Graham, Gary, 1990s - 1 of 1
Photograph
January 1, 1990 - January 1, 2000

Wide World Photos
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 7. Suit Filed Charging Civil Service Test Discriminatory, 1979. 5559c69a-bb92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/939e30f2-427f-458d-8698-e17edf3a129f/suit-filed-charging-civil-service-test-discriminatory. Accessed April 08, 2025.
Copied!
@ NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC egal efense lund 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 « (212) 586-8397 SUIT FILED CHARGING CIVIL SERVICE TEST DISCRIMINATORY For immediate release For further information: Monday, January 29, 1979 N.Y. - Steve Ralston 212-586-8397 San Fran. - Fernando Garcia 415-863-8232 Washington, D.C. — LDF 202-638-3278 Washington, D.C. - January 29 -- A legal challenge that goes to the heart of racial discrimination in the federal civil service system was filed today in the United States District Court in the District of Columbia. If successful, the suit (Luevano v.- Campbell would eliminate the present Professional and Administrative Career Examination (PACE) which, in most cases, is the single determining factor in considering applicants for hundreds of thousands of professional, administrative and technical jobs in a large number of federal agencies. The suit, jointly filed by the NAACP Legal Defense Fund (LDF), the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and I.M.A.G.E. De California (IMAGE), an association of Hispanic-American federal and state employees, charges that the adverse impact of the PACE —-more- Contributions are deductible for U.S. income tax purposes ‘The NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND is not part of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People although it was founded by it and shares its commitment to equal rights. LDF has had for over 20 years a separate Board, program, staff, office and budget. Civil Service Test - 2 on blacks, Hispanics and other racial minorities is so severe that it threatens to segregate the middle and upper levels of the executive branch of the Federal government. The suit further charges that the test is not in compliance with the guidelines established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the Federal Executive Agency Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, or certain provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Angel Luevano, Melody Van and Vicky Chapman are represented in the case as individuals and as members of a class which includes past, present and future black and Hispanic applicants for civil service positions which are awarded on the basis of the PACE scores. IMAGE is also a plaintiff in the suit, representing the interests of its members and other Hispanic persons who are discriminated against by the use of the PACE. The defendant is Alan Campbell, Director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, formerly the Civil Service Commission. The PACE is a written test that is supposed to test cognitive ability. It has been developed and is used by the federal civil service to select persons for entry-level positions in nonclerical, administrative and technical jobs. Those chosen by the PACE are often -more- Civil Service Test - 3 placed in "career ladder" positions and subsequently promoted to higher, non-supervisory levels without competition. Thus, failure on the PACE substantially reduces opportunities for these jobs as well. Competition for the jobs filled from the PACE register is intense. Approximately 200,000 applicants compete each year for one of the 8,000 jobs that become available. Most applicants must score at least 90% to be considered for a job even though the passing score is 70%. Generally, final employment decisions are based strictly on the PACE score with no consideration given other abilities which may be relevant to the job. The adverse impact of the PACE on racial minorities is clear. For example, in the 1977 PACE in the San Francisco region, 25.2% of the white applicants scored 90% or above, while only 1.1% of the black, and no Hispanic, applicants did. Despite these indications, the PACE has not been properly validated as required by federal employment testing guidelines. The suit contends that continued use of the test, without validation, is a violation of the plaintiffs' rights to equal employment opportunity. -more- Civil Service Test - 4 The plaintiffs are seeking a court declaration that their rights have been violated, an injunction against the continued use of the PACE and back pay for the losses they have suffered due to the racially discriminatory examination. =30>