Thurgood Marshall disclosed today that a lawsuit involving Greenville, S.C. airport…
Press Release
October 30, 1959
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. Thurgood Marshall disclosed today that a lawsuit involving Greenville, S.C. airport…, 1959. bbc7417b-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b166157e-45d0-4823-b41f-9654014420ab/thurgood-marshall-disclosed-today-that-a-lawsuit-involving-greenville-sc-airport. Accessed November 02, 2025.
Copied!
press RELEASE @ @
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND
10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE «+ NEW YORK 19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397
DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS SS THURGOOD MARSHALL
President Director-Counsel
NEW YORK, Friday, Oct. 30.--Thurgood Marshall disclosed today
that a lawsuit involving the Greenville, S. C. airport is currently
pending in a federal court.
The Greenville airport is where Jackie Robinson and a party of
NAACP leaders were recently threatened with jail sentences for sitting
in the waiting room.
Mr. Marshall, who is director-counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense
and Educational Fund, Inc., said the case against the airport author-
ities originated on November 7, 1958, when a Negro air force public
relations man, Richard Henry, was not permitted to sit in the white
waiting room at the Greenville airport while waiting for a flight to
Detroit. Mr. Henry was returning to headquarters after having covered
an extensive air force maneuver near Greenville.
In mid-September of this year District Judge George Bell
Timmerman ruled against Mr. Henry. The case was then appealed to the
Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on September 24 by NAACP Legal Defense
Fund attorneys. It is now awaiting hearing.
Mr. Marshall, in reply to questions regarding possible legal
action that might be taken by Jackie Robinson, revealed that the issues
in the Henry case are essentially the same as in Mr. Robinson's situa
tion.
The famed civil rights attorney also revealed that four discrimi
nation cases were heard Tuesday in the federal court in Greensboro,
N. C. Two of them involved the Greensboro Board of Education, one
involved the Caswell County, N C. Board of Education and the other
was against the Greensboro-High Point Airport Authority.
The two Greensboro school cases charged the Greensboro school
board with refusing to admit Negro children to two all-white public
schools because of their race. Following the filing of the cases, the
Negro students were admitted.
=oe
However, in oné case, involving the Caldwell School campus where
there was a building for whites and an inferior one for Negroes, all
Negroes in the area were assigned to the building previously attended
by whites. All white students and instructional staff were then
transferred out of the school and sent elsewhere. A Negro faculty
and principal were installed in the school.
NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys sought to file a supplemental
complaint alleging that these are new occurrences which demonstrate
that the school board was employing the state Pupil Assignment Act to
Manipulate the students for the purpose of perpetuating segregation.
In the Tuesday hearing the District Court held that the only
right the Negro students had was to attend a particular school build-
ing, and that they had been admitted to the building to which they
had sought admission. The District Court indicated that an order
would be issued to this effect after additional affidavits have been
filed. This is expected to be done within the next two weeks.
In the Caswell County case additional time was given to the
plaintiffs to comply with technicalities of the North Carolina Pupil
Assignment Law.
The fourth case heard Tuesday was against the Greensboro-High
Point Airport Authority for having refused restaurant service to a
Negro. However, since the filing of the case Negroes have been
served in the restaurant. The parties agreed to a judgment which
stated that the refusal of service was unknown to the present manager
of the restaurant and that it is the restaurant's policy not to dis-
criminate in the future.
aa30=5