Correspondence from Rhyne to Clerk
Public Court Documents
October 18, 1979

1 page
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Correspondence from Rhyne to Clerk, 1979. 915d1be5-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/96f8c139-5dcb-4805-aece-d0c0f8ce83bc/correspondence-from-rhyne-to-clerk. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
Law OFFICES RuaYyNE & BRHYNE CHARLES S. RHYNE SUITE 800 BRICE W. RHYNE 9217-1972) WILLIAM S. RHYNE ; 1000 CoNNEcTICUT AVENUE, N. W. ALFRED J. TIGHE, JR. DONALD A. CARR WasHiNGTON, D. C. 20036 RICHARD J. BACIGALUPO MARTIN W. MATZEN STEPHEN P. ELMENDORF MICHAEL A. HESS ARTHUR A. GUTHRIE ROBERT H. DRUMMER (202) 466-5420 CABLE ADDRESS JOAN E. LEWIS CHASRHYNE October 18, 1979 Michael Rodak, Jr. Clerk Supreme Court of the United States Washington, D. C. 20543 Re: City of Mobile v. Bolden, No. 77-1844 Dear Mr. Rodak: 4 We will conduct the re-argument on behalf of the City of Mobile in No. 77-1844 in exactly the same manner as the original argument. That arrangement was, as follows. Charles S. Rhyne argued for the appellant City, re- serving time for rebuttal. One of the several attorneys for the appellees argued in the City case only. Then, the United States as amicus curiae argued in both the City case and in No. 78-357 involving the Mobile County School Board. Finally, Charles Rhyne argued in rebuttal. At the first argument, this series of argument was allotted 1 hour, 7 1/2 minutes (with a corresponding reduction in the time of argument in support of appellees in the School Board case). Sincerely, 3. Charles S. Rhyne cc: all counsel