McKissick v. Carmichael Jr. Appendix to Appellants' Brief
Public Court Documents
October 9, 1950

This item is featured in:
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Williams. Correspondence from Winner to Guinier, Suitts, Klein, and Williams, 1982. c1b1dd56-da92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/8913a81e-fb4e-4fdb-bfd7-62d84fbef809/correspondence-from-winner-to-guinier-suitts-klein-and-williams. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
CHAMBERS, FERGUSON, WATT, WALLAS, ADKINS & FULLER, P.A ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 73O EAST INDEPENDENCE PLAZA 951 SOUTH INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 24202 TELEPHONE (704) 375-446r June 3, L982 JULIUS LEVONNE CHAMBERS JAMES E. FERGUSON. II MELVIN L. WATT JONATHAN WALLAS KARL ADKINS JAMES C, FULLER. JR, YVONNE MIMS EVANS JOHN W. GRESHAM RONALD L, GIBSON GILOA F, GLAZER LESLIE J, WINNER JOHN T, NOCKLEBY' . OF O. C. BAR ONLY Ms. Lani Guinier NAACP Legal Defense Fund Suite 2030 10 Col-umbus Circle New York, New York 1-0019 Mr. Steve Suitts Southern Regional Council 75 Marietta Street NW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Mr. Richard Klein Legal Services of North Carolina Post Office Box 6505 Raleigh, North Carolina 27628 Mr. Napoleon Williams Legal Defense Fund Suite 2030 l0 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 Re: Gingles v. Edmisten Dear Folks: Enclosed is a copy of a Motion to Consolidate and our response to it. After my discussion with Chambers, w€ agreed that we need to be kept informed of the proceedings in Cavanagh v. Brock since if the Cavanagh plaintiffs win, we will automatically 1ose. The Cavanagh plaintiffs seek a declaration that counties that are not Section 5 counties may not be divided. Chambers al-so suggests that we may want to intervene as defendants in Cavanagh v. Brock whether or not the actions are consolidated. @ thoughts about that, p1-ease 1et me know. Thank you. LJW: ddb Enclosures Lesl Winner