Memorandum on Dokes v. Arkansas - Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Clarify Laws on Juveniles

Press Release
April 24, 1967

Cite this item

Memorandum on Dokes v. Arkansas - Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Clarify Laws on Juveniles preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Press Releases
Creator
- LDF
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 08095cc4-b792-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 4. Memorandum on Dokes v. Arkansas - Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Clarify Laws on Juveniles, 1967. 08095cc4-b792-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/890a301b-db81-43c0-8e4e-1c0454f7747f/memorandum-on-dokes-v-arkansas-asks-us-supreme-court-to-clarify-laws-on-juveniles. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

President
Hon. Francis E. Rivers

PRESS RELEASE Director Counsel
e gal efense und Jack Greenberg

Director, Public Relations NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. Jesse DeVore, Jr. 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 » JUdson 6-8397 FOR RELEASE © NIGHT NUMBER 212-749-8487
MONDAY . fF Fy
April 24, 1967 je

MEMORANDUM

TOs WASHINGTON AND LITTLE ROCK REPORTERS

FROM: Jesse DeVore, Director of Public Information

RE: ASK U.S. SUPREME COURT TO
CLARIFY LAWS ON JUVENILES

CASE TITLE: John Henry Dokes and Sylvia Dokes v. State of Arkansas

DATE OF FILING: April 24, 1967

QUESTIONS Are laws which broadly define a crime of contributing
PRESENTED: to the delinquency of minors unconstitutionally vague

and indefinite?
Did a Negro couple waive their constitutional right
of privacy when police entered, without a warrant,
their orderly interracial party and arrested them--
without telling them that they had a constitutional
right not to permit the police to enter?

NATIONAL NEWS This represents a new aspect in the current contro-
A eB versy over juvenile delinquency laws.

WASHINGTON---An Arkansas Negro couple today asked the U.S. Supreme Court
to dismiss charges of contributing to the delinquency of minors--a charge that. grew out of a peaceful interracial social gathering.

Attorneys of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDE) argue that such statutes, which are unconstitutional and vague, there-
fore invite arbitrary police interference in relationships between
adults and children,

LDF lawyers point out that there is a lack of clear definition in
this area of the law in all 50 states.

Mr. and Mrs. John Henry Dokes face this charge "solely because they permitted a peaceable interracial gathering in their home," the LDF
attorneys asserted,

They added that this is a case of shocking police misconduct in that the police entered a peaceful interracial party in a Little Rock public housing project because they saw whites and Negroes enter, and
arrested all participants.

Minors were charged with possession of alcohol and adults with con- tributing to the delinquency of minors,

: The evidence against Mr, and Mrs. Dokes was merely that one minor "smelled" of alcohol,

In summary, LDF attorneys argue that the Dokes's convictions by the courts of Arkansas are in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments in that:

1 There is no evidence in the record to support the convictions.

2) The contributing to delinquency statute under which the state proceeded is vague and uncertain,

3) The admission of testimony regarding observations by police officers inside a home entered without warrant or probable cause violates the Constitution,

(more)
S25

ASK U.S. SUPREME COURT TO
ARGEARIFY LAWS ON JUVENILES -2- April 24, 1967

1 ¢€ase is being handled by LDF Director-Counsel Jack Greenbe 3,
sel James M. Nabrit III, Assistant Counsel Michael

Sage

joined by Professor Anthony Amsterdam of the University
@ in Philadelphia and Little Rock attorneys John W,

= 730-

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Memorandum on Dokes v. Arkansas - Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Clarify Laws on Juveniles

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in