Albemarle Paper Company v. Moody Leads to Awarding of Back Pay
Press Release
June 25, 1975

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Albemarle Paper Company v. Moody Leads to Awarding of Back Pay, 1975. a2071f1a-bb92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9a80b9cf-85a4-4e8c-86cb-c204779f6053/albemarle-paper-company-v-moody-leads-to-awarding-of-back-pay. Accessed May 13, 2025.
Copied!
abl P Legal e and Educational Fund, Inc. 10 Columbus Circle york, New York 10019 Contact: Barry Goldstein Telephone: 212 586-8397 ‘OR IMMEDIATE RE: New York, N.Y. June 25 - The U. S. Supreme Court today ruled that blacks who suffer lost wages as a result of employment discri ation should y recover those wages in the form of “back pay." The Court also rich restrict xculed that employment tests w e opportunities of blacks and hich are not "job related" according to established professional standards unlawful. This important decision arose out of a lawsuit involving the Albemarle Paper Company and Local 425, United Papermakers and Paperworkers. Brought in 1966 by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc Albem rle Paper Company v. Moody concerns the application of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the federal law designed to end discrimination in employment. Julius Chambers, a North Carolina attorney, now President of the Fund, argued the case before the Supreme Court. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals had held that the defendants had discriminated and ordered that back pay be awarded to the class of black workers and that discr natory testing practices be halted. Although the Supreme Court also determined that the defendants discriminated and that a xr ed was required, the Court articulated the standards for awarding relief differently from the Fourth Circuit. The Supreme Court made clear that the courts will order full relief, including monetary awards, for all the consequences of racial discrimination. Jack Greenberg, the Director-Counsel of the Legal Defense Fund, stated that "The decision is of tremendous practical importance, since companies and unions now know that if they continue to discriminate they will be liable for substantial back pay awards. This fact should cause many companies and unions to cease discriminating and to take effective measures to provide equal employment opportunity." NOTE TO EDITOR: The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund is a completely separate organization, even though originally established by the NAACP in 1939. The correct designation is NAACP Legal Defense and Educa- tional Fund, Inc., frequently shortened to Legal Defense Fund. The organiza- tion has a national staff and headquarters in New York City, and works with 400 cooperating attorneys throughout the country.