LDF Files Two Muhammad Ali Cases in One Week
Press Release
November 11, 1969

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. LDF Files Two Muhammad Ali Cases in One Week, 1969. 44b7e3de-b992-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a5c4ca90-b426-47cb-beec-40e4f153d566/ldf-files-two-muhammad-ali-cases-in-one-week. Accessed October 09, 2025.
Copied!
[AACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. » President Hon. Francis F. PRESS RELEASE Ditector-Gommsed egal efense lund Jack Greenberg Director, Public Relations Jesse DeVore, Jr. 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 NIGHT NUMBER 212-749-8487 S25 FOR RELEASE Tuesday, November 11, 1969 LDF FILES TWO MUHAMMAD ALI CASES IN ONE WEEK Rights To Box and Draft Deferment Sought NEW YORK-~Muhammad Ali's right to box in New York State was called for in a suit filed this week in U. S. District Court here by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF). The State Athletic Commission “arbitrarily, capriciously, and unreasonably refused to renew plaintiff's professional boxer's license for a reason which has no rational connection with plain- tiff's fitness or capacity to discharge the duties of the boxing profession," LDF attorneys asserted. (Meanwhile, in the U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans, LDF attorneys sought reversal of the draft evasion conviction of Mr. Ali.) (They challenged the legality of the government's practice of wire tapping as used in Mr. Ali's case as well as systematic exclusion of Negroes from draft boards.) These suits bring the nation's largest private civil rights legal organization to Mr. Ali's assistance. The LDF's New York complaint noted that on September 22, Mr. Ali applied to the Commission for renewal of his boxer's license. On October 14, the Commission unanimously voted to deny the application on the basis of his conviction for refusing to submit to induction in the Armed Services. According to the LDF complaint, the Commission stated that his participation in boxing events in the State was “detrimental to the best interest of boxing or to the public interest, con- venience or necessity." The complaint asserted that failure to renew the license denied Ali's constitutional rights to due process of law, to equal protection of the laws and to freedom of religion. The suit also stated that barring him "from the right to earn a livelihood as a professional athlete during those few remaining years in which he can expect to be gainfully employed" constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. The Commission, according to the LDF, has violated Mr. Ali's rights under the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The attorneys cite Mr. Ali's work as a minister of the Nation of Islam, having "taught and preached his faith at Muslim Temples, in ghetto streets, and at schools and colleges all over the nation. "He has counseled teenage gangs such as the Blackstone Rangers of Chicago, Ill." in efforts to bring community peace and harmony. According to Michael Meltsner, the LDF's First Assistant Counsel: MUHAMMAD ALI'S RIGHT TO BOX -2- November 7, 1969 IN NEW YORK SOUGHT BY LDF The NAACP Legal Defense Fund believes that the State of New York has unlawfully denied Muhammad Ali a renewal of his boxing license. His conviction for refusing to submit to induction in the Armed Forces has nothing to do with his ability to box. His character and sincerity are not in doubt. His ability is beyond question. He should not be denied the right to earn a livelihood in the few years re- maining in his career. Mr. Ali was convicted in 1967 of refusing to submit to induction into the Armed Services in a Texas federal court, but later the Supreme Court of the United States remanded the case for reconsideration. On July 24, 1969 the Texas court resentenced Mr. Ali to five years in prison md a $10,000 fine. The case is presently being appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Mr. Ali's license to box in New York State was “indefinitely suspended" by the Commission on April 28, 1967, the same day he refused to submit to induction. =30- NOTE: Please bear in mind that the LDF is a completely separate and distinct organization even though we were established by the NAACP and retain those initials in our name. Our correct desig- nation is NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., fre- quently shortened to LDF.