Modification of Order
Public Court Documents
July 3, 1969
9 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Modification of Order, 1969. 7b4d8728-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/8d1fdbd1-5929-48cc-bb13-130134362aa4/modification-of-order. Accessed November 19, 2025.
Copied!
“ United States Uourt of 2s
FIFTH CIRCUIT
EDWARD W. WADSWORTH OFFICE OF THE CLERK ROOM 408-400 ROYAL ST. CLERK
NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130
July 25, 1969
Mr. Robert C, Thomas, Clerk
U, 8S. District Court
P, 0, Box 769
Jackson, Miss, 39205
Dear Mr, Thomas:
Nos, 030 and 28042
U.S. v. Hinds County School Board, et al
(And Related Cases)
Enclosed is a certified copy of this Court's
order entered today in the above referenced
causes modifying its opinion of July 3, 1969,
which is self-explanatory,
Very truly yours,
EDWARD W, WADSWORTH, Clerk
y Ledgen A. -,
Depufy Clerk
/adg
Encl.
cc & enc, to:
All Counsel of Record
Hon, William Harold Cox
Hon, Dan M. Russell, Jr,
Hon, Walter L, Nixon, Jr,
EXT
. INGEHE UNITED STATES Court iW:
FOR THE PIPTH CIRCUIT
Nos, 28030 2 23: (va)
OO
|
ww
I)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Ve
HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al.’
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No, 2075(J))
BUFORD A. LEE, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Ve.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
- Defendant-Appellant,
Vis
MILTON EVANS,
Third Party
. oh Defendant-Appellee.
(Civil Action No. 2034 (H))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ,
. Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. .
KEMPER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
{Civil Action No. 1373(E))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Ve.
NORTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED
SCHOOL, DISTRICT, ef al.,
Defendants-Appelleecs.
{Civil Action No. 3807(J))
.
.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
V.
NATCHEZ SPECIAL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE
SCHOOL, DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1120(W))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Ve.
MARION COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et 2l.;,
Defendants-Appellees.
{Civil Action No, 217801)
re
JOAN ANDERSON, et al., i:
Plaintiffs-Appellants;
. BNITED STATES OF AMERICA
. Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant,
Vv.
THE CANTON MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
and THE MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees. .
(Civil Action No, 3700(J))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
5 *
SOUTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et: al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
{Civil Action lio, 39384(J))
°
.
re er St ee A th nt atl nt
BEATRICE ALEXANDER, ef al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Ve.
3
HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al.,
: Defendants-Appellees,
{Civil Action No. 3779(3))
a we A mg A
BOY LEE HARRIS, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Ve.
THE YAZOO COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al.,
| Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1209(VW))
JOHN BARNHARDT, et al., |
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Ve.
MERIDIAN’ SEPARATE SCHOOL ‘DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No, 1300(E))
——
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Ve
NESHOBA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1396(E))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
vy
NOXUBEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1372(E))
Dr i
UNITED STATES or AMERY CA,
. Plaintiff-Appellant,
Ve.
LAUDERDALE COUNTY SCHOOL DIS TRICY?, et al.,
Defendants Appalices.
(Civil Action No. 1367(E))
tt. he tet ig. eae rn Pe et amin
DIAN HUDSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
UNITED STATES Or AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant,
Ve.
., LEAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al.,
Defendants- Aoraliene.
(Civil Action No, 3382 (J))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintife- Appellant,
V.
COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL, et al.
Po fendnate -Appellees,
(Civil Action No, 2199 (H))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff- -Appellant,
Ve
AMITE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.
Pefendants- capocllices,
(Civil Action No. 3983 (J))
{
¢
Brin = eran +a ent
® UNITED STATES ky
Pl SI 1ff-Appel 1 ant,
| v. |
COVINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 2148(H))
La ——— TE ———
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Ve.
LAVWRERCE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants- Appellees,
(Civil Action No. 2216 (i))
JEREMIAH BLACKWELL, JR., et al.,
. Plaintiffs~-Appellants,
V.
ISSAQUENA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No, 1096 (W))
UNITED. STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Ve.
WILKINSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al:,
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 1160(W))
CHARLES KILLINGSWORTH, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
. Ve.
THE ENTERP RISE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT
_and QUITMAN CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
Defendants-Appellees.
{Civil Action No, 1302(F))
s PF og x
.
a a
UNITED STATES OF AMZERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Vv.
y
/
LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL, DISTRICT, et al
"3
Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 4294 (J))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA .
Plaintiff-Appellant,
Ve.
: : ; t PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE ing ¥
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
: - Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil) Action Ne, 3388(m))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : go,
Plaintiff-Appellant, a “io 5. ny
. v.
FRANKLIN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
‘ Defendants-Appellees.
(Civil Action No. 4256 (J))
a
Appeals fr om the United States District Court for the.
Southern District of Mississippi :
(July 25, 1969)
MODIFICATION OF ORDER
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
cases on July 3,
renumbering former paragraph 8 to be
such order,
paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 in their entirety, and inserting in lieu
thereof new paragraphs 5 and 6 which shall read as follows:
1 agreement is reached, the Office of Education
a plan for the school
efore August
The parties shall have ten (10) days from
the date such a proposed plan is filed with the dis-
trict court to file objections or suggested amend-
ments thereto. The district court shall hold a
hearing on the proposed plan and any objections and
suggested amendments thereto, and shall enter a plan
which conforms to constitutional standards no later
than ten (10) days after the time for filing objec-
tions has expired.
A plan for the school district shall be entered for
implementation by the district court no later than
September 1, 1969 and shall be effective for the
beginning of the 1869-1970 school year, The district
court shall enter Findings of Fact and Conclusions of
Law regarding the efficacy of any plan which is
approved or ordered to immediately disestablish the