Selma Background 3
Press Release
March 11, 1965
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 2. Selma Background 3, 1965. 32b6eac1-b592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7cfeea33-26ba-4a9b-b17b-4c93a71e36e3/selma-background-3. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
10 Columbus Circle
New York, N.Y. 10019
JUdson 6-8397
NAACP
‘Legal Defense and Educational F und
PRESS RELEASES ~~
President ay id
Dr. Allan Knight oe
Director-Counsel 3
Jack Creenberg ca
€ MEMORANDUM
March 1965
FROM: Public Information Department
NAACP Legal Defense Fund
RE? BACKGROUND ON LITIGATION IN ALABAMA
March ll, IAACP Legal Defense Fund Attorneys filed a
1965 "Plaintiffs! Memorandum of Points and Authorities
in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction
and Motion to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order
Against Plaintiffs.
In reference to the demonstrators continuing
to exercise their rights as American citizens,
without interference from the District Court, or
Alabama law officials, the motion stated: ... "It
is clear that the threat of violence or other public
disturbance acainst persons seeking to exercise
peacefully a constitutionally protected rights is not =
a ground for interfering with them. If violence
is threatened, the proper remedy is to restrain or
Move against those threatening the violence"...
March 10, U.S. Justice Department asked Federal District Court
965 in Montgomery to stop Governor George C, Wallace,
Director of Public Safety Al Lingo and Sheriff Clark
from interfering with demonstrations aimed at
securing the vote. The Government accused the three
officials of preventing and discouraging Negroes
from exercising their full rights of citizenship."
The Department asked for an order preventing the
officials from summarily punishing, by striking,
beating, tear-gassing or other means, any person
seeking citizenship rights.
March 8, NAACP Legal Defense lawyers moved, by asking federal
965 Judge Frank M. Johnson, U.S. District Court for the
Middle District of Alabama, to forbid state and local
law enforcement officials from further interference
with peaceful Negro attempts to march from Selma to
Montgomery, Alabama. Also, the Legal Defense Fund
sought a temporary restraining order against Governor
George C. Wallace, State Public Safety Commissioner
Al Lingo, and Dallas County Sheriff James Clark.
Instead, Judge Johnson issued an injunction
halting a planned march from Selma to Montgomery,
February 26, Judge Thomas granted permission to file amended and
1965 supplemental compl aint adding Judge James Hare,
Circuit Judge of Fourth Judicial Circuit, as a
defendant.
(more)
Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 >a
February 23,
1965
February 13,
1965
February 11,
1965
February 10,
1965
%
“February 10,
§1965
February 8,
1965
February 5,
1965
February 5,
1965
-2-
Legal Defense Fund filed an amended and supplemental
complaint seeking to add Judge Hare as a party
defendant and to enjoin his ordering of arrests and
prosecution of Negroes for peacefully assembling in
vicinity of the Dallas County Courthouse, Civil
rights attorneys also sought to enjoin his summary
conviction of such persons for contempt of court.
Legal Defense Fund supplemented a motion for
Additional Relief and for Order to Show Cause, charginc
that the District Court's order had been further
violated by the arrests of February 1 through 8.
Motion also detailed events of February 10 when
Sheriff Clark led nearly 200 Negro children on a
forced march. In addition, attorneys asked Judge
Thomas to require the defendants to appear before
him immediately and show cause why they should not
be held in contempt of his orders.
Acting on a motion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
filed by the NAACP Legal Defense Fund for the 26
Negroes arrested in Selma for "Contempt of Court,"
the District Court of Appeals in New Orleans
handed down an order requiring the Federal District
Court, in Mobile, Ala., to hear the Legal Defense
Fund's argument for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the
case cf the 26,
In New Orleans, Legal Defense Fund attorney, Norman
Amaker filed amotion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
with District Court of Appeals Judge John Minor
Wisdom for the 26 Negroes arrested for contempt of
Court in Selma, Ala.
Also, attorney Amaker asked the District Court
of Appeals to delay the execution of the 5-day
sentence and $50 fine imposed by the Circuit Court
on the 26 Negroes until the appeal proceedings
had been decided.
In Washington, D.C., NAACP Legal Defense Fund
Director-Counsel, Jack Greenberg and Dr, Martin
Luther King, Jr. met in a private session with
President Lyndon Johnson to discuss the Selma
situation.
