(Proposed) Order Appointing Guardian Ad Litem
Public Court Documents
December 20, 1990
3 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Matthews v. Kizer Hardbacks. (Proposed) Order Appointing Guardian Ad Litem, 1990. da69150f-5e40-f011-b4cb-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/82f7986e-4380-4d69-9f46-7a1d1aa0cac3/proposed-order-appointing-guardian-ad-litem. Accessed June 17, 2025.
Copied!
1 | JOEL R. sewvorl 1
JACQUELINE WARREN i DEC 2 6 1990
2 || NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL thik
617 S. Olive Street, Suite 1210
Los Angeles, CA 90014 Wi
3 (313) 892-1500 R E C E ! V E DPD us
JANE PERKINS DEC 2 0 1990
5 | NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM
2639 S. La Cienega Blvd. RICHARD W. WI
6 | Los Angeles, CA 90034 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COST
(213) 204-6010 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STEPHEN RONFELDT
8 || SUSAN SPELLETICH
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
9| 1440 Broadway, Suite 700
Oakland, CA 94612
10] (415) 451-9261
11 { BILL LANN LEE
KEVIN S. REED
12 | NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.
315 W. 9th Street, Suite 208
13 || Los Angeles, CA 90015
(213) 624-2405
MARK D. ROSENBAUM : ) ‘ . a I
15 | ACLU FOUNDATION OF SOUTH CAL IN A 0 “ez §
633 South Shatto Place
16 Los Angeles, CA 90005
(213) 480-3221
37
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
18 (Additional counsel on following page)
19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
ERIKA MATTHEWS AND JALISA MATTHEWS, )
21 | by their guardian ad litem Lisa ) Civ. No.
Matthews, and PEOPLE UNITED FOR A )
22 || BETTER OAKLAND, On Behalf of ) CLASS ACTION
Themselves and All Others Similarly )
23 || Situated, ) [PROPOSED] ORDER
) APPOINTING GUARDIAN
24 Plaintiffs, ) AD LITEM
)
25 Vie )
)
56 | KENNETH KIZER, Director, California )
Department of Health Services, )
27 )
Defendant. )
28 )
l. [ PROPOSED] ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM
EDWARD M. CHEN
ACLU FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
1663 Mission Street, Suite 460
San Francisco, CA 94103
(415) 621-2493
2.
PROPOSED] ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM
Litem regularly came on for hearing before the Honorable
The vor 1 ds Lisa Matthews for svodliP seit of Guardian Ad
on January , 1991. Having considered the
arguments of counsel and the evidence presented, the Court finds
that:
1) Infant plaintiffs Jalisa and Erika Matthews do not have
the capacity to bring their own claims challenging the
denial of lead blood screening or treatment and lack any
other guardian or duly appointed representative;
2) The movant and mother of the infant plaintiffs, Lisa
Matthews, will competently represent plaintiffs’
interests in this action and does not have any interests
adverse to them.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ordered that Lisa Matthews is
appointed Guardian Ad Litem in this action for her two infant
children, plaintiffs Erika Matthews and Jalisa Matthews.
Dated: January +1991
U.S. District Court Judge
3.
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN Al