Correspondence from Lee to Samuels Re: Children's Advocacy Institute Proposal

Correspondence
October 7, 1991

Cite this item

Correspondence from Lee to Samuels Re: Children's Advocacy Institute Proposal preview

2 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Impact area
- Economic Justice
Topic
- Environmental Justice
Matter
- Matthews & People United for a Better Oakland v. Coye/Kizer
Case
- Matthews & People United for a Better Oakland v. Coye/Kizer
U.S. state
- California
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- af7ce967-5d40-f011-b4cb-002248226c06

Cite this item

Case Files, Matthews v. Kizer Hardbacks. Correspondence from Lee to Samuels Re: Children's Advocacy Institute Proposal, 1991. af7ce967-5d40-f011-b4cb-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/abb72e6c-7d42-4bdb-a6c1-2760236ed848/correspondence-from-lee-to-samuels-re-childrens-advocacy-institute-proposal. Accessed November 23, 2025.

Copied!

Regional Office

A A Suite 208

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE 315 West Ninth Street

AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. Los Angeles, CA 90015 (213) 624-2405 Fax: (213) 624-0075

October 7, 1991

Ms. Sara Samuels
Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
Quadrus
2400 Sand Hall Road
Menlo Park, CA 94205

Re: Children's Advocacy Institute Proposal

Dear Ms. Samuels:

The NAACP Legal Defense Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) supports
the proposal of the Children's Advocacy Institute for funds from
the Kaiser Family Foundation to set up a Model Health Promotion
Program.

United States Secretary of Health and Human Services Louis
Sullivan has called childhood lead poisoning the "number one
environmental childhood health problem." While almost 1/5 of all
young children suffer from lead poisoning, 2/3 of young African
American inner city children do.

LDF, along with several other public interest law offices, is
litigating a lawsuit against the California Department of Health
Services for failing to administer blood lead level testing among
young, poor (Medicaid-eligible) children. Matthews vv. Kizer.
Although the federal Medicaid statute requires such testing, the
Health Services Department tests virtually no children, less than
300 of the 570,000 eligible children younger than six years of age.
Happily, the parties in the Matthews case are now in serious
settlement negotiations concerning increased testings. These
negotiations are premised in part on the ability of the Department
and groups like Children's Advocacy Institute to provide adequate
public education and. outreach to parents to insure adequate and
effective testing. Such educational efforts are especially needed
in light of the action of the federal Centers for Disease Control
today to lower the threshold level of lead poisoning to ten ug/dL
so that levels once thought to be tolerable are now recognized as
toxic. Centers for Disease Control, Preventing lead Poisoning in
Young Children (October 1991).

National Office Regional Office

Contributions are The NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) is not part Suite 1600 Suite 301

deductible for U.S. of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People 99 Hudson Street 1275 K Street, NW

income tax purposes. (NAACP) although LDF was founded by the NAACP and shares its New York, NY 10013 ~~ Washington, DC 20005
commitment to equal rights. LDF has had for over 30 years a separate (212) 219-1900 (202) 682-1300

Board, program, staff, office and budget. Fax: (212) 226-7592 Fax: (202) 682-1312

oct. . 79.1991

Page 2

The proposed pilot project of Children's Advocacy Institute
in Oakland and selected San Francisco neighborhoods is especially
appropriate in light of the large stock of dilapidated housing as
well as impoverished minority communities in these areas, factors
highly correlated with lead poisoning.

LDF is therefore happy to support the Institutes! Model Health
Promotion Program. | ]

Wegtern Regional Counsel

BLL: jb

Encl.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Lee to Samuels Re: Children's Advocacy Institute Proposal

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in