Memo from Berrien and Cox to Counsel Re: NC Congressional Redistricting Case Decision and Order and Permanent Injunction
Correspondence
April 3, 1998
3 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Memo from Berrien and Cox to Counsel Re: NC Congressional Redistricting Case Decision and Order and Permanent Injunction, 1998. 7d225703-dd0e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9dee624d-84d3-4459-add3-30f7b9798368/memo-from-berrien-and-cox-to-counsel-re-nc-congressional-redistricting-case-decision-and-order-and-permanent-injunction. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
EDF MEMORANDUM
TO: Elaine Jones, Ted Shaw, Norman Chachkin and Victor Bolden
FROM: Jackie Berrienland Todd Cox
RE: North Carolina Congressional Redistricting Case Decision
DATE: April 3, 1998
As you may recall, after the Supreme Court’s 1996 decision in Shaw v. Hunt invalidated
North Carolina’s Twelfth Congressional District (represented by Congressman Mel Watt), the
North Carolina Legislature adopted a new congressional plan ("the 1997 plan"). A group of
white voters, represented by the same attorney who filed the Shaw case, challenged the First and
Twelfth congressional districts of the 1997 plan in Cromartie v. Hunt, Civil No. 4:96CV104-
BO(3). The 1997 plan was drawn using data from past elections, with the goal of preserving
a balance of six Republican and six Democratic congressional districts in the state. African
Americans comprise a minority of the population of the revised Twelfth Congressional District,
and both the new Twelfth, and the First Congressional District of the plan (which remains a
majority-Black district) are more geographically compact than their companion districts in the
1992 congressional plan.
Despite these revisions, a three-judge federal court in North Carolina entered an Order
today which invalidated the revised Twelfth Congressional District and permanently enjoined
the State from conducting elections under the 1997 redistricting plan. The ruling was entered
following a hearing in which the Court refused to rule on our pending intervention motion and
did not allow us to participate in oral argument. Todd Cox, Anita Hodgkiss, and Adam Stein
attended the hearing.
A copy of the Order and Permanent Injunction, which was entered by Judges Boyle and
Voorhees, is attached to this Memorandum. Circuit Judge Ervin dissented from the Order.
Neither majority nor dissenting opinions have been issued by the Court yet. The majority
directed the parties to propose a timetable for the legislature to enact a new plan and a revised
election schedule by April 8, 1998. The State is planning to seek a stay of the decision (Chief
Justice Rehnquist is the Circuit Justice).
/attachment
APR-03-98 06:14PM FROM-FERGUSON, Yl) HALLAS ADKINS GRES HAMAS UM +7043345654 a T-430 P.01/02 F-173
FILED
Iu THE DISTRICT COURT OF TED UNITED STATES
. JOR THE SABTERN DIBTRICT OF FORTH CAROLINA
:
EASTILN DIVISION APR 3 1998
CIVIL NO. 4196CV104-BO(3)
DAVID W. DANIEL, CLERK
u. S DISTRICT COURT
MARTIN CROMARTIE, ot al., E DIST. NO. CAR
plaintifrs,
ve QBREIR._ANR
JAMES B. HUNT, 3k., in his
capacity as Governor of the
gcats of North Carolina,
et al.,
Defendants.
et
?
Va
g?
Ca
e?
Ca
ll
B
e
d
B
t
C
a
Go
vt
B
t
B
d
B
®
M
e
h
Be
t
Ca
g
Q
e
”
2HYE MATTER la Dafora tha Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for
prelirinary injunction, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment,
and Defendants’ motion for susaary judgrent.
Following a hearing an Tuesday. March 31, 1558, tho Court
took these mationa under advisement and naw isaves the fallowing
ruling:
1) Finding That the Twelfth congressional plstrict under
the 1597 North Carelina cangresaianal redistricting
plan is unconstitutional, the Court hersby GRANTS
Plaintifzs' motion for summary judgment as to the
Twelfth congressional Disrriat.
2) Based upsnh tha Court's finding that the Twelfth
Cangressianal Diotrict is unconstitutlanal, it is
further ORDERED that Plaintiffe’ motion for a
preliminary injunction and Plaintiff's request for a
APR-03-98 06:14PM FROM-FERGUSON, ff) HALLAS ADKINS. GRESHAWASUM +7043345654 @ T-430 P.02/02 F-173
permanent injunaction ans contained in its complaint aya
GRANTED. Defendants ars herady ENJOINED from canducting
any primary or general election lor congveaaisnal
off {cen under the redistricting plan enacted as 1997
N.C. Sespien Laws, Chapter 11.
3) Tt is rurther ORDERED that tha parties file a written
gubmigsion no later than Wadnesday, april 8, 19338,
addrensing the tollawing lgsues:
a) An appropriate time peried within which tha North
carolina General Assambly may he allawed the
cpportunicy to corrsct the conctitcutional dafacts
in the 1997 plan, in default of which the caurt
would.undartaka the task.
b) A proposed glection schedula to follaw
redimrricting which providds far a primary
election process culminating in a general
congtasajonal election ta be held an Tuesday,
November 3, 1958.
Tnis order and permanent injuncticnh ara entered hy a
majority of theo thras-judge papal. Circuit Judges Bam J Bevin,
TTY, dissents. Memoranda with reference to chim order will be
issued as scon as possibla.
THIS the shira day of April, 1998.
TERRENCE W. BOYLE
chief United States District Judge
FICHARD L. VOORHEES
United States District Judge
BY: N garnet (J:
TERRENCE W. BAQYLE Eo
chief United States District Judge