Tison v. Arizona Brief for Petitioners
Public Court Documents
October 7, 1985

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Remarks by Hopkins on Boston School Committee Suit, 1969. cb80a5c6-b992-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e22c488a-0bc1-412f-8956-f522e8985adc/remarks-by-hopkins-on-boston-school-committee-suit. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
ole President § Hon, Francis E. Rivers 4 PRESS RELEA! Director-Counsel egal fefense und Jack Greenberg NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC a eskt out 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 » JUdson 6-8397 Septenber 6,19 te NIGHT NUMBER 212-749-8487 Remarks by LDF Attorney Donald Hopkins Today, a suit has been filed in the United States District District Court on behalf of the residents of the Roxbury area to enjoin the holding of future elections of the Boston School Committee on an at-large basis. 7 The black parents, through their a forneys from the NAACP Legal tefense and Educational Fund, Inc./Massachusetts Law Reform Institute @yy@Mehew are asking the Court to: 1) preliminarily and permanently enjoin the operation and enforcement of Section 18 of the Boston City ’ Charter, the statute by which the school committee is elected; 2) declare that the section is in violation of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution in that the purpose and effect of the at-large system is to deprive a minority racial group of effective exercise of their franchise; 3) order the Mayor and City Council to petition the General Court for an amendment to the City Charter, providing for the election of School Committee members on a district basis and; 4) to order the establishment of local governing boards to supervise and control the local func- tions of schools in the Roxbury area. The complaint alleges that the at-large election of the Boston School Committee was historically designed, in part, to keep minorities from exercising effective voting power and in- fluencing the decisions of the School Committee. The complaint further alleges that today the at-large system is being used to minimize, dilute and cancel the effectiveness of the black vote, heavily concentrated in wards 9 and 12, by ab- sorbing the black votes in the predominantly white city-wide vote. The result of the absorption of the black vote in the pre- dominantly white city-wide vote is to allow the School Committee to ignore the interests and desires of the black community in determining school policy. Various examples of traditional unresponsiveness of the School Committee to the black community are cited, such as the reluctance to admit the existence of segregated education in the Boston schools in the early nineteen sixties, and the School Committee's attempt to have the Racial Imbalance Act declared unconstitutional. The complaint alleges that as a result of these factors, the black parents and children of Roxbury are being denied the right to equality of educational opportunity and the right to effective exercise of the franchise which was the intent of the Fifteenth Amendment. Tt er alleges they are being unjustly discriminated against ii tion of the equal protection clause of the Fourt ee =30=< A