LDF Files Two Muhammad Ali Cases in One Week
Press Release
November 11, 1969

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Correspondence from Smiley to McGee and Neyhart Re: Joint Appendix, 2000. 5d222de0-fc0e-f011-9989-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/fdb4a6b2-702f-446d-94fd-e773ac45b344/correspondence-from-smiley-to-mcgee-and-neyhart-re-joint-appendix. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
State of North Carolina MICHAEL F. EASLEY Department of Justice ATTORNEY GENERAL P.O. BOX 629 REPLY TO: Tiare B. Smiley RALEIGH Special Litigation 27602-0629 (919) 716-6900 FAX: (919) 716-6763 August 1, 2000 Martin B. McGee Williams, Boger, Grady, Davis & Tuttle, P.A. Post Office Box 2 Kannapolis, North Carolina 28082 BY FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL Seth Neyhart Everett and Everett Law Firm Post Office Box 586 (Self-Help Building) Durham, North Carolina 27702 Re: Cromartie Joint Appendix Dear Marty and Seth: For purposes of finalizing the joint appendix, we are setting a deadline of noon, Thursday, August 3, 2000 for you to provide us any additional designations as a result of materials we added based on your designations. With regard to your questions regarding what testimony is part of the trial record, our understanding is that the court admitted all Cromartie depositions in toto, in lieu of additional trial testimony. This broad expansion of the record rendered the designations of Cromartie depositions in the pre-trial order irrelevant, and complete copies of all these depositions were provided to the court. Thus, all the parties are free to put any portions of these transcripts in the joint appendix. However, you raise an interesting point with regard to the Shaw and Pope depositions and testimony. Although plaintiffs designated some of these materials for “proffer on cross- examination” in the pre-trial order, our investigation does not reveal that copies of Cohen’s Shaw testimony and deposition transcripts or Cohen’s Pope deposition transcript were ever submitted to the court in full, or that selected portions based on the designations ever were submitted. Plaintiffs’ failure to provide the court copies of this testimony renders the designations meaningless. Thus, our view is that none of the Shaw and Pope testimony was made part of the record and none of this testimony belongs in the joint appendix. If you still want to include any of this material in the joint appendix, please advise whether a copy of this testimony was ever filed McGee, Neyhart August 1, 2000 Page 2 or submitted to the Cromartie court, when it was filed or submitted and how it was filed or submitted. Sincerely, ( ZA2_ are B. Smiley Special Deputy Attorney General TBS/cdf ce: Todd Cox Adam Stein