A suit involving 170 Negro students was filled last week in the federal district court against the Durham Board of Education…
Press Release
May 3, 1960

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. A suit involving 170 Negro students was filled last week in the federal district court against the Durham Board of Education…, 1960. 962a569f-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9e144f67-230d-4fd6-9edf-076dfa4a3322/a-suit-involving-170-negro-students-was-filled-last-week-in-the-federal-district-court-against-the-durham-board-of-education. Accessed July 16, 2025.
Copied!
PRESS RELEASE®@ & NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE «+ NEW YORK 19,N. Y. + JUdson 6-8397 DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS oa THURGOOD MARSHALL President Director-Counsel May 3, 1960 NEW YORK. -- A suit involving 170 Negro students was filed last week in the federal district court against the Durham Board of Educa- tion, This is the largest number of plaintiffs in a single legal action brought against a school system since the Supreme Court 1954 decree outlawing segregation in public education. The Durham Board of Education is accused of using the North Carolina Pupil Placement laws to maintain and operate segregated schools by assignment on the basis of race. The North Carolina Pupil Placement statutes give local school officials the authority to assign school children on the basis of various vague factors. The suit charges the school board with making assignments on the basis of 2 school zones--one for white and another for Negro students. It also accuses school officials of operating 2 segregated school systems. The school board has not applied the state pupil placement statutes as a means of abolishing state-imposed racial distinctions, the court was told in the complaint filed here today. Nor have the school authorities advanced a "genuine method" for desegregating the city's public schools, the complaint charged. The complaint was filed on behalf of 170 Negro children by NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund attorneys. It asked the court to issue a decree enjoining the school board officials from assigning the students to any school other than the one to which they would be assigned if they were white. It also asked the court to direct the scheol officials to cease operating segregated schools and to presen* a complete desegregation plan within a time set by the court. The action today resulted from refusal of the school board to grant requests of 217 Negro students who sought reassignment from all-Negro schcols to schools nearer their homes. =O5 At the hearing at which 170 students applied for change of assignment, 85 personally appeared. Those who did not personally appear were represented by counsel. The board rejected those who did not appear because they were not present. It rejected the others without any explanation. Originally 225 sought reassignment before the 1959-60 school term. Eight were reassigned and the other 217 were required to cor- tinue attendance at the all-Negro schools. Attorneys for the Negroes are Lincoln C. Jenkins of Columbia South Carolina and Matthew J. Perry of Spartanburg, South Carolina, Thurgood Marshall and Jack Greenberg of the NAACP Legal Defense Fur.” tle-f in New York City.