Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Labor/Community Strategy Center Brief in Opposition to Certiorari

Public Court Documents
January 1, 2001

Cite this item

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Labor/Community Strategy Center Brief in Opposition to Certiorari preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Parties to the proceeding also include Bus Riders Union, Pearl Daniels, Maria Guardado, Korean Immigrant Workers Advocates and Southern Christian Leadership Conference of Greater Los Angeles as respondents and Roger Snoble as petitioner. Date is approximate.

Topic
- Economic Justice
Notable Person
- Elaine R. Jones
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 079bd8a9-bb9a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Sheila Bair (Deputy Counsel) Re Thornburg v. Gingles, 1985. c34e7ce1-e892-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/4d57a83b-23c9-4160-b27e-3dfaaa4b2683/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-sheila-bair-deputy-counsel-re-thornburg-v-gingles. Accessed July 01, 2025.

Copied!

    E&r".kLesat NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUNO, INC.

99 Hudson Street, New york, N.Y. 10013o(212) 21S,19O0

September 25, 1985

It{s . Shei la Ba ir , Deputy Counsel
United States CaPitol
Room S-230
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear SheiIa:

I enclose a printed coPy of Appellees'
Brief in lhogtsgg v. Ginqle.s. Thl*
you ever so much for the work You drd
on the Congressional amicus brief in
this case.

Sincerelv,0VY
Lani Guinier

LG/x
Enclosure #I

^Ar*L l.tr) r*ilr*S
.t@ffr'

/ /L 4. lr*,1* ;//
//- Jr-tr- f a*l

.2'w
Contributions are deductibLe lor Lr.S. incmnr tar purposes

The NAACp LEGAL oEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND rs nor part ol the Natronal Association lor the Advancement ol colored People althouoh it

was tounOed by itind shares rts commitment lo equal righrs. LDF has had for over 25 years a separate Board, program. stall. ollice and budget

SAn -0--,

Tb J-r*d /\t/<'M

f. No- hr /4 ln

MLq.T
+;J""- sfrrfl1 /v"

@

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Labor/Community Strategy Center Brief in Opposition to Certiorari

Topic

Notable Person

Organization

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in