Correspondence from Rhyne to Clerk
Public Court Documents
October 18, 1979
1 page
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Correspondence from Rhyne to Clerk, 1979. 915d1be5-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/96f8c139-5dcb-4805-aece-d0c0f8ce83bc/correspondence-from-rhyne-to-clerk. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
Law OFFICES
RuaYyNE & BRHYNE
CHARLES S. RHYNE SUITE 800
BRICE W. RHYNE 9217-1972)
WILLIAM S. RHYNE ; 1000 CoNNEcTICUT AVENUE, N. W.
ALFRED J. TIGHE, JR.
DONALD A. CARR WasHiNGTON, D. C. 20036 RICHARD J. BACIGALUPO
MARTIN W. MATZEN
STEPHEN P. ELMENDORF
MICHAEL A. HESS
ARTHUR A. GUTHRIE
ROBERT H. DRUMMER (202) 466-5420 CABLE ADDRESS
JOAN E. LEWIS CHASRHYNE
October 18, 1979
Michael Rodak, Jr.
Clerk
Supreme Court of the
United States
Washington, D. C. 20543
Re: City of Mobile v. Bolden,
No. 77-1844
Dear Mr. Rodak:
4 We will conduct the re-argument on behalf of the City
of Mobile in No. 77-1844 in exactly the same manner as the
original argument. That arrangement was, as follows.
Charles S. Rhyne argued for the appellant City, re-
serving time for rebuttal. One of the several attorneys
for the appellees argued in the City case only. Then, the
United States as amicus curiae argued in both the City case
and in No. 78-357 involving the Mobile County School Board.
Finally, Charles Rhyne argued in rebuttal. At the first
argument, this series of argument was allotted 1 hour, 7 1/2
minutes (with a corresponding reduction in the time of
argument in support of appellees in the School Board case).
Sincerely,
3.
Charles S. Rhyne
cc: all counsel