High Court Ends Fla. Interracial Sex Ban

Defense Fund Wins Victory for Crawfordville Negroes 2 preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Press Releases
Creator
- LDF
Taxonomy
Identifier
- ece50d5f-b692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 2. High Court Ends Fla. Interracial Sex Ban, 1964. 4cd79a7e-b592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/45948c12-5e1b-4807-b738-19ed10fc1eb7/high-court-ends-fla-interracial-sex-ban. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    10 Columbus Circle 
New York, N.Y. 10019 
JUdson 6-8397 

NAACP 

Legal Defense and Educational Fund 
PRESS RELEASE 
President 

Dr. Allan Knight Chalmers 

FOR RELEASE 

Saturday, 
December 12, 1964 

Director-Counsel 

Jack Greenberg 

 Ccatiance Hallea Mot 
; HTGa COURT ENDS FLA, 

INTERRACIAL SEX BAN 

WASHINGTON---The U.S. Supreme Court said this week that Florida 
cannot make it a crime for Negroes and whites who are not married 
to occupy the same room at night. 

This ruling came six weeks after attorneys of the NAACP Legal 

Defense Fund argued before the high court in behalf of a Miami 

Beach couple---Miss Connie Hoffman, white and Dewey McLaughlin, 

Negro, 

The couple were arrested and convicted under a Rlorida:'‘ *- 

law that made it a crime for a "Negro man and white woman...who are 

not married to each other (to)...habitually live in and occupy in 

the night time the same room." 

"We find nothing," wrote Justice Byron R. White in the Court's 

unanimous decision, "which makes it essential to punish promiscuity 

by one racial group and not that of another. 

"There is no suggestion that a white person and a Negro are any 

more likely habitually to occupy the same room together than the 

white or the Negro couple or to engage in illicit intercourse if 

they do," he said. 

Jack Greenberg, director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense 

Fund commented that the Supreme Court "did the obvious in striking 

down this conviction, 

"As a legal matter, this knocks on the head the ultimate 

superstition upon which racial differences in law are supposed to 

be justified." 

The Supreme Court did not deal with the Legal Defense Fund's 

argument against Florida's law prohibiting interracial marriage. 

t Leen states still have laws against interracial marriage: 
Alabama,“Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North 
and South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia~--all members of 
the.old confederacy. Also the border states of Delaware, Maryland, 
West thee Missouri, Oklahoma, Kentucky, indtena and Wyeming, 

case was argued by two members of the Legal Defense Fund 
Board of Daregtors illiam ae Seas Jr. of Philadelphia, Pa. 
and ieee . 8 

Defense Fana® sreeneetes eak enemas CRORE Aone dot ed. ba. be 
New York and G.E. Graves, Jr. of Miami, Florida, loca B cistk steam, 

Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Defense Fund Wins Victory for Crawfordville Negroes 2

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in