Lawrence County Defendants' Notice of Proposed Schedule for Complying with Preliminary Injunction
Public Court Documents
June 18, 1986
5 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Lawrence County Defendants' Notice of Proposed Schedule for Complying with Preliminary Injunction, 1986. b3d856d3-b7d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9e2a389b-94ff-46aa-a10d-b23c433f1692/lawrence-county-defendants-notice-of-proposed-schedule-for-complying-with-preliminary-injunction. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
4
J §F
|: £ 20
» | al ‘
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
JOHN DILLARD, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Vv, CASE NO. 85-T-1332-N
CRENSHAW COUNTY, ALABAMA,
et al.,
W
t
?
N
i
t
N
a
t
l
a
t
l
l
r
l
“
a
u
s
“
a
u
t
“
u
t
t
Defendants.
LAWRENCE COUNTY DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF PROPOSED
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLYING WITH PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
In accordance with the Court's order and injunction dated
May 28, 1986, which required the Lawrence County Defendants "to
submit to the Court within 21 days . . . their time schedules
for the development, approval, and implementation by January 1,
1987, of new commission election plans that comply with Section
2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 . . .", said Defendants
submit the following proposed schedule:
1. Not later than August 15, 1986 (and earlier if possi-
ble), these Defendants shall have developed and submitted to
the Court and opposing counsel a proposed single-member dist-
rict Commission plan, along with appropriate descriptive mater-
ial such as maps and population figures, by race. Contemporan-
eously, these Defendants shall submit their proposed plan to
the Attorney General of the United States for preclearance,
with a request for expedited consideration, pursuant to the
provisions of 42 U.S.C. §1973(c), Section 5 of the Voting
Rights Act of 1965. It is the understanding of these Defen-
dants that the Attorney General may, but does not have the
obligation to, review such a plan submitted by an agency that
is without the state law authority to adopt such a plan.
2. Consistent with these Defendants' letter to the Court
dated June 11, 1986, it is currently contemplated that the
proposed plan will include a Commission Chairman (or County
Executive) elected at-large. Further, the plan may include
provisions (not yet developed) for phasing in the plan over a
reasonable time period, with the possibility of incumbents
remaining in office during all or a portion of their unexpired
terms. It is the view of these Defendants that, under the
circumstances of this case (particularly the time constraints),
it would not necessarily be appropriate for this Court to with-
hold its review of the plan pending Section 5 review, although
such a procedure might be appropriate in other circumstances.
3. Assuming the plan submitted by these Defendants is
approved by the Court and, if reviewed by the Attorney General,
approved under Section 5, it is proposed that the details of
the plan be adequately publicized to advise the citizens of
Lawrence County of the change in the form of government and the
special election to be held under the plan.
4. The special election will be held under the new plan
at some appropriate date in late 1986 (probably December), on a
date to be selected taking into account various factors such as
polling place availability, the desire to maximize voter parti-
cipation, the desire to avoid unnecessary conflict with holiday
season activities, and the like.
It should be recognized that there are many factors which
could affect this proposed schedule and which are largely not
within the control of the Lawrence County Defendants. This
schedule does, however, represent what these Defendants, after
consultation with their counsel and consultants, believe to be
a reasonable schedule for compliance with the preliminary
injunction.
Respectfully submitted,
AK Thabo og
D. L. Martin
215 South Main Street
Moulton, Alabama 35650
(205) 974-9200
viel 7 Bnle—
David R. Boyd
Attorneys for Bey dant.
Lawrence County, Alabama,
Larry Smith and Dan Ligon
BALCH & BINGHAM
P. DO. Box 78
Montgomery, Alabama 36101
(205) 834-6500
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have served the foregoing Lawrence
County Defendants' Notice of Proposed Schedule For Complying
With Preliminary Injunction, upon all counsel of record listed
below by placing copies of same in the United States Mail,
properly addressed and postage paid this is day of June,
1986.
Sem Ep
OF COUNSEL
Larry T. Menefee, Esq.
James U. Blacksher, Esq.
Wanda J. Cochran, Esq.
Blacksher, Menefee & Stein
405 Van Antwerp Building
P. 0. Box 1051
Mobile, Alabama 36633
Terry G. Davis, Esq.
Seay & Davis
732 Carter Hill Road
P. O. ‘Box 6125
Montgomery, Alabama 36106
Deborah Fins, Esq.
Julius L. Chambers, Esq.
NAACP Legal Defense Fund
1900 Hudson Street
16th Floor
New York, New York 10013
Jack Floyd, Esq.
Floyd, Kenner & Cusimano
816 Chestnut Street
Gadsden, Alabama 35999
H. R. Burnham, Esq.
Burnham, Klinefelter, Halsey,
Jones & Cater
401 SouthTrust Bank Building
P. O. Box 1618
Anniston, Alabama 36202
Warren Rowe, Esq.
Rowe & Sawyer
P. O. Box 150
Enterprise, Alabama 36331
Reo Kirkland, Jr., Esq.
P. O. Box 646
James W. Webb, Esq.
Webb, Crumpton, McGregor,
Schmaeling & Wilson
166 Commerce Street
P. O. Box 238
Montgomery, Alabama 36101
Lee Otts, Esq.
Otts & Moore
P., OO. Box 467
Brewton, Alabama 36427
W. O. Rirk, Jr., Bsqg.
Curry & Kirk
Phoenix Avenue
Carrollton, Alabama 35447
Barry D. Vaughn, Esq.
Proctor & Vaughn
121 N. Norton Avenue
Sylacauga, Alabama 35150
Alton Turner, Esq.
Turner & Jones
P. O Box 207
Luverne, Alabama 36049
D. L. Martin, Esq.
215 S. Main Street
Moulton, Alabama 35650
Edward Still, Esq.
714 South 29th Street
Brewton, Alabama 36427 Birmingham, Alabama 35233-2810