Response to Application for Relief of a Three-Judge Court

Public Court Documents
June 15, 1982

Cite this item
Response to Application for Relief of a Three-Judge Court preview

2 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Response to Application for Relief of a Three-Judge Court, 1982. e5704b11-c803-ef11-a1fd-6045bdec8a33. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7d371489-d2d5-4d34-afa0-b0789d1c0fbe/response-to-application-for-relief-of-a-three-judge-court. Accessed November 05, 2025.

    Copied!

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA 

ATOTART RNET.T 
MICHAE Lt DARNELL ’ 

TMA Ty Tm NDA QUANT, 
ANNTE A ANNIE A. 

on behalf of 

similarly situated, 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 82-1192 D 

h 
S 
a 

Robert 1 ins 

Ss United 3 District Judge 

Fred J. Cassibry 

United States District Judge 

CIRCUIT JUDGE Henry A. Politz 

United States Circuit Judge 

 



  

above named, to whom an application for 

lief has been presented in the above cause, having notified me that 

the action is one required by ac f Congress to be heard and determined 

by a district court of three judges, I, Charles Clark, Chief Judge of 

the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, hereby 

lesignate the circuit 3 ] 3 nd district judge (2) named above 

to serve with the requesting judg (1) as members of, and with him to 

court to hea nd determine the action. 

his designation and composition of the three-judge court is not 

ment, implied, as to whether this properly is a 

se for a three-judge r than a one-judge court. This. is a mat- 

judge court as this enables a simultaneous 

to the Supreme Court without the 

nsufficiency of a proceeding 

of Appeals, the Supreme Court, 

the presiding 

ox: both. he parties will be afforded the opportunity 

rgue all such questions before the three-judge panel 

rily or on the trial of the merits, or otherwise, as 

the court thinks appropriate.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.