LDF Files Two Muhammad Ali Cases in One Week
Press Release
November 11, 1969
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. LDF Files Two Muhammad Ali Cases in One Week, 1969. 44b7e3de-b992-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a5c4ca90-b426-47cb-beec-40e4f153d566/ldf-files-two-muhammad-ali-cases-in-one-week. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
[AACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.
» President
Hon. Francis F.
PRESS RELEASE Ditector-Gommsed
egal efense lund Jack Greenberg
Director, Public Relations
Jesse DeVore, Jr.
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 NIGHT NUMBER 212-749-8487
S25
FOR RELEASE
Tuesday, November 11, 1969
LDF FILES TWO MUHAMMAD
ALI CASES IN ONE WEEK
Rights To Box and Draft Deferment Sought
NEW YORK-~Muhammad Ali's right to box in New York State was called
for in a suit filed this week in U. S. District Court here by the
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF).
The State Athletic Commission “arbitrarily, capriciously,
and unreasonably refused to renew plaintiff's professional boxer's
license for a reason which has no rational connection with plain-
tiff's fitness or capacity to discharge the duties of the boxing
profession," LDF attorneys asserted.
(Meanwhile, in the U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans, LDF
attorneys sought reversal of the draft evasion conviction of
Mr. Ali.)
(They challenged the legality of the government's practice
of wire tapping as used in Mr. Ali's case as well as systematic
exclusion of Negroes from draft boards.)
These suits bring the nation's largest private civil rights
legal organization to Mr. Ali's assistance.
The LDF's New York complaint noted that on September 22, Mr.
Ali applied to the Commission for renewal of his boxer's license.
On October 14, the Commission unanimously voted to deny the
application on the basis of his conviction for refusing to submit
to induction in the Armed Services.
According to the LDF complaint, the Commission stated that
his participation in boxing events in the State was “detrimental
to the best interest of boxing or to the public interest, con-
venience or necessity."
The complaint asserted that failure to renew the license
denied Ali's constitutional rights to due process of law, to
equal protection of the laws and to freedom of religion.
The suit also stated that barring him "from the right to
earn a livelihood as a professional athlete during those few
remaining years in which he can expect to be gainfully employed"
constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.
The Commission, according to the LDF, has violated Mr. Ali's
rights under the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the
Constitution.
The attorneys cite Mr. Ali's work as a minister of the Nation
of Islam, having "taught and preached his faith at Muslim Temples,
in ghetto streets, and at schools and colleges all over the nation.
"He has counseled teenage gangs such as the Blackstone Rangers
of Chicago, Ill." in efforts to bring community peace and harmony.
According to Michael Meltsner, the LDF's First Assistant
Counsel:
MUHAMMAD ALI'S RIGHT TO BOX -2- November 7, 1969
IN NEW YORK SOUGHT BY LDF
The NAACP Legal Defense Fund believes that the State
of New York has unlawfully denied Muhammad Ali a
renewal of his boxing license. His conviction for
refusing to submit to induction in the Armed Forces
has nothing to do with his ability to box. His
character and sincerity are not in doubt. His
ability is beyond question. He should not be denied
the right to earn a livelihood in the few years re-
maining in his career.
Mr. Ali was convicted in 1967 of refusing to submit to
induction into the Armed Services in a Texas federal court, but
later the Supreme Court of the United States remanded the case
for reconsideration. On July 24, 1969 the Texas court resentenced
Mr. Ali to five years in prison md a $10,000 fine. The case is
presently being appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit.
Mr. Ali's license to box in New York State was “indefinitely
suspended" by the Commission on April 28, 1967, the same day he
refused to submit to induction.
=30-
NOTE: Please bear in mind that the LDF is a completely separate
and distinct organization even though we were established by the
NAACP and retain those initials in our name. Our correct desig-
nation is NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., fre-
quently shortened to LDF.