Later, Dr. King met with Vice-President Hubert
Humphrey and U.S, Attorney General Nicholas
Katzenbach to discuss the need for additional
federal legislation in order to guarantee all
citizens the right to vote, Both meetings were
confidential.
Federal District Court Judge Daniel H, Thomas denied
Legal Defense Fund motion for a Writ of Habeas
Corpus in the conviction of 26 Negroes for "Contempt
of Court" in Selma.
NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys filed a motion
for a Writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of 26 Negroes
who had been arrested for Contempt of Court when
they paraded in the Courthouse area while Court was
in session. They were convicted and given punish-
ment of 5 days in jail and $50 fine. The motion
was made before the Federal District Court.
Dr. Martin Luther King's Southern Christian Leader-
ship Conference called a temporary halt to
demonstrations to consider future action.
(more)
February 4,
1965
February 3,
1965
February 3,
1965
February 2,
1965 >
2
February 1,
1965
ae
Judge Daniel H. Thomas, acting on a suit filed by
the U.S. Department of Justice more than’a year ago,
handed down an injunction streamlining procedures
for processing Negro voter applications; barring the
use of complicated literacy tests; and assuring
Negroes of the right to apply directly to the court
if rejected,
Although this injunction covered generally the
relief sought in the NAACP Legal Defense Fund suit
(King v. Baker), it was not as all encompassing or
as specific in detail.
NAACP Legal Defense Fund filed a suit (King v. Baker)
with the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of Alabama, which, in part, asked the Court
to enjoin Wilson Baker, Director of Public Safety,
from intefering with peaceful demonstrations; instruct
Dallas County officials to hire a minimum of 10
additional registrars and require .they process at
least 100 persons a day; require that Selma's voter-
registration office stay open six days a week; and
to enjoin the registrars from refusing to allow Negroes
to take the old test by which registered whites
qualified in the past.
This entire motion was denied by Judge Daniel
H, Thomas. However, the motion to enjoin Wilson
Baker from interfering with Negro registration
efforts, which was denied, was based on similar facts
and of the same nature as the motion granted against
Sheriff James Clark.
Judge James A, Hare of the Circuit Court of Dallas
County issued an order which, in the opinion of Legal
Defense Fund attorneys, directly conflicted with the
order issued by the U.S, District Court. It said
in part:
«.."That any person or persons assembling or
attempting in, around or about the Dallas County
Court House or grounds for the purpose of demon-
strating or assembling for said purpose, be and
are hereby ordered to separate and disassemble..."
Demonstrators who did assemble at the Dallas County
Court House were arrested and given as high as $50.00
fine and five days in jail.
Sheriff James Clark arrested 26 Negroes conducting
a peaceful demonstration outside the County Court-
house for disturbing the Court while it was in
session. They were convicted on a "Contempt of
Court" charge and were required to serve 5 days in
jail and $50 fines. ae
we
Director of Police, ‘lilson Baker arrested Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr., Rev. Ralph Abernathy and 267 other
Negroes for "Parading Without a License." Dr. King
stated that the purpose of the march was to urge
the Board of Registrars to increase the number of
days when Negroes in Selma can register to vote.
Presently, (Feb, 1) the Registration Office is open
only on the lst and 3rd Mondays of the month,
Also, on the same day (Feb. 1) some 400 Negro
youths were arrested near the Courthouse on charges
of "Truancy" and "Juvenile Delinquency." They were
holding a "peaceful" demonstration and singing :
"freedom" songs. Arrested Negro youths were either
released in their parents' custody; released after
signing a statement that they would not participate
sbn®future ‘demonstrations; “or, were made to appear
before the Family, Court Judge. 2M
< ¥ rs % oat
i
(more)
January 30,
1965 i
aks x eis Pes
aes
January 28,
1965
uary 23,
5
January 22,
1965
wishiouse in Selma, Ala.
SA
Judge Daniel H. Thomas issued an order "Amending
the Temporary Restraining Order of January 23, 1965."
In effect, it.stated only 100 persons would be
“alYowed in the voter-registration line at the Court-
However, as long as
= demonstrations for the purpose of encouraging
persons to register were peaceful, orderly ar
not interfere with the proceedings at the Courth
or traffic outside, such gatherings were permissible.
After many more arrests, including that of John Lewis,
SNCC Chairman, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund filed a
"Motion for Additional Relief and Show Cause Order,"
in which they urged that Sheriff Clark proved himself
not in contempt of the Court's order or be fined or
imprisoned, or both. Also, that all inteference with
Negroes seeking to register to vote be halted.
