Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Disclose Expert Witnesses Pursuant to Practice Book Section 220 (D)
Public Court Documents
November 28, 1990

7 pages
Cite this item
-
Connecticut, Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Disclose Expert Witnesses Pursuant to Practice Book Section 220 (D), 1990. f0857975-a946-f011-8779-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/79ddcd17-2ba5-4161-ae49-8aea41958ea9/joint-motion-for-extension-of-time-to-disclose-expert-witnesses-pursuant-to-practice-book-section-220-d. Accessed September 18, 2025.
Copied!
Cv89-0360977S MILO SHEFF, et al. SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiffs Vv. : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al. AT HARTFORD A L LJ L L J Defendants NOVEMBER 28, 1990 JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESSES PURSUANT TO PRACTICE BOOK SECTION 220(D) The parties respectfully request an extension of time to disclose the experts expected to testify at trial pursuant to Practice Book Section 220(D) as follows: a. On January 15, 1990, all parties shall simultaneously disclose the initial list of persons whom each party expects to call as an expert witness at trial (including any employees cor consultants of defendants or plaintiffs), shall state the subject matter on which the expert is expected to testify, and shall state the substance of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify and a summary of the grounds for each opinion. b. Every sixty days thereafter, all parties shall exchange a list of any additional expert witnesses identified in the prior sixty-day period. NO ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED/NO TESTIMONY REQUIRED c. Plaintiffs shall make final disclosure of such expert witnosses 120 days prior to the final trial date, and defendants shall make final disclosure of such expert witnesses sixty days thereafter. In. support of this joint motion, the parties state the following: fi On July 13, 1990, the defendants submited snteioiathoics to the defendants which requested a list of expert witnesses which the plaintiffs intend to offer. iF On September 24, 1990, the plaintiffs submitted interrogatories to the defendants which requested a list of expert witnesses which the defendants intend to offer. 3. On September 6, 1990, plaintiffs submitted a Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories, which included a stipulation that disclosure of experts be delayed until October 31, 1990. 4. on October 9, 1990, defendants also submitted a Motion for Extension to Disclose Experts Pursuant to Practice Book Section 220(D). 5. On October 31, 1990, this Court granted a Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Interrogatories Regarding Disclosure of Expert Witnesses, pending formulation of the present motion. 6. Because of the extremely complex and comprehensive nature of this case, at the present time, neither party has completed the process of identifying expert witnesses for trial, nor have the identified experts completed all of their research and analysis. 7. The present case. presents a broad challenge to the defendants’ practices in regard to the system of public education in the WaTL Lond region. Because of the wide range of possible issues upon which the plaintiffs might want to offer expert testimony, the defendants will not know the entire scope of expert testimony they might need to seek until plaintiffs have identified their experts and the subject matter on which these experts will testify. B. The present motion would permit plaintiffs’ experts to substantially complete their research prior to being subjected to depositions by defendants. The present motion would also permit defendants to wait until such research is completed to conduct depositions, thus alleviating the need for duplicating depositions of the same witness. g. The parties, by this motion, do not waive any rights they may have to object to depositions or other discovery of experts, or to move for payment for such depositions or other discovery pursuant to Practice Book Section 220. WHEREFORE, the parties request an extension of time as set out above to disclose their experts pursuant to Practice Book Section 220(D). FOR THE PLAINTIFFS Philip D. Tegeler Martha Stone Connecticut Civil Liberties Union Foundation 32 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06106 Wesley W. Horton Moller, Horton, & Fineberg 90 Gillett Street Hartford, CT 06105 Julius L. Chambers Marianne Lado Ron Ellis NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. 99 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 Helen Hershkoff John A. Powell Adam Cohen American Civil Liberties Union Foundation 132 West 43rd Street New York, NY 10036 Respectfully Submitted, Wilfred Rodriguez Hispanic Advocacy Project Neighborhood Legal Services 1229 Albany Avenue Hartford, CT 06112 John Brittain University of Connecticut School of Law 65 Elizabeth Street Hartford, CT 06105 Jenny Rivera Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund 99 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 i FOR THE DEFENDANTS I CLARINE NARDI RIDDLE H ATTO Y GENERAL i // | yy / | By: 4 LL re JoHnfR. Whelan A sistant Attorney General 1 10 Sherman Street Hartford, Connecticut 06105 | Telephone: 566-3696 | ORDER | For good cause shown the foregoing motion is hereby: I GRANTED/DENIED || lH | BY THE COURT I 1 i CERTIFICATION This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed, postage prepaid on December JB, 1990 to the following counsel or record: John Brittain University of Connecticut School of Law 65 Elizabeth Street Hartford, CT 06105 Wilfred Rodriguez Hispanic Advocacy Project Neighborhood Legal Services 1229 Albany Avenue Hartford, CT 06112 Philip Tegeler Martha Stone Connecticut Civil Liberties Union 32 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06106 Wesley W. Horton Mollier, Horton & Fineberg, P.C. 90 Gillett Street Hartford, CT 06105 Jenny Rivera, Esq. Puerto Rican Legal Defense Fund, Inc. 99 Hudson Street 14th Floor New York, NY 10013 Julius L. Chambers Marianne Lado, Esq. Ronald Ellis, Esq. NAACP Legal Defense Fund and Educational Fund, Inc. 99 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 John A. Powell Helen Hershkoff American Civil Liberties Union 132 West 43rd Street New York, NY 10036 LIN yA JOhA R. Whelan Assistant Attorney General { 7 L