Thurgood Marshall disclosed today that a lawsuit involving Greenville, S.C. airport…
Press Release
October 30, 1959

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. Thurgood Marshall disclosed today that a lawsuit involving Greenville, S.C. airport…, 1959. bbc7417b-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b166157e-45d0-4823-b41f-9654014420ab/thurgood-marshall-disclosed-today-that-a-lawsuit-involving-greenville-sc-airport. Accessed May 20, 2025.
Copied!
press RELEASE @ @ NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE «+ NEW YORK 19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397 DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS SS THURGOOD MARSHALL President Director-Counsel NEW YORK, Friday, Oct. 30.--Thurgood Marshall disclosed today that a lawsuit involving the Greenville, S. C. airport is currently pending in a federal court. The Greenville airport is where Jackie Robinson and a party of NAACP leaders were recently threatened with jail sentences for sitting in the waiting room. Mr. Marshall, who is director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., said the case against the airport author- ities originated on November 7, 1958, when a Negro air force public relations man, Richard Henry, was not permitted to sit in the white waiting room at the Greenville airport while waiting for a flight to Detroit. Mr. Henry was returning to headquarters after having covered an extensive air force maneuver near Greenville. In mid-September of this year District Judge George Bell Timmerman ruled against Mr. Henry. The case was then appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on September 24 by NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys. It is now awaiting hearing. Mr. Marshall, in reply to questions regarding possible legal action that might be taken by Jackie Robinson, revealed that the issues in the Henry case are essentially the same as in Mr. Robinson's situa tion. The famed civil rights attorney also revealed that four discrimi nation cases were heard Tuesday in the federal court in Greensboro, N. C. Two of them involved the Greensboro Board of Education, one involved the Caswell County, N C. Board of Education and the other was against the Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority. The two Greensboro school cases charged the Greensboro school board with refusing to admit Negro children to two all-white public schools because of their race. Following the filing of the cases, the Negro students were admitted. =oe However, in oné case, involving the Caldwell School campus where there was a building for whites and an inferior one for Negroes, all Negroes in the area were assigned to the building previously attended by whites. All white students and instructional staff were then transferred out of the school and sent elsewhere. A Negro faculty and principal were installed in the school. NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys sought to file a supplemental complaint alleging that these are new occurrences which demonstrate that the school board was employing the state Pupil Assignment Act to Manipulate the students for the purpose of perpetuating segregation. In the Tuesday hearing the District Court held that the only right the Negro students had was to attend a particular school build- ing, and that they had been admitted to the building to which they had sought admission. The District Court indicated that an order would be issued to this effect after additional affidavits have been filed. This is expected to be done within the next two weeks. In the Caswell County case additional time was given to the plaintiffs to comply with technicalities of the North Carolina Pupil Assignment Law. The fourth case heard Tuesday was against the Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority for having refused restaurant service to a Negro. However, since the filing of the case Negroes have been served in the restaurant. The parties agreed to a judgment which stated that the refusal of service was unknown to the present manager of the restaurant and that it is the restaurant's policy not to dis- criminate in the future. aa30=5