Correspondence from Rhyne to Clerk

Public Court Documents
October 18, 1979

Correspondence from Rhyne to Clerk preview

1 page

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Correspondence from Rhyne to Clerk, 1979. 915d1be5-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/96f8c139-5dcb-4805-aece-d0c0f8ce83bc/correspondence-from-rhyne-to-clerk. Accessed August 19, 2025.

    Copied!

    Law OFFICES 

RuaYyNE & BRHYNE 

  

CHARLES S. RHYNE SUITE 800 
BRICE W. RHYNE 9217-1972) 

WILLIAM S. RHYNE ; 1000 CoNNEcTICUT AVENUE, N. W. 
ALFRED J. TIGHE, JR. 
DONALD A. CARR WasHiNGTON, D. C. 20036 RICHARD J. BACIGALUPO 
MARTIN W. MATZEN 

STEPHEN P. ELMENDORF 

MICHAEL A. HESS 
ARTHUR A. GUTHRIE 

ROBERT H. DRUMMER (202) 466-5420 CABLE ADDRESS 
JOAN E. LEWIS CHASRHYNE 

October 18, 1979 

Michael Rodak, Jr. 
Clerk 
Supreme Court of the 

United States 
Washington, D. C. 20543 

Re: City of Mobile v. Bolden, 
No. 77-1844 
  

Dear Mr. Rodak: 

4 We will conduct the re-argument on behalf of the City 
of Mobile in No. 77-1844 in exactly the same manner as the 
original argument. That arrangement was, as follows. 

Charles S. Rhyne argued for the appellant City, re- 
serving time for rebuttal. One of the several attorneys 
for the appellees argued in the City case only. Then, the 
United States as amicus curiae argued in both the City case 
and in No. 78-357 involving the Mobile County School Board. 
Finally, Charles Rhyne argued in rebuttal. At the first 
argument, this series of argument was allotted 1 hour, 7 1/2 
minutes (with a corresponding reduction in the time of 
argument in support of appellees in the School Board case). 

Sincerely, 

3. 
Charles S. Rhyne 

cc: all counsel

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top