Hartford, CT 06105
Jenny Rivera
Puerto Rican Legal Defense
and Education Fund
99 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10013
i
FOR THE DEFENDANTS
I CLARINE NARDI RIDDLE
H ATTO Y GENERAL
i //
| yy / | By: 4 LL re
JoHnfR. Whelan
A sistant Attorney General
1 10 Sherman Street
Hartford, Connecticut 06105
| Telephone: 566-3696
| ORDER
| For good cause shown the foregoing motion is hereby:
I GRANTED/DENIED
||
lH
| BY THE COURT
I
1
i
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed,
postage prepaid on December JB, 1990 to the following counsel or
record:
John Brittain
University of Connecticut
School of Law
65 Elizabeth Street
Hartford, CT 06105
Wilfred Rodriguez
Hispanic Advocacy Project
Neighborhood Legal Services
1229 Albany Avenue
Hartford, CT 06112
Philip Tegeler
Martha Stone
Connecticut Civil Liberties Union
32 Grand Street
Hartford, CT 06106
Wesley W. Horton
Mollier, Horton & Fineberg, P.C.
90 Gillett Street
Hartford, CT 06105
Jenny Rivera, Esq.
Puerto Rican Legal Defense Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street
14th Floor
New York, NY 10013
Julius L. Chambers
Marianne Lado, Esq.
Ronald Ellis, Esq.
NAACP Legal Defense Fund and
Educational Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10013
John A. Powell
Helen Hershkoff
American Civil Liberties Union
132 West 43rd Street
New York, NY 10036
LIN yA
JOhA R. Whelan
Assistant Attorney General
{ 7
L