Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board Brief of Appellee

Public Court Documents
October 5, 1998

Cite this item

Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board Brief of Appellee preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Date is approximate.

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- Education
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 4ca032fb-c19a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 4. LDF Asks Halt of Evictions for Illegitimate Pregnancy by Alabama Housing Authorities, 1967. c2dd6f93-b792-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ea19bfc1-80c2-4cfb-89c2-33fd711e4d9d/ldf-asks-halt-of-evictions-for-illegitimate-pregnancy-by-alabama-housing-authorities. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    ww 

President 
Hon. Francis E. Rivers 

PRESS RELEASE Director-Counsel 
egal efense und Jack Greenberg 

Director, Public ions 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. jane 
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUd: 6-8397 see ae ‘olumbus Circle, New York, N.Y. ison 6- FOR RELEASE po SIGHTJNUMBER 212-749-8487 

SATURDAY 
February 11, 1967 

LDF ASKS HALT OF EVICTIONS 
FOR ILLEGITIMATE PREGNANCY 
BY ALA.HOUSING AUTHORITIES 

BIRMINGHAM-~-The U.S. District Court here was asked yesterday to halt 
eviction of two Negro women and their families from public housing in 
Talladega, Alabama because of the pending birth of illegitimate childrer. 

Mrs, Everline Lewis and her children were ordered out of the Knox- 
ville Homes because Mrs. Lewis' daughter, who does not reside with her, 
is expecting an illegitimate child. 

Another tenant of the same public housing development, Mrs,Margaze 
Truss, has been ordered evicted because she is expecting an illegitmate 
child. 

Attorneys of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. 
(LDF) filed motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary 
injunction o' grounds that both women, and the class they represent, 
were denied: 

* proper and sufficient notice 
* adequate and reasonable grounds 
* a fair hearing on the charges. 

LDF lawyers argue that eviction of the families would violate the 
"basic purpose of all publicly supported low-income housing as set 
forth in the policy provisions of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937," 

That act, the attorneys assert, seeks to "remedy the unsafe and 
unsanitary housing conditions and the acute shortage of decent, safe 
and sanitary dwellings for low-income" families. 

LDF attorneys added that "the Talladega policy does not help 
eliminate the problems attendant to slum dwellings: it creates them, 

"It deprives low-income people of desperately needed housing by 
its exclusionist policy. 

"Depriving children of a decent home to live in neither serves to 
curb the rate of illegitimacy nor to benefit other tenants in the 
project," the attorneys said. 

In conclusion, the Court was told that "due process requires that 
plaintiffs be given some opportunity to be heard. 

"Hearings are an important protection from arbitrariness. 

“Tenants should have the right to have decisions on such issues 
based on evidence and not on rumor or fancy. 

"For the indigent, eviction is a serious penalty," the lawyers sail 

-30-

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board Brief of Appellee

Impact area

Topic

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in