Modification of Order
Public Court Documents
July 3, 1969

9 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Modification of Order, 1969. 7b4d8728-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/8d1fdbd1-5929-48cc-bb13-130134362aa4/modification-of-order. Accessed October 05, 2025.
Copied!
“ United States Uourt of 2s FIFTH CIRCUIT EDWARD W. WADSWORTH OFFICE OF THE CLERK ROOM 408-400 ROYAL ST. CLERK NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130 July 25, 1969 Mr. Robert C, Thomas, Clerk U, 8S. District Court P, 0, Box 769 Jackson, Miss, 39205 Dear Mr, Thomas: Nos, 030 and 28042 U.S. v. Hinds County School Board, et al (And Related Cases) Enclosed is a certified copy of this Court's order entered today in the above referenced causes modifying its opinion of July 3, 1969, which is self-explanatory, Very truly yours, EDWARD W, WADSWORTH, Clerk y Ledgen A. -, Depufy Clerk /adg Encl. cc & enc, to: All Counsel of Record Hon, William Harold Cox Hon, Dan M. Russell, Jr, Hon, Walter L, Nixon, Jr, EXT . INGEHE UNITED STATES Court iW: FOR THE PIPTH CIRCUIT Nos, 28030 2 23: (va) OO | ww I) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, Ve HINDS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al.’ Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No, 2075(J)) BUFORD A. LEE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Ve. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, - Defendant-Appellant, Vis MILTON EVANS, Third Party . oh Defendant-Appellee. (Civil Action No. 2034 (H)) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, , . Plaintiff-Appellant, v. . KEMPER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al., Defendants-Appellees. {Civil Action No. 1373(E)) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, Ve. NORTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL, DISTRICT, ef al., Defendants-Appelleecs. {Civil Action No. 3807(J)) . . UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, V. NATCHEZ SPECIAL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL, DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1120(W)) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, Ve. MARION COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et 2l.;, Defendants-Appellees. {Civil Action No, 217801) re JOAN ANDERSON, et al., i: Plaintiffs-Appellants; . BNITED STATES OF AMERICA . Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, Vv. THE CANTON MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., and THE MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellees. . (Civil Action No, 3700(J)) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, 5 * SOUTH PIKE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et: al., Defendants-Appellees. {Civil Action lio, 39384(J)) ° . re er St ee A th nt atl nt BEATRICE ALEXANDER, ef al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Ve. 3 HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., : Defendants-Appellees, {Civil Action No. 3779(3)) a we A mg A BOY LEE HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Ve. THE YAZOO COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., | Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1209(VW)) JOHN BARNHARDT, et al., | Plaintiffs-Appellants, Ve. MERIDIAN’ SEPARATE SCHOOL ‘DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No, 1300(E)) —— UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, Ve NESHOBA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1396(E)) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, vy NOXUBEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1372(E)) Dr i UNITED STATES or AMERY CA, . Plaintiff-Appellant, Ve. LAUDERDALE COUNTY SCHOOL DIS TRICY?, et al., Defendants Appalices. (Civil Action No. 1367(E)) tt. he tet ig. eae rn Pe et amin DIAN HUDSON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNITED STATES Or AMERICA, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, Ve. ., LEAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al., Defendants- Aoraliene. (Civil Action No, 3382 (J)) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintife- Appellant, V. COLUMBIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL, et al. Po fendnate -Appellees, (Civil Action No, 2199 (H)) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff- -Appellant, Ve AMITE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. Pefendants- capocllices, (Civil Action No. 3983 (J)) { ¢ Brin = eran +a ent ® UNITED STATES ky Pl SI 1ff-Appel 1 ant, | v. | COVINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 2148(H)) La ——— TE ——— UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, Ve. LAVWRERCE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants- Appellees, (Civil Action No. 2216 (i)) JEREMIAH BLACKWELL, JR., et al., . Plaintiffs~-Appellants, V. ISSAQUENA COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No, 1096 (W)) UNITED. STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, Ve. WILKINSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al:, Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 1160(W)) CHARLES KILLINGSWORTH, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, . Ve. THE ENTERP RISE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT _and QUITMAN CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendants-Appellees. {Civil Action No, 1302(F)) s PF og x . a a UNITED STATES OF AMZERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, Vv. y / LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL, DISTRICT, et al "3 Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 4294 (J)) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA . Plaintiff-Appellant, Ve. : : ; t PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE ing ¥ SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., : - Defendants-Appellees. (Civil) Action Ne, 3388(m)) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : go, Plaintiff-Appellant, a “io 5. ny . v. FRANKLIN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., ‘ Defendants-Appellees. (Civil Action No. 4256 (J)) a Appeals fr om the United States District Court for the. Southern District of Mississippi : (July 25, 1969) MODIFICATION OF ORDER Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY and MORGAN, Circuit Judges. cases on July 3, renumbering former paragraph 8 to be such order, paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 in their entirety, and inserting in lieu thereof new paragraphs 5 and 6 which shall read as follows: 1 agreement is reached, the Office of Education a plan for the school efore August The parties shall have ten (10) days from the date such a proposed plan is filed with the dis- trict court to file objections or suggested amend- ments thereto. The district court shall hold a hearing on the proposed plan and any objections and suggested amendments thereto, and shall enter a plan which conforms to constitutional standards no later than ten (10) days after the time for filing objec- tions has expired. A plan for the school district shall be entered for implementation by the district court no later than September 1, 1969 and shall be effective for the beginning of the 1869-1970 school year, The district court shall enter Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law regarding the efficacy of any plan which is approved or ordered to immediately disestablish the