Mrs. Annie Lee Cooper, a 53 year old clerk at a Selma
motel, was wrestled to the ground by Sheriff James Gy
Clark and three of his deputies. Dr. Martin Luther
King a¢cused the-police of brutality. Mrs. Cooper
contends she was defending herself against the Sheriff
when she struck him. She was arrested and released ;
under $2,000 bail on two charges of assault.
Legal Defense Fund attorneys moved for and obtained
a temporary restraining order after oral argument.
Judge Thomas said, in part, that "those interested in
encouraging others to register to vote have the right
peaceably to assemble outside the Courthouse, but
shall not do so in such a way as to intefere with
lawful business expected to be transacted in the
Courthouse. Such persons have the right to peaceably
assembly without molestation, and will be permitted
to do so.”
The Court also added that Negroes “are entitled
to have lawful protection in such assemblage."
The NAACP Legal Defense Fund filed with the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of Alabama,
a complaint and motion for temporary restraining
order requesting injunctive relief again against
Sheriff James G. Clark restraining him and the other
cefendants. It asked that the defendants be
enjoined from intefering with Negroes attempting
to register to vote or those peacefully gathered for
the purpose of vouching for them or to encourage
them.
more
January 2).
°
ie Dr. King addressed mass meeting and launched
“ woter registration drive.
ecember 31, © NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys filed a re-
Tees
July 14-15,
1964
July 9
1964
Earl ul
oO
March 6
1964
“9newed motion to dissolve injunction (see Tuly 9,
. 1964, herewith) in light of plans for “anuary 2,
ter registration drive launching.
ion cannot be enforced in local state court,
«so long as Federal Court has jurisdictions , Pa
Federal uidge, Daniel Thomas ordered the release
of all those arrested, reducing bail to comply wi
federal standards.
ON
G
%
Dallas County Circuit Judge ‘ames Hare issued an
injunction @€njoining SNCC, other civil rights
organizations, and individuals doing civil rights
work, as well as the Ku Klux Klan and other racist
grouos (from meeting in public, in groups larger
than three, or in private where violations of law
are suggested or advocated.) The Legal Defense
Fund is fighting to have the injunction dissolved
and is currently urging the Federal District ©
Court, to which the,case has been removed, to
tain jurisdiction. = 6
About 75 participants in a SNCC-sponsored ee a
registration drive were arrested for various e
charges, including disturbing the peace, trespass —
after warning, interfering with a court in ‘session,
and contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
Some of these arrests grew out of a test of the
Civil Rights Act at a local movie theater,! others
from peaceful picketing. Pail was effectively
denied by the continual shifting of bond conditions
In the next week, the Legal Defense Fund secured :
the removal of all of these cases to the Federal
District Court. é
The Alabama Court of Appeals reversed the peace
bond convictions. Subsequently, the Appeals
Court denied a rehearing. In Tune, 1964, the.
state asked the Alabama Supreme Court to hear the
case. In August, that court refused to do $0 and
in WN vember declined to reconsider its refusal.
September thru During these months, peaceful demonstrations, part
October,
1963
of a voter registration campaign (in Dallas
County, only 300 Negroes are registered), resulted
in about 200 arrests. The Legal Defense Fund he-
gan its defense of these persons. Fifteen were
convicted in City Court of parading without a
permit; these convictions were upheld by the county
court. Among other convictions were three for
contributing to the delinquency of a minore==
sentences for these three were one. yeatat hard
labor, a $300 fine, and a.%1)000 “peace bond --
and of. My un Law i hg ee bi -- sentences for
ra signee wedays.in jail, {100"fines, and
A) ee peace bonds. 2 i =
Si.
Editor's Note:
Since October 1963, trials of the other
persons arrested have continued in the Recorder's
Court of Selma, The County Court of Dallas
County, and appeals of all convictions taken
to the Circuit Court of Dallas County. Those
upheld in the Circuit Court have been further
appealed to the Alabama Court of Appeals.
The Legal Defense Fund efforts to secure the
release of the persons being held on peace
bonds, including ‘ohn Lewis, Chairman, and
other members of SNCC, failed in the Dallas
County Circuit Court. The "peace bond" con=
victions required posting of a $1,000 bond and
keeping the peace fees not engaging in further
demonstrations).
Legal Defense Fund attorneys:
Norman Amaker, Charles “ones and Peter Hall
may be reached:
Day: 205-872-3759
205- 324-7691
Night: 205-323-